ISSUE-30: Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may implement further security beyond the spec?

Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may implement further security beyond the spec?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
CORS
Raised by:
Nick Allott
Opened on:
2008-07-02
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: [cors] Status (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-02-25)
  2. Re: [cors] Status (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-02-25)
  3. [cors] Status (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-02-09)
  4. Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-10-16)
  5. Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-10-10)
  6. Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-10-09)
  7. [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32 (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-10-09)

Related notes:

Closing per mailing list proposal.

Anne van Kesteren, 3 Mar 2009, 01:22:21

Display change log ATOM feed


Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Chairs, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.287 2012/02/01 05:29:12 dom Exp $