13:19:25 RRSAgent has joined #er 13:19:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/04-er-irc 13:19:27 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:19:27 Zakim has joined #er 13:19:29 Zakim, this will be 3794 13:19:29 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 13:19:30 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 13:19:30 Date: 04 March 2009 13:20:36 Chair: squillace 13:22:07 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Mar/0002.html 13:23:20 zakim, agenda+ Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section. 13:23:20 agendum 1 added 13:23:56 zakim, agenda+ ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009 13:23:56 agendum 2 added 13:24:03 zakim, agenda+ next and future meetings 13:24:03 agendum 3 added 13:24:14 zakim, angedna? 13:24:14 I don't understand your question, squillace. 13:24:23 zakim, agedna 13:24:23 I don't understand 'agedna', squillace 13:24:33 zakim, agenda 13:24:33 I don't understand 'agenda', squillace 13:24:46 zakim, agenda? 13:24:46 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 13:24:47 1. Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section [from squillace] 13:24:51 2. ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009 [from squillace] 13:24:52 3. next and future meetings [from squillace] 13:27:04 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 13:27:11 + +1.512.286.aaaa 13:27:30 zakim, +1.512 is squillace 13:27:30 +squillace; got it 13:27:44 zakim, call shadi-617 13:27:44 ok, shadi; the call is being made 13:27:45 +Shadi 13:30:13 agenda+ WAI Evaluation Resource Suite 13:30:21 agenda? 13:30:22 JohannesK has joined #er 13:30:50 zakim, order 1,4,2,3 13:30:50 I don't understand 'order 1,4,2,3', shadi 13:30:51 +CarlosV 13:30:58 zakim, agenda order 1,4,2,3 13:30:58 ok, shadi 13:31:02 zakim, CarlosV is really me 13:31:02 +JohannesK; got it 13:31:05 agenda? 13:31:18 carlosI has joined #er 13:31:39 CarlosV is too busy to join 13:31:59 regrets: CarlosV 13:32:18 +CarlosI 13:33:00 zakim, agenda order 2,4,1,3 13:33:00 ok, shadi 13:33:26 Scribe: CarlosI 13:33:36 zakim, take up next agendum 13:33:36 agendum 2. "ERT WG meeting during TPAC 2009" taken up [from squillace] 13:33:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Feb/0020.html 13:34:43 MS: TPAC 2-6 November 2009 Santa Clara, CA, USA. 13:35:04 MS: exploring potential interest of group attending 13:35:30 SAZ: this year need to confirm hotel reservations 13:35:49 SAZ: we haven't met in the USA for quite a while 13:36:23 SAZ: although most participants are not from the USA it could encourage more participation 13:36:41 SAZ: need to decide for the next telecon at most 13:37:12 MS: will be attending 13:37:26 MS: good opportunity to share with other groups 13:40:37 CI: not sure at this moment 13:41:01 CI: if need to have an answer right now it would be a no 13:41:28 SAZ: depend on what groups will meet 13:42:22 SAZ: may decide later in the year depending on the group progress 13:42:35 JK: quite a difficult week 13:42:44 JK: probably won't attend 13:43:27 SAZ: looks like a no for a full group meeting 13:44:20 SAZ: should have a F2F this year 13:44:33 SAZ: need to think where and when 13:45:06 MS: could do an european F2F meeting again with also phone participation 13:45:34 SAZ: can wait until last call stage and then think more seriously about F2F 13:45:40 https://www.hcii2009.org/ 13:46:33 SAZ: HCI International in July, San Diego 13:46:57 SAZ: paper submission 13:47:17 SAZ: interesting to keep an eye on it 13:49:33 MS: concusion: no official F2F group meeting at TPAC but need a F2F probably coinciding with other event 13:50:11 RESOLUTION: no F2F at TPAC 2009 but keep eyes and ears open for F2F for our group with regard to time and palce, possibly co-locating with anotehr conference (e.g. HCI in July 2009) 13:50:23 zakim, take up next agendum 13:50:23 agendum 4. "WAI Evaluation Resource Suite" taken up [from shadi] 13:50:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/ 13:52:04 SAZ: need to update the evaluation resources suite according to WCAG 2 13:53:51 SAZ: have submitted a proposal to the Leonardo da Vinci program with Braillenet, Bartimeus and University of Linz 13:54:19 SAZ: its and educational program 13:54:42 SAZ: working on methodologies and guidelines assistance 13:55:21 SAZ: waiting for a response 13:55:39 SAZ: if starting not before November or so 13:55:58 SAZ: work will be done through WAI WGs 13:56:37 SAZ: participation will be open to as much stakeholders as possible 13:57:20 SAZ: previous work on UWEM methodology for WCAG 1.0 13:57:43 SAZ: working on WCAG 2 guidelines and 1.0 methodology at the same time 13:57:51 SAZ: hope to reuse as much as possible 13:58:31 SAZ: UWEM projects are public and have ended 13:59:37 JK: as a UWEM participant would like to say that some parts where WCAG 1.0 dependant but others are generic enough to be resused 13:59:49 SAZ: two different parts 13:59:55 SAZ: the tests themselft 14:00:04 SAZ: and the procedure 14:00:44 zakim, take up next agendum 14:00:44 agendum 1. "Review of updated EARL 1.0 Schema with special attention to the conformance section" taken up [from squillace] 14:00:54 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090302 14:01:09 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090302#conformance 14:01:15 MS: like the new approach 14:01:22 MS: looks more clear 14:01:39 MS: like the overall layout 14:02:04 MS: can go section by section 14:05:21 CI: would like to clarify that cnt:Content and http:Response are optional 14:06:29 MS: how does RDF handle different languages? 14:08:42 MS: about the third point in 4.2 14:09:03 carlosI_ has joined #er 14:10:00 JK: the problem is that you can have several different serializations for the same model 14:10:09 JK: wich one to select? 14:11:05 JK: maybe can't be possible to use some RDF tools because they not use the same serialization 14:11:40 SAZ: the question is if it is a restriction o requirement we want to adopt or not 14:11:53 MS: then why are we using RDF at all? 14:13:05 JK: think it is contrary to the RDF philosophy in general 14:13:21 SAZ: it won't be a must 14:15:33 JK: RDF tools shouldn't be required to support specific serializations 14:17:14 SAZ: about Appendix A 14:17:40 SAZ: the idea is that tools should be able to consume or produce all the terms if there is information for them 14:21:02 JK: about 4.1 point 1 14:21:39 JK: does it mean that the tool should be RDF aware or may one use an XML tool and say it is a conformin processor 14:21:56 s/conformin/conforming 14:22:29 SAZ: it should be able to handle any serialization 14:23:03 add "any" to RDF/XML serialization (in point 4.2) 14:27:07 consider "must *be able to*" to 4.2.2 and 4.3.2 14:28:03 RESOLUTION: drop section 4.4 14:31:19 SAZ: need to clearly separate between EARL conforming and supporting tools 14:31:32 SAZ: not sure whether it is the right wording 14:31:44 SAZ: related to the EARL Lite idea 14:31:52 -squillace 14:31:55 -JohannesK 14:32:00 -Shadi 14:32:05 -CarlosI 14:32:06 trackbot, end meeting 14:32:06 Zakim, list attendees 14:32:07 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:32:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/04-er-minutes.html trackbot 14:32:07 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended 14:32:08 RRSAgent, bye 14:32:08 I see no action items 14:32:09 Attendees were +1.512.286.aaaa, squillace, Shadi, JohannesK, CarlosI 14:32:10 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is