16:57:36 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:57:36 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-soap-jms-irc 16:57:38 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:57:38 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:57:40 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:57:40 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 16:57:41 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:57:41 Date: 16 December 2008 16:57:59 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Dec/0014.html 16:58:17 Chair: Roland 16:58:37 alewis has joined #soap-jms 16:59:26 trackbot, start telcon 16:59:28 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:59:30 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:59:30 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute 16:59:31 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:59:31 Date: 16 December 2008 17:00:38 Zakim, Roland_Merrick is Roland 17:00:38 +Roland; got it 17:02:53 +Yves 17:03:04 peaston has joined #soap-jms 17:03:35 +Peter_Easton 17:03:47 + +0196270aabb 17:04:04 + +1.408.956.aacc 17:04:15 bhakti has joined #soap-jms 17:04:28 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 17:06:12 Regrets: Phil 17:06:18 Topic: FAQ 17:06:23 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2008-09_FAQ 17:07:40 Roland: Is "Why is WS-Addressing out of scope for SOAP-JMS Binding specification? " the right question 17:08:31 eric has joined #soap-jms 17:08:40 Bhakti: Some of the points in the FAQ entry are taken from the questions on the mailing list. If we re-phrase the question we may need to rephrase the answer 17:09:22 + +1.650.846.aadd 17:09:46 Zakim, aadd is eric 17:09:46 +eric; got it 17:10:45 Roland: The SOAP/JMS binding is analagous to the SOAP/HTTP binding which does not mention WS-Addressing 17:12:02 Peter: SOAP/JMS is much more asynchronous than HTTP, but it does boild down to providing the transport - replies with correllation IDs are like the HTTP anonymous back channe 17:12:59 Roland: We could have 2 questions i.e. - "Why is there no mention to WS-Addressing in the SOAP/JMS Binding Spec?" and "How would WS-Addressing relate to SOAP/JMS?" 17:13:08 Eric "Where does WS-Addressing fit?" 17:13:23 Peter: Agreed - sounds like a good question 17:14:04 Yves: WS-Addressing happens at the application level - it is application specific, whereas SOAP/JMS happens lower at the transport layer 17:15:22 Eric: We *could* specify how WS-A maps to SOAP/JMS but we don't need to put that in our specification - it should be specified elsewhere. Probably worth suggesting that the anonymous back channel maps to the SOAP/JMS ReplyTo mechanism in the FAQ 17:16:44 Yves: Maybe say that It is possible to map WSA to SOAP/JMS, but it is never possible to map SOAP/JMS to WSA 17:18:17 Eric: MediaWiki has discussion pages so we can discuss this in the Wiki. Could send emails inviting people to contribute 17:18:53 Roland: Could all members of the working group be added to the Wiki please? 17:19:25 Yves: If all WG members create Wiki IDs then Yves will grant them the necessary permissions 17:21:17 Action peaston to Add answer to FAQ on how to use WSA anonymous and JMS ReplyTo 17:21:18 Created ACTION-56 - Add answer to FAQ on how to use WSA anonymous and JMS ReplyTo [on Peter Easton - due 2008-12-23]. 17:23:25 Roland: In the new year we will send a message to the mailing list inviting readers to join the debate on the Wiki 17:24:07 Topic: URI Specification 17:24:19 Topic: Testing 17:24:53 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html 17:25:19 Peter: This adds some detail to the cases Phil put together 17:25:51 Peter: It covers each of the fault types SOAP1.1 and 1.2 17:26:51 Peter: A lot of the XML behind the tests is very boiler-plate 17:26:54 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html 17:29:16 Eric: We have two tests reporting unsupported JMS message format - for SOAP1.1 and SOAP 1.2. I am worried about the explosion of the text matrix - one of these seems redudant 17:30:28 Eric: We could end up with 4 test for each combination of SOAP 1.1, 1.2 TextMessage and BytesMessage. We should use our judgement to determine whether all the tests are required 17:30:37 Peter: Agreed 17:30:42 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 17:31:03 close action-51 17:31:03 ACTION-51 Add a test case. closed 17:31:14 close action-19 17:31:14 ACTION-19 Write up an answer to the question of WS-Addressing. closed 17:32:02 Topic: URI specification 17:33:14 Roland: had contact from Cisco, suggested they would contact Eric directly 17:33:51 Bhakti: Contacted Chris Newman from Sun who has said he would review and give suggestions 17:34:41 Eric: Was cc'ed on emails between members of the IETF. Eric will forward to the mailing list. 17:35:41 Eric: Lisa De Salls(sp?) has offered to look at the draft 17:35:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Dec/0016.html 17:36:12 s/De Salls(sp?)/Dusseault/ 17:36:15 s/De Salls/Lisa Dusseault/ 17:37:05 (thanks Yves) 17:38:05 Bhakti: Will chase up Chris 17:38:20 Topic: Next Call 17:38:38 +1 17:39:03 Roland: Will be away for two weeks - propose next call on the 6th January 2009 17:39:14 +1 17:39:23 all agree 17:40:04 RESOLUTION: Next call 6th January 2009 17:40:09 Topic: AOB 17:40:23 none 17:40:36 -eric 17:40:38 - +0196270aabb 17:40:39 - +1.408.956.aacc 17:40:39 -Peter_Easton 17:40:41 -alewis 17:40:48 -Yves 17:40:53 rrsagent, generate minutes 17:40:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 17:41:45 -Roland 17:41:46 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 17:41:47 Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, Roland, Yves, Peter_Easton, +0196270aabb, +1.408.956.aacc, +1.650.846.aadd, eric 17:41:58 rrsagent, generate minutes 17:41:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 17:47:43 Zakim, aa is alewis 17:47:43 sorry, Roland, I do not recognize a party named 'aa' 17:48:11 Roland has left #soap-jms 18:20:52 eric has joined #soap-jms 19:50:46 eric has joined #soap-jms 20:10:19 Zakim has left #soap-jms