15:55:25 RRSAgent has joined #swd 15:55:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc 15:55:37 rrsagent, bookmark 15:55:37 See http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T15-55-37 15:55:41 zakim, this will be swd 15:55:41 ok, TomB; I see SW_SWD()11:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 15:55:55 genda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0041.html 15:56:08 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0041.html 15:56:19 Meeting: SWD 15:56:21 Chair: Tom 15:56:27 Regrets: Sean, Daniel 15:56:38 rrsagent, please make record public 15:56:46 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html 15:56:53 Scribe: Diego 15:59:29 SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started 15:59:36 +??P15 15:59:47 zakim, ??p15 is me 15:59:47 +TomB; got it 16:01:44 +Ralph 16:03:02 berrueta has joined #swd 16:03:14 Antoine has joined #swd 16:03:32 aliman has joined #swd 16:03:52 +martin_spain 16:04:00 zakim, martin_spain is me 16:04:00 +berrueta; got it 16:04:31 Scribenick: berrueta 16:04:32 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0041.html 16:04:34 +Antoine_Isaac 16:05:14 +??P44 16:05:33 zakim, ?p44 is aliman 16:05:33 sorry, TomB, I do not recognize a party named '?p44' 16:05:43 zakim, ??p44 is aliman 16:05:43 +aliman; got it 16:06:29 -aliman 16:07:04 JonP has joined #swd 16:07:07 +??P2 16:07:17 zakim, ??p2 is aliman 16:07:17 +aliman; got it 16:07:38 berrueta_ has joined #swd 16:07:43 +Ben_Adida 16:07:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html Ralph 16:08:19 +Jon_Phipps 16:08:35 topic: Admin 16:08:44 PROPOSED to accept minutes of the last telecon 16:08:52 RESOLVED to accept minutes of the Jan 06 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html 16:09:09 zakim, Jon_Phipps is me 16:09:09 +JonP; got it 16:09:15 TomB: our charter has been extended to end of apr 16:09:27 topic: RDFa 16:09:44 ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] 16:10:15 BenA: we're in the middle of a discussion with the XHTML WG re use cases 16:10:17 --continues 16:11:00 Guus has joined #swd 16:11:01 BenA: working now to provide guidance about adding rdfa in xhtml 16:11:10 TomB: any isssues? 16:11:31 [i will not be able to join sorry] 16:11:38 [ok] 16:11:48 BenA: introduction of a new attribute to declare namespaces in html (not xmlns) 16:12:05 ... @prefix 16:13:13 ... another issue, ability to import profiles specially targeted to common patterns (i.e., vocabularies) 16:13:26 ... for instance, social networks 16:13:27 s/in xhtml/in HTML/ 16:14:44 ... focus on browser features vs. data extracted from RDFa-documents 16:15:10 TomB: any pointers to the discussion? 16:15:21 BenA: in the XHTML WG mailing list 16:15:51 topic: Recipes 16:16:02 ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15] 16:16:04 --continues 16:16:09 ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] 16:16:11 --continues 16:16:21 topic: RDFa metadata note 16:16:28 ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03] 16:16:29 --continues 16:16:33 topic: AOB 16:16:40 ACTION: Guus to look at OWL documents for review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10] 16:16:42 --continues 16:16:47 topic: SKOS 16:17:00 ACTION: Ralph send CR transition request for SKOS [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:17:01 --done 16:17:05 CR transition request -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0017.html 16:17:14 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JanMar/0000.html "Transition Request: SKOS to Candidate Recommendation" [Ralph 2009-01-07] 16:17:34 ** SKOS primer 16:17:40 ACTION: Antoine to prepare revised draft of SKOS Primer ready for decision to publish as WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action04] 16:17:41 --done 16:17:45 Revised draft of SKOS Primer -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0042.html 16:18:01 TomB: propose we take a decision to publish as WD 16:18:12 Ralph: I'm ok to proceed 16:18:32 TomB: I'm the main reviewer, I'm ok with publishing 16:18:55 ... some issues may need futher discussion, maybe later in this telecon, they are non-blocking 16:18:55 edsu has joined #swd 16:19:25 PROPOSED to accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0042.html as WD 16:19:29 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SKOSPrimer-090113.html 16:19:51 PROPOSED to publish http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SKOSPrimer-090113.html as WD 16:20:08 +[LC] 16:20:14 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090113.html "Editor's Draft 13 January 2009" 16:20:26 zakim, LC is EdSu 16:20:26 +EdSu; got it 16:20:31 PROPOSED to publish http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090113.html as WD 16:21:26 Antoine: both versions are the same 16:22:00 ... http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090113.html is the same as the wiki attachment 16:22:31 TomB: any discussion? 16:22:41 +1 to publish 16:23:05 RESOLVED to publish http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090113.html as WD 16:23:15 nice work! 16:23:31 TomB: thanks Ed and Antoine 16:24:07 ** SKOS Impl report 16:24:19 ACTION: Guus to report on usage of SKOS in vocabularies at VU for SKOS implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09] 16:24:22 --continues 16:24:28 ACTION: Sean to report on SKOSED for SKOS implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10] 16:24:30 --continues 16:25:13 TomB: Ralph: what's the status of our CR request? 16:25:32 Ralph: send, probably reply by this week 16:25:47 TomB: when our CR is published, we can make a call for impl 16:25:56 Ralph: it's part of the CR announcement 16:26:37 TomB: call for impl should include updated pointer to Primer 16:26:54 Ralph: I'll make sure they cross-reference each one 16:27:37 Ralph: do we have a draft of the impl report in any form? 16:27:42 TomB: none I'm aware of 16:28:09 Ralph: I would like to have a URI 16:28:17 ... but if we don't have one, that's ok 16:28:37 s/a URI/have content for the URI I put in the draft Status 16:28:48 TomB: re Impl Report, I would like to talk about LCSH 16:29:23 I wrote "n implementation report will be available at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/implementation-report " and that URI is currently 404 16:29:42 TomB: what the situation is about LCSH in SKOS? 16:29:44 (which is OK, until we actually publish :) 16:29:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html Ralph 16:30:22 s/"n/"An 16:30:40 s/have have/have 16:30:59 edsu: they want to have it running for an upcoming conference 16:32:31 I've read all the comments at http://lcsh.info -- all very constructive I thought 16:36:58 q+ 16:38:00 ack aliman 16:40:02 ack Ralph 16:40:22 aliman: we have more than enough vocabs 16:44:00 Ralph: we have six weeks to deliver the impl report, lcsh.info may be included as an experiment if it's online at the time 16:46:54 Ralph: http://lcsh.info/comments1.html is now an important piece of our history :) so if and when the experimental data reappears at lcsh.info, I hope http://lcsh.info/comments1.html will also remain 'cool' :) 16:47:09 Ralph++ 16:47:20 Antoine: we can mention LCSH in the Impl Report even if not online at that time 16:47:38 [I wish I hadn't been off the 'net during that period to add my comments.] 16:48:52 i/PROPOSED to accept minutes /scribenick: berrueta_ 16:48:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html Ralph 16:50:56 TomB: i would be nice to know who to contact in LCSH regarding statements about skos usage 16:51:49 Barbara Tillett is your best bet 16:53:17 TomB: re: discussion about RDF struct values, I don't see this as a blocker 16:53:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0039.html 16:54:48 TomB: section on the primer about mapping/standard/ properties, three paragraphs, need more discussion 16:55:14 Antoine: I could buy your story 16:56:15 i/TomB: re: discussion/Topic: mapping properties 16:56:17 JonP: the mappings aren't owned by either schema, but by the creator of the mapping 16:56:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html Ralph 16:57:42 TomB: Alistair suggested to drop the paragraph, I rather think to replace it 16:58:36 ... the challenge is to articulate what the distinction is. Not sure if the current text does that 16:59:05 Tom: I think we can better articulate the differentce between mapping properties and standard semantic properties 16:59:13 s/entce/ence 16:59:47 SKOS Reference: The mapping properties skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch and skos:relatedMatch are provided as a convenience, for situations where the provenance of data is known, and it is useful to be able to tell "at a glance" the difference between internal links within a concept scheme and mapping links between concept schemes. 16:59:51 JonP: better replaced than dropped 16:59:59 q+ 17:00:47 ack aliman 17:01:10 TomB: the question is who feels in the position to make assortments about standard properties as opposite to mapping relationships 17:01:24 aliman: I rather say as little as possible 17:01:26 [perhaps we can note that we recognize a need for standard ways to communicate provenance in the Semantic Web and when we have such mechanisms, this question of what one thesaurus provider says versus what others say about the thesaurus will become more explicit] 17:01:52 s/this question/the answer to this question 17:01:58 ... there is enough in the examples in the Primer 17:02:26 ack Ralph 17:02:34 q+ 17:02:45 aliman: i think it's difficult to say more than the quotation from the SKOS Reference 17:03:55 Ralph: it's outside scope of SKOS to differenciate triples with regard to their source 17:03:59 +1 on what ralph says, hence SKOS Reference says: However, using the SKOS mapping properties is no substitute for the careful management of RDF graphs or the use of provenance mechanisms. 17:04:01 [The argument could run as follows: Ideally, we should be able 17:04:18 Ralph++ # well said 17:05:18 TomB: actually the text I propose says that 17:05:25 +1 17:05:30 Ralph: we're both thinking in the same line 17:05:55 aliman: we don't have best practices to represent provenance. This may be a convention you may follow 17:06:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0039.html 17:06:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0039.html 17:06:20 -Ben_Adida 17:06:44 TomB: if we don't say anything about the distinction, people will wonder what the distinction is 17:07:21 [ah, I see the difference Alistair points out between my thoughts and Tom's text. I'll have to think about this more. Thanks, Alistair.] 17:07:34 Antoine: I would be happy if we say sthg about mapping relations in the Primer 17:08:16 [it's still out of scope for SKOS to say anything about provenance :) ] 17:08:20 TomB: propose we move the discussion to the list 17:08:38 TomB: next meeting? 17:08:53 thanks everyone for the useful discussion of loc.gov/lcsh/skos issues 17:09:02 ... I propose we meet next week even if a short call 17:09:22 [adjourned] 17:09:38 -aliman 17:09:53 -berrueta 17:10:18 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item04 17:11:54 -Ralph 17:12:08 -JonP 17:12:15 -Antoine_Isaac 17:12:16 -EdSu 17:12:17 -TomB 17:12:17 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 17:12:18 Attendees were TomB, Ralph, berrueta, Antoine_Isaac, aliman, Ben_Adida, JonP, EdSu 17:12:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html Ralph 17:12:33 zakim, bye 17:12:33 Zakim has left #swd 17:13:11 rrsagent, bye 17:13:11 I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-actions.rdf : 17:13:11 ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] [1] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-09-44 17:13:11 ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15] [2] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-16-02 17:13:11 ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [3] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-16-09 17:13:11 ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03] [4] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-16-28 17:13:11 ACTION: Guus to look at OWL documents for review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10] [5] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-16-40 17:13:11 ACTION: Ralph send CR transition request for SKOS [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action01] [6] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-17-00 17:13:11 ACTION: Antoine to prepare revised draft of SKOS Primer ready for decision to publish as WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action04] [7] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-17-40 17:13:11 ACTION: Guus to report on usage of SKOS in vocabularies at VU for SKOS implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09] [8] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-24-19 17:13:11 ACTION: Sean to report on SKOSED for SKOS implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10] [9] 17:13:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-irc#T16-24-28