ISSUE-30: Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may implement further security beyond the spec?
Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may implement further security beyond the spec?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- HISTORICAL: CORS [this spec uses Bugzilla for Bug/Issue tracking http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-CORS]
- Raised by:
- Nick Allott
- Opened on:
- 2008-07-02
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [cors] Status (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-02-25)
- Re: [cors] Status (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-02-25)
- [cors] Status (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-02-09)
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-10-16)
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-10-10)
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-10-09)
- [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-10-09)
Related notes:
Closing per mailing list proposal.
Anne van Kesteren, 3 Mar 2009, 01:22:21Display change log
