IRC log of er on 2009-03-04
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:19:25 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #er
- 13:19:25 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/04-er-irc
- 13:19:27 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 13:19:27 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #er
- 13:19:29 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 3794
- 13:19:29 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 11 minutes
- 13:19:30 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference
- 13:19:30 [trackbot]
- Date: 04 March 2009
- 13:20:36 [squillace]
- Chair: squillace
- 13:22:07 [squillace]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Mar/0002.html
- 13:23:20 [squillace]
- zakim, agenda+ Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section.
- 13:23:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 added
- 13:23:56 [squillace]
- zakim, agenda+ ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009
- 13:23:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 added
- 13:24:03 [squillace]
- zakim, agenda+ next and future meetings
- 13:24:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 added
- 13:24:14 [squillace]
- zakim, angedna?
- 13:24:14 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, squillace.
- 13:24:23 [squillace]
- zakim, agedna
- 13:24:23 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'agedna', squillace
- 13:24:33 [squillace]
- zakim, agenda
- 13:24:33 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'agenda', squillace
- 13:24:46 [squillace]
- zakim, agenda?
- 13:24:46 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda:
- 13:24:47 [Zakim]
- 1. Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section [from squillace]
- 13:24:51 [Zakim]
- 2. ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009 [from squillace]
- 13:24:52 [Zakim]
- 3. next and future meetings [from squillace]
- 13:27:04 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started
- 13:27:11 [Zakim]
- + +1.512.286.aaaa
- 13:27:30 [squillace]
- zakim, +1.512 is squillace
- 13:27:30 [Zakim]
- +squillace; got it
- 13:27:44 [shadi]
- zakim, call shadi-617
- 13:27:44 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; the call is being made
- 13:27:45 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 13:30:13 [shadi]
- agenda+ WAI Evaluation Resource Suite
- 13:30:21 [shadi]
- agenda?
- 13:30:22 [JohannesK]
- JohannesK has joined #er
- 13:30:50 [shadi]
- zakim, order 1,4,2,3
- 13:30:50 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'order 1,4,2,3', shadi
- 13:30:51 [Zakim]
- +CarlosV
- 13:30:58 [shadi]
- zakim, agenda order 1,4,2,3
- 13:30:58 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi
- 13:31:02 [JohannesK]
- zakim, CarlosV is really me
- 13:31:02 [Zakim]
- +JohannesK; got it
- 13:31:05 [shadi]
- agenda?
- 13:31:18 [carlosI]
- carlosI has joined #er
- 13:31:39 [JohannesK]
- CarlosV is too busy to join
- 13:31:59 [shadi]
- regrets: CarlosV
- 13:32:18 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI
- 13:33:00 [shadi]
- zakim, agenda order 2,4,1,3
- 13:33:00 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi
- 13:33:26 [squillace]
- Scribe: CarlosI
- 13:33:36 [squillace]
- zakim, take up next agendum
- 13:33:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009" taken up [from squillace]
- 13:33:51 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Feb/0020.html
- 13:34:43 [carlosI]
- MS: TPAC 2-6 November 2009 Santa Clara, CA, USA.
- 13:35:04 [carlosI]
- MS: exploring potential interest of group attending
- 13:35:30 [carlosI]
- SAZ: this year need to confirm hotel reservations
- 13:35:49 [carlosI]
- SAZ: we haven't met in the USA for quite a while
- 13:36:23 [carlosI]
- SAZ: although most participants are not from the USA it could encourage more participation
- 13:36:41 [carlosI]
- SAZ: need to decide for the next telecon at most
- 13:37:12 [carlosI]
- MS: will be attending
- 13:37:26 [carlosI]
- MS: good opportunity to share with other groups
- 13:40:37 [carlosI]
- CI: not sure at this moment
- 13:41:01 [carlosI]
- CI: if need to have an answer right now it would be a no
- 13:41:28 [carlosI]
- SAZ: depend on what groups will meet
- 13:42:22 [carlosI]
- SAZ: may decide later in the year depending on the group progress
- 13:42:35 [carlosI]
- JK: quite a difficult week
- 13:42:44 [carlosI]
- JK: probably won't attend
- 13:43:27 [carlosI]
- SAZ: looks like a no for a full group meeting
- 13:44:20 [carlosI]
- SAZ: should have a F2F this year
- 13:44:33 [carlosI]
- SAZ: need to think where and when
- 13:45:06 [carlosI]
- MS: could do an european F2F meeting again with also phone participation
- 13:45:34 [carlosI]
- SAZ: can wait until last call stage and then think more seriously about F2F
- 13:45:40 [shadi]
- https://www.hcii2009.org/
- 13:46:33 [carlosI]
- SAZ: HCI International in July, San Diego
- 13:46:57 [carlosI]
- SAZ: paper submission
- 13:47:17 [carlosI]
- SAZ: interesting to keep an eye on it
- 13:49:33 [carlosI]
- MS: concusion: no official F2F group meeting at TPAC but need a F2F probably coinciding with other event
- 13:50:11 [squillace]
- RESOLUTION: no F2F at TPAC 2009 but keep eyes and ears open for F2F for our group with regard to time and palce, possibly co-locating with anotehr conference (e.g. HCI in July 2009)
- 13:50:23 [squillace]
- zakim, take up next agendum
- 13:50:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "WAI Evaluation Resource Suite" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:50:47 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/
- 13:52:04 [carlosI]
- SAZ: need to update the evaluation resources suite according to WCAG 2
- 13:53:51 [carlosI]
- SAZ: have submitted a proposal to the Leonardo da Vinci program with Braillenet, Bartimeus and University of Linz
- 13:54:19 [carlosI]
- SAZ: its and educational program
- 13:54:42 [carlosI]
- SAZ: working on methodologies and guidelines assistance
- 13:55:21 [carlosI]
- SAZ: waiting for a response
- 13:55:39 [carlosI]
- SAZ: if starting not before November or so
- 13:55:58 [carlosI]
- SAZ: work will be done through WAI WGs
- 13:56:37 [carlosI]
- SAZ: participation will be open to as much stakeholders as possible
- 13:57:20 [carlosI]
- SAZ: previous work on UWEM methodology for WCAG 1.0
- 13:57:43 [carlosI]
- SAZ: working on WCAG 2 guidelines and 1.0 methodology at the same time
- 13:57:51 [carlosI]
- SAZ: hope to reuse as much as possible
- 13:58:31 [carlosI]
- SAZ: UWEM projects are public and have ended
- 13:59:37 [carlosI]
- JK: as a UWEM participant would like to say that some parts where WCAG 1.0 dependant but others are generic enough to be resused
- 13:59:49 [carlosI]
- SAZ: two different parts
- 13:59:55 [carlosI]
- SAZ: the tests themselft
- 14:00:04 [carlosI]
- SAZ: and the procedure
- 14:00:44 [squillace]
- zakim, take up next agendum
- 14:00:44 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section" taken up [from squillace]
- 14:00:54 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090302
- 14:01:09 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090302#conformance
- 14:01:15 [carlosI]
- MS: like the new approach
- 14:01:22 [carlosI]
- MS: looks more clear
- 14:01:39 [carlosI]
- MS: like the overall layout
- 14:02:04 [carlosI]
- MS: can go section by section
- 14:05:21 [carlosI]
- CI: would like to clarify that cnt:Content and http:Response are optional
- 14:06:29 [carlosI]
- MS: how does RDF handle different languages?
- 14:08:42 [carlosI]
- MS: about the third point in 4.2
- 14:09:03 [carlosI_]
- carlosI_ has joined #er
- 14:10:00 [carlosI_]
- JK: the problem is that you can have several different serializations for the same model
- 14:10:09 [carlosI_]
- JK: wich one to select?
- 14:11:05 [carlosI_]
- JK: maybe can't be possible to use some RDF tools because they not use the same serialization
- 14:11:40 [carlosI_]
- SAZ: the question is if it is a restriction o requirement we want to adopt or not
- 14:11:53 [carlosI]
- MS: then why are we using RDF at all?
- 14:13:05 [carlosI]
- JK: think it is contrary to the RDF philosophy in general
- 14:13:21 [carlosI]
- SAZ: it won't be a must
- 14:15:33 [carlosI]
- JK: RDF tools shouldn't be required to support specific serializations
- 14:17:14 [carlosI]
- SAZ: about Appendix A
- 14:17:40 [carlosI]
- SAZ: the idea is that tools should be able to consume or produce all the terms if there is information for them
- 14:21:02 [carlosI]
- JK: about 4.1 point 1
- 14:21:39 [carlosI]
- JK: does it mean that the tool should be RDF aware or may one use an XML tool and say it is a conformin processor
- 14:21:56 [carlosI]
- s/conformin/conforming
- 14:22:29 [carlosI]
- SAZ: it should be able to handle any serialization
- 14:23:03 [shadi]
- add "any" to RDF/XML serialization (in point 4.2)
- 14:27:07 [shadi]
- consider "must *be able to*" to 4.2.2 and 4.3.2
- 14:28:03 [carlosI]
- RESOLUTION: drop section 4.4
- 14:31:19 [carlosI]
- SAZ: need to clearly separate between EARL conforming and supporting tools
- 14:31:32 [carlosI]
- SAZ: not sure whether it is the right wording
- 14:31:44 [carlosI]
- SAZ: related to the EARL Lite idea
- 14:31:52 [Zakim]
- -squillace
- 14:31:55 [Zakim]
- -JohannesK
- 14:32:00 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 14:32:05 [Zakim]
- -CarlosI
- 14:32:06 [shadi]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 14:32:06 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 14:32:07 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 14:32:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/04-er-minutes.html trackbot
- 14:32:07 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended
- 14:32:08 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 14:32:08 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items
- 14:32:09 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.512.286.aaaa, squillace, Shadi, JohannesK, CarlosI
- 14:32:10 [Zakim]
- sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is