16:31:55 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #sml
16:31:55 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/20-sml-irc
16:32:17 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
16:32:25 <lencharest> zakim, [Microsoft] is me
16:32:25 <Zakim> +lencharest; got it
16:32:43 <Zakim> +johnarwe_
16:34:50 <Kumar> scribe: Kumar Pandit
16:35:08 <Kumar> scribenick: Kumar
16:35:15 <johnarwe_> sandy called me shortly before the call, he will not be with us today.
16:35:18 <Kumar> meeting: SML WG Conf Call
16:35:20 <johnarwe_> regrets: sandy
16:35:32 <Kumar> chair: John
16:35:54 <johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Apr/att-0030/20090413-sml-minutes.html
16:35:58 <Kumar> topic: Approval of minutes from previous meeting(s): 
16:36:46 <Kumar> RESOLUTION: minutes of 4/13/09 approved.
16:37:01 <Kumar> topic: Action items
16:37:09 <Kumar> no AIs open.
16:37:20 <johnarwe_> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6805
16:37:35 <Kumar> topic: review bugs
16:38:52 <Kumar> topic: bug# 6805
16:39:11 <Kumar> john: any objection to resolving bug# 6805?
16:39:35 <Kumar> RESOLUTION: bug# 6805 should be resolved as fixed.
16:39:37 <johnarwe_> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6806
16:39:45 <Kumar> topic: bug# 6806
16:43:48 <ht> zakim, unmute me
16:43:48 <Zakim> Ht should no longer be muted
16:47:22 <Kumar> john: any objection to resolving bug# 6806?
16:47:49 <Kumar> RESOLUTION: bug# 6806 should be resolved as fixed.
16:48:56 <Kumar> topic: Rec track documents 
16:49:08 <ht> ack ht
16:50:08 <Kumar> henry: I suggest 4/30 as the publication date for SML/SML-IF rec track documents.
16:51:34 <Kumar> kumar: Does 'implementations' refer to documents or processors or both?
16:52:28 <Kumar> henry: Since all validation/checks are done by processors the word refers to processors.
16:53:28 <Kumar> Len: the current wording allows implementations to support only 5e. is that ok?
16:54:16 <Kumar> henry: All documents that are valid under 4e are also valid under 5e, therefore a processor that only supports 5e will be able to support all 4e documents.
16:54:32 <Kumar> kumar: Will this be true for all future editions of XML 1.0?
16:55:38 <Kumar> henry: yes. We refer to 'later editions' and not 'later versions' for that reason. All later editions will always be backward compatible.
16:55:53 <Kumar> len: In that case, I am ok with it.
16:56:21 <ht> s/valid/well-formed/g
16:57:17 <Kumar> topic: Review EPR and XLink Notes 
16:57:47 <Kumar> john: kirk has agreed to provide the final draft on 5/4.
16:59:02 <Kumar> john: Please review the xlink note and provide your comments. Deadline for comments is 5/4/09 as well.
16:59:32 <ginny> ginny has joined #sml
17:00:17 <Zakim> +Ginny_Smith
17:04:17 <Zakim> -Ht
17:04:28 <Zakim> -Ginny_Smith
17:04:29 <Zakim> -lencharest
17:04:30 <Zakim> -johnarwe_
17:04:38 <Zakim> - +1.425.836.aaaa
17:04:39 <Zakim> XML_SMLWG()12:30PM has ended
17:04:40 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.425.836.aaaa, Ht, lencharest, johnarwe_, Ginny_Smith
17:04:54 <Kumar> john: I may not be able to run the meeting on 5/4. Is the group ok with treating the meeting on 5/4/09 as virtual meeting? (that is, discuss issues over email).
17:05:36 <Kumar> RESOLUTION: we will discuss issues over email that were going to be discussed in the meeting on 5/4/09.
17:36:24 <johnarwe_> johnarwe_ has left #sml
19:00:38 <Zakim> Zakim has left #sml