16:54:05 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:54:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-irc 16:54:06 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:54:06 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 16:54:07 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:54:07 Date: 24 February 2009 16:54:13 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0019.html 16:54:18 Chair: Roland 16:55:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 16:59:23 Phil has joined #soap-jms 16:59:32 alewis has joined #soap-jms 16:59:54 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started 17:00:01 +alewis 17:00:08 +Roland_Merrick 17:00:11 -Roland_Merrick 17:00:33 +Roland_Merrick 17:00:54 Zakim, Roland_Merrick is Roland 17:00:55 +Roland; got it 17:00:57 Derek has joined #soap-jms 17:01:17 peaston has joined #soap-jms 17:01:26 + +1.708.246.aaaa 17:01:55 +Phil 17:02:03 Zakim, aaaa is Derek 17:02:04 +Derek; got it 17:02:10 +Peter_Easton 17:02:27 Zakim, Peter_Easton is peaston 17:02:27 +peaston; got it 17:02:52 eric has joined #soap-jms 17:03:39 +Eric_Johnson 17:03:57 zakim, Eric_Johnson is eric 17:03:57 +eric; got it 17:04:33 +mphillip 17:04:43 Scribe:peaston 17:04:52 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 17:04:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0019.html 17:05:01 Chair:Roland 17:05:22 Topic: Actions 17:05:35 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 17:06:52 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/ 17:07:54 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html 17:08:55 Close:Action-53 17:09:15 close action-53 17:09:15 ACTION-53 Provide testcase(s) in properties area closed 17:12:03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0017.html 17:13:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0020.html 17:15:27 Topic: discussing Action 64 topic reply to name 17:16:30 phil: this is a corner case perhaps not specify 17:16:43 I think that was eric, not phil :) 17:17:08 : Re:ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) 17:17:12 : Re:ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) 17:17:32 this is a corner case perhaps not specify 17:19:03 roland: we should specify the jndi case 17:19:48 roland: if you use jndi ignore topicReplyTo 17:21:44 Dongbo question: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0008.html 17:21:57 eric: hesitant to add topicReplyTo to wsdl 17:24:01 derek: could we just use it in the URI 17:24:53 derek: could have a reply to type 17:33:30 eric: do we have a conflict if wsdl and URI are inconsistent 17:33:51 eric: we could leave this in the URI spec 17:34:07 roland: what about error conditions 17:35:32 mphillips: just take the first one in the URI is there are conflicts 17:36:41 eric : there are a bunch of error cases 17:38:16 -eric 17:38:36 +eric 17:39:18 derek: make statements about what is ignored versus errors if the URI has conflicting R2 specs 17:42:42 action: derek to redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO 17:42:42 Created ACTION-67 - Redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-03-03]. 17:42:53 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0022.html 17:46:32 topic: discuss jndiContextParameters proposal act 62 17:47:20 roland the security principal may be contraversial otherwise ok 17:47:36 peter will pick another property 17:48:14 topic: Act 66 Additional Robust In-Only MEP 17:48:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0018.html 17:48:48 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0021.html 17:49:18 amy: Robust In-Only designed with JMS in mind 17:49:56 I muted 17:50:53 roland: we could fully specify it or specify it as other meps like RIO are not prohibited 17:51:57 eric: or do nothing note that we have to consider security concerns of NOT being rebust 17:52:24 amy roland etc: additional MEPS allowable is good 17:52:53 roland: do we state this in the spec i.e. other MEPS ok 17:53:43 derek: if we don't define RIO fully could be interpop issues 17:55:11 eric: is RIO a SOAP MEP ? should check 17:56:14 amy: SOAP WG only defined SOAP/HTTP perhaps SOAP/email 17:57:12 amy: RIO is being implemented getting traction 17:58:00 roland: this is a significant addition i.e. time spec tests etc 17:58:48 roland: adding an MEP may reset the W3C process 17:59:11 phil: what about next rev 18:00:00 eric: how about a non-normative appendix ? 18:00:48 eric : RIO has JMS QOS implications 18:01:47 eric: non-normative section(appendix) would be a step in the right direction 18:02:19 roland: Q1 do we want a normative section ? 18:02:37 all: no 18:02:56 roland: any volunteers for a non-normative section ? 18:04:29 all: generally restrained response 18:05:07 -eric 18:05:08 -Phil 18:05:09 -mphillip 18:05:10 -Derek 18:05:10 -alewis 18:05:14 -Roland 18:05:15 action: derek to draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO 18:05:15 Created ACTION-68 - Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-03-03]. 18:05:29 rrsagent, generate minutes 18:05:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html peaston 18:05:41 -peaston 18:05:43 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 18:05:45 Attendees were alewis, Roland, +1.708.246.aaaa, Phil, Derek, peaston, eric, mphillip 18:06:27 eric has left #soap-jms 18:07:17 rrsagent, generate minutes 18:07:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 18:07:43 Roland has left #soap-jms 19:27:32 Zakim has left #soap-jms