IRC log of ws-ra on 2009-01-27
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 20:30:29 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra
- 20:30:29 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-irc
- 20:30:31 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 20:30:31 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #ws-ra
- 20:30:33 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WSRA
- 20:30:33 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot, I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM already started
- 20:30:34 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference
- 20:30:34 [trackbot]
- Date: 27 January 2009
- 20:30:45 [Zakim]
- +Yves
- 20:31:47 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 20:31:48 [Zakim]
- +Wu_Chou
- 20:32:39 [Zakim]
- +Prasad_Yendluri
- 20:32:41 [Zakim]
- + +1.703.266.aaaa
- 20:33:31 [Zakim]
- + +0208234aabb
- 20:34:07 [Sumeet]
- Sumeet has joined #ws-ra
- 20:35:05 [Katy]
- Katy has joined #ws-ra
- 20:35:09 [Yves]
- Scribe: Gilbert
- 20:35:12 [gpilz]
- scribenick: gpilz
- 20:35:28 [gpilz]
- topic: roll call
- 20:36:24 [prasad]
- prasad has joined #ws-ra
- 20:36:39 [Vikas]
- Vikas has joined #ws-ra
- 20:36:48 [prasad]
- zakim, who is here?
- 20:36:48 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Doug_Davis, [Microsoft], [Oracle], Yves, Li_Li, Wu_Chou, Prasad_Yendluri, Vikas, Katy_Warr
- 20:36:51 [Zakim]
- [Oracle] has gpilz
- 20:36:51 [Zakim]
- [Microsoft] has Geoff
- 20:36:52 [Zakim]
- Vikas has Vikas, Sumeet
- 20:36:53 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Vikas, prasad, Katy, Sumeet, Zakim, RRSAgent, gpilz, Geoff, dug, trackbot, Yves
- 20:37:08 [Wu]
- Wu has joined #ws-ra
- 20:38:41 [gpilz]
- roll will be tracked separately from the minutes
- 20:38:55 [Yves]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0052.html
- 20:38:56 [gpilz]
- topic: agenda
- 20:39:03 [dug]
- Geoff - did you send in a proposal for 6404?
- 20:39:16 [Yves]
- Geof want to talk about 6404 if time permit
- 20:39:17 [Geoff]
- no, sorry, did not get a chance
- 20:39:22 [gpilz]
- Katy: I raised 6472 as a new issue
- 20:39:27 [Geoff]
- but we can talk a bit if you like and then I will send update
- 20:39:30 [dug]
- ok good - thought my email trashed it by mistake :-)
- 20:39:44 [gpilz]
- topic: minutes
- 20:40:03 [gpilz]
- yves: did people get a chance to look at the minutes from the F2F
- 20:40:12 [gpilz]
- resolved: minutes from F2F approved
- 20:40:33 [gpilz]
- resolved: minutes from 1/20/2009 approved
- 20:40:35 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc
- 20:40:37 [gpilz]
- topic: tracker
- 20:40:49 [dug]
- trackbot, status
- 20:40:49 [trackbot]
- Sorry, dug, I don't understand 'trackbot, status'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
- 20:41:08 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/
- 20:41:43 [gpilz]
- yves: we aren't using Tacker for issues
- 20:41:59 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/users/my to access your own actions
- 20:42:00 [gpilz]
- ...: so the issue-related commands are irrelevant
- 20:42:11 [gpilz]
- geoff: will that allow you to get a list of all action item?
- 20:42:15 [gpilz]
- yves: two modes
- 20:42:21 [gpilz]
- ...: in general, all AIS
- 20:42:40 [gpilz]
- ...: but using "my" will just give you yours (across all W3C WGs)
- 20:42:51 [gpilz]
- topic: editors report
- 20:42:58 [gpilz]
- yves: traffic on mailing list
- 20:43:06 [gpilz]
- doug: we're half-way done
- 20:43:17 [gpilz]
- ...: 2.5 specs complete and the others in a day or so
- 20:43:29 [gpilz]
- ...: on track to get conversion done by end of the week
- 20:43:38 [dug]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/
- 20:43:52 [gpilz]
- geoff: will those be available?
- 20:44:04 [gpilz]
- doug: this is where we will put our files
- 20:44:13 [gpilz]
- ...: we'll send out a note at the end of the week
- 20:44:26 [gpilz]
- yves: tomorrow I will add links to the editors drafts
- 20:44:27 [Yves]
- ACTION: Yves to add link to the edcopies (once they are ready for review)
- 20:44:27 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-1 - Add link to the edcopies (once they are ready for review) [on Yves Lafon - due 2009-02-03].
- 20:45:48 [gpilz]
- topic: new issues
- 20:45:48 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6463
- 20:46:31 [gpilz]
- katy: (describes issue)
- 20:47:44 [gpilz]
- ...: how would we recommend that clients get the policies that they should use for the GetMetadata request
- 20:47:50 [gpilz]
- ...: bootstrapping problem
- 20:48:05 [gpilz]
- ...: how should policy be exchanged?
- 20:48:17 [gpilz]
- geoff: any ideas on how to do this?
- 20:48:36 [gpilz]
- katy: it may not be possible to exchange policy; may need some out-of-band agreement
- 20:48:51 [gpilz]
- ...: as a group we need to agree on what we would recommend
- 20:49:01 [gpilz]
- yves: accept this?
- 20:49:11 [gpilz]
- resolved: 6463 accepted
- 20:49:39 [gpilz]
- assign 6463 to Katy
- 20:49:39 [dug]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6472
- 20:50:06 [gpilz]
- katy: (describes issue)
- 20:51:00 [gpilz]
- wu: can you provide more details
- 20:51:28 [gpilz]
- ...: do you want to propose similar changes on "unable to renew"?
- 20:52:12 [gpilz]
- yves: we can accept this and close with no action if necessary
- 20:52:22 [gpilz]
- wu: we can accept this issue but we'd like to see more details
- 20:52:38 [gpilz]
- resolved: 6472 accepted and assigned to Katy
- 20:53:11 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
- 20:53:54 [dug]
- proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0047.html
- 20:54:21 [Geoff]
- q+
- 20:54:31 [gpilz]
- wu: I don't have anything to add to this proposal
- 20:54:41 [gpilz]
- ...: we left this for people to study
- 20:54:48 [dug]
- No objection to the proposal
- 20:54:55 [gpilz]
- Li Li: proposal is to expand the current element
- 20:55:07 [gpilz]
- Wu: (describes proposal)
- 20:55:37 [gpilz]
- +q
- 20:55:49 [dug]
- interesting, so "+q" does work
- 20:55:56 [gpilz]
- geoff: I have no real objection to this
- 20:56:07 [gpilz]
- ...: we need to think about the wording
- 20:56:17 [gpilz]
- ...: the "Delivery" section in the eventing spec
- 20:56:33 [gpilz]
- ...: one question; using "Push" is NotifyTo mandatory?
- 20:56:43 [gpilz]
- wu: yeah
- 20:56:53 [gpilz]
- geoff: the spec doesn't say that and neither does the schema
- 20:57:13 [gpilz]
- li li: it's hard for the schema to enforce that
- 20:57:22 [gpilz]
- geoff: we need to fix the normative language
- 20:57:44 [gpilz]
- ...: we also want to make sure that there is there are optional things you can add
- 20:57:57 [gpilz]
- li li: that's the sense we got from the discussion
- 20:58:09 [gpilz]
- ...: I agree, the language should make it very clear
- 20:58:21 [gpilz]
- ...: not sure there is a way to make the schema enforce this
- 20:58:57 [gpilz]
- gil: we do this all the time; normative language that enforces further constraints on the XML
- 20:59:17 [gpilz]
- geoff: we need something that says "in delivery modes other than push you don't need NotifyTo"
- 20:59:40 [gpilz]
- q-
- 21:00:47 [Yves]
- ACTION: Li Li to add some wording to clarify the use of NotifyTo (re: issue 6426)
- 21:00:47 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2 - Li to add some wording to clarify the use of NotifyTo (re: issue 6426) [on Li Li - due 2009-02-03].
- 21:01:12 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.970.aacc
- 21:02:44 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
- 21:03:29 [Yves]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0048.html
- 21:03:31 [gpilz]
- Li: (describes issue)
- 21:04:09 [dug]
- no objection
- 21:04:16 [gpilz]
- no objection
- 21:04:30 [dug]
- woo hoo - one down! we're flying now! :-)
- 21:04:34 [Geoff]
- no objection
- 21:04:42 [gpilz]
- resolved: 6427 closed with proposed resolution plus ammendments
- 21:05:43 [Zakim]
- -Katy_Warr
- 21:06:02 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6398
- 21:06:26 [gpilz]
- doug: (describes issue and proposal)
- 21:06:32 [Geoff]
- q+
- 21:06:46 [gpilz]
- doug: nothing new since last week
- 21:07:16 [gpilz]
- yves: crux of issue was xs:any vs. xs:any*
- 21:07:24 [gpilz]
- doug: that was a separate issue
- 21:07:44 [Katy]
- Katy has joined #ws-ra
- 21:07:45 [gpilz]
- yves: depends if the group agrees
- 21:07:48 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 21:08:24 [gpilz]
- geoff: one issue we have is doesn't this effect what happens with 6392 and 6396?
- 21:08:40 [gpilz]
- ...: I know you're talking about schema, but the wording is effected as well
- 21:08:58 [gpilz]
- ...: how will the text change?
- 21:09:02 [dug]
- q+
- 21:09:09 [dug]
- q-
- 21:09:25 [gpilz]
- doug: basically leave text as is, then look at them separately
- 21:09:38 [gpilz]
- ...: this proposal may close those issues with no action
- 21:09:47 [gpilz]
- geoff: the wording will have to change somewhat
- 21:10:03 [gpilz]
- doug: that is either another issue or, during review, we can raise a new issue
- 21:10:13 [gpilz]
- ...: don't think we need to resolve that in this issue at this time
- 21:10:16 [gpilz]
- +1
- 21:10:47 [gpilz]
- geoff: we're not going to talk about the xs:any* issues?
- 21:11:18 [gpilz]
- doug: to me that is a side issue
- 21:11:18 [gpilz]
- ...: i'd like to just get the wrapper in place
- 21:11:18 [gpilz]
- ...: then address the cardinality issues later
- 21:11:34 [gpilz]
- geoff: i'm not sure i'm going to be willing to close on this today
- 21:11:51 [gpilz]
- ...: are you expecting others to raise those issues separately
- 21:12:12 [gpilz]
- yves: i hear that people are not ready yet to agree on closing it
- 21:12:18 [gpilz]
- geoff: i'd like one more week
- 21:12:30 [gpilz]
- ...: how is it going to affect RT and everything gels
- 21:12:52 [gpilz]
- yves: be ready to discuss this next week
- 21:14:26 [Yves]
- ACTION: dug to raise issue about cardinality of xs:any, relative to issue 6398
- 21:14:27 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-3 - Raise issue about cardinality of xs:any, relative to issue 6398 [on Doug Davis - due 2009-02-03].
- 21:14:53 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6413
- 21:15:14 [Zakim]
- -Prasad_Yendluri
- 21:15:17 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6399
- 21:15:44 [gpilz]
- doug: don't want to resolve this but am willing to discuss
- 21:16:01 [gpilz]
- ...: one way is to simply remove this operation
- 21:16:08 [Zakim]
- +Prasad_Yendluri
- 21:16:11 [gpilz]
- ...: but that probably won't be popular
- 21:16:23 [gpilz]
- ...: would like to defer this until we resolve the WS-Eventing issues
- 21:16:37 [gpilz]
- ...: because whatever we do will probably be patterned after that solution
- 21:16:56 [gpilz]
- geoff: I don't like the option of removing this operation
- 21:17:07 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
- 21:17:27 [gpilz]
- all: we did this one already
- 21:17:51 [Yves]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
- 21:18:22 [dug]
- Gil: reviews his proposal
- 21:19:13 [dug]
- q+
- 21:20:27 [gpilz]
- doug: two parts - remove wsa04:action is obvious
- 21:20:38 [gpilz]
- doug: thinks we should use wsam:Action
- 21:20:42 [gpilz]
- geoff: agrees
- 21:20:49 [FBM]
- FBM has joined #ws-ra
- 21:20:54 [gpilz]
- ACTION: gpilz to update proposal to include wsam:Action
- 21:20:54 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-4 - Update proposal to include wsam:Action [on Gilbert Pilz - due 2009-02-03].
- 21:22:05 [gpilz]
- doug: would like to discuss proposals
- 21:22:10 [Yves]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0051.html
- 21:22:12 [gpilz]
- yves: lets start with gils
- 21:22:43 [dug]
- gil: talks about his proposal for wseventing bp/policy/... issues
- 21:23:49 [dug]
- ... very raw proposal - looking for initial feedback
- 21:24:16 [dug]
- ... endpoint policy subject
- 21:24:22 [dug]
- ... wsdl port level
- 21:27:15 [dug]
- ... this wsdl defines what the event sink needs to support
- 21:28:57 [Wu]
- q+
- 21:29:03 [dug]
- q-
- 21:31:18 [dug]
- q+
- 21:36:41 [dug]
- bea.com?? what's that???
- 21:37:03 [dug]
- q-
- 21:37:22 [Wu]
- would like to have a better understanding of backward competibility with exisiting ws-eventing implemetation
- 21:37:25 [Wu]
- q+
- 21:37:27 [gpilz]
- doug: I don't believe this impacts what appears on the wire
- 21:37:42 [gpilz]
- wu: i think this is something we need to really study
- 21:38:01 [gpilz]
- ...: one thing we need to think about is how to maintain the spirit of ws-evetning
- 21:38:02 [gpilz]
- +q
- 21:38:15 [gpilz]
- ...: need to make it friendly to existing implementations
- 21:38:21 [gpilz]
- ...: we need to be prudent
- 21:38:39 [gpilz]
- ...: everybody should check this out for issues
- 21:40:16 [dug]
- q+
- 21:41:32 [gpilz]
- q+
- 21:41:51 [dug]
- q-
- 21:41:58 [Wu]
- Thanks for point out that
- 21:45:00 [Yves]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0056.html
- 21:45:00 [gpilz]
- topic: proposal on 6429
- 21:45:33 [Zakim]
- -Prasad_Yendluri
- 21:45:51 [gpilz]
- Li: (describes proposal)
- 21:46:39 [dug]
- q+
- 21:47:22 [gpilz]
- +q
- 21:48:11 [dug]
- that's ok - I didn't mind if gil went first :-)
- 21:51:14 [dug]
- q-
- 21:52:52 [dug]
- <wse:Notify actionURI="xs:anyURI"> ...data... </wse:Notify> would be the body
- 21:53:57 [dug]
- <wsa:Action> http://.../wseventing/Notify </wsa:Action>
- 21:55:46 [gpilz]
- why not the wsa:Action?
- 21:56:20 [gpilz]
- putting metadata (which is what "action" is) in the body makes it harder to retrieve
- 21:56:24 [dug]
- some people dispatch on the wsa:Action - so it would need to be static just like the Body in order to go to the same operation each time.
- 21:56:38 [gpilz]
- fair enough
- 21:56:39 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 21:56:41 [Zakim]
- -Li_Li
- 21:56:42 [Zakim]
- -Wu_Chou
- 21:56:42 [Zakim]
- -Katy_Warr
- 21:56:43 [Zakim]
- -Fred_Maciel
- 21:56:44 [Zakim]
- -Doug_Davis
- 21:56:46 [Zakim]
- -Vikas
- 21:56:48 [Zakim]
- -Yves
- 21:56:53 [Zakim]
- -[Oracle]
- 21:56:55 [Zakim]
- WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended
- 21:56:56 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Doug_Davis, Yves, Geoff, gpilz, Wu_Chou, Prasad_Yendluri, +1.703.266.aaaa, Li_Li, Vikas, Sumeet, +0208234aabb, Katy_Warr, +1.408.970.aacc, Fred_Maciel
- 21:57:12 [gpilz]
- yves, how do I process these minutes?
- 21:57:19 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves
- 21:57:46 [Yves]
- gil: see http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-minutes.html
- 21:58:02 [Yves]
- nothing more to do ;)
- 21:58:20 [gpilz]
- send email?
- 21:58:44 [Yves]
- not needed, we will put a amended version in the ws/ra space and Bob will send an email
- 21:58:59 [gpilz]
- fantastic
- 21:59:12 [Yves]
- thank you for scribing !
- 22:01:58 [Yves]
- rrsagent, bye
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-actions.rdf :
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Yves to add link to the edcopies (once they are ready for review) [1]
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-irc#T20-44-27
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Li Li to add some wording to clarify the use of NotifyTo (re: issue 6426) [2]
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-irc#T21-00-47
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: dug to raise issue about cardinality of xs:any, relative to issue 6398 [3]
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-irc#T21-14-26
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: gpilz to update proposal to include wsam:Action [4]
- 22:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-ws-ra-irc#T21-20-54