ISSUE-49: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?

AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
HISTORICAL: CORS [this spec uses Bugzilla for Bug/Issue tracking http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-CORS]
Raised by:
Arthur Barstow
Opened on:
2007-07-06
Description:
Raised by the TAG and the POWDER WG
See:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun/0145.html>

and:

<http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/07/02-minutes.html#item02>
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-09-20)
  2. Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2007-09-20)
  3. ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-07-06)

Related notes:

The POWDER WG will align with us it seems so closing.

17 Jan 2008, 13:34:39

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 49.html,v 1.1 2016/01/25 10:26:21 carine Exp $