13:26:19 RRSAgent has joined #er 13:26:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-er-irc 13:26:21 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:26:21 Zakim has joined #er 13:26:23 Zakim, this will be 3794 13:26:23 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:26:24 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 13:26:24 Date: 21 January 2009 13:26:32 agenda? 13:26:49 agenda+ Pointers-in-RDF 13:26:56 agenda+ HTTP-in-RDF 13:27:03 agenda+ Next meetings 13:27:12 squillace has joined #er 13:27:24 zakim, call shadi-617 13:27:24 ok, shadi; the call is being made 13:27:25 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 13:27:26 +Shadi 13:29:11 +MikeS 13:31:05 JohannesK has joined #er 13:31:24 +ThomasT 13:31:34 zakim, thomast is me 13:31:34 +JohannesK; got it 13:33:10 regrets: CarlosV 13:34:21 scribe: MikeS 13:34:27 scribenick: squillace 13:34:28 Scribe: MikeS 13:34:47 zakim, take up agendum 2 13:34:47 agendum 2. "HTTP-in-RDF" taken up [from shadi] 13:35:17 SAZ: AWWSW subgroup of W3C TAG 13:35:56 ...Technical Architecture Group oversees many differing groups of w3 and how technologies fit together or can be assimilated 13:36:38 ...central distnction: syntactic model v. semantic model 13:36:46 carlosI has joined #er 13:37:20 +Carlos_Iglesias 13:37:32 ...tools exchanging information = syntax, meaning, inference, and description fo resources and their relations = semantics 13:38:22 ...how do we communicate conformance - to what degree is it syntactic v. semantic? 13:39:22 ...look at coments from group and interact on conformance 13:39:39 ..should happen prior to next draft 13:40:27 ...Http in RDF will be focal point for discussion since it is most likely to be used in other contexts 13:40:38 http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswHttpVocabularyInRdfComments 13:41:02 Topic: Section header 13:41:48 JK: they want specific property named contentType 13:43:20 ...we have two properties: one has literal value, one has resource but we do not ahve specific properties 13:44:23 ...fieldName is literal, headerName is resource-oriented 13:45:25 ...don't want to provide properties for each and every header defined (e.g. would not be just HTTP1.1) 13:46:09 SAZ: could we have header names/properties for more comon ones (e.g. contenttype) 13:47:11 JK: present reasons for our current approach to AWWSW and ask which headers should be properties (e.g. only ones defined in HTTP 1.1) 13:47:34 +1 13:50:39 Topic: body alternativves 13:51:25 JK: strictly speaking, object culd only be Base64Content 13:52:51 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20081216 13:53:29 SAZ: need to revisit 13:53:41 ...marked already as an issue 13:55:12 JK: we already ahve separate classes for varying levels of interpreatation in Content in RDF 13:55:19 ...how does this work in HTTP? 13:55:36 Topic: Term usage 13:56:27 SAZ: probably generic not AAWSW sense of the word 'representation' 13:57:16 ....all to look at webarch document cited in comment 13:57:56 Topic: MessageHeader 13:58:07 JK: already remove owl restrictions 13:58:10 Topic: Date 13:58:31 SAZ: suggestion is to subclass dc:date with our own for more specific purpsoe 13:59:28 ...do we want to have a specific meaning? 14:01:27 JK: Do we need it in Http in RDF at all? 14:02:51 SAZ: do we want to add a property that inherits from dc:date (e.g. timestamp)? 14:06:59 ....leave this bc it might ahve ripple effects (e.g. do we subclass dc:hasPart)? 14:07:16 Topic: MethodName v. Method 14:10:01 Topic: Header element 14:10:20 JK: may be confusing given the word 'element' in the ocntext of HTML/XML 14:10:37 ...no element in HTTP 14:12:34 SAZ: not sure aobut next steps except to explain 'element' 14:13:20 Topic: domains and ranges 14:14:14 JK: is it permisslbe to say that the range is an HTTP Heaer element and then use colection? 14:15:02 Tpoic: status codes 14:15:16 SAZ: ties in directly with EARL schema issue 14:15:34 ...every status code would be a class 14:15:43 http://www.w3.org/2008/http-statusCodes 14:16:30 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20081126#OutcomeValue 14:17:00 ...OutcomeValue (e.g. Pass) 14:21:57 ...should create a list of status codes we need, they belong to HTTP in RDF 14:26:11 ...JK pls draft some responses and update document accordingly 14:26:20 ...may also be items for group discussions 14:26:24 -Carlos_Iglesias 14:27:48 zakim, close agendum 2 14:27:48 agendum 2, HTTP-in-RDF, closed 14:27:49 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:27:51 1. Pointers-in-RDF [from shadi] 14:27:53 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:27:53 agendum 1. "Pointers-in-RDF" taken up [from shadi] 14:29:13 zakim, close agendum 3 14:29:14 agendum 3, Next meetings, closed 14:29:15 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 14:29:16 1. Pointers-in-RDF [from shadi] 14:29:19 zakim, take up agendum 3 14:29:19 agendum 3. "Next meetings" taken up [from shadi] 14:29:47 -JohannesK 14:29:57 -Shadi 14:29:58 -MikeS 14:29:59 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended 14:30:02 Attendees were Shadi, MikeS, JohannesK, Carlos_Iglesias 14:30:23 trackbot, end meeting 14:30:23 Zakim, list attendees 14:30:23 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 14:30:24 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:30:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-er-minutes.html trackbot 14:30:25 RRSAgent, bye 14:30:25 I see no action items