20:26:55 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 20:26:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/03-ws-ra-irc 20:27:04 Zakim has joined #ws-ra 20:27:06 Geoff has joined #ws-ra 20:28:03 TRutt has joined #ws-ra 20:28:19 zakim, this will be #WS-WSRA 20:28:19 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Bob 20:28:25 zakim, this will be #WS_WSRA 20:28:25 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Bob 20:28:29 zakim, this will be WS_WSRA 20:28:29 ok, Bob, I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM already started 20:28:45 zakim, who is on the phone? 20:28:45 On the phone I see SVij, Bob_Freund, [Microsoft] 20:28:54 +gpilz 20:28:59 gpilz1 has joined #ws-ra 20:29:01 +[IBM] 20:29:08 Zakim, IBM is Dug 20:29:08 +Dug; got it 20:29:38 + +1.408.970.aaaa 20:29:39 zakim, [Micr is geoff 20:29:39 +geoff; got it 20:29:47 zakim, aaaa is fmaciel 20:29:47 +fmaciel; got it 20:29:52 asir has joined #ws-ra 20:29:59 zakim, geoff holds asir 20:29:59 +asir; got it 20:30:10 +Tom_Rutt 20:30:50 Bob - I'd like to verify the attendee list for the f2f - if that's ok 20:31:42 +Prasad_Yendluri 20:31:56 + +1.208.234.aabb 20:32:22 +Yves 20:32:23 zakim, who is talking? 20:32:36 dug, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: SVij (88%), Yves (3%) 20:32:38 +JeffM 20:32:55 so, who was SVij ? 20:33:04 +Wu_Chou 20:33:31 Sumeet I am there 20:34:15 http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim 20:34:16
  • li has joined #ws-ra 20:36:25 Fred Maciel as scribe 20:36:29 scribe: Fred Maciel 20:36:40 Katy has joined #ws-ra 20:36:46 scribenick: fmaciel 20:37:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0005.html 20:37:41 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0005.html 20:38:10 topic: agenda bashing 20:38:47 added F2F attendance 20:39:18 topic: minutes approval 20:39:42 Geoff's comments re minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0009.html 20:41:59 On (1) Agreement to add Bob's comment. No requests for other comments. 20:42:26 bob will ad his comment concerning pointer to ws-ra homepage and mixed list 20:42:28 q+ 20:42:42 ack dug 20:42:49 Bob asked several times and ways to see if people had any more 20:42:50 questions about either proposal and no one spoke up. 20:44:09 but we did not discuss IBM proposal last week 20:48:15 Geoff described summary section of proposal. the chair asked if there were any questions concerning the proposal - "People can read" was one comment made. 20:48:44 i recall that both Geoff and I asked for more discussion of Geoff's proposal (particularly given variations in geoff's proposal 20:48:44 me thinks he probably typed that in IRC 20:48:51 On (2), decided to use text above by Bob 20:49:03 Discussion on (3) 20:50:12 geoff: voting on it is too soon, need more time to discuss. My proposal was only submitted yesterday and there were new comments on the mailing list about it as little as 10 minutes before the start of this call. 20:50:33 Text above accepted 20:50:38 Discussion on (4) 20:50:59 q+ 20:51:09 Bob asked if anyone's position would change with more discussions and 20:51:10 no one spoke up. This wasn't specific to Geoff's proposal but rather 20:51:11 q+ 20:51:12 to the issue itself. 20:51:24 ack dug 20:51:27 jeffm has joined #ws-ra 20:51:40 +q 20:51:56 +Don_Wright 20:52:54 ack asir 20:53:00 ack jeff 20:53:51 Will any more discussion change anybody's minds? 20:53:57 +1 20:54:09 +Tom_Rutt.a 20:54:18 q+ 20:54:21 -Tom_Rutt 20:54:28 ack asir 20:54:30 q? 20:56:14 +q 20:56:17 =q 20:56:32 the vote was clear on which proposal we were voting on - I didn't hear any objection/confusion on that point. 20:57:10 acj jeff 20:57:14 ack jeff 20:57:20 That is not what we heard .. 20:57:38 context is everything! 20:57:49 timing is everything 20:57:56 Bob will add his recollection of his statement 20:58:17 (sorry - as a drummer I have to say that) 20:58:21 Aproval of minutes defered until corrections done 20:58:39 topic: administratrivia 20:59:37 F2F: 11 people attending in person 21:00:22 -Prasad_Yendluri 21:00:38 F2F in November? Need decision in call next week. 21:01:09 SoTD note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0000.html 21:01:22 Bob - you were going to talk about the agenda for the F2F? 21:01:23 First working draft comments: received comment that front matter not clear why 21:01:49 s/why/what 21:01:56 is the purpose of document 21:03:39 q+ 21:03:43 q- 21:03:53 ack dug 21:04:48 bob's proposal looks OK to us 21:04:57 ack yves 21:05:01 +1 to Yves 21:05:13 The working group page provides additional information and the related specifications produced by this working group. 21:05:58 why not mention the issues list? 21:06:25 we discussed and voted on this last week 21:07:06 Alternative wording by dug accepted 21:10:46 Structure of minutes 21:12:59 Wu has joined #ws-ra 21:13:58 Proposal by Bob on issues for F2F discussion accepted without discussion (Bob: please add details later) 21:14:32 topic: issue discussion 21:14:51 New issues: all accepted, with proposers as owners 21:15:48 issues marked as completed changed to closed 21:16:02 6587 21:16:10 topic: Issue 6587 21:16:19 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0004.html 21:16:32 -Tom_Rutt.a 21:18:32 Curly brackets 1, 2, 4 accepted as partial resolution 21:20:30 rrsagent, make logs public 21:22:34 q+ 21:23:48 ack bob 21:24:39 q+ 21:24:58 q+ 21:26:04 ack geo 21:26:26 q+ 21:27:21 ack gp 21:28:14 +q 21:30:12 q- 21:31:46 ack geo 21:32:01 q+ 21:32:11 q+ 21:32:19 q+ 21:33:38 q- 21:34:38 ack katy 21:35:08 ack dug 21:36:09 no text needed in not.conv. - just let ... say "ignore unknown extensions" 21:36:13 +q 21:36:15 This text: ... If a receiver does not recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it. 21:36:17 not consensus 21:36:19 Discussion on 3: undecided if it's notational or semantic change 21:36:38 ack geo 21:37:08 if the WG says that black is white then of course we can say it :-) 21:39:01 Katy - your voice is breaking up a bit on the phone 21:39:45 ack gp 21:39:49 -JeffM 21:40:41 Issue 6648 created for SOAP processing for Eventing 21:43:09 +q 21:43:27 ack geo 21:43:40 q+ 21:43:40 q+ 21:44:10 ack gp 21:45:31 q+ 21:46:19 proposal, move {3} to a point after notional conventions labeled extensibility behavior 21:46:28 ack dug 21:46:53 ! 21:47:58 Bob's proposal is consistent with other Web Service specifications 21:48:43 +1 21:49:24 See http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Extensibility 21:50:08 Bob's proposal accepted 21:50:18 shemp 1,2,4 21:51:15 resolution: resolve 6587 with {1,2,and 4} limit description of ... to simply denote an extensibility point, and move explicit description of extensibility behavior to a new section 21:51:26 +1 21:51:54 resolution accepted 21:52:38 topic: Issue 6392 21:53:05 q+ 21:53:10 proposal, close with no actions 21:53:11 ack bob 21:53:20 ack geo 21:54:28 Issue 6392 closed with no action 21:54:34 resolution: 6392 CWNA 21:54:57 topic: Issue 6396 21:55:16 proposal, close with no actions 21:55:35 resolution: 6396 CWNA 21:56:13 topic: Issue 6588 21:56:43 resolution: 6588 closed 21:57:19 -geoff 21:57:20 -Wu_Chou 21:57:22 -gpilz 21:57:24 -Yves 21:57:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/03-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves 21:57:26 -Bob_Freund 21:57:28 - +1.208.234.aabb 21:57:33 -Don_Wright 21:57:38 -Dug 21:57:40 gpilz1 has left #ws-ra 21:57:53 -SVij 21:58:30 -fmaciel 21:58:31 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 21:58:33 Attendees were SVij, Bob_Freund, [Microsoft], gpilz, Dug, +1.408.970.aaaa, fmaciel, asir, Tom_Rutt, Prasad_Yendluri, +1.208.234.aabb, Yves, JeffM, Wu_Chou, Don_Wright 22:46:54 TRutt has left #ws-ra