IRC log of sml on 2009-04-20
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:31:55 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #sml
- 16:31:55 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/20-sml-irc
- 16:32:17 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 16:32:25 [lencharest]
- zakim, [Microsoft] is me
- 16:32:25 [Zakim]
- +lencharest; got it
- 16:32:43 [Zakim]
- +johnarwe_
- 16:34:50 [Kumar]
- scribe: Kumar Pandit
- 16:35:08 [Kumar]
- scribenick: Kumar
- 16:35:15 [johnarwe_]
- sandy called me shortly before the call, he will not be with us today.
- 16:35:18 [Kumar]
- meeting: SML WG Conf Call
- 16:35:20 [johnarwe_]
- regrets: sandy
- 16:35:32 [Kumar]
- chair: John
- 16:35:54 [johnarwe_]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Apr/att-0030/20090413-sml-minutes.html
- 16:35:58 [Kumar]
- topic: Approval of minutes from previous meeting(s):
- 16:36:46 [Kumar]
- RESOLUTION: minutes of 4/13/09 approved.
- 16:37:01 [Kumar]
- topic: Action items
- 16:37:09 [Kumar]
- no AIs open.
- 16:37:20 [johnarwe_]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6805
- 16:37:35 [Kumar]
- topic: review bugs
- 16:38:52 [Kumar]
- topic: bug# 6805
- 16:39:11 [Kumar]
- john: any objection to resolving bug# 6805?
- 16:39:35 [Kumar]
- RESOLUTION: bug# 6805 should be resolved as fixed.
- 16:39:37 [johnarwe_]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6806
- 16:39:45 [Kumar]
- topic: bug# 6806
- 16:43:48 [ht]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:43:48 [Zakim]
- Ht should no longer be muted
- 16:47:22 [Kumar]
- john: any objection to resolving bug# 6806?
- 16:47:49 [Kumar]
- RESOLUTION: bug# 6806 should be resolved as fixed.
- 16:48:56 [Kumar]
- topic: Rec track documents
- 16:49:08 [ht]
- ack ht
- 16:50:08 [Kumar]
- henry: I suggest 4/30 as the publication date for SML/SML-IF rec track documents.
- 16:51:34 [Kumar]
- kumar: Does 'implementations' refer to documents or processors or both?
- 16:52:28 [Kumar]
- henry: Since all validation/checks are done by processors the word refers to processors.
- 16:53:28 [Kumar]
- Len: the current wording allows implementations to support only 5e. is that ok?
- 16:54:16 [Kumar]
- henry: All documents that are valid under 4e are also valid under 5e, therefore a processor that only supports 5e will be able to support all 4e documents.
- 16:54:32 [Kumar]
- kumar: Will this be true for all future editions of XML 1.0?
- 16:55:38 [Kumar]
- henry: yes. We refer to 'later editions' and not 'later versions' for that reason. All later editions will always be backward compatible.
- 16:55:53 [Kumar]
- len: In that case, I am ok with it.
- 16:56:21 [ht]
- s/valid/well-formed/g
- 16:57:17 [Kumar]
- topic: Review EPR and XLink Notes
- 16:57:47 [Kumar]
- john: kirk has agreed to provide the final draft on 5/4.
- 16:59:02 [Kumar]
- john: Please review the xlink note and provide your comments. Deadline for comments is 5/4/09 as well.
- 16:59:32 [ginny]
- ginny has joined #sml
- 17:00:17 [Zakim]
- +Ginny_Smith
- 17:04:17 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 17:04:28 [Zakim]
- -Ginny_Smith
- 17:04:29 [Zakim]
- -lencharest
- 17:04:30 [Zakim]
- -johnarwe_
- 17:04:38 [Zakim]
- - +1.425.836.aaaa
- 17:04:39 [Zakim]
- XML_SMLWG()12:30PM has ended
- 17:04:40 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.425.836.aaaa, Ht, lencharest, johnarwe_, Ginny_Smith
- 17:04:54 [Kumar]
- john: I may not be able to run the meeting on 5/4. Is the group ok with treating the meeting on 5/4/09 as virtual meeting? (that is, discuss issues over email).
- 17:05:36 [Kumar]
- RESOLUTION: we will discuss issues over email that were going to be discussed in the meeting on 5/4/09.
- 17:36:24 [johnarwe_]
- johnarwe_ has left #sml
- 19:00:38 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #sml