18:05:50 RRSAgent has joined #RIF-PRD 18:05:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-RIF-PRD-irc 18:05:51 zakim, what is the code 18:05:51 I don't understand 'what is the code', GaryHallmark 18:05:58 zakim, what is the code? 18:05:58 sorry, GaryHallmark, I don't know what conference this is 18:06:02 zakim, this will be rifprd 18:06:02 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, csma 18:06:15 zakim, room for 6? 18:06:16 ok, csma; conference Team_(rif-prd)18:06Z scheduled with code 26631 (CONF1) for 60 minutes until 1906Z 18:06:39 Gary, the code will be 26631, this time 18:06:45 Team_(rif-prd)18:06Z has now started 18:06:52 +Gary_Hallmark 18:06:57 That's because, according ot Zakim, our telecon was one hour ago! 18:07:20 yes, Zakim was very lonely 18:07:44 +??P5 18:07:44 trying to connect to the call, but the conf is restricted 18:08:06 changhai, the code is 26631, not the usual one 18:08:15 +??P6 18:08:25 Zakim, ??P6 is me 18:08:25 +AdrianP; got it 18:08:33 zakim, ??P5 is me 18:08:33 +csma; got it 18:08:45 +??P4 18:09:17 zakim, ??P4 is cke 18:09:17 +cke; got it 18:11:34 zakim, what is the code? 18:11:34 the conference code is 26631 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), csma 18:11:59 zakim, what is the code? 18:11:59 the conference code is 26631 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), cke 18:14:29 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open 18:14:33 issue 37 18:15:51 issue 37 CP 18:16:37 Raised at F2F7, based on presentation by Dave Reynolds on issue 32. 18:19:10 issue 38 not CP; interoperating with arbitrary XML would reauire, from a PRD point of view, addtional facility to modify/create arbitrary XML 18:22:05 how do we validate arbitrary XML? 18:32:02 they will write translators anyway 18:32:16 at least for mapping from RIF into the platform specific syntax 18:32:51 issue 57 (to be further discussed: Gary, csma think it is high priority, but not blocking to PRD LC; Changhai prefers to keep it CP, and to demote it later if not enough time; Adrian sees issue 38 as higher priority than that) 18:36:14 PaulVincent has joined #rif-prd 18:39:24 Christian: FYI the W3C call system is claiming the conference is "restricted" :) [... and apologies for being late] 18:40:06 Zakim ,mute me 18:40:25 Zakim, mute me 18:40:25 AdrianP should now be muted 18:41:04 Zakim, unmute me 18:41:04 AdrianP should no longer be muted 18:42:40 ISSUE 62 CP, ISSUE 66 merged with 62 and closed 18:44:17 issue 67 not CP 18:46:02 what about if all of us write 3 test cases for PRD 18:47:48 issue 77 not CP 18:49:05 issue 80 not CP 18:54:59 issue 81 not cp (in itself for PRD; as long as DTB does not include OWL datatypes that conflict with XML-S data types :-) 18:55:52 -AdrianP 18:57:05 issue 86 and issue 87 not CP 18:58:40 +??P6 19:00:41 issue 92 not cp 19:03:22 issue 93 not cp 19:10:36 Common production rule systems all allow reasoning on Java objects 19:13:15 the question is if also want to support the Java type system 19:13:27 including class hierarchies 19:14:43 issue 94 CP 19:16:36 issue 95 CP 19:17:32 rule qualifications such as priorities 19:20:03 that would lead to a (extternal) type system 19:21:10 class Employee [name=String, managerOf->Employee] 19:27:26 Rule qualification (other than priorities) will be useful, but are not CP for PRD 1.0 19:28:17 -Gary_Hallmark 19:28:19 -??P6 19:28:23 -csma 19:28:33 rrsagent, make log public 19:28:41 rrsagent, make minutes 19:28:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-RIF-PRD-minutes.html csma 19:28:47 -cke 19:28:48 Team_(rif-prd)18:06Z has ended 19:28:49 Attendees were Gary_Hallmark, AdrianP, csma, cke 19:29:23 rrsagent, make minutes 19:29:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-RIF-PRD-minutes.html csma 19:36:18 csma has left #rif-prd 20:56:44 Zakim has left #RIF-PRD