IRC log of er on 2009-04-08

Timestamps are in UTC.

12:27:20 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #er
12:27:20 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/08-er-irc
12:27:22 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
12:27:22 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #er
12:27:24 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be 3794
12:27:24 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
12:27:25 [trackbot]
Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference
12:27:25 [trackbot]
Date: 08 April 2009
12:27:55 [MikeS]
Chair: MikeS
12:28:06 [JohannesK]
JohannesK has joined #er
12:28:53 [MikeS]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Apr/0013.html
12:30:13 [MikeS]
zakim agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema - prepare for publication of next WD
12:30:33 [MikeS]
zakim, agenda+ Where we are, where we are going
12:30:36 [Zakim]
agendum 1 added
12:30:40 [Zakim]
WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started
12:30:44 [Zakim]
+cvelasco
12:30:55 [JohannesK]
Zakim, cvelasco is really me
12:30:55 [Zakim]
+JohannesK; got it
12:30:58 [MikeS]
zakim, agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema - prepare for publication
12:30:59 [Zakim]
agendum 2 added
12:31:15 [shadi]
zakim, call shadi-617
12:31:15 [Zakim]
ok, shadi; the call is being made
12:31:16 [Zakim]
+Shadi
12:31:22 [MikeS]
zakim, agenda+ next and future meetings
12:31:22 [Zakim]
agendum 3 added
12:31:36 [shadi]
zakim, who is on the phone?
12:31:36 [Zakim]
On the phone I see JohannesK, Shadi
12:32:04 [Zakim]
+ +1.512.823.aaaa
12:32:33 [MikeS]
zakim, +1.512 is really me
12:32:33 [Zakim]
+MikeS; got it
12:32:41 [cvelasco]
cvelasco has joined #er
12:32:42 [shadi]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Apr/0016.html
12:32:50 [shadi]
shadi has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Apr/0016.html
12:33:28 [Zakim]
+JohannesK.a
12:33:35 [MikeS]
zakim, who is on the phone?
12:33:35 [Zakim]
On the phone I see JohannesK, Shadi, MikeS, JohannesK.a
12:34:07 [JohannesK]
zakim, JohannesK.a is really cvelasco
12:34:07 [Zakim]
+cvelasco; got it
12:34:20 [shadi]
scribe: Shadi
12:34:25 [shadi]
chair: Mike
12:34:30 [shadi]
agenda?
12:34:35 [MikeS]
zakim, next agendum
12:34:35 [Zakim]
agendum 1. "Where we are, where we are going" taken up [from MikeS]
12:35:38 [shadi]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/charter4
12:35:46 [shadi]
MS: is this still draft?
12:35:54 [shadi]
SAZ: not yet approved by AC
12:36:42 [shadi]
MS: we are behind, were supposed to public Last Call for the EARL Schema
12:37:24 [shadi]
...also need to publish first draft of the EARL Guide
12:37:33 [shadi]
...also the Requirements document
12:38:36 [shadi]
SAZ: there are change requests for the requirements document in the f2f minutes and in tracker
12:38:51 [shadi]
MS: need to get started on test suites to catch up
12:38:58 [shadi]
...what are the plans?
12:39:04 [shadi]
CV: working now on it
12:41:11 [shadi]
SAZ: if we publish EARL Schema WD by mid-end April
12:41:35 [shadi]
...we could aim for a the big Last Call publication for beginning of June
12:42:01 [shadi]
...that means EARL 1.0 Schema + HTTP-in-RDF + Content-in-RDF + Pointers-in-RDF
12:42:48 [shadi]
...is this realistic?
12:43:03 [shadi]
JK: doing on-going changes
12:44:00 [shadi]
SAZ: forgot, EARL 1.0 Guide should be part of the "big publication"
12:44:11 [shadi]
CV: should be possible
12:44:41 [shadi]
JK: am on vacation during second half of May
12:46:03 [shadi]
SAZ: if you can get the changes done before then it would be useful
12:47:11 [shadi]
...most worried about the Guide
12:48:27 [shadi]
SAZ: back to test suites, what do we need to host them?
12:49:00 [shadi]
MS: generated tests serve as test suites?
12:49:25 [shadi]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/
12:50:54 [shadi]
SAZ: could we provide test results for the WCAG 2.0 Test Samples?
12:51:09 [shadi]
...would provide the according tests (for the context)
12:51:16 [shadi]
...but adds a dependency
12:54:21 [shadi]
CV: mixing two objectives
12:54:36 [shadi]
...can provide examples of valid and invalid EARL reports
12:56:06 [shadi]
MS: need to describe how the test suites should look like
12:56:50 [shadi]
CV: EARL does not require accessibility tests
12:59:41 [shadi]
SAZ: instead of inventing test criteria, my thought was to reuse the WCAG 2.0 Test Samples
12:59:48 [MikeS]
zakim, take up next agendum
12:59:48 [Zakim]
agendum 2. "EARL 1.0 Schema - prepare for publication" taken up [from MikeS]
13:00:03 [shadi]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Apr/0016.html
13:01:44 [shadi]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090407#OutcomeValue
13:02:50 [cvelasco]
typo in related instances earl:cantTell
13:04:40 [shadi]
SAZ: removed OWL namespace and fixed namespace for DC elements and DC terms
13:05:16 [shadi]
...added instances for OutcomeValue in Section 2.7, Appenix A, and the RDF file
13:05:25 [shadi]
...need to discuss these changes
13:05:52 [shadi]
CV: wording for Related Instances is too weak
13:06:07 [shadi]
JK: don't think it's too weak
13:09:01 [JohannesK]
JK: change "can not" to "cannot"?
13:09:59 [shadi]
MS: maybe we get a question why we didn't do this for Test Mode
13:10:37 [shadi]
JK: last week we discussed that Test Mode doesn't need subclassing
13:10:48 [shadi]
MS: isn't that clear to me
13:11:31 [shadi]
SAZ: how about adding an editor's note in section Test Mode to ask for feedback?
13:11:36 [shadi]
[agreement]
13:12:23 [shadi]
JK: isn't "cannot" one word?
13:12:28 [shadi]
MS: yes, one word
13:12:50 [shadi]
RESOLUTION: Shadi to change "can not" to "cannot"
13:13:18 [shadi]
CV: don't like acronyms in upper case for instance names
13:14:28 [shadi]
SAZ: instance names were not discussed
13:14:52 [shadi]
...it is generally not considered good practice to differentiate between to entities using just the casing
13:16:19 [shadi]
[agreement to "passed", "failed", and "cantTell"]
13:16:37 [shadi]
MS: how about earl:na and earl:nt (lower case)?
13:17:02 [MikeS]
other option sfor names is 'inapplicable' and 'untested'
13:17:51 [shadi]
RESOLUTION: Shadi to change "NA" and "NT" to "inapplicable" and "untested"
13:18:19 [shadi]
MS: everyone set?
13:18:55 [shadi]
...other issues?
13:21:02 [shadi]
SAZ: in this publication we are looking for feedback on: 1. use of foaf:Document, 2. instances for TestMode (like OutcomeValue), 3. replacing earl:Software with DOAP, 4. conformance section
13:22:53 [shadi]
...pending adding these 4 questions to the "Status of the Document", and making the two changes discussed above, any objection to publication?
13:23:44 [shadi]
JK: range for earl:info is Literal or XML:Literal?
13:23:49 [shadi]
MS: think Literal
13:23:56 [shadi]
JK: should be RDF namespace?
13:24:12 [shadi]
...actually RDFS
13:24:34 [JohannesK]
<http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_literal>: rdfs:Literal
13:24:44 [shadi]
RESOLUTION: Shadi to change range of earl:info to rdfs:Literal
13:25:28 [JohannesK]
So it should be <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal>
13:26:39 [shadi]
RESOLUTION: publish EARL 1.0 Schema as an updated Working Draft pending the three changes recorded above
13:27:08 [MikeS]
zakim, take up next agendum
13:27:08 [Zakim]
agendum 3. "next and future meetings" taken up [from MikeS]
13:27:26 [shadi]
SAZ: regrets for the 15th
13:28:06 [Zakim]
-JohannesK
13:28:08 [shadi]
MS: next week discuss EARL 1.0 Guide and Requirements document
13:28:11 [Zakim]
-MikeS
13:28:22 [shadi]
MS: next meeting *15 April*
13:28:28 [Zakim]
-Shadi
13:28:38 [shadi]
trackbot, end meeting
13:28:38 [trackbot]
Zakim, list attendees
13:28:39 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes
13:28:39 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/08-er-minutes.html trackbot
13:28:39 [Zakim]
As of this point the attendees have been JohannesK, Shadi, +1.512.823.aaaa, MikeS, cvelasco
13:28:40 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, bye
13:28:40 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items
13:28:42 [Zakim]
-cvelasco