<trackbot> Date: 10 March 2009

Hello

<scribe> Scribe: peaston

Open Actions

<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0010.html

<eric> Peter, is that the mail you're referring to?

Including the standard JNDI property java.naming.referral to disable (ignore) JNDI provider referrals.

<soapjms:jndiContextParameter name=" java.naming.referral " value="ignore" />

Heres the change:

Including the standard JNDI property java.naming.referral to disable (ignore) JNDI provider referrals.

<soapjms:jndiContextParameter name=" java.naming.referral " value="ignore" />

Close: Action-62

close Action-62

<trackbot> ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) closed

<eric> Email from Phil: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0009.html

close Action-65

<trackbot> ACTION-65 Clarify for content Type closed

<scribe> ACTION: Phil to come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-69 - Come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week [on Eric Adams - due 2009-03-17].

Discuss Content Type Proposal

Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0009.html above

Eric property should be specified as "text/xml" - "must" vs "should"

Eric: should be specified as "multipart/related". same must but there could be mime type parms

Amy: be precise about it say the content type value must ....
... precise definition ct header has value plus parms

<scribe> ACTION: Phil take another pass of the Content Type wording [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-70 - Take another pass of the Content Type wording [on Phil Adams - due 2009-03-17].

Also bit about removing parens

discuss rev to act 65 (JNDI params)

<eric> Email under discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0012.html

<eric> Last call item: LC06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0008.html

<eric> Do we believe that Peter's email addresses the concern?

<scribe> ACTION: peaston to incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-71 - Incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor [on Peter Easton - due 2009-03-17].

AOB?

<eric> Phil's revision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0014.html

Phil has just resent Content-Type discussion act 70

Peter,Eric ensure CT value appears

sorry !

Eric MUST vs must

Phil will send another email

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/
Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/
Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/
Found Scribe: peaston
Inferring ScribeNick: peaston
Default Present: +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.512.286.aabb, Phil, +1.650.846.aacc, eric, Peter_Easton
Present: +1.919.663.aaaa alewis +1.512.286.aabb Phil +1.650.846.aacc eric Peter_Easton
Found Date: 10 Mar 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: peaston phil

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.