IRC log of tt on 2009-01-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:01:50 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tt
- 15:01:50 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/23-tt-irc
- 15:01:52 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:01:52 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tt
- 15:01:54 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be DFXP
- 15:01:55 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot, I see IA_(DFXP)10:00AM already started
- 15:01:55 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
- 15:01:55 [trackbot]
- Date: 23 January 2009
- 15:02:00 [Zakim]
- +Plh
- 15:02:32 [Zakim]
- + +0147383aaaa
- 15:03:12 [plh]
- zakim, ??p15 is Glenn
- 15:03:12 [Zakim]
- +Glenn; got it
- 15:03:18 [plh]
- zakim, aaaa is John
- 15:03:18 [Zakim]
- +John; got it
- 15:05:25 [Zakim]
- + +0154558aabb
- 15:05:43 [plh]
- zakim, aabb is Sean
- 15:05:43 [Zakim]
- +Sean; got it
- 15:06:02 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 15:06:29 [plh]
- zakim, ??p2 is David
- 15:06:29 [Zakim]
- +David; got it
- 15:06:50 [plh]
- Regrets: Andrew
- 15:10:17 [Zakim]
- + +04179827aacc
- 15:11:53 [plh]
- zakim, aacc is Franz
- 15:11:53 [Zakim]
- +Franz; got it
- 15:12:27 [plh]
- scribe: plh
- 15:12:37 [plh]
- Chair: Sean
- 15:12:40 [david]
- david has joined #tt
- 15:12:48 [plh]
- Sean: question 1:
- 15:12:50 [plh]
- ...
- 15:13:04 [plh]
- ... we have 2 yes, 2 no
- 15:13:27 [plh]
- ... the goal was to required the ttm: namespace elements to be nested
- 15:13:54 [plh]
- Glenn: I believe they should be allowed outside the metadata elements
- 15:14:19 [plh]
- Sean: the reason for this to come up: it's just easier if all the metadata is in one place
- 15:14:31 [plh]
- ... having it all over the place makes it more complex
- 15:15:06 [plh]
- Glenn: the rationale was to support farm metadata as well.
- 15:16:05 [plh]
- Sean: because the metadata element is called "metadata", I assumed that all metadata will go there
- 15:17:00 [plh]
- Glenn: part of the reasons for having the metadata element was to support transformation processor to group metadata
- 15:17:16 [plh]
- ... ie having some grouping mechanisms
- 15:17:31 [plh]
- ... if a transformation combines metadata from two sources into one source
- 15:17:51 [plh]
- ... it might group them by origin in the result document
- 15:18:18 [plh]
- Sean: it's not about having the metadata grouping element
- 15:18:32 [plh]
- ... if title is metadata, they should be in the metadata element
- 15:18:48 [plh]
- ... if not, then it should be moved out of the metadata namespace
- 15:19:30 [plh]
- Glenn: it creates work to make a change now and it doesn't seem a significant issue to change now
- 15:19:49 [plh]
- Sean: that's a cognitive issue. I'd expect to find all the metadata would be in the metadata element
- 15:20:15 [plh]
- ... how much work is it to move title out of the metadata namespace or within the metadata element
- 15:20:39 [plh]
- Glenn: probably not that complex. change in the schema. that's substantive change, but it wouldn't be that difficult
- 15:20:57 [plh]
- David: I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other
- 15:21:34 [plh]
- ... if we're going to put title in ttm, we identified it as metadata already, why moving it into metadata?
- 15:21:49 [plh]
- Sean: since no one feels strongly, let's leave as-is
- 15:22:26 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-3 to be closed without change
- 15:22:53 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-5
- 15:23:56 [plh]
- Sean: ISSUE-3 was about more than one metadata element, and ISSUE-5 is about direct children
- 15:24:43 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-4
- 15:25:15 [plh]
- Resolution: we should allow the ttm attributes on the region element
- 15:26:29 [plh]
- s/ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-5 to be closed if no objection from Geoff/
- 15:26:51 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-6
- 15:28:42 [plh]
- Sean: the idea here is that we define fixed set of roles and if we want to extend, we would need to add values
- 15:29:08 [plh]
- ... agent is fairly complicated structure and you can point to that
- 15:29:21 [plh]
- ... having a role element would allow the same
- 15:29:28 [plh]
- ... there is no user defined role in the spec
- 15:30:07 [plh]
- Glenn: there is an extension mechanism.
- 15:30:26 [plh]
- Resolution: close ISSUE-6 without changes
- 15:31:05 [plh]
- David: peharps we could simplify the actors as well...
- 15:31:32 [plh]
- Glenn: are you suggesting a ttm:actor attribute?
- 15:32:08 [plh]
- David: yes, ttm:agent is an IDREF that has to refer to the agent element
- 15:32:27 [plh]
- Sean: should we wait on this and revisit issue-6 later?
- 15:32:49 [plh]
- ... let's keep close and reopen it later if necessary
- 15:33:11 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-7
- 15:33:31 [plh]
- Sean: we inherited it from SMIL. that's the only abbrev form we have
- 15:33:53 [plh]
- Glenn: we have an appendix that describe where our vocabulary comes from
- 15:34:08 [plh]
- ... ttm:desc comes from svg:desc
- 15:34:16 [plh]
- Sean: why from svg?
- 15:34:39 [plh]
- Glenn: we took a couple from them: metadata, set, desc, title comes from SVG
- 15:35:06 [plh]
- ... for the attributes, we referenced SMIL for some of them
- 15:35:21 [plh]
- Sean: I prefer to have full word when we can
- 15:35:39 [plh]
- ... it would be cleaner to have a full word
- 15:35:51 [plh]
- David: don't have a strong feeling. it's easier if it's full word
- 15:36:06 [plh]
- ... in this case, it's in metadata namespace.
- 15:36:45 [plh]
- Glenn: SMIL, SMIL and XHTML are all consistent in using desc
- 15:36:58 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-7 is closed with no change
- 15:37:08 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-8
- 15:37:21 [plh]
- skipped (needs Geoff around)
- 15:37:33 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-10
- 15:37:44 [plh]
- skipped (needs Geoff around)
- 15:37:51 [plh]
- Glenn: who proposed it?
- 15:37:54 [plh]
- Sean: I did
- 15:38:36 [plh]
- Glenn: we made design choice not to allow linking to external media
- 15:39:18 [plh]
- Sean: we had a long discussion about that a while ago, fonts, images, audio, ... we decided we did not want that
- 15:39:29 [plh]
- s/Sean/Glenn/
- 15:39:48 [plh]
- Sean: I'm doing it in a private namespace right now, so not an issue
- 15:40:00 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-10 is postponed to v.next
- 15:40:11 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-11
- 15:40:54 [plh]
- Resolution: we'll make the change
- 15:41:41 [plh]
- ACTION: Glenn to fix inconsistency with regard to time container defaults
- 15:41:41 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-29 - Fix inconsistency with regard to time container defaults [on Glenn Adams - due 2009-01-30].
- 15:43:29 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-18
- 15:43:48 [plh]
- Glenn: I could add an editorial note to clarify the semantic from SMIL
- 15:44:15 [plh]
- ACTION: Glenn add an editorial note to clarify the semantic from SMIL for dur and end
- 15:44:15 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-30 - add an editorial note to clarify the semantic from SMIL for dur and end [on Glenn Adams - due 2009-01-30].
- 15:44:37 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-19
- 15:44:45 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-19 closed. no change.
- 15:45:11 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-20
- 15:45:27 [plh]
- David: that seems late to make a change now
- 15:46:18 [plh]
- Sean: we may reopne them if it's a major problem
- 15:46:35 [plh]
- ... happy to postpone to v.next
- 15:47:07 [plh]
- ACTION: Philippe to foward CEA communication to the list
- 15:47:07 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-31 - Foward CEA communication to the list [on Philippe Le Hégaret - due 2009-01-30].
- 15:47:50 [plh]
- Sean: check to make sure it's ok to make it public
- 15:48:24 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-26
- 15:49:54 [plh]
- Glenn: [...] it's specified in the definition of overflow in the spec
- 15:50:06 [plh]
- ... [citing the spec]
- 15:50:44 [plh]
- Sean: sounds reasonable. can we add a note on the scroll value to point to that text?
- 15:51:24 [plh]
- Glenn: the scroll value is under the definition of the overflow, so it's already there
- 15:51:36 [plh]
- Sean: we will remove that if we don't have dynamic flow?
- 15:51:39 [plh]
- Glenn: yes
- 15:51:51 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-26 is closed. no change.
- 15:52:20 [plh]
- Topic: ISSUE-27
- 15:52:36 [plh]
- Glenn: we have some inconsistency indeed with XSL...
- 15:52:59 [plh]
- ... looks like we tried to make it more consistent with naming instead of XSL
- 15:53:21 [plh]
- Sean: everybody said we should be consistent with XSL or we should document why not
- 15:53:32 [plh]
- Glenn: I'm happy to make it consistent with XSL
- 15:53:42 [plh]
- Resolution: ISSUE-27 to make it consistent with XSL
- 15:54:20 [plh]
- Topic: Next steps
- 15:54:33 [plh]
- Philippe: we look into creating a new questionnaire
- 15:56:28 [plh]
- Topic: Namespace style
- 15:58:58 [Zakim]
- -Glenn
- 16:06:22 [Zakim]
- -Sean
- 16:06:23 [Zakim]
- -Franz
- 16:06:25 [Zakim]
- -John
- 16:06:25 [Zakim]
- -David
- 16:06:52 [plh]
- Glenn: we never fixed the namespace in the spec
- 16:07:11 [Zakim]
- -Plh
- 16:07:13 [Zakim]
- IA_(DFXP)10:00AM has ended
- 16:07:14 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Plh, +0147383aaaa, Glenn, John, +0154558aabb, Sean, David, +04179827aacc, Franz
- 16:07:28 [plh]
- Philippe: other groups usually fix it at CR by respect for implementators, unless they make significant changes
- 16:07:45 [plh]
- Sean: we can be lenient for now in the test suite and fix it later
- 16:08:27 [plh]
- Philippe: ok. as long as we demonstrate interop at the end of CR. We could a short version for namespace btw, e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/dfxp
- 16:08:39 [plh]
- Sean: would very much like to switch to that indeed
- 16:09:01 [plh]
- Resolution: we'll use a short namespace (ie no year/month) by the end of CR
- 16:09:06 [plh]
- [adjourned]
- 16:09:11 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/23-tt-minutes.html plh
- 17:40:07 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tt