13:29:47 RRSAgent has joined #er 13:29:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-irc 13:29:49 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:29:49 Zakim has joined #er 13:29:51 Zakim, this will be 3794 13:29:51 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:29:52 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 13:29:52 Date: 18 March 2009 13:30:18 Meeting: ERT 13:30:24 Chair: Shadi 13:30:37 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:30:37 WAI_ERTWG()9:30AM has not yet started, squillace 13:30:38 On IRC I see RRSAgent, squillace, shadi, trackbot 13:30:42 zakim, call shadi-617 13:30:42 ok, shadi; the call is being made 13:31:26 zakim, who is on phone? 13:31:26 I don't understand your question, shadi. 13:31:33 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:31:33 WAI_ERTWG()9:30AM has not yet started, shadi 13:31:34 On IRC I see RRSAgent, squillace, shadi, trackbot 13:32:20 carlosI has joined #er 13:32:33 JohannesK has joined #er 13:32:38 agenda+ EARL 1.0 Guide 13:32:44 agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema 13:33:32 cvelasco has joined #er 13:36:53 Present: MikeS, Shadi, CarlosV, CarlosI, Johannes 13:37:18 scribe: squillace 13:37:24 zakim, mute me 13:37:24 sorry, squillace, I don't know what conference this is 13:38:05 zakim, take up agendum 1 13:38:05 agendum 1. "EARL 1.0 Guide" taken up [from shadi] 13:38:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Mar/0022 13:39:09 SAZ: now that we have EARL Schema more amture and auxiary docs are coming along, time to look back at the guide 13:39:52 MS: Published as a recommendation or tech note? 13:40:11 SAZ: currently on rec-track 13:40:44 ...atypical to have such guidance as a rec but has been precedent for this (e.g. OWL Guide, RDF PRimer) 13:42:11 CV: complementary to EARL Schema so may want same status as rec 13:42:39 JK: how does it compare to other guides or primers? 13:44:14 SAZ: no clear precedent; if docs together (e.g. OWL language and OWL Guide) form a coherent language, should be published in same status 13:46:08 MS: Can we publish as tech note and move to rec later? 13:46:17 SAZ: very difficult in W3C process to change status 13:49:11 SAZ: should try to reuse same examples throughout documents 13:49:28 CV: could also point to full example files 13:51:15 SAZ: OWL Guide uses full-fledgee example with snipets throughout document pointing to the full file when encessary 13:58:58 ...should possibly create directory in CVS for example files 13:59:10 ...CVS access is an entirely separate issue 13:59:57 a very nice example, btw 14:00:31 ...the OWL Guide winery example 14:01:43 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ 14:03:01 SAZ: How important is the relationship to IEEE spec regarding testing? 14:03:08 ...how and where does EARL fit in? 14:03:15 ...no need for detail of specification 14:05:49 CV: IEEE spec is most generic of testing frameworks that were reviewed 14:06:53 SAZ: didn't develop EARL specifically for IEEE process but IEEE process could be an example of a framework into which EARL fits 14:10:08 MS: do we need the goal of "To explain the restrictions of the different EARL components." in the GUide? 14:10:23 ...may lead to the quagmire introduced in the schema itself and there's no point in duplicating that work 14:10:32 SAZ: agreed 14:11:35 CV: extending and customization? 14:11:44 SAZ: worth mentioning other documents in section 2, maybe 14:13:43 SAZ: move section 3 introductory amterial about other vocabularies to section 2 14:14:12 MS: +1 14:14:21 no way! 14:18:25 ACTION: CarlosV to have updated EARL Guide due April 8, 2009 14:18:26 Created ACTION-87 - Have updated EARL Guide due April 8, 2009 [on Carlos A. Velasco - due 2009-03-25]. 14:19:41 zakim, take up next 14:19:41 agendum 2. "EARL 1.0 Schema" taken up [from shadi] 14:19:59 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309 14:21:30 SAZ: "should" might be too strong in "should support other RDF serializations" 14:21:52 JK: use "may" 14:22:08 SAZ: leave it as is and see how people react 14:26:21 action: shadi to provide an updated EARL schema document 14:26:21 Created ACTION-88 - Provide an updated EARL schema document [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-03-25]. 14:27:46 +1 to publish 14:27:51 SAZ: Do we wait to publish until we have schema docs ready? 14:27:56 CI: publish 14:28:33 MS: wait for schema 14:28:47 SAZ: only little time to update schema 14:29:10 agenda+ Next meeting 14:29:13 zakim, take up next 14:29:13 agendum 3. "Next meeting" taken up [from shadi] 14:30:37 no meeting Mar 25 14:30:51 CV regrets for Apr 1 14:31:06 next meeting on Apr 1 14:32:43 zakim, bye 14:32:43 Zakim has left #er 14:33:38 rrsagent, make minutes 14:33:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-minutes.html shadi 14:33:46 rrsagent, make logs world 14:33:48 rrsagent, make minutes 14:33:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-minutes.html shadi 14:33:52 rrsagent, bye 14:33:52 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-actions.rdf : 14:33:52 ACTION: CarlosV to have updated EARL Guide due April 8, 2009 [1] 14:33:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-irc#T14-18-25 14:33:52 ACTION: shadi to provide an updated EARL schema document [2] 14:33:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/18-er-irc#T14-26-21