W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

26 Jan 2009

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
jeanne, JR, andrewr, JuttaT, Tim_Boland, Sueann, Greg_Pisocky
Regrets
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
AndrewR

Contents


 

 

Process survey results:

<JR> Scribe: AndrewR

1. Proposal for Glossary Appendix Introduction (from Tim Boland)

JR - proposed change was to make it slightly shorter

JS would also like to shorten it

JR - didn't think it was necessary to tell people to go elsewhere to find certain information

JR - proposed shortening: This appendix contains definitions for all of the important and/or unfamiliar terms used in the normative parts of this specification, including terms used in the (link to conformance) section. All of these terms are linked at least from their first usage in the specification. Where appropriate definitions for these terms could be found in other W3C Recommendations,...

scribe: the source is designated by "[ ]". In some cases, editorial adaptation was required to make the definitions suitable for the ATAG 2.0.

General concensus of the group is the shortening is acceptable

Glossary Proposal - changing the source quotation

<JR> ACTION: JS insert JR's text for Proposal for Glossary Appendix Introduction (#1 in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20090114/results) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-81 - Insert JR's text for Proposal for Glossary Appendix Introduction (#1 in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20090114/results) [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Abbreviation

JT: unanimous acceptance of this

<JR> ACTION: JS insert JR's text for abbreviation (#2) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-82 - Insert JR's text for abbreviation (#2) [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Glossary Proposal - authoring tool user interface (non-Web-based)

JT: the reason we have the distinction is because when something is web based we can use WCAG

GP: is there a difference is how we treat web based vs non web based?

JT: yes. Web based would have WCAG applied to it

JR: primary objection is the non-web-based is quite an awkward term

GP: people will probably call it non-browser based

<JR> authoring tool user interface (Web-based)

<JR> Any parts of an authoring tool user interface that are implemented using Web content technologies and are accessed by authors via a user agent..

<JR> ACTION: JS to Insert "authoring tool user interface (non-Web-based) Any parts of an authoring tool user interface that are not implemented as Web content and instead run directly on a platform that is not a user agent, such as Windows, MacOS, Java Virtual Machine, etc. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-83 - Insert \"authoring tool user interface (non-Web-based) Any parts of an authoring tool user interface that are not implemented as Web content and instead run directly on a platform that is not a user agent, such as Windows, MacOS, Java Virtual Machine, etc. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Glossary Proposal - authoring tool

TB: is the first use of the term authoring tool linked to the glossary?
... the definition of authoring tool has implications for the applicability / scope of the document so it's an important subject
... all the significant definition should be consolidated in the glossary

JR: trying to avoid duplicating the language
... trying to define it in one place
... seems to be some confusion as to where that place should be

<JR> JT: Idea change "Definition of authoring tool" to "Scope and Applicability"

<JR> JR: +1

<JR> TB: Reading from QA best practices....

<JR> JT: Authoring tool defintion stays in glossary

<JR> JR: Where should notes go

<JR> ACTION: JR to Put defintion of Authoring Tool back in Glossary, make a Scope and Applicability section out of list of tools and the 2 notes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-84 - Put defintion of Authoring Tool back in Glossary, make a Scope and Applicability section out of list of tools and the 2 notes [on Jan Richards - due 2009-02-02].

author permission

JT: the only difference is "has the right" compared to "has a right"

Glossary Proposal - authors

<JR> ACTION: JS to Use new wording of "authoring permission" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-85 - Use new wording of \"authoring permission\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

authors

JT: proposal unanimously accepted. Slight editorial change required.

JR: we're making a distinction by content that's only going to be seen by the author vs content that will be seen by others

TB: has reservations about our definition of author. It may cause us problems down the line.

JR: would you like us to drop it entirely?

TB: what would be lost if we did?

<JR> ATAG 2.0 defines an "authoring tool" as any software, or collection of software components, that authors can use to create or modify Web content for use by other people.

<JR> ATAG 2.0 defines an "authoring tool" as any software, or collection of software components, that authors can use to create or modify Web content.

<JR> ACTION: JR to Put "by other people" on agenda for next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-86 - Put \"by other people\" on agenda for next meeting [on Jan Richards - due 2009-02-02].

checking (accessibility)

JR: [] means where we have "adapted" from somewhere else

Glossary Proposal - content being edited

<JR> ACTION: JS to Insert: [harmonized with EARL 1.0] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-87 - Insert: [harmonized with EARL 1.0] [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

content being edited

<JR> JT: Should we drop term "Content being edited"

<JR> JR: +1

AR: +1

<JR> ACTION: JS to Remove definition of term "Content being edited" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action08]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-88 - Remove definition of term \"Content being edited\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Glossary Proposal - content generation

<JR> ACTION: JS to Change "broad categories" to "types" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action09]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-89 - Change \"broad categories\" to \"types\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Glossary Proposal - content

JT: is the term we're defining "content (web)"

JR: WCAG say "content (web content)"
... would we consider WCAG 1.0 a good enough standard to be ATAG compliant against?

<JR> ACTION: JS to Use new defn of "content (Web)", not adding 2.0 to end of WCAG. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action10]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-90 - Use new defn of \"content (Web)\", not adding 2.0 to end of WCAG. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

i had an official response from Shadi r.e. WCAG 1 / 2 which i posted on our blog - http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/news/wcag-20-moves-to-proposed-recommendation/

content rendering

<JR> ACTION: JS to Make change to "content rendering" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action11]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-91 - Make change to \"content rendering\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

conversion

<JR> ACTION: JS to Make change to "conversion" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action12]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-92 - Make change to \"conversion\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

authoring practice

<JR> ACTION: JS to Make change to "authoring practice" incl bolding [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action13]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-93 - Make change to \"authoring practice\" incl bolding [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-02-02].

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: JR to Put "by other people" on agenda for next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to Put defintion of Authoring Tool back in Glossary, make a Scope and Applicability section out of list of tools and the 2 notes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JS insert JR's text for abbreviation (#2) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: JS insert JR's text for Proposal for Glossary Appendix Introduction (#1 in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20090114/results) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Change "broad categories" to "types" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Insert "authoring tool user interface (non-Web-based) Any parts of an authoring tool user interface that are not implemented as Web content and instead run directly on a platform that is not a user agent, such as Windows, MacOS, Java Virtual Machine, etc. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Insert: [harmonized with EARL 1.0] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Make change to "authoring practice" incl bolding [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action13]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Make change to "content rendering" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action11]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Make change to "conversion" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action12]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Remove definition of term "Content being edited" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Use new defn of "content (Web)", not adding 2.0 to end of WCAG. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to Use new wording of "authoring permission" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html#action05]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/01/26 22:01:01 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: AndrewR
Inferring ScribeNick: AndrewR
Default Present: jeanne, JR, andrewr, JuttaT, Tim_Boland, Sueann, Greg_Pisocky
Present: jeanne JR andrewr JuttaT Tim_Boland Sueann Greg_Pisocky
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JanMar/0026.html
Got date from IRC log name: 26 Jan 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/26-au-minutes.html
People with action items: jr js

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]