<dug> Bob - I'd like to verify the attendee list for the f2f - if that's ok

<dug> so, who was SVij ?

<Sumeet> Sumeet I am there

<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim

Fred Maciel as scribe

<Bob> scribe: Fred Maciel

<Bob> scribenick: fmaciel

<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0005.html

agenda bashing

added F2F attendance

minutes approval

<Bob> Geoff's comments re minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0009.html

On (1) Agreement to add Bob's comment. No requests for other comments.

<Bob> bob will ad his comment concerning pointer to ws-ra homepage and mixed list

<dug> Bob asked several times and ways to see if people had any more

<dug> questions about either proposal and no one spoke up.

<asir> but we did not discuss IBM proposal last week

<Bob> Geoff described summary section of proposal. the chair asked if there were any questions concerning the proposal - "People can read" was one comment made.

<asir> i recall that both Geoff and I asked for more discussion of Geoff's proposal (particularly given variations in geoff's proposal

<gpilz1> me thinks he probably typed that in IRC

On (2), decided to use text above by Bob

Discussion on (3)

<Bob> geoff: voting on it is too soon, need more time to discuss. My proposal was only submitted yesterday and there were new comments on the mailing list about it as little as 10 minutes before the start of this call.

Text above accepted

Discussion on (4)

<dug> Bob asked if anyone's position would change with more discussions and

<dug> no one spoke up. This wasn't specific to Geoff's proposal but rather

<dug> to the issue itself.

<jeffm> +q

<Bob> Will any more discussion change anybody's minds?

<dug> +1

<jeffm> +q

<jeffm> =q

<dug> the vote was clear on which proposal we were voting on - I didn't hear any objection/confusion on that point.

<Bob> acj jeff

<asir> That is not what we heard ..

<asir> context is everything!

<gpilz1> timing is everything

Bob will add his recollection of his statement

<gpilz1> (sorry - as a drummer I have to say that)

Aproval of minutes defered until corrections done

administratrivia

F2F: 11 people attending in person

F2F in November? Need decision in call next week.

<dug> SoTD note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0000.html

<Geoff> Bob - you were going to talk about the agenda for the F2F?

First working draft comments: received comment that front matter not clear what

is the purpose of document

<Geoff> bob's proposal looks OK to us

<Geoff> +1 to Yves

<dug> The working group <a>page</a> provides additional information and the related specifications produced by this working group.

<asir> why not mention the issues list?

<dug> we discussed and voted on this last week

Alternative wording by dug accepted

Structure of minutes

Proposal by Bob on issues for F2F discussion accepted without discussion (Bob: please add details later)

issue discussion

<scribe> New issues: all accepted, with proposers as owners

issues marked as completed changed to closed

6587

Issue 6587

<Bob> proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0004.html

Curly brackets 1, 2, 4 accepted as partial resolution

<Geoff> +q

<dug> no text needed in not.conv. - just let ... say "ignore unknown extensions"

<Geoff> +q

<Katy> This text: ... If a receiver does not recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.

<asir> not consensus

Discussion on 3: undecided if it's notational or semantic change

<dug> if the WG says that black is white then of course we can say it :-)

<asir> Katy - your voice is breaking up a bit on the phone

Issue 6648 created for SOAP processing for Eventing

<Geoff> +q

<Bob> proposal, move {3} to a point after notional conventions labeled extensibility behavior

<gpilz1> !

<asir> Bob's proposal is consistent with other Web Service specifications

<Geoff> +1

<asir> See http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Extensibility

Bob's proposal accepted

<dug> shemp 1,2,4

<Bob> resolution: resolve 6587 with {1,2,and 4} limit description of ... to simply denote an extensibility point, and move explicit description of extensibility behavior to a new section

<Yves> +1

resolution accepted

Issue 6392

proposal, close with no actions

Issue 6392 closed with no action

<Bob> resolution: 6392 CWNA

Issue 6396

proposal, close with no actions

resolution: 6396 CWNA

Issue 6588

resolution: 6588 closed

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/why/what/
Found Scribe: Fred Maciel
Found ScribeNick: fmaciel

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Bob Bob_Freund Don_Wright F2F IBM Katy Microsoft Prasad_Yendluri SVij Sumeet TRutt Tom_Rutt Wu Wu_Chou Yves aaaa aabb asir dug fmaciel geoff gpilz gpilz1 jeffm joined li scribenick ws-ra
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0005.html

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 03 Mar 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/03-ws-ra-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.