13:50:06 RRSAgent has joined #egov 13:50:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-egov-irc 13:50:24 chair: kevin, john 13:50:48 agenda+ Appoint a scribe 13:51:12 agenda+ agenda adjustments 13:51:27 agenda+ Debrief of recent Kevin/TimBL meeting 13:51:39 agenda+ CEN eGov-Share comments sent 13:51:48 agenda+ New Use Cases 13:52:04 agenda+ Confirmed: 2nd F2F @ AIA (12-13 March 2009) 13:52:16 agenda? 13:52:42 zakim, move agendum 6 to 4 13:52:42 I don't understand 'move agendum 6 to 4', josema 13:54:46 zakim, order is 1,2,3,6,4,5 13:54:46 sorry, josema, I do not recognize a party named 'order' 13:55:01 agenda order is 1,2,3,6,4,5 13:55:04 agenda? 13:55:29 agenda+ Editor's draft 13:55:39 agenda+ Deadlines and completeness 13:55:49 agenda+ Open actions 13:55:58 agenda+ Next Meeting 13:56:01 agenda? 13:56:37 trackbot, start telcon 13:56:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:56:41 Zakim, this will be EGOV 13:56:41 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_EGOV()9:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:56:42 Meeting: eGovernment Interest Group Teleconference 13:56:42 Date: 21 January 2009 13:56:56 chair: kevin, john 13:57:35 kevin has joined #egov 13:57:52 I am here on IRC and about to jump on the conference line. 13:58:07 hi kevin :) 14:00:23 T&S_EGOV()9:00AM has now started 14:00:24 +Josema 14:00:46 zakim, who's here? 14:00:46 On the phone I see Josema 14:00:47 On IRC I see kevin, RRSAgent, Zakim, josema, trackbot 14:02:40 + +1.509.464.aaaa 14:03:15 zakim, aaaa is rachel 14:03:16 +rachel; got it 14:03:27 Rachel has joined #egov 14:03:42 zakim, who's here? 14:03:42 On the phone I see Josema, rachel 14:03:44 On IRC I see Rachel, kevin, RRSAgent, Zakim, josema, trackbot 14:03:58 zakim, rachel is Rachel 14:03:58 +Rachel; got it 14:04:25 john has joined #eGov 14:05:05 + +1.202.207.aabb 14:05:27 +john 14:05:38 + +1.301.455.aacc 14:05:40 zakim, aabb is kevin 14:05:40 +kevin; got it 14:05:49 zakim, aacc is owen 14:05:49 +owen; got it 14:06:33 -Josema 14:07:07 +berrueta 14:07:52 agenda? 14:10:04 agenda? 14:10:07 Owen has joined #egov 14:10:27 I can scribe if Kevin wants to chair? 14:10:50 scribe: josema 14:11:01 move to next agendum 14:11:01 agendum 1. "Appoint a scribe" taken up [from josema] 14:11:19 me takes on scribing 14:11:25 move to next agendum 14:11:25 agendum 1 was just opened, josema 14:11:29 close this agendum 14:11:33 move to next agendum 14:11:33 agendum 2. "agenda adjustments" taken up [from josema] 14:11:40 close this agendum 14:11:44 move to next agendum 14:11:44 agendum 3. "Debrief of recent Kevin/TimBL meeting" taken up [from josema] 14:12:03 kevin: met with TimBL at MIT, talked about challenges 14:12:32 ... eGov activity being long term, challenges of our first year 14:12:54 ... talked about optimism around Obama 14:13:18 ... issues paper important for people like new administration in the US 14:13:33 ... to understand importance of open standards, etc. 14:13:59 ... Obama also talking about US being recognized as the lead in initiatives 14:14:09 ... we need to review charter by May 14:14:18 ... setup agenda for next 1-2 years 14:14:39 ... overall a good conversation 14:14:59 ... Tim to give keynote at @@ event, gave him some ideas 14:15:23 ... also to Karen Myers, speech to focus on openness and transparency 14:15:54 ... start on capitalizing on opportunities with new US Admin. 14:16:19 ... also had lunch with KM, talked about our focus on high level issues 14:16:30 ... the need of coordination with other Groups at W3C 14:17:03 ... the policy vs. technology differences 14:17:32 ... the upcoming AC Meeting, much strategic discussion expected 14:18:19 ... development vs. deployment, need to get a better and bigger picture 14:18:49 ... talked to TimBL about meeting at TWB back in November 2008 14:19:10 ... there was discussion about technological issues in developing countries 14:19:23 ... financial data, government services 14:19:53 ... Tim thinks it was a great brainstorming session, but not many conclusions yet 14:20:40 ... TWB championing eGov architecture in dev. countries?? 14:21:15 ... need to work with legacy systems, but also long-term planning and new infrastructure in place 14:21:51 agenda? 14:25:06 s/@@/TED 14:25:39 [connection between open government and open standards] 14:26:27 john: interesting how we can make SW work for Gov 14:26:43 ... there are some practical things that are easy to do and can be done today 14:26:58 ... that would be the building blocks for future apps 14:27:37 owen: any specific actions came out of the meeting? 14:28:49 kevin: 1)publish our document, maybe in pieces??, 2)re-charter, 3)asked Tim, others to support our work, 4)funding, emphasized the importance of our work 14:29:17 ... 5)need to outreach in conferences 14:29:47 owen: good, I will think about it and things we could do to support those 14:29:50 agenda? 14:30:03 move to next agendum 14:30:08 agendum 6. "Confirmed: 2nd F2F @ AIA (12-13 March 2009)" taken up [from josema] 14:30:29 kevin: confirmed meeting at AIA, board room can host up to 65?? 14:30:49 ... calls are good, but some F2F could also help us focus better 14:31:00 ... on where we are, what we should do, how to move forward 14:31:17 ... expect it will help energize people 14:31:53 ... also taking advantage of new US Admin. 14:32:16 rachel: I'm disappointed because of not getting more people on calls 14:32:36 ... understand all very busy, but this is an important and huge topic 14:33:02 kevin: agree 14:34:13 agenda? 14:34:51 owen: I presume people are not in calls because they have more urgent and important things to do 14:35:11 ... we should try to reflect their issues they are trying to solve in the paper??? 14:36:35 q+ 14:36:37 ... I think it's because people is busy, not because they are not interested 14:36:40 q? 14:37:10 zakim, take up agendum 7 14:37:10 agendum 7. "Editor's draft" taken up [from josema] 14:37:25 [kevin on document authorship] 14:39:42 ack john 14:40:01 [jose on authorship, message is coming, sorry for the dealy] 14:40:20 john: besides draft, how can we encourage people to attend? 14:40:47 ... we organized a barcamp recently and 150+ people showed up 14:41:08 ... seats were gone in just 24 hours?? 14:42:04 ocr has joined #egov 14:44:43 + +34.98.439.aadd 14:44:54 zakim, aaadd is oscar 14:44:54 sorry, josema, I do not recognize a party named 'aaadd' 14:45:00 zakim, aadd is oscar 14:45:00 +oscar; got it 14:45:05 hi all 14:45:16 [jose on lowering barriers as much as possible] 14:45:18 sorry for being late - coming from the never ending meeting :( 14:45:52 kevin: yes, room holds 65 14:46:10 ... if we could have a very good speaker, that could also help 14:46:15 owen: any idea on who? 14:46:37 kevin: not yet, maybe someone from the Obama administration 14:46:59 ... tried to get one from the campaign to speak at AIA but everybody too busy right now 14:47:32 owen: obviously the head of technology of his transition Team, but probably a long shot 14:47:40 kevin: I agree 14:47:51 rachel: let me think about it 14:47:59 owen: I'll give it some thought, too 14:48:27 kevin: reaching out to FIRM, so maybe they would like to participate, too 14:48:38 ... thanks Owen for putting us in touch, btw 14:48:44 owen: ok 14:49:14 john: I don't think it would be difficult to get a bunch of people 14:49:31 ... many people interested in discussing pressing issues 14:50:13 ... if we can have an easy for people to figure out how to participate 14:50:22 ... we may use some tools 14:50:47 ... will use my Twitter 14:51:03 [[me did this so far: 14:51:05 http://www.w3.org/blog/egov/2009/01/17/egovig_f2f_2 14:51:05 http://www.epractice.eu/document/5372 14:51:05 http://www.govloop.com/events/w3c-egovernment-interest-group 14:51:05 http://events.linkedin.com/pub/29772 14:51:06 ]] 14:52:02 kevin: we may have a PR piece that we could circulate to those 14:52:07 like always Jose, one step ahead 14:55:12 jose: what else to do besides that? 14:55:37 kevin: we are doing our best effort, let's outreach to our networks 14:56:14 jose: very much believe we need to get the draft out, and things will change for good 14:56:17 kevin: agree 14:56:30 s/good/better 14:56:51 Have tweeted: http://twitter.com/johnlsheridan/status/1136357938 14:57:04 owen: in my experience, this comes down to 2-3 committed individuals to do the drating 14:57:08 s/drating/drafting 14:57:12 agenda? 14:57:24 zakim, close agendum 6 14:57:24 agendum 6, Confirmed: 2nd F2F @ AIA (12-13 March 2009), closed 14:57:25 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:57:26 4. CEN eGov-Share comments sent [from josema] 14:57:51 http://www.w3.org/2009/01/W3C-CEN-eGov-Share-comments 14:59:43 agenda? 15:00:53 zakim, take up next agendum 15:00:53 agendum 4. "CEN eGov-Share comments sent" taken up [from josema] 15:01:01 zakim, close this agendum 15:01:01 agendum 4 closed 15:01:02 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:01:03 5. New Use Cases [from josema] 15:01:05 zakim, take up next agendum 15:01:05 agendum 5. "New Use Cases" taken up [from josema] 15:01:18 [[ http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_10_-_Persistent_URIs 15:01:19 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_11_-_Identification_Authentication 15:01:19 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_12_-_Risk_Management_for_Social_Media 15:01:19 ]] 15:04:09 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/UseCases/ 15:10:26 [jose on need for stable location] 15:11:06 [kevin, john agree] 15:11:31 [jose on difference between use cases and case studies] 15:12:37 many thanks to Martin Alvarez (W3C.es) for helping me put together the stuff! 15:12:45 agenda? 15:13:16 [john on government changes and persistence] 15:13:38 john: whitehouse.gov as example, fully changed yesterday 15:14:53 owen: I haven't realized, but I was trying to find a OMB circular that is not available 15:15:08 rachel: maybe at a different address than where it was last night 15:15:29 agenda? 15:17:22 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/actions/open 15:18:10 ACTION rachel to provide use case on social media 15:18:10 Created ACTION-42 - Provide use case on social media [on Rachel Flagg - due 2009-01-28]. 15:18:24 ACTION rachel to provide use case on "plain language" 15:18:25 Created ACTION-43 - Provide use case on \"plain language\" [on Rachel Flagg - due 2009-01-28]. 15:19:09 agenda? 15:19:30 zakim, take up next agendum 15:19:30 agendum 8. "Deadlines and completeness" taken up [from josema] 15:19:50 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/ActivityPlan 15:23:15 [jose on deadlines] 15:23:33 jose: propose 28 February as hard deadline 15:25:25 kevin: ok 15:25:27 john: ok 15:25:59 oscar: also interested in interop 15:26:09 jose: I'm putting john, oscar there 15:26:11 agenda? 15:26:31 take up next agendum 15:26:33 http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/actions/open 15:27:43 agenda? 15:28:06 next meeting: 4 Feb 15:28:50 -kevin 15:28:52 -owen 15:28:53 -Rachel 15:28:55 -josema 15:28:55 -john 15:29:00 [ADJOURNED] 15:31:06 zakim, list attendees 15:31:06 As of this point the attendees have been Josema, +1.509.464.aaaa, Rachel, +1.202.207.aabb, john, +1.301.455.aacc, kevin, owen, +34.98.439.aadd, oscar 15:31:12 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:31:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-egov-minutes.html josema 15:31:16 -oscar 15:31:18 T&S_EGOV()9:00AM has ended 15:31:19 Attendees were Josema, +1.509.464.aaaa, Rachel, +1.202.207.aabb, john, +1.301.455.aacc, kevin, owen, +34.98.439.aadd, oscar 15:42:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:42:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-egov-minutes.html josema 16:05:52 agenda? 16:06:07 next agendum 16:06:17 zakim, next agendum 16:06:23 zakim, take up next agendum 16:06:24 agendum 10 was just opened, josema 16:06:30 agendum 10 was just opened, josema 16:06:39 zakim, close agendum 16:06:42 I don't understand 'close agendum', josema 16:06:47 zakim, close this agendum 16:06:47 agendum 10 closed 16:06:48 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 16:06:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:06:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/21-egov-minutes.html josema 16:25:00 zakim, bye 16:25:00 Zakim has left #egov 16:25:04 rrsagent, bye 16:25:04 I see no action items