15:46:00 RRSAgent has joined #backplane 15:46:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-irc 15:46:04 rrsagent, make logs public 15:46:13 Meeting: RWAB telecon 15:46:18 Chair: CharlieWiecha 15:46:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-app-backplane/2008Dec/0012.html 15:46:37 Regrets: John Boyer 15:49:45 oedipus has joined #backplane 15:51:42 rrsagent, pointer? 15:51:42 See http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-irc#T15-51-42 15:57:57 INC_RWAB()11:00AM has now started 15:58:06 +[IBM] 15:58:12 zakim, [IBM] is CharlieWiecha 15:58:14 +CharlieWiecha; got it 15:59:11 +Gregory_Rosmaita 16:02:07 Scribe: Gregory_Rosmaita 16:02:13 ScribeNick: oedipus 16:03:27 jackjansen has joined #backplane 16:03:45 rrsagent, make minutes 16:03:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-minutes.html oedipus 16:04:57 Grmpf. My machine is as good as completely frozen:-( Can anyone tell me the phone# and code, please? 16:05:10 zakim, code? 16:05:23 the conference code is 7922 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), CharlieWiecha 16:05:27 :-) 16:06:57 +??P76 16:07:00 regrets+ John_Boyer 16:07:09 regrets- John, Boyer 16:07:19 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-minutes.html oedipus 16:07:28 zakim, p76 is me 16:07:28 sorry, jackjansen, I do not recognize a party named 'p76' 16:07:48 zakim, ??P76 is jackjansen 16:07:48 +jackjansen; got it 16:07:50 zakim, ??P76 is me 16:07:50 I already had ??P76 as jackjansen, jackjansen 16:08:21 TOPIC: Where Do We Want to/Need to Go? 16:08:52 CW: participation thin; worried that not high enough priority; may be don't have a precise enough deliverable 16:09:12 CW: spirit of outline i circulated -- had hoped would do more technical/application work 16:09:44 CW: how to get prototyping ideas to "product" either real or roadmapped on wiki; who are we targetting and how to go after them 16:09:53 TOPIC: Target Audience 16:11:50 JJ: note also shows an issue i've encountered myself; on 1 level identified some areas and technologies that are out there and allow people to create RWAB; if was to create something tomorrow, would be lost -- haven't created list of what to do or roadmap "if you want to produce a RWA look here and here and here" 16:12:29 JJ: disconnected bag of technologies now -- need to integrate -- here is what there is, here is how use it; then decide, document or deliverable (library) that they can relate to and use 16:13:02 CW: who is it we are trying to sell that to -- the implementor? the strategist? what level of descriptino -- conceptual or nuts-and-bolts 16:13:35 JJ: something Pablo reminded me is that XGs can spawn working groups; aiming for people to attract ot become members of WG 16:14:06 CW: never shared that feeling; my PoV is trying to connect dots; cross-cutting technologies; W3C lacks cross-cutting vision 16:14:23 CW: still some nuts-and-bolts oriented, but not particularly a WG 16:14:36 JJ: don't see clearcut WG coming out of this XG 16:14:46 CW: who is at center of what we are doing? 16:15:36 JJ: on other hand, if at end of XG life what is left is a document that shows people on various levels, where they should look for W3C and related standard techs that will help solve problems, fill needs 16:15:42 CW: would be quite useful; 16:16:07 CW: people outside industry don't know about a lot of the existing technologies; roadmap to assembly has yet to be drawn 16:16:39 CW: HTML container DTD; XForms controller; SVG - graphics engine; SMIL - timing mechanism; XML Events 16:16:58 CW: currently each individual has to connect the dots for herself 16:17:13 CW: no one has assembled everything and ordered it and put lipstick on it 16:17:31 JJ: you are looking at it from managerial PoV 16:18:17 JJ: haven't had to create -- you are lead of team and have clear vision of what silverlight can do -- how to use it with scripting 16:18:26 JJ: roughly follow CW's outline 16:18:42 JJ: also think that document on more component level would also be good to have 16:19:38 JJ: joe-web-designer plays with XHTML and CSS and XForms and now needs to tie together; 90% chance now that will use javascript to do what needed, when there are technologies more declaratively designed, that should be used 16:19:52 CW: set of patterns that are available to people in a repository that they can use 16:20:03 CW: a cookbook -- here is a set of read-made examples 16:20:18 JJ: examples before february? 16:20:32 CW: no; just trying to nail down our specific audience 16:20:57 CW: reason having conversation is because concerned that if i write the document, it will be a tree falling in the woods 16:21:57 JJ: cookbook may be aiming too high -- would be happy if describe each technology in a nutshell to at least encourage people to look at technology; documents such as stevenP's "XHTML for HTML Authors" -- great model; gives enough of feeling of technology to encourage it's use 16:22:07 CW: could be fleshed out 16:23:11 CW: use steveP's note as pattern 16:23:35 CW: timing, SVG - canvas from API PoV, but SVG promotion important 16:24:33 JJ: both SVG and XForms have disadvantage that they are small technology that does one thing; big specs but tackling limited set of questions; we are tackling a huge questio, should show when 5 ways of doing something appropriate using standards/W3C based techs 16:24:49 JJ: now that we are talking, though wondering if should do a demo app? 16:25:07 CW: was going to say that -- best way to lead authors to info they need 16:25:46 GJR: danbri and i are going to ARIA enable OpenSocial to make a virtual visually impaired computer users group - could incorporate other techs 16:26:13 CW: can't really pin them down; big picture not compelling 16:26:39 JJ: in a way, people are right; each technology in its own field is nice, but conflicts with other techs; we should emphasize integration 16:27:04 JJ: over past year become convinced that have something nice for integration, but how to communicate to outside world that helps real people solve real issues 16:27:45 CW: integration is the core part; not just "piling on" specs, but mixing technologies; not widget, but single document with data, controller, SVG -- blend of technologies 16:28:25 JJ: demo app -- aiming for complex demo apps because in real life will be using these things in complex situatns, but shouldn't we be shaping world what a rich web app IS 16:28:52 JJ: show in such a way that integration present and professional can realize integration issues herre -- if do in flash, will become inaccessible 16:29:08 CW: break down integration problem into series of rich fragments 16:29:22 CW: comes back to patterns idea; illustrate aspects of integration 16:29:33 JJ: how to add timing to group of controls 16:29:42 CW: how to add validation to a group of data items 16:29:59 s/JJ:/CW: as JJ said, 16:30:27 JJ: where we shine is integration; should aim for something - single app that shows everything, even if just a toy app 16:30:45 CW: built out of progressive exposure; break down into components 16:30:48 JJ: depends on app 16:31:17 CW: how one explains what it is itself - look at from data PoV, control PoV, timing integration 16:31:39 JJ: somebody came up with app 16:31:44 GJR: virtual weather station 16:32:33 GJR: could work with professor who proposed it; use student's work 16:32:40 CW: harvest out of them best practice 16:32:45 CW: separate or collaborate 16:32:53 GJR: that would be up to you as chair 16:34:19 GJR: can contact prof and ascertain what stage is at what doing 16:34:54 ACTION: Gregory - contact proffesor about virtual SVG weather station 16:35:28 CW: if do this, any chairs of existing WGs at W3C pay attention to it? any AJAX authors pay attention to it? 16:36:25 CW: IG may come out of this work to perform evangelizing 16:36:29 GJR: plus one 16:37:38 GJR: explains SVGIG aggregator site 16:38:36 CW: shoot for jump-starting content with IG proposal - what would attract people 16:38:45 CW: example app needs to be motivating 16:39:41 JJ: why not implement server side -- what is advantage of serving as app 16:40:02 GJR: if i were to implement in real life, i would definitely handle things server side 16:41:06 JJ: data aggregating is anonymous data - GPS position - if need data from source a and data from source b but don't want the one to know i'm using the other... 16:42:23 JJ: reason to do web app is combining data from 2 sources: information on bank account should be secure, info about another private source (a store) don't want bank to harvest purchasing habits and don't want store to know banking bussiness would do 16:42:30 as web app 16:42:42 CW: downside: not much input flavor 16:42:57 CW: not capturing input, or serving rich data 16:43:26 CW: leave app choice to later; if trying to populate IG as outcome of XG, what would be tools IG should maintain 16:43:36 GJR: aggregation site like planetsvg.com 16:43:55 CW: motivate people to participate, have to have something to spark their interest 16:44:09 CW: would really like to build something 16:44:30 JJ: thinking of apps, should we think of a game? 16:44:50 JJ: simple games have a bit of secrecy -- info don't want to reveal to peers 16:44:57 GJR: like JJ's idea 16:45:03 CW: input as well as output 16:45:16 CW: could start with "game" broadly as generalization 16:45:36 CW: multiple server side pieces, multiple client side pieces, distributed devices 16:46:14 JJ: virtual world games logic done centrally, rendering done client side; want ability to "hide" what you are doing locally 16:46:22 JJ: direct feedback equal better user experience 16:46:40 CW: lot of potential 16:47:30 GJR: very good idea - timing of actions in game 16:47:38 CW: what would be good game to model 16:48:19 JJ: strong point of RWA as opposed to Flash and on the other hand organization wide server-side, client-side; strong points of solution? can we think of game that highlights strong points? 16:49:01 CW: game requirements: countdown timer, ability to move around, ARIA live regions, mash-up 16:50:39 GJR: talks about danbri and openSocial - will post more to list 16:50:51 CW: richness of open social? 16:51:46 CW: think about OpenSocial, games 16:51:56 GJR: OpenSocial probably a longer term project 16:52:10 CW: discuss potential of games on list 16:52:17 JJ: upcoming meetings? 16:52:24 CW: this will be last of year 16:52:40 JJ: can do next week, but not week after 16:52:50 CW: take poll on list - if not, then sixth 16:52:57 -jackjansen 16:53:00 jackjansen has left #backplane 16:53:06 -Gregory_Rosmaita 16:53:08 -CharlieWiecha 16:53:08 ADJOURN 16:53:09 INC_RWAB()11:00AM has ended 16:53:11 Attendees were CharlieWiecha, Gregory_Rosmaita, jackjansen 16:53:21 zakim, please part 16:53:21 Zakim has left #backplane 16:53:27 rrsagent, make minutes 16:53:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-minutes.html oedipus 16:53:48 rrsagent, make minutes 16:53:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-minutes.html oedipus 17:06:41 rrsagent, please part 17:06:41 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-actions.rdf : 17:06:41 ACTION: Gregory - contact proffesor about virtual SVG weather station [1] 17:06:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/16-backplane-irc#T16-34-54