15:49:07 RRSAgent has joined #css 15:49:07 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/25-css-irc 15:49:13 Zakim, this will be Style 15:49:13 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 15:50:51 wow 15:50:58 Skype works over this connection 15:51:01 I am so impressed 15:52:47 fantasai: : so you'll be on the call? 15:52:54 I think so 15:53:31 unless the connection to w3c is significantly worse than to skype test call 15:53:56 ok 15:54:41 Zakim, code ? 15:54:41 the conference code is 78953 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), glazou 15:55:09 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:55:16 +glazou 15:57:05 +[IPcaller] 15:57:27 Zakim: IPCaller is fantasai 15:57:35 Zakim, IPCaller is fantasai 15:57:35 +fantasai; got it 15:59:02 + +1.858.216.aaaa 15:59:16 zakim, +1.858.216 is me 15:59:16 +plinss; got it 15:59:51 sylvaing has joined #css 16:00:29 ChrisL has joined #css 16:00:59 +Bert 16:01:01 +[Microsoft] 16:01:14 Zakim, [Microsoft] has sylvaing 16:01:14 +sylvaing; got it 16:02:19 Zakim, [Microsoft] has alexmog 16:02:19 +alexmog; got it 16:02:34 +??P20 16:02:47 zakim, ??P20 is me 16:02:47 +ChrisL; got it 16:03:11 +Melinda_Grant 16:03:53 Zakim, [Microsoft] has arronei 16:03:53 +arronei; got it 16:04:25 melinda has joined #CSS 16:04:30 alexmog has joined #css 16:04:46 melinda, I made a number of edits to css3-page, but I haven't checked in yet 16:05:10 melinda, don't have net access under linux from here, hopefully will get a chance next week 16:05:24 fantasai, k, cool. 16:05:36 ScribeNick: fantasai 16:05:43 fantasai doesn't have email access this week 16:05:45 fantasai, I may have a few locally that we'll need to merge in... 16:05:57 Topic: Agenda 16:06:01 + +47.21.65.aabb 16:06:18 Topic: F2F Meeting in the Fall 16:06:30 glazou: deadline for 18th of March for TPAC was extended to April 2 16:06:31 zakim, +47 is Howcome 16:06:32 +Howcome; got it 16:06:44 glazou: The number of groups planning to meet is already above expectations 16:07:12 glazou: joint meeting with SVG Open? 16:07:24 chrisl: That was a fallback if the main meeting didn't go through 16:07:41 glazou: I guess we have to find another location for the f2f 16:08:23 glazou: We still have time to find another spot for the TPAC 16:08:29 alexmog: Why? 16:08:38 glazou: THere's not enough room at TPAC, too many groups 16:08:53 alexmog: I thought we were going to go with SVG Open because the groups we wanted to meet with weren't going to be at TPAC 16:09:26 chrisl: They downsized the venue 16:10:04 Topic: Agenda Items 16:10:11 glazou: I was too busy to read all the comments 16:10:25 glazou: Anybody have anything to add, please ask now 16:10:36 Bert: Is howcome's draft ready for publication or not? 16:10:45 Bert: GCPM or multicol? 16:10:57 howcome: They're not done yet, will be done next week 16:11:15 Bert: css3-namespaces? 16:11:22 fantasai: not done yet 16:11:28 shepazu: can you be on the call ? 16:11:35 for item 5 on agenda 16:11:54 glazou: anything else? 16:11:59 glazou: Sylvain? 16:12:03 sure 16:12:11 sylvain: We wanted to know if another CSS2.1 draft would be published soon 16:12:11 thx 16:12:23 sylvain: Also wanted to know if anything about test suite will be on the agenda for June F2F 16:12:33 sylvain: So we know whether to budget in Arron 16:12:46 glazou: June F2F agenda is open for suggestions 16:12:57 glazou: please suggest something more detailed than just "Test Suite" 16:13:14 glazou: Holiday season starts in June, so please plan your hotels earlyu 16:13:43 Topic: Follow-up on @import 16:13:59 glazou: Is this resolved? I saw Sylvain follow-up on this on the mailing list 16:14:14 sylvain: I believed we solved this in Tokyo 16:14:37 Topic: Implementation Status Reports 16:14:48 glazou: Mozilla and Antenna House posted detailed implementation reports to www-style 16:14:48 these are for css 2.1, or for 3? 16:15:09 Chris, both 16:15:12 glazou: I think David Baron has in mind some coordination among browsers 16:15:21 glazou: wrt implementation of CSS features for the Web 16:15:33 glazou: I encourage other browser vendors to do the same 16:15:53 glazou: If Opera, Microsoft, Apple can send this information to www-style as well, that would be very cool 16:16:24 Topic: :not() and pseudo-elements 16:16:31 glazou: There's a clarification to make in the spec 16:16:39 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0193.html 16:16:47 glazou: Sylvain posted a clarification 16:16:54 glazou: I think David posted something else 16:16:55 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0195.html 16:17:30 glazou: fantasai also said that she expects a future version of Selectors to accept more in :not() than a simple selectors 16:17:37 glazou: Sylvain, which proposal do you prefer? 16:18:03 +Shepazu 16:18:12 glazou: I think David's proposal is more complete 16:18:21 sylvain: My proposal was just a clarification 16:18:34 glazou: Is everyone ok with David's proposal? 16:18:39 #The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation taking a simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo- 16:18:39 #class itself) as an argument. It represents an element that is not represented by the argument. 16:18:39 #Note: Appending a pseudo-element to a simple selector results in a selector; selectors are not valid negation pseudo 16:18:40 #class arguments. 16:21:27 Peter: The note doesn't clarify that a pseudo-element by itself is not a simple selector 16:22:27 fantasai proposese addding a Note that says "SInce pseudo-elements are not simple selectors, they are not a valid argument to :not9)" 16:22:33 minus the typos :) 16:23:39 RESOLVED: sylvain+fantasai's proposal accepted 16:23:55 Topic: CSS+SVG Task Force 16:24:03 Shepazu to summarize 16:24:18 Doug: This basically started as something regarding transforms and animations 16:24:29 Doug: David Singer thought it would be a good idea for general coordination 16:24:43 Doug: It would also involve animations, transitions, other little issues that might pop up 16:24:57 Doug: I'm just suggesting we make a mailing list 16:25:14 Doug: So we don't have to keep cross-posting 16:25:34 glazou: Dean Jackson says he's ok with a mailing list, but not a sub-group 16:25:43 Doug: THere isn't really any formaility to a task force 16:25:52 chrisl: It's just somewhere that we can post to 16:26:06 Melinda: My question, this has started off as being specific to 2d-3d transforms 16:26:14 Melinda: but then became more general 16:26:26 Melinda: If it was just about transofrms, then I wouldn't want to subscribe 16:26:39 Melinda: If it's more general, maybe discussion of image-fit/image-scaling 16:26:47 Melinda: Then I need to subscribe 16:26:59 Melinda: Wheres' the efficiency benefit 16:27:18 ChrisL: It's avoiding cross-posting and diverging threads 16:27:50 glazou: My problem with the separate group 16:28:07 glazou: is that the wg memebers are supposed to keep track of everything that's going on, even if it's not of direct concern to them 16:28:27 Doug: My concern wrt transforms, especially 16:28:39 Doug: we are both working on different proposals that may end up being the same proposal 16:28:46 Doug: If people are sending feedback ... 16:28:56 Doug: The SVG WG has already gotten feedback about our trnasforms module 16:29:04 Doug: It's got sent to the public SVG mailing list 16:29:18 Doug: At what point are we going to be able to .. I'm concerned that emails going to get sent to both lists 16:29:22 Doug: separately 16:29:37 Doug: And we're not going to coordinate 16:29:51 Doug: For SVG group, we just can't track everything that flows throught he www-style list 16:30:37 ChrisL: It's much more efficient for someone from the csswg to subscribe to just the joint task force list, and not to all the svg lists 16:31:01 Doug: For those of us that are subscribed to both lists, it's a big savings for the SVG group so we dont' ahve to track everything 16:31:29 Doug: I'm sure you can have the joint mailing list shoved in a filter so it comes to your attention with CSS 16:31:42 Doug: Also, if you're not interested in transforms you don't have to mointor the list for the next few months 16:32:07 Melinda seems to be ok with this 16:32:20 glazou: Open mailing list, or just publicly-viewable 16:32:25 agreement on open 16:32:31 public read-write 16:33:14 discussion of what David thinks 16:33:25 Doug: For specifications like transforms and animations and things like that 16:33:34 Doug: That might be the default mailing list for sending comments 16:33:49 Doug: I can understand why csswg might not want that, but just a suggestion. SVG group is ok with that 16:34:07 Melinda: I think if the CSSWG agrees to establish that new mailing list, I don't see why we wouldn't want to direct comments there 16:34:17 Doug: We could have a wiki if we wanted, I dont' think it's necessary 16:35:20 discussion of names for the list 16:35:29 svg-css-mafia 16:35:35 www-svg-css-coord 16:35:41 public-fx 16:36:40 RESOLVED: Make a joint CSS SVG task force, Doug to set it up, specs of common interest to send comments there, will be *public read-write* 16:39:11 -Shepazu 16:39:18 Topic: Publishing Template Layout module 16:39:24 Bert: I think it's time for an update 16:39:31 Bert: I think I sent also the changes 16:39:40 CesarAcebal has joined #css 16:39:55 Bert: I removed the part about tabbed layout. interesting, but not so urgent... people aren't talking about it at least 16:40:00 Bert: Also updated the title 16:40:08 Bert: That's why I want to publish it 16:40:55 fantasai: I thought it was called Template Layout MOdule? 16:41:11 RESOLVED: publish updated WD of css3-layout 16:41:25 Topic: Wording for Issue 24 16:41:27 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-24 16:42:30 mollydotcom has joined #css 16:42:36 It was accepted to fix the problem, but not exactly what wording iirc 16:43:42 hi mollydotcom 16:43:53 am I an hour off again? 16:44:47 yeah 16:44:50 yes :) 16:45:01 fantasai: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Dec/0091.html 16:45:10 fantasai: There were two woriding proposals there 16:45:11 mollydotcom: leave the norwegian TZ :) 16:45:26 fantasai: We discussed them and Bert wanted to write another one that was clearer on how the two interact 16:45:58 it's the Arizona Time Zone 16:45:59 I'm afraid I have had the same error with the hour than Molly. In Spain we are not still in Summer Time until this weekend. Sorry! 16:46:18 np CesarAcebal 16:46:46 fantasai: to answer Sylvain's question, we need to solve this issue before publishing CSS2.1 again, because we regressed the text with the last resolution 16:47:16 +Cesar_Acebal 16:47:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0212.html 16:49:44 Bert summarizes his email 16:51:17 fantasai, I can't hear you 16:51:31 fantasai: It shouldn't be limited to selectors 16:51:40 fantasai: We want all statements to fall under the matching brackets rule 16:51:47 fantasai: including @statmeents 16:52:16 fantasai: I don't think the reuqirement to "match" brackets and quotes is hard to understand, it's good enough for now I think 16:52:25 fantasai: but it needs to apply to statements and to declarations 16:52:39 ACTION: everyone come up with an opinion on Bert's email 16:52:39 Sorry, couldn't find user - everyone 16:53:16 Topic: Others 16:53:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0207.html 16:53:24 glazou, dbaron had good comments on those 16:53:33 see above 16:54:08 linked above 16:54:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0207.htmlhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0207.htmlhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0207.html 16:54:25 er 16:55:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0207.html 16:55:15 Zakim, code ? 16:55:15 the conference code is 78953 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), glazou 16:55:19 mollydotcom: see above 16:56:46 it seems to be the usual way to remove things, set the attribute to "" 16:56:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0256.html 16:57:53 dbaron's comment: I think this could be tossed out as a "not all requirements are 16:57:54 expressed in the formal grammar". It's a nice-to-have (and perhaps 16:57:54 somewhat complicated to get right, so maybe not worth it), but I 16:57:54 don't think it's a bug in the spec. 16:58:31 glazou: another issue where the grammar is completed by the prose 16:58:53 glazou: we will always have these sort of things 16:59:08 glazou: not worth the time and complexity grammar to fix 16:59:13 peter: why not fix in css3 16:59:20 glazou: ok, we leave for css3.. but not 2.1 16:59:28 bert: which are you talking about now? 16:59:37 glazou: points bert at url 17:00:54 Bert: So far I havent' seen anything that I would like to change in the grammar 17:01:03 glazou: So Yves posted at least 2 issues here 17:01:12 glazou: Specifically about 2.1, do we want to change something? 17:01:57 RESOLVED: keep grammar and prose as is for 2.1, defer issue to css3 17:02:17 ==> tracker 17:02:32 adjourned 17:02:32 Meeting closed. 17:02:40 -[Microsoft] 17:02:41 -Cesar_Acebal 17:02:43 -Howcome 17:02:47 -Melinda_Grant 17:02:50 -ChrisL 17:02:53 zakim, list attendees 17:02:58 As of this point the attendees have been glazou, fantasai, +1.858.216.aaaa, plinss, Bert, sylvaing, alexmog, ChrisL, Melinda_Grant, arronei, +47.21.65.aabb, Howcome, Shepazu, 17:03:02 ... Cesar_Acebal 17:03:07 -plinss 17:03:08 rrsagent, make logs public 17:03:14 rrsagent, make minutes 17:03:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL 17:03:17 -glazou 17:03:19 chrisl, could you also make sure last week's minutes made it to the mailing list? 17:03:29 -Bert 17:03:46 k, thanks :) 17:03:52 -fantasai 17:03:52 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 17:03:53 Attendees were glazou, fantasai, +1.858.216.aaaa, plinss, Bert, sylvaing, alexmog, ChrisL, Melinda_Grant, arronei, +47.21.65.aabb, Howcome, Shepazu, Cesar_Acebal 17:04:06 ChrisL: +1.858 was me, don't know why Zakim listed me twice... 17:04:25 Bert? 17:04:29 same for Howcome, he was +47.21 17:04:35 Hi Molly 17:04:51 Hi! I just wanted to touch base with you regarding any web site needs 17:05:04 I sent an email, but I know you're busy - but I'm available to help 17:05:48 Yes, I'm going to answer. I put something on line for you to look at. 17:06:14 oh good, if you could just email me now at mollyh@opera.com for that, I'll be happy to take a look! 17:06:30 Meeting: CSS WG telcon 17:06:40 Chair: Daniel 17:06:50 I'm trying to streamline all CSS WG related items into that address now 17:07:14 it should be møllyh@opera.com 17:07:20 Hahaha 17:07:22 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009JanMar/0204.html 17:07:38 I really wanted molly@opera.com but they couldn't do it 17:07:48 my alternative was mholzschlag@opera.com 17:07:57 so I figured mollyh was the best middle ground :) 17:08:54 Regrets: Steve Zilles, David Baron, Tona Henderson, Emily Walters, David Singer 17:08:59 rrsagent, make minutes 17:08:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL 17:10:45 bye people 17:11:41 also has to work on slides 17:11:51 byeeee! I'll look for that email, Bert! 17:15:56 alexmog has joined #css 17:17:21 Lachy has joined #css 17:56:48 arronei has joined #CSS 19:04:35 alexmog has joined #css 19:20:51 Zakim has left #css 20:06:03 melinda has joined #CSS