14:40:06 RRSAgent has joined #xhtml 14:40:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/02/18-xhtml-irc 14:40:07 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:40:07 Zakim has joined #xhtml 14:40:09 Zakim, this will be IA_XHTML2 14:40:09 ok, trackbot; I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 14:40:10 Meeting: XHTML2 Working Group Teleconference 14:40:10 Date: 18 February 2009 14:40:42 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Feb/0033 14:40:46 Chair: Steven 14:40:59 Regrets: Roland 14:41:58 Scribe: Gregory_Rosmaita 14:42:02 ScribeNick: oedipus 14:43:23 rrsagent, make minutes 14:43:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/18-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 14:43:32 ShaneM has joined #xhtml 14:44:45 IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has now started 14:44:52 +Gregory_Rosmaita 14:45:20 previous: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/11-xhtml-minutes.html 14:45:23 +McCarron 14:45:30 zakim, dial steven-617 14:45:30 ok, Steven; the call is being made 14:45:32 +Steven 14:46:15 mgylling has joined #xhtml 14:46:35 alessio has joined #xhtml 14:47:07 +??P4 14:47:23 Zakim, ??P4 is mgylling 14:47:23 +mgylling; got it 14:47:40 TOPIC: News, Notes & Agenda Additions 14:47:59 +??P6 14:48:07 zakim, ??P6 14:48:07 I don't understand '??P6', alessio 14:48:12 zakim, ??P6 is Alessio 14:48:12 +Alessio; got it 14:48:28 SP: sorry sent out agenda late; 14:48:59 GJR: action item update - http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/tracker/actions/49 14:49:45 GJR: we voting on sending ARIA 1.0 to last call today 14:50:01 GJR: MCooper will provide Shane with updated info 14:50:15 SP: update at last call? should it not express only what is in rec? 14:50:19 SM: doesn't 14:50:33 SM: reflects what is in ARIA WD, needs to be updated to conform 14:50:51 SP: ok, fair enough 14:51:47 SP: action item - send PER transition request -- done; will keep my eye on it; should hear within a week 14:51:57 SP: action to write intro to XHTML2 14:52:02 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml2.html 14:52:05 SP: created very draf first version 14:52:50 SP: a) very early draft; b) in "telegram" style - listed what needs to be explained and intent of each section; sections need populating; comments on structure welcome 14:53:41 SP: composed of lots of pieces; have to check RDFa example for right triples; bit about XFrames that probably needs to be cut, but is placeholder until we decide what to do about XFrames; sketched out XForms section 14:53:53 SP: any comments welcome 14:54:44 GJR: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/tracker/actions/50 is still open (didn't finish - hope to do so today) 14:55:18 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml2/wiki/ProposedElements/ModificationMarkup#Investigating_INS_and_DEL_.28and_perhaps_MOD.29 14:55:26 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml2/wiki/ProposedElements/ModificationMarkup 14:58:39 SP: word level for INS and DEL - normal to do DEL on false plural - dogs = dogs 14:59:44 GJR: best practice, should point out at least the dangers of using internal INS and DEL for rendering especially alternate rendering 15:00:13 GJR: no, i still need to finish compiling the document 15:00:36 GJR: will email list when ready to review 15:03:18 SP: voting on going to last call 15:03:22 GJR: correct 15:03:59 GJR: plan is to get through as soon as possible -- 3 weeks from date of announcement, probably a week from friday 15:04:19 latest ARIA editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria 15:05:15 I suspect a 3 week last call is a little naive - the rest of the membership needs to read the doc. 15:05:24 agreed 15:06:08 Off topic: quote of the day (from Mark Birbeck): 15:06:08 There are two aspects to this debate. Some people want RDFa to be added to HTML5, and that browsers do something with it. I'd love to see that too, but then I'd also like to solve world hunger, and teach the world to sing. 15:06:45 TOPIC: RDFa in HTML5 15:07:05 SP: amazed at how 1 thread generated so much discussion 15:07:55 SP: Manu reported back from conference support and interest in RDFa; discussion devolved into HTML5 versus RDFa argument 15:08:13 SP: quote of the day right on topic! 15:09:37 SP: discussion is one i had last year at TPAC when i attended HTML WG to discuss RDFa and HTML5; Henri Sivonen still singing the same song against RDFa -- counter arguments to use of RDFa is ; attributes won't be removed from DOM when document parsed, so RDFa will just work; only problem is validation, and HTML5 doesn't have a validation story 15:09:41 validator.nu 15:09:59 SM: generic validation - http://validator.nu 15:10:21 SM: thread traffic today - HS' argument interesting; HTML5 does remove attributes from info stack 15:10:24 SP: which ones? 15:10:32 SM: anyone that is in xmlns 15:11:40 s/use of RDFa is ;/use of RDFa is extensibility, namespacing, and control 15:11:49 SP: how plan to declare version of HTML5 15:11:53 SM: are no versions 15:12:03 SP: either this is the last HTML ever, or need to solve problem 15:12:30 SP: at some point in future going to have to have another iteration of HTML which will need to be validated; could then have profile to validate HTML5 + RDFa 15:13:17 SM: yesterday's quote of the day from TAG discussion on versioning; HTML5 Issue 41 - precludes extensibility in HTML5 15:13:23 David Orchard said: This is also directly related to HTML5 WG issue 41, which is that HTML5 currently precludes support for distributed extensibility. 15:13:24 SM: source david orchard 15:14:01 GJR: no support for my "role for HTML5" proposal - http://esw.w3.org/topic/PF/XTech/HTML5/RoleAttribute 15:14:19 SM: problem is don't want distributed extensibility - want a locked-down developer-centric language 15:14:35 SP: done our best to make XHTML markup useable by everyone 15:15:21 q+ to say sam ruby has action to discuss HTML5 and XHTML alignment - Janina Sajka, co-chair of PF should be at meeting 15:15:25 q? 15:15:39 ack owe 15:15:42 ack oe 15:15:42 oedipus, you wanted to say sam ruby has action to discuss HTML5 and XHTML alignment - Janina Sajka, co-chair of PF should be at meeting 15:16:59 SP: haven't received request from Sam 15:17:25 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/105 15:17:48 SP: good approach 15:19:08 GJR: would like Janina Sajka to be included in meeting 15:19:28 rrsagent, make minutes 15:19:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/18-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 15:20:39 q+ to say HTML5 new PWD pushed without consultation with WG 15:21:30 ack oe 15:21:30 oedipus, you wanted to say HTML5 new PWD pushed without consultation with WG 15:22:56 Regrets+MarkB 15:25:01 rrsagent, make minutes 15:25:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/18-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 15:27:04 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/markup-spec/ 15:27:54 TOPIC: XHTML 1.0 PER 15:27:58 SP: objection from DanC about 1.0 PER 15:27:59 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml1-20081121/ 15:28:17 SP: stated not enough time for community review 15:28:30 s/stated not/DanC stated not/ 15:29:09 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml-media-types-20090116 15:29:38 SM: make sure reviewing right draft of Media Types (16 January 2009) 15:29:47 SP: reference from normative section to the document 15:30:26 "Many people want to use XHTML to author their web pages, but are confused about the best ways to deliver those pages in such a way that they will be processed correctly by various user agents. This Note contains suggestions about how to format XHTML to ensure it is maximally portable, and how to deliver XHTML to various user agents - even those that do not yet support XHTML natively. This document is intended to be used by document authors who want to use XHTM 15:31:02 SP: complaint is in reference to Section 5 15:31:20 SM: think previous REC had same pointer -- pointed to appendix C, now points to Media Types 15:31:44 SP: was concern about a normative section pointed to from an informative section 15:31:51 SP: what is normative about Section 5? 15:31:53 SM: nothing 15:32:02 SP: can we mark that "This section is informative"? 15:32:52 SP: section 5 should be non-normative, and provide pointer to January 2009 draft 15:33:15 SP: definitely have had opportunity to review 15:34:50 I presented it to the HCG 15:34:56 RESOLVED: reply to DanC's comments on PER of XHTML 1.0 to state that Section 5 (of XHTML 1.0 PEF) is non-normative and provide pointer to 16 January 2006 draft of XHTML Media Types - Second Edition 15:35:21 s/PEF/PER/ 15:35:47 TOPIC: Burning Issues 15:35:59 SP: discussion of XHTML2 and HTML5 combined? 15:37:20 SP: at Forms f2f, realized don't have dates for virtual face2face for XHTML2 WG -- do we want to plan a longer session (day, day and a half) to work on XHTML2 draft 15:37:41 SP: need Roland to set but should start thinking about timing 15:37:50 AC: agree 15:38:10 ADJOURN 15:38:24 -McCarron 15:38:27 -Gregory_Rosmaita 15:38:29 -Steven 15:38:29 -mgylling 15:38:38 zakim, please part 15:38:38 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Gregory_Rosmaita, McCarron, Steven, mgylling, Alessio 15:38:38 Zakim has left #xhtml 15:38:43 rrsagent, make minutes 15:38:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/18-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 15:41:40 . 15:43:49 rrsagent, please part 15:43:49 I see no action items