IRC log of svg on 2008-12-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:31:07 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #svg
- 19:31:07 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/12/01-svg-irc
- 19:31:09 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 19:31:11 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
- 19:31:11 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()2:30PM scheduled to start now
- 19:31:12 [trackbot]
- Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
- 19:31:12 [trackbot]
- Date: 01 December 2008
- 19:31:44 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()2:30PM has now started
- 19:31:46 [Zakim]
- +Shepazu
- 19:31:48 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 19:31:50 [Zakim]
- -Shepazu
- 19:31:51 [Zakim]
- +Shepazu
- 19:31:52 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 19:31:52 [heycam]
- Zakim, ??P2 is me
- 19:31:54 [Zakim]
- +heycam; got it
- 19:32:26 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 19:32:35 [anthony]
- Zakim, ??P3 is me
- 19:32:35 [Zakim]
- +anthony; got it
- 19:32:39 [heycam]
- Zakim, mute me
- 19:32:39 [Zakim]
- heycam should now be muted
- 19:32:53 [heycam]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 19:32:53 [Zakim]
- heycam should no longer be muted
- 19:33:16 [NH]
- ??P1 is me
- 19:33:42 [anthony]
- Zakim, ??P1 is NH
- 19:33:42 [Zakim]
- +NH; got it
- 19:34:06 [NH]
- Zakim, ??P1 is me
- 19:34:06 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P1 as NH, NH
- 19:34:10 [Zakim]
- -NH
- 19:35:20 [ed]
- ed has joined #svg
- 19:35:54 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 19:36:10 [ed]
- Zakim, ??P1 is me
- 19:36:10 [Zakim]
- +ed; got it
- 19:36:24 [ed]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 19:36:24 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shepazu, heycam, anthony, ed
- 19:36:25 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ed, RRSAgent, Zakim, NH, trackbot, heycam, shepazu, anthony, ed_work
- 19:37:48 [Zakim]
- +??P4
- 19:41:08 [shepazu]
- Zakim, unmute ed
- 19:41:08 [Zakim]
- ed was not muted, shepazu
- 19:42:12 [anthony]
- Scribe: anthony
- 19:42:14 [anthony]
- Chair: Erik
- 19:42:21 [anthony]
- Topic: Selectors API
- 19:42:34 [anthony]
- DS: We should address this as early as possible
- 19:42:55 [anthony]
- ED: Was there anyone else going to review it?
- 19:43:00 [anthony]
- AG: I had an action to review it
- 19:43:04 [anthony]
- ... I'll do that today
- 19:43:51 [anthony]
- DS: Having looked at why the CSS WG decided to say never mind on that issue
- 19:44:21 [anthony]
- ... (namespaces) I inclined to let it go
- 19:44:29 [anthony]
- ... what do you guys to think?
- 19:44:51 [anthony]
- ... do we really want to the SVG WG to be the group that insists on namespaces
- 19:45:17 [anthony]
- ED: To me realistically want namespaces are you going to encounter?
- 19:45:33 [anthony]
- ... I can only see SVG and HTML5 as the opportunity to select only SVG or HTML elements
- 19:46:21 [anthony]
- ... and it's always possible to use DOM3 XPath if you need arbitrary selection support
- 19:46:47 [anthony]
- DS: If we pushed off namespaces to the second version there is a very good chance
- 19:46:56 [anthony]
- ... that people may not support that version
- 19:47:20 [anthony]
- CM: For the case of between SVG and HTML
- 19:47:58 [anthony]
- ... there is probably use the selector itself and look at the parent to clarify what it is
- 19:48:59 [anthony]
- [discussion on how selection works]
- 19:49:17 [anthony]
- DS: Lets assume that a version gets implemented that doesn't use namespaces
- 19:49:30 [anthony]
- ... I don't think it would be that much harder to implement
- 19:49:53 [anthony]
- ... as you're accumulating elements you can always just check the namespace URI attribute/property
- 19:50:09 [anthony]
- ... it would be slower, but only if you're using namespaces
- 19:50:55 [anthony]
- ... authors can always do the namespace URI check manually, it's just a pain
- 19:51:09 [anthony]
- ED: That's why I pushed for an example on the spec on this
- 19:51:17 [anthony]
- ... so people can see how to solve the problem
- 19:51:32 [anthony]
- DS: I'll have to go back and look through the whole namespaces thing
- 19:52:16 [anthony]
- ... David Barron said that someone had a spec with name spaces, and he argued to
- 19:52:25 [anthony]
- s/to/that/
- 19:52:27 [ed]
- spec or impl?
- 19:52:33 [anthony]
- ... it would go to rec quicker
- 19:52:56 [heycam]
- s/Barron/Baron/
- 19:53:03 [anthony]
- ... I don't know why they dropped it
- 19:53:17 [shepazu]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0538.html
- 19:56:13 [anthony]
- CM: Do you know which implementations support CCS3 namespaces?
- 19:57:02 [heycam]
- s/CCS/CSS/
- 19:57:07 [anthony]
- ... just wondering the complexity is because of implementing namespace support in CSS in general or the NS resolve stuff in the Selectors API?
- 19:57:15 [anthony]
- DS: Not sure
- 19:57:16 [heycam]
- s/NS resolve/NSResolver/
- 19:57:35 [anthony]
- ED: I haven't looked into this I know that Opera has implemented some of this
- 19:58:16 [anthony]
- ... not in my hands to implement, but it would be quite simple to do
- 19:58:29 [anthony]
- ... the NSResolvers look fairly simple to me
- 20:00:13 [anthony]
- DS: I'll talk to Lochi and Boris and look at the rationale as why namespaces was removed
- 20:00:43 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to Investigate why namespaces was removed
- 20:00:44 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2364 - Investigate why namespaces was removed [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:00:52 [shepazu]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0115.html
- 20:01:48 [anthony]
- DS: This seems to be the point at where Lochi says to remove it
- 20:02:04 [anthony]
- ... so maybe we should our comments in on Thursday instead
- 20:02:08 [anthony]
- ED: That would be good
- 20:03:19 [anthony]
- Topic: Errata
- 20:03:22 [heycam]
- s/Lochi/Lachy/
- 20:03:28 [heycam]
- s/Lochi/Lachy/g
- 20:04:59 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0411.html
- 20:07:16 [anthony]
- CM: That looks like what we want
- 20:08:11 [anthony]
- ... should change "For example" to e.g.
- 20:08:42 [anthony]
- DS: I tried to word it in such a way that implementors could derive the value for boundingbox
- 20:09:07 [anthony]
- ED: I like the first paragraph there with the clippath and the boundingbox
- 20:09:34 [anthony]
- DS: It solves two issues what the boundingbox should be and where pointer events should occur
- 20:10:40 [anthony]
- DS: How are we going to make the new spec?
- 20:10:46 [anthony]
- AG: How do you mean?
- 20:11:12 [anthony]
- DS: Are we going to make a new build process like Tiny 1.2 or are we going to do it manually?
- 20:11:36 [anthony]
- CM: Probably manually
- 20:13:05 [anthony]
- DS: Anthony can you make the changes please. Typos are "and" to "an" and "e.g" to "i.e"
- 20:14:06 [shepazu]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/repository/errata/errata.xml#clippath-pointer-events
- 20:14:16 [ed]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#clippath-pointer-events
- 20:16:39 [shepazu]
- http://www.svg-whiz.com/svg/HideShow.svg
- 20:18:01 [ed]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 20:18:01 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shepazu, heycam, anthony, ed, ??P4
- 20:18:02 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ed, RRSAgent, Zakim, NH, trackbot, heycam, shepazu, anthony, ed_work
- 20:18:36 [ed]
- Zakim, ??P4 is NH
- 20:18:36 [Zakim]
- +NH; got it
- 20:18:37 [anthony]
- ACTION: Anthony to Adds Doug proposed wording to the errata and make changes as discussed
- 20:18:37 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2365 - Adds Doug proposed wording to the errata and make changes as discussed [on Anthony Grasso - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:19:18 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to Follow up errata proposal on the Email list to say that pointer events and clipping have been resolved
- 20:19:18 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2366 - Follow up errata proposal on the Email list to say that pointer events and clipping have been resolved [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:24:01 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0408.html
- 20:24:31 [anthony]
- ED: We did get an email from Niklas clamping of rx and ry values
- 20:24:37 [anthony]
- ... just wondering if we should errata this
- 20:25:02 [anthony]
- ... so I did start writing a new test for this particular issue
- 20:25:13 [anthony]
- ... from the testing so far we have more than two ways of doing it
- 20:25:24 [anthony]
- ... testing browsers
- 20:26:01 [anthony]
- AG: Did we specify anything in Tiny?
- 20:26:09 [anthony]
- ED: I think it was lifted from 1.1
- 20:26:28 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0409.html
- 20:26:46 [anthony]
- NH: In emailed a second test
- 20:26:54 [anthony]
- ED: It does seem to make sense
- 20:27:12 [anthony]
- ... So maybe we should discuss briefly which way is more appropriate
- 20:27:33 [anthony]
- ... it is difficult to read from the spec which right way
- 20:28:23 [anthony]
- NH: I think we have two options either we to assign ry if it's not specified and clamp that
- 20:28:36 [anthony]
- ... or you should clamp all the way as my last email says
- 20:28:56 [anthony]
- ED: Do you have a preference
- 20:29:04 [anthony]
- NH: Actually it doesn't really matter for me
- 20:29:17 [anthony]
- ... easiest way would be to not clamp "ry"
- 20:29:38 [anthony]
- AG: I think in this case what is most intuitive when it comes to authoring
- 20:29:56 [anthony]
- ED: For for authoring I'd expect to be whatever is clamped for rx and ry
- 20:30:21 [anthony]
- ... then I'd expect that value to be used for the other attribute (not specified)
- 20:30:34 [anthony]
- NH: It's not that obvious
- 20:34:13 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to Propose an errata item for rx and ry
- 20:34:13 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2367 - Propose an errata item for rx and ry [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:38:06 [anthony]
- ED: We can look at the current translate and current scale errata
- 20:38:10 [ed]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#currenttranslate-currentscale-nested-svg
- 20:38:12 [anthony]
- ... it has a resolution
- 20:40:46 [anthony]
- ... looks like Doug raised this
- 20:40:55 [anthony]
- DS: Not sure what the spec says right now
- 20:41:15 [anthony]
- ED: Probably only need to do changes in the structure chapter
- 20:42:27 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to Propose wording for the change that addresses the errata item Current Translate Current Scale on nested SVG
- 20:42:27 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2368 - Propose wording for the change that addresses the errata item Current Translate Current Scale on nested SVG [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:43:22 [shepazu]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata
- 20:44:11 [ed]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#bzwidth
- 20:45:33 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0022.html
- 20:45:34 [anthony]
- ED: There are no links there
- 20:45:38 [anthony]
- ... would be useful
- 20:45:47 [anthony]
- ... This is probably the start of it
- 20:46:53 [anthony]
- ... Might be a good idea to go through
- 20:47:04 [anthony]
- ... and find out if Tiny fixed this
- 20:47:25 [anthony]
- DS: We should give this serious thought about how this interacts with CSS
- 20:47:50 [anthony]
- ... we should start coordinating on little issues like this
- 20:48:02 [anthony]
- ... will help create a better working relationship with CSS
- 20:48:26 [anthony]
- ... The SVG spec should say what the width and height are and should also allow authors to use that more usefully
- 20:50:51 [anthony]
- ED: There were some changes in Firefox and Opera where the width and height on the SVG were ignored if the SVG was being used in an object tag
- 20:51:03 [anthony]
- ... we should definitely try to specify it better
- 20:52:16 [ed]
- if there was width and height AND a viewbox...and the object had width and height...IIRC
- 20:52:36 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to Investigate if WICD addresses some of the issues about scaling size interaction between SVG and CSS
- 20:52:36 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2369 - Investigate if WICD addresses some of the issues about scaling size interaction between SVG and CSS [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:53:47 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to Go through the e-mailing thread for errata item "Sizing of the outermost svg" and update the item discussion
- 20:53:47 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2370 - Go through the e-mailing thread for errata item \"Sizing of the outermost svg\" and update the item discussion [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-12-08].
- 20:56:07 [anthony]
- <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../../tools/errata/errata2xhtml.xsl"?>
- 20:56:52 [anthony]
- application/xslt+xml
- 20:59:54 [Zakim]
- -heycam
- 20:59:56 [Zakim]
- -ed
- 20:59:58 [Zakim]
- -anthony
- 20:59:59 [Zakim]
- -NH
- 21:00:19 [Zakim]
- -Shepazu
- 21:00:20 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()2:30PM has ended
- 21:00:21 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Shepazu, heycam, anthony, NH, ed
- 21:00:27 [anthony]
- Zakim, bye
- 21:00:27 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #svg
- 21:00:34 [anthony]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 21:00:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/01-svg-minutes.html anthony
- 21:01:41 [shepazu]
- ed: is there a published API for your bug tracker?
- 21:03:03 [ed]
- shepazu: what type of api?
- 21:04:31 [shepazu]
- well, some way of filing a bug with a script, and getting followups and responses back out (if you ever open it up to public)
- 21:05:43 [ed]
- bugs.opera.com, or bugs.opera.com/wizard is what's there now
- 21:06:26 [ed]
- unfortunately it's still sort of a black hole to the public
- 21:07:38 [shepazu]
- lhc?
- 21:09:00 [ed]
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lhc
- 21:09:28 [shepazu]
- lol
- 21:09:57 [ed]
- the system is called JIRA, there might be some existing tools that interact with it
- 21:10:04 [ed]
- http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/
- 22:22:55 [heycam]
- heycam has joined #svg
- 22:24:46 [ed__]
- ed__ has joined #svg
- 22:25:41 [ed___]
- ed___ has joined #svg