ISSUE-22: Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?

Is SHA1 good enough?

Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

HISTORICAL: Widgets [Bugs and Issues are tracked via Bugzilla https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?product=WebAppsWG]

Raised by:

Josh Soref

Opened on:

2008-06-27

Description:

The widgets 1.0: Digital Signature specification currently mandates that the DigestValue be calculated using RSA-SHA1(and indicated as such by the DigestMethod). However, weaknesses have been found in SHA1 [1]. So would some other DigestMethod be more appropriate? does it really matter that SHA1 has been "broken" for this use case?

[1] http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-228 on Arthur Barstow to Ask the XML Sec WG "what algorithm do you recommend we use and what identifier should we use for it?" - due 2008-09-03, closed

Related emails:

1. Re: Thoughts behind the Streams API ED (from vitteaymeric@gmail.com on 2013-11-07)
2. Re: Thoughts behind the Streams API ED (from tyoshino@google.com on 2013-11-07)
3. Re: ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures? (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-11-03)
4. Widgets digital signatures, off-list discussion about requirements and algorithms. (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-09-26)
5. Seeking feedback regarding Widgets Digital Signatures spec (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-09-26)
6. [widgets] Minutes from 25 September 2008 Voice Conference (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-09-25)
7. [widgets] Agenda for 25 September 2008 Voice Conference (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-09-24)
8. ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-06-27)

Related notes:

Display change log