13:23:57 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:23:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/14-bpwg-irc 13:23:59 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:23:59 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:24:01 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:24:01 ok, trackbot; I see MWI_BPWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 13:24:02 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:24:02 Date: 14 April 2009 13:24:07 Chair: DKA 13:24:22 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Apr/0012.html 13:25:22 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has now started 13:25:29 +??P3 13:25:38 zakim, ??P3 is me 13:25:38 +tomhume; got it 13:27:54 DKA has joined #bpwg 13:28:13 +??P4 13:28:16 -tomhume 13:28:17 +tomhume 13:28:36 zakim, ??P4 is me 13:28:36 +JonathanJ; got it 13:28:38 Regrets: manrique, adam, jeffs, kai, abel 13:28:50 Hi, 13:28:58 + +1.774.811.aaaa 13:29:22 zakim, who is here? 13:29:23 On the phone I see tomhume, JonathanJ, +1.774.811.aaaa 13:29:24 On IRC I see DKA, Zakim, RRSAgent, tomhume, JonathanJ, yeliz_, francois, matt, trackbot 13:29:33 zakim, code? 13:29:33 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), francois 13:30:04 +Francois 13:30:55 +??P7 13:31:00 zakim, ?P7 is yeliz 13:31:00 sorry, yeliz_, I do not recognize a party named '?P7' 13:31:02 zakim, aaaa is DKA 13:31:02 +DKA; got it 13:31:12 zakim, ??P7 is yeliz 13:31:12 +yeliz; got it 13:31:46 zakim, mute yeliz 13:31:47 yeliz should now be muted 13:32:14 EdC has joined #bpwg 13:33:03 zakim, who is here? 13:33:03 On the phone I see tomhume, JonathanJ, DKA, Francois, yeliz (muted) 13:33:04 On IRC I see EdC, DKA, Zakim, RRSAgent, tomhume, JonathanJ, yeliz_, francois, matt, trackbot 13:33:26 + +41.31.972.aabb 13:33:55 zakim, aabb is EdC 13:33:55 +EdC; got it 13:34:47 Scribe: Tom 13:34:51 Scribenick: tomhume 13:35:03 rob has joined #bpwg 13:35:21 + +0207287aacc 13:35:24 dka: Not a lot of activity on the mailing list since we last met, and lots of regrets for today 13:35:27 SeanP has joined #bpwg 13:35:35 zakim, aacc is me 13:35:35 +rob; got it 13:35:54 ...Alan and Kai both send regrets, which rules out any discussion on BP2 or the addendum to BP1 13:36:09 ...Adam will have a new draft of BP2 ready for next Tuesday tho. 13:36:24 ...the idea being to issue a new draft prior to that telecon. 13:36:38 + +1.630.414.aadd 13:36:40 Topic: Checker update 13:36:47 Zakim, aadd is me 13:36:47 +SeanP; got it 13:37:02 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2009Apr/0000.html mobileOK Checker re-factoring details 13:37:32 francois: We talked about this a couple of weeks ago. During the F2F I agreed to refactor the MobileOK library to make it more flexible. I'm mostly done and committed. 13:38:07 ...Don't think I need to go deeply into coding considerations here; but the new version isn't totally backwards-compatible, other than from an external POV. 13:38:35 ...Any questions or comments, feel free to email the checker mailing list or contact me privately. 13:38:54 ...Small TODOs have been listed in the code itself, I'll do some minor editing in the upcoming days. 13:39:17 http://dev.w3.org/2007/mobileok-ref/docs/org/w3c/mwi/mobileok/basic/package-summary.html#package_description 13:39:51 nacho has joined #bpwg 13:39:53 ...I tried to detail as much as possible what I did. I regenerated the library javadocs. The code is the same as before, but now you can make your dreams come true and extend the library without having to touch the library itself. 13:40:00 zakim, unmute yeliz 13:40:00 yeliz should no longer be muted 13:40:17 yeliz: Thanks. Can we use the code, or are there some more changes to be made? 13:40:31 francois: I'll make some minor ones, but nothing that makes a difference to how you plug into the library. 13:41:13 dka: what impact does this have on the validator itself, the W3C mobileOK checker? When does the code you've written become the code that underlies the checker? 13:42:02 + +49.842.9.aaee 13:42:18 zakim, +49.842.9aaee is nacho 13:42:18 sorry, nacho, I do not recognize a party named '+49.842.9aaee' 13:42:23 zakim, aaee is nacho 13:42:23 +nacho; got it 13:42:36 q? 13:42:57 francois: none, I've not released it so far. What was mobileOK is still mobileOK. I still need to make a few small changes, at this point I wouldn't consider it to be 100% stable though it passes our test suite. 13:43:30 ... I have no schedule right now, but ASAP. The new version should be more performant (multithreading was improved whilst doing it). 13:44:26 ...The Korean guys should be able to build on top of it to create a derivation of the mobileOK standard, and Yeliz should be able to add file support. 13:44:42 dka: we should make sure the new version is released to the HUGE SERVER FARM that W3C has installed to run the validator 13:45:21 q+ 13:45:25 ack nacho 13:45:51 nacho: we haven't had enough time to review the code from Francois 13:46:41 ...but we'll take a look at it and keep in touch during the week 13:47:19 ACTION-916? 13:47:20 ACTION-916 -- François Daoust to prepare some material for F2F identifying what changes would be needed to the mobileOK checker to allow subclassing for file: scheme handling -- due 2009-03-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 13:47:20 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/916 13:47:33 close ACTION-916 13:47:34 ACTION-916 Prepare some material for F2F identifying what changes would be needed to the mobileOK checker to allow subclassing for file: scheme handling closed 13:48:09 zakim, mute yeliz 13:48:09 yeliz should now be muted 13:48:13 Regrets+ Bryan 13:48:15 Topic: Status CT Guidelines 13:48:16 q+ 13:48:19 dka: no update from Jo 13:48:29 ... is a new updated draft needed before we can go any further? 13:48:57 francois: I have 2 actions: an hour to send a summary on the same-origin policy test conformance. I would like to send my findings to the mailing list before we discuss it. It's mostly ready. 13:49:13 ...The second is on the x-device header registration and I haven't had time to make any progress on this 13:49:40 miguel has joined #bpwg 13:50:32 +[W3C-Spain] 13:51:11 ACTION-922? 13:51:11 ACTION-922 -- Jonathan Jeon to look at how the existing headings could be improved and to propose classiification groupings that are orthogonal (don't talk about the same things) -- due 2009-04-01 -- OPEN 13:51:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/922 13:51:25 zakim, miguel is with me 13:51:25 +miguel; got it 13:51:26 Jonathan - do you have an update on this action? 13:51:40 Past week, I have sent a proposal for ACTION-922. 13:51:47 http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pI9qmqLP3vij6U574ZhUeCQ&hl=ko 13:52:03 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Apr/0007.html Jonathan's proposal 13:52:19 Topic: reviewing Jonathan's Proposal 13:52:43 dka: the idea was to reclassify some of the sections within BP2 13:52:57 ... I don't think we can have this conversation with Adam on the call, but we can close off the action. 13:53:14 OK. 13:53:17 ...and next week when we're discussing BP2 we can incorporate this. 13:53:24 q+ 13:53:31 ack franc 13:53:50 francois: Is the idea to change the heading for the time being? 13:54:10 dka: during the F2F Jonathan made a proposal (a good one) that we should use a cross-referencing scheme for the different BPs and BP2.0 13:54:27 ...so if we're still having them in a hierarchical structure, we'll need one that doesn't conflict with that tagging. 13:55:00 francois: this is the renaming of sub-headings, and we need to come up with some tagging for BP? 13:55:01 dka: yes. 13:55:30 dka: to an extent this is editorial. So it's good to do and to think about, but doesn't change the recommendations, it's a better way to find or classify them. 13:55:44 close ACTION-922 13:55:44 ACTION-922 Look at how the existing headings could be improved and to propose classiification groupings that are orthogonal (don't talk about the same things) closed 13:56:14 dka: meanwhile, back at the actions... I don't see much else we can talk about today in terms of actions on these documents. 13:56:36 dka: lots of folks aren't here or are on holiday. 13:56:42 francois: nothing else from me 13:56:52 q? 13:56:56 dka: we should close the call, unless anyone has anything else they'd like to raise? 13:57:05 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/open 13:57:27 13:57:54 dka: back next week then! 13:57:57 bye all 13:57:57 bye 13:57:59 bye 13:58:01 -Francois 13:58:02 -rob 13:58:02 -tomhume 13:58:05 yeliz_ has left #bpwg 13:58:07 -SeanP 13:58:08 -miguel 13:58:09 -DKA 13:58:11 -nacho 13:58:13 miguel has left #bpwg 13:58:14 -EdC 13:58:16 -yeliz 13:58:19 JonathanJ has left #bpwg 13:58:27 -JonathanJ 13:58:29 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has ended 13:58:30 Attendees were tomhume, JonathanJ, +1.774.811.aaaa, Francois, DKA, yeliz, +41.31.972.aabb, EdC, +0207287aacc, rob, +1.630.414.aadd, SeanP, +49.842.9.aaee, nacho, miguel 13:58:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:58:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/14-bpwg-minutes.html francois 13:59:14 nacho has left #bpwg 14:20:16 rob has left #bpwg 14:58:59 jo has joined #bpwg 15:10:18 zakim, bye 15:10:18 Zakim has left #bpwg 15:10:26 RRSAgent, get out 15:10:26 I'm logging. I don't understand 'get out', francois. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:10:31 RRSAgent, bye 15:10:31 I see no action items