IRC log of er on 2009-04-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:31:12 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #er
- 12:31:12 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/01-er-irc
- 12:31:14 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 12:31:14 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #er
- 12:31:16 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 3794
- 12:31:16 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start now
- 12:31:17 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference
- 12:31:17 [trackbot]
- Date: 01 April 2009
- 12:31:51 [shadi]
- zakim, call shadi-617
- 12:31:51 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; the call is being made
- 12:31:55 [squillace]
- squillace has joined #er
- 12:32:41 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 12:32:41 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has not yet started, shadi
- 12:32:43 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see squillace, Zakim, RRSAgent, JohannesK, shadi, trackbot
- 12:32:57 [shadi]
- zakim, this is ert
- 12:32:57 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; that matches WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM
- 12:33:30 [shadi]
- regrets: CarlosV
- 12:33:33 [carlosI]
- carlosI has joined #er
- 12:35:23 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI
- 12:35:58 [shadi]
- scribe: Johannes
- 12:36:04 [shadi]
- scribenick: JohannesK
- 12:36:27 [shadi]
- present: Mike, Shadi, Johannes, CarlosI
- 12:36:49 [shadi]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Mar/0028.html
- 12:37:02 [shadi]
- agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema
- 12:37:26 [shadi]
- agenda+ Next and future meetings
- 12:37:44 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 12:37:44 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "EARL 1.0 Schema" taken up [from shadi]
- 12:37:59 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Mar/0025
- 12:42:11 [JohannesK]
- MS: there are still some typos in the EARL draft
- 12:42:38 [JohannesK]
- MS: assertedBy property: do we have to add foaf:Agent, etc. to the property's range?
- 12:42:43 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: no
- 12:43:28 [JohannesK]
- no substantial comments on the current draft
- 12:44:48 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: each object of earl:assertedBy is an earl:Assertor, it may also be something else
- 12:45:52 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: please look at RDF schema and the issue list; we are required to process every comment
- 12:47:40 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: Mike, please fix all typos; and record editorial changes -> note
- 12:49:11 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: others, in case of found typos, please send mail to Mike or SAZ
- 12:50:44 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: in our documents we have values, e.g. earl:Passed is sub-class of earl:Outcome
- 12:50:55 [JohannesK]
- s/Outcome/OutcomeValue
- 12:51:41 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: so you can further sub-class them, e.g. NearlyPassed subClassOf earl:CannotTell
- 12:52:25 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: what happens when someone creates an instance of type earl:Passed and give it a different meaning?
- 12:54:03 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: 1. possibility: leave as it is; 2.: change back to instances; 3.: create a parallel instance for each class
- 12:55:39 [shadi]
- JK: shouldn't do #2 because it restricts
- 12:55:59 [shadi]
- JK: #3 sounds good but may be too much
- 12:57:12 [shadi]
- JK: if we create earl:passed, it does not have the type earl:OutcomeValue
- 12:57:59 [JohannesK]
- s/passed/Passed
- 12:58:10 [shadi]
- earl:passed instanceOf earl:Pass
- 12:58:23 [shadi]
- earl:Pass subClassOf earl:OutcomeValue
- 13:00:26 [shadi]
- JK: should ask Ivan if worth the effort
- 13:00:47 [shadi]
- JK: for HTTP-in-RDF, it does not make sense to create a class for status code 404
- 13:01:06 [shadi]
- ...maybe for "Redirect" or "Error" but not for individual status codes
- 13:05:39 [JohannesK]
- MS: a difference between status codes and outcome values is: status codes are predefined with specific meaning, whereas outcome values may be sub-classed to create more specific values
- 13:05:54 [JohannesK]
- MS: not sure into which class modes fall
- 13:10:27 [JohannesK]
- MS: perhaps test mode is more like status code than outcome value
- 13:11:10 [JohannesK]
- so change back to instances
- 13:13:27 [shadi]
- [Proposal: add instances to each subclass of earl:OutcomeValue; change subclasses of earl:TestMode to instances; change HTTP-in-RDF status code groups to subclasses of status; keep HTTP-in-RDF status codes as instances (of the status code group classes)]
- 13:17:17 [shadi]
- RESOLUTION: Shadi check with Ivan on dual class and instance approach; everyone review schema.rdf and known issues list; Johannes do changes to HTTP-in-RDF per the above proposal; Mike take and editorial pass on the EARL 1.0 Schema spec
- 13:18:28 [shadi]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:18:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Next and future meetings" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:20:37 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: next meeting April 8th 2009
- 13:20:53 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: chaired by Mike
- 13:21:43 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: CI, please record comments to pointers draft
- 13:22:11 [JohannesK]
- CI: think they are only editorial; I'll do necessary changes
- 13:24:17 [JohannesK]
- SAZ: put pointers draft on agenda for 15th or 22nd
- 13:24:26 [Zakim]
- - +1.512.286.aaaa
- 13:24:29 [Zakim]
- -cvelasco
- 13:24:31 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 13:24:35 [Zakim]
- -CarlosI
- 13:24:36 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended
- 13:24:37 [Zakim]
- Attendees were cvelasco, Shadi, +1.512.286.aaaa, CarlosI
- 13:26:01 [shadi]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 13:26:01 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 13:26:01 [Zakim]
- sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
- 13:26:02 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 13:26:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/01-er-minutes.html trackbot
- 13:26:03 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 13:26:03 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items