15:55:18 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
15:55:18 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc
15:55:24 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #rdfa
15:55:31 <msporny> zakim, this will be rdfa
15:55:31 <Zakim> ok, msporny; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
15:55:40 <msporny> Scribe: Manu_Sporny
15:55:50 <msporny> ScribeNick: msporny
15:56:02 <msporny> Meeting: RDF in XHTML 1.0 Task Force
15:56:10 <msporny> Chair: Ben_Adida
15:56:44 <msporny> rrsagent, make log public
15:56:50 <msporny> rrsagent, draft minutes
15:56:50 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
15:56:51 <mhausenblas> hey people, Happy New Year everybody! will be with you in ca. 5min
15:57:07 <msporny> Happy new Year Michael! :)
15:58:38 <ShaneM> ShaneM has joined #rdfa
15:59:43 <Zakim> SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
15:59:51 <Zakim> +McCarron
15:59:56 <Zakim> +Ralph
16:00:05 <ShaneM> zakim, mccarron is ShaneM
16:00:08 <Zakim> +ShaneM; got it
16:02:15 <markbirbeck> previous call running late...
16:02:41 <Zakim> +??P58
16:02:46 <msporny> zakim, I am ??P58
16:02:46 <Zakim> +msporny; got it
16:03:05 <Zakim> +??P62
16:03:22 <Ralph> zakim, ??p62 is Michael
16:03:22 <Zakim> +Michael; got it
16:03:35 <Ralph> zakim, Michael is DrMichael
16:03:35 <Zakim> +DrMichael; got it
16:04:14 <msporny> Present: Ralph_Swick, Dr_Michael_Hausenblas, Manu_Sporny, Shane_McCarron, Ben_Adida
16:04:21 <msporny> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:04:21 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
16:05:21 <msporny> Topic: Action Items
16:05:53 <benadida> benadida has joined #rdfa
16:06:00 <Zakim> +Ben_Adida
16:06:11 <Ralph> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0022.html
16:06:13 <Ralph> Chair: Ben
16:06:14 <msporny> Present+ Ben_Adida
16:06:35 <mhausenblas> Previous:  2008-12-18 http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-rdfa-irc
16:06:49 <benadida> zakim, who is on the phone
16:06:49 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the phone', benadida
16:06:55 <benadida> zakim, who is on the call?
16:06:55 <Zakim> On the phone I see ShaneM, Ralph, msporny, DrMichael, Ben_Adida
16:06:55 <Ralph> s/-irc/-minutes
16:07:32 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
16:08:53 <markbirbeck> zakim, code?
16:08:54 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
16:09:52 <ShaneM> we do not use that namespac
16:09:55 <Zakim> + +0208761aaaa
16:10:02 <markbirbeck> zakim, i am aaaa
16:10:02 <Zakim> +markbirbeck; got it
16:10:42 <msporny> Topic: RDFa NS URL
16:10:48 <ShaneM> it is pointed to from the xhtml namespace document
16:10:55 <msporny> Ralph: It is up there, somewhere - the XHTML namespace document points to it.
16:11:07 <msporny> Ralph: Where is http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa/ used?
16:11:19 <msporny> ShaneM: It shouldn't be circulating, nothing should point to it.
16:12:47 <ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/
16:13:25 <benadida> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/Overview.xhtml
16:13:29 <benadida> (2 days younger)
16:13:40 <benadida> http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt
16:13:58 <msporny> ShaneM: Ralph/Steven or I will fix this.
16:14:27 <msporny> ShaneM: The contents of both those documents should be exactly the same.
16:14:29 <ShaneM> ACTION: fix the .htaccess for the XHTML namespace
16:14:29 <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
16:14:42 <msporny> Topic: Action Items
16:15:03 <Ralph> trackbot, bye
16:15:03 <trackbot> trackbot has left #rdfa
16:17:02 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
16:18:47 <benadida> action items --> http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary
16:19:25 <msporny> ACTION: Mark to review reasoning on setting explicit about="" on HEAD and BODY [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-rdfa-irc] 
16:19:37 <msporny> -- continues
16:20:04 <msporny> ACTION: Ben to add public-rdfa examples to wiki and think of slightly improved top-level organization [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] 
16:20:07 <msporny> -- continues
16:20:15 <msporny> ACTION: Ben to put up information on "how to write RDFa" with screencast possibly and instructions on bookmarklet. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] 
16:20:25 <msporny> -- continues
16:20:38 <msporny> ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] 
16:20:40 <msporny> -- continues
16:20:48 <msporny> ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action04] 
16:20:58 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:04 <msporny> ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] 
16:21:06 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:13 <msporny> ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] 
16:21:16 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:22 <msporny> ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] 
16:21:25 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:31 <msporny> ACTION: Mark to send Ben ubiquity related wizard stuff [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] 
16:21:33 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:42 <msporny> ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action13] 
16:21:45 <msporny> -- continues
16:21:51 <msporny> ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action14] 
16:22:02 <mhausenblas> http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Microformats_in_RDF
16:25:58 <Ralph> Manu: 2 parts
16:26:20 <Ralph> ... part 2 is "If I've already setup my page to use hCard, how do I switch to RDFa?"
16:26:24 <mhausenblas> Michael: split it into two parts (how and differences)
16:27:54 <msporny> -- continues
16:28:14 <msporny> Manu: Perhaps we need something that shows general differences between uF and RDFa, and then gives specific examples.
16:28:29 <msporny> ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action15] 
16:28:31 <msporny> -- continues
16:28:34 <msporny> Topic: Test Cases
16:28:39 <benadida> scribenick: benadida
16:28:54 <msporny> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0016.html
16:29:38 <benadida> Manu: the issue tested here is with suffix-less CURIEs, e.g. "example:"
16:29:55 <Ralph> s/.html/.html Test Case #121: "[prefix:]" CURIE format is valid
16:30:02 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
16:30:20 <benadida> ... CURIE still expands, empty-string as suffix.
16:30:37 <Ralph> +1
16:30:38 <mhausenblas> +1
16:30:44 <ShaneM> +1
16:31:06 <benadida> RESOLVED: test case 121 suffix-less CURIE approved
16:31:15 <msporny> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0017.html
16:31:25 <Ralph> s/.html/.html Test Case #122: "[:]" CURIE format is valid
16:33:12 <mhausenblas> +1
16:33:13 <Ralph> +1
16:33:16 <benadida> +1
16:33:16 <ShaneM> +1
16:33:23 <markbirbeck> +1
16:33:27 <msporny> +1
16:33:30 <benadida> RESOLVED: test case 122 prefix and suffix-less CURIE [:]
16:33:40 <benadida> RESOLVED: test case 122 prefix and suffix-less CURIE [:] approved
16:33:43 <msporny> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0018.html
16:33:53 <Ralph> s/.html/.html Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE
16:34:13 <mhausenblas> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0026.html
16:34:42 <msporny> about="[foo]"
16:34:48 <Ralph> Manu: the current consensus is that the subject is http://example.org/
16:34:49 <msporny> about="[]"
16:35:09 <Ralph> Manu: "[foo]" is an invalid CURIE, therefore so should be the empty string
16:35:28 <Ralph> ... as neither is in the reserved (XHTML) list
16:35:36 <msporny> # the mapping to use when there is no prefix is not defined, which effectively prohibits the use of CURIEs that do not contain a colon;
16:35:48 <Ralph> scribenick: Ralph
16:36:16 <Ralph> Ben: did we define CURIES to require a prefix in RDFa?
16:36:17 <Ralph> Mark: yes
16:36:32 <Ralph> ... wasn't my preference, but it was a long discussion
16:36:49 <Ralph> Ben: considering consistency w.r.t. reserved words
16:37:05 <Ralph> ... this is the first instance where an invalid value actually changes the structure
16:37:19 <Ralph> Mark: and Ivan pointed out the same thing occurs with @about="[foo]"
16:37:33 <Ralph> Shane: right; @about="[foo]" should not change the subject
16:37:46 <Ralph> Ben: but the presence of @rel alters the graph structure even if the CURIE is not valid
16:37:58 <Ralph> ... however in this case it's acting as if @about was not present
16:38:33 <Ralph> ... however, since @about just changes the subject and doesn't by itself generates triples, maybe this is OK
16:38:59 <Ralph> Mark: it's clear that this is the current spec.  We could discuss whether this is the most desireable choice.
16:39:27 <Ralph> Ben: so if it's not a valid CURIE value, the behavior is as if @about were not there
16:39:50 <Ralph> Mark: the alternative discussed was to assume the invalid CURIE was in the local document namespace
16:39:56 <Ralph> ... and we liked that less
16:40:13 <Ralph> Ben: the discussion is about the subject; some triple has to be generated, and the spec is clear
16:40:29 <Ralph> Mark: however, as you note @rel="[foo]" does do some work
16:40:58 <Ralph> Ben: rephrasing, what is the alternative when an invalid CURIE is found?
16:41:05 <Ralph> ... it would seem wrong to drop the triple entirely
16:41:26 <Ralph> ... whereas it's more reasonable to drop the triple in @rel="[foo]" 
16:41:42 <Ralph> ... so I don't see a better alternative for @about="[foo]" without major changes to CURIE
16:42:14 <Ralph> ... I'm satisfied with this conclusion
16:42:28 <Ralph> Mark: the test case seems to be unnecessarily nested
16:42:38 <Ralph> Manu: yeah, probably; it went through several iterations
16:42:47 <Ralph> Mark: the middle DIV could probably be dropped
16:43:04 <Ralph> ... you only need the first one
16:43:35 <Ralph> Manu: yeah, it appears the  <div about="http://example.org/"> could be dropped
16:43:48 <Ralph> ... the correct SPARQL should be ...
16:44:26 <Ralph> Shane: do you agree, Mark, that the same rules apply to @resource, @href, @src?
16:44:33 <Ralph> Ben: only @resource uses SafeCURIE
16:44:48 <msporny> Here's the updated case:
16:44:52 <msporny> ---------------------Test Case 123 XHTML--------------------------
16:44:52 <msporny> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
16:44:52 <msporny> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
16:44:52 <msporny>                       "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
16:44:52 <msporny> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
16:44:53 <msporny>       xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
16:44:55 <msporny>    <head>
16:44:56 <msporny>       <title>Test Case 0123</title>
16:44:59 <msporny>    </head>
16:45:01 <msporny>    <body>
16:45:02 <msporny>       <p about="http://example.org/">
16:45:05 <msporny>          <span about="[]" property="dc:title">Test Case 0123</span>
16:45:06 <msporny>          checks to make sure RDFa processors resolve the empty
16:45:09 <msporny>          CURIE correctly.
16:45:11 <msporny>          <div>
16:45:13 <msporny>             <div resource="[]">
16:45:15 <msporny>                <span property="dc:contributor">Shane McCarron</span>
16:45:16 <msporny>                contributed to this test.
16:45:19 <msporny>             </div>
16:45:20 <msporny>          </div>
16:45:22 <msporny>       </p>
16:45:24 <msporny>    </body>
16:45:27 <msporny> </html>
16:45:29 <msporny> -----------------------------------------------------------------
16:45:31 <msporny> ---------------------Test Case 123 SPARQL -----------------------
16:45:33 <msporny> ASK WHERE {
16:45:34 <msporny> <http://example.org/>
16:45:37 <msporny>    <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
16:45:38 <msporny>       "Test Case 0123" .
16:45:40 <Ralph> Shane: assuming that it is possible to create an illegal URI then the general rule would hold that an illegal URI is ignored
16:45:41 <msporny> <http://example.org/>
16:45:42 <msporny>    <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/contributor>
16:45:45 <msporny>       "Shane McCarron" .
16:45:47 <msporny> }
16:45:49 <msporny> ----------------------------------------------------------------
16:45:51 <Ralph> Mark: yeah
16:45:52 <msporny> more corrections:
16:45:57 <benadida> Shane: @href and @src?
16:46:07 <Ralph> scribenick: benadida
16:46:07 <msporny> sorry ralph
16:46:09 <msporny> ---------------------Test Case 123 XHTML--------------------------
16:46:09 <msporny> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
16:46:09 <msporny> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
16:46:09 <msporny>                       "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
16:46:09 <msporny> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
16:46:09 <msporny>       xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
16:46:12 <msporny>    <head>
16:46:14 <msporny>       <title>Test Case 0123</title>
16:46:15 <msporny>    </head>
16:46:17 <msporny>    <body>
16:46:19 <msporny>       <p about="http://example.org/">
16:46:22 <msporny>          <span about="[]" property="dc:title">Test Case 0123</span>
16:46:24 <msporny>          checks to make sure RDFa processors resolve the empty
16:46:25 <msporny>          CURIE correctly.
16:46:28 <msporny>          <div resource="[]">
16:46:30 <msporny>             <span property="dc:contributor">Shane McCarron</span>
16:46:31 <msporny>             contributed to this test.
16:46:33 <msporny>          </div>
16:46:36 <msporny>       </p>
16:46:38 <msporny>    </body>
16:46:40 <msporny> </html>
16:46:42 <msporny> -----------------------------------------------------------------
16:46:44 <msporny> ---------------------Test Case 123 SPARQL -----------------------
16:46:46 <msporny> ASK WHERE {
16:46:47 <msporny> <http://example.org/>
16:46:50 <msporny>    <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
16:46:52 <msporny>       "Test Case 0123" .
16:46:54 <msporny> <http://example.org/>
16:46:56 <msporny>    <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/contributor>
16:46:57 <msporny>       "Shane McCarron" .
16:46:59 <msporny> }
16:47:03 <msporny> ----------------------------------------------------------------
16:47:14 <benadida> Shane: @href and @src are evaluated the same way
16:47:20 <msporny> +1
16:47:23 <markbirbeck> +1
16:47:23 <benadida> Ben: +1
16:47:24 <mhausenblas> +1
16:47:40 <benadida> RESOLVED: test case 123 with [] invalid CURIE approved
16:48:47 <ShaneM> +1 
16:49:05 <Zakim> -DrMichael
16:49:22 <Ralph> +1, though recommend changing the SPAN content to give a semantically less confusing title
16:50:27 <msporny> Action: Manu to create TC to test @resource="[]" does not set object based on TC 123.
16:51:14 <msporny> Topic: comment from december about test suite:
16:52:42 <msporny> scribenick: msporny
16:53:07 <benadida> ACTION: Manu to look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Dec/0037.html
16:53:07 <msporny> Manu: Didn't have time to look at it in depth.
16:54:05 <benadida> consensus from dec 4th:
16:54:06 <benadida> so I think we have consensus about @prefix='p1=u1 p2=u2 ...'
16:54:07 <benadida> ... and that @prefix='=u1' seems not to have value
16:54:07 <benadida> ... and @prefix='u1' may have value and should be further investigated
16:54:11 <benadida> --> http://www.w3.org/2008/12/04-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary
16:54:12 <msporny> Topic: keyword bundles and HTML4-compatible RDFa
16:55:05 <msporny> benadida: We agree that there needs to be some non-xml based approach to declare namespaces. Should it be called @prefix?
16:55:14 <Ralph> s/ActionSummary/item02
16:55:19 <msporny> benadida: We need to make that decision.
16:55:31 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
16:56:08 <msporny> benadida: We should confirm the idea that a "with" statement is not useful. We drop the idea of @prefix="=u1".
16:56:42 <msporny> benadida: If we want to provide bundles, are they bundles of reserved words, or more involved transformations.
16:57:19 <msporny> markbirbeck: I don't think we finalized whether the syntax within the attribute is "a=b" or "a:b" or something else.
16:58:21 <msporny> markbirbeck: If it is some sort of transformation, it would be a set of transformations defined using RDF.
16:58:31 <msporny> markbirbeck: Fresnel is one example of this approach.
16:58:57 <msporny> markbirbeck: Transformations are out of scope in a way, we don't need to overload the RDFa parsing algorithm.
16:59:39 <msporny> benadida: Do you have a draft of your deeper thoughts about this issue?
17:00:03 <msporny> markbirbeck: I'm a bit weary of discussing this off-list, prefer to have the discussion in the public.
17:00:22 <msporny> markbirbeck: We're keen to address the issue
17:00:33 <msporny> benadida: I agree.
17:01:09 <msporny> markbirbeck: I like "keyword bundle"
17:02:05 <msporny> benadida: It would be good to see how all this stuff plays together.
17:02:40 <msporny> ShaneM: These should be two separate topics. @prefix is one, keyword bundles is the other.
17:03:11 <msporny> benadida: Any other decisions that we need to make that are missing?
17:03:30 <msporny> markbirbeck: there isn't any particular reason that we couldn't end up with two more attributes.
17:03:50 <msporny> markbirbeck: We could agree on @prefix and get that done.
17:04:12 <msporny> markbirbeck: @token and keyword bundles could use another attribute.
17:04:19 <msporny> markbirbeck: and it could come later.
17:04:46 <ShaneM> oooh - we could introduce curie-xxx attributes just to irritate people in the tag 
17:04:55 <msporny> @token would be used to specify these values at run-time.
17:05:10 <msporny> server-curie-xx
17:05:34 <ShaneM> s/people in the tag/people in the tag (that was sarcasm!)/
17:05:50 <msporny> benadida: We do have a proposal on the table for @prefix, prefix="p1=u1 p2=u2"
17:06:40 <msporny> markbirbeck: There are some benefits to have @prefix in the HEAD - it could be argued that it should apply in the BODY.
17:07:35 <msporny> ShaneM: Didn't we talk about using LINK to specify that?
17:07:50 <msporny> markbirbeck: Yes, or we could extend it in some other way - a new element or attribute.
17:08:24 <ShaneM> I agree that having prefix / keyword bundles in the head that apply to the entire document makes sense.
17:08:42 <Ralph> Ben: regrets for 22 Jan
17:08:54 <Ralph> next meeting: 22 Jan
17:09:03 <Zakim> -ShaneM
17:09:04 <Zakim> -markbirbeck
17:09:04 <Zakim> -Ben_Adida
17:09:13 <Zakim> -Ralph
17:09:14 <Zakim> SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
17:09:15 <Zakim> Attendees were Ralph, ShaneM, msporny, DrMichael, Ben_Adida, +0208761aaaa, markbirbeck
17:09:22 <Ralph> zakim, bye
17:09:22 <Zakim> Zakim has left #rdfa
17:09:27 <Ralph> rrsagent, please draft minutes
17:09:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
17:16:33 <ShaneM> ShaneM has left #rdfa
17:21:22 <ShaneM> ShaneM has joined #rdfa
17:42:04 <ShaneM> ShaneM has left #rdfa
18:08:01 <Ralph> rrsagent, bye
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> I see 15 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-actions.rdf :
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: fix the .htaccess for the XHTML namespace [1]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-14-29
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mark to review reasoning on setting explicit about="" on HEAD and BODY [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-rdfa-irc]  [2]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-19-25
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben to add public-rdfa examples to wiki and think of slightly improved top-level organization [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]  [3]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-20-04
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben to put up information on "how to write RDFa" with screencast possibly and instructions on bookmarklet. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]  [4]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-20-15
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action03]  [5]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-20-38
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action04]  [6]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-20-48
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]  [7]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-04
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]  [8]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-13
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]  [9]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-22
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mark to send Ben ubiquity related wizard stuff [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]  [10]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-31
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action13]  [11]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-42
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action14]  [12]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-21-51
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action15]  [13]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-28-29
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu to create TC to test @resource="[]" does not set object based on TC 123. [14]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-50-27
18:08:01 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu to look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Dec/0037.html [15]
18:08:01 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-rdfa-irc#T16-53-07