19:31:07 RRSAgent has joined #svg 19:31:07 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/12/01-svg-irc 19:31:09 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:31:11 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 19:31:11 ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()2:30PM scheduled to start now 19:31:12 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 19:31:12 Date: 01 December 2008 19:31:44 GA_SVGWG()2:30PM has now started 19:31:46 +Shepazu 19:31:48 +??P2 19:31:50 -Shepazu 19:31:51 +Shepazu 19:31:52 +??P1 19:31:52 Zakim, ??P2 is me 19:31:54 +heycam; got it 19:32:26 +??P3 19:32:35 Zakim, ??P3 is me 19:32:35 +anthony; got it 19:32:39 Zakim, mute me 19:32:39 heycam should now be muted 19:32:53 Zakim, unmute me 19:32:53 heycam should no longer be muted 19:33:16 ??P1 is me 19:33:42 Zakim, ??P1 is NH 19:33:42 +NH; got it 19:34:06 Zakim, ??P1 is me 19:34:06 I already had ??P1 as NH, NH 19:34:10 -NH 19:35:20 ed has joined #svg 19:35:54 +??P1 19:36:10 Zakim, ??P1 is me 19:36:10 +ed; got it 19:36:24 Zakim, who's here? 19:36:24 On the phone I see Shepazu, heycam, anthony, ed 19:36:25 On IRC I see ed, RRSAgent, Zakim, NH, trackbot, heycam, shepazu, anthony, ed_work 19:37:48 +??P4 19:41:08 Zakim, unmute ed 19:41:08 ed was not muted, shepazu 19:42:12 Scribe: anthony 19:42:14 Chair: Erik 19:42:21 Topic: Selectors API 19:42:34 DS: We should address this as early as possible 19:42:55 ED: Was there anyone else going to review it? 19:43:00 AG: I had an action to review it 19:43:04 ... I'll do that today 19:43:51 DS: Having looked at why the CSS WG decided to say never mind on that issue 19:44:21 ... (namespaces) I inclined to let it go 19:44:29 ... what do you guys to think? 19:44:51 ... do we really want to the SVG WG to be the group that insists on namespaces 19:45:17 ED: To me realistically want namespaces are you going to encounter? 19:45:33 ... I can only see SVG and HTML5 as the opportunity to select only SVG or HTML elements 19:46:21 ... and it's always possible to use DOM3 XPath if you need arbitrary selection support 19:46:47 DS: If we pushed off namespaces to the second version there is a very good chance 19:46:56 ... that people may not support that version 19:47:20 CM: For the case of between SVG and HTML 19:47:58 ... there is probably use the selector itself and look at the parent to clarify what it is 19:48:59 [discussion on how selection works] 19:49:17 DS: Lets assume that a version gets implemented that doesn't use namespaces 19:49:30 ... I don't think it would be that much harder to implement 19:49:53 ... as you're accumulating elements you can always just check the namespace URI attribute/property 19:50:09 ... it would be slower, but only if you're using namespaces 19:50:55 ... authors can always do the namespace URI check manually, it's just a pain 19:51:09 ED: That's why I pushed for an example on the spec on this 19:51:17 ... so people can see how to solve the problem 19:51:32 DS: I'll have to go back and look through the whole namespaces thing 19:52:16 ... David Barron said that someone had a spec with name spaces, and he argued to 19:52:25 s/to/that/ 19:52:27 spec or impl? 19:52:33 ... it would go to rec quicker 19:52:56 s/Barron/Baron/ 19:53:03 ... I don't know why they dropped it 19:53:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0538.html 19:56:13 CM: Do you know which implementations support CCS3 namespaces? 19:57:02 s/CCS/CSS/ 19:57:07 ... just wondering the complexity is because of implementing namespace support in CSS in general or the NS resolve stuff in the Selectors API? 19:57:15 DS: Not sure 19:57:16 s/NS resolve/NSResolver/ 19:57:35 ED: I haven't looked into this I know that Opera has implemented some of this 19:58:16 ... not in my hands to implement, but it would be quite simple to do 19:58:29 ... the NSResolvers look fairly simple to me 20:00:13 DS: I'll talk to Lochi and Boris and look at the rationale as why namespaces was removed 20:00:43 ACTION: Doug to Investigate why namespaces was removed 20:00:44 Created ACTION-2364 - Investigate why namespaces was removed [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08]. 20:00:52 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0115.html 20:01:48 DS: This seems to be the point at where Lochi says to remove it 20:02:04 ... so maybe we should our comments in on Thursday instead 20:02:08 ED: That would be good 20:03:19 Topic: Errata 20:03:22 s/Lochi/Lachy/ 20:03:28 s/Lochi/Lachy/g 20:04:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0411.html 20:07:16 CM: That looks like what we want 20:08:11 ... should change "For example" to e.g. 20:08:42 DS: I tried to word it in such a way that implementors could derive the value for boundingbox 20:09:07 ED: I like the first paragraph there with the clippath and the boundingbox 20:09:34 DS: It solves two issues what the boundingbox should be and where pointer events should occur 20:10:40 DS: How are we going to make the new spec? 20:10:46 AG: How do you mean? 20:11:12 DS: Are we going to make a new build process like Tiny 1.2 or are we going to do it manually? 20:11:36 CM: Probably manually 20:13:05 DS: Anthony can you make the changes please. Typos are "and" to "an" and "e.g" to "i.e" 20:14:06 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/repository/errata/errata.xml#clippath-pointer-events 20:14:16 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#clippath-pointer-events 20:16:39 http://www.svg-whiz.com/svg/HideShow.svg 20:18:01 Zakim, who's here? 20:18:01 On the phone I see Shepazu, heycam, anthony, ed, ??P4 20:18:02 On IRC I see ed, RRSAgent, Zakim, NH, trackbot, heycam, shepazu, anthony, ed_work 20:18:36 Zakim, ??P4 is NH 20:18:36 +NH; got it 20:18:37 ACTION: Anthony to Adds Doug proposed wording to the errata and make changes as discussed 20:18:37 Created ACTION-2365 - Adds Doug proposed wording to the errata and make changes as discussed [on Anthony Grasso - due 2008-12-08]. 20:19:18 ACTION: Doug to Follow up errata proposal on the Email list to say that pointer events and clipping have been resolved 20:19:18 Created ACTION-2366 - Follow up errata proposal on the Email list to say that pointer events and clipping have been resolved [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08]. 20:24:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0408.html 20:24:31 ED: We did get an email from Niklas clamping of rx and ry values 20:24:37 ... just wondering if we should errata this 20:25:02 ... so I did start writing a new test for this particular issue 20:25:13 ... from the testing so far we have more than two ways of doing it 20:25:24 ... testing browsers 20:26:01 AG: Did we specify anything in Tiny? 20:26:09 ED: I think it was lifted from 1.1 20:26:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0409.html 20:26:46 NH: In emailed a second test 20:26:54 ED: It does seem to make sense 20:27:12 ... So maybe we should discuss briefly which way is more appropriate 20:27:33 ... it is difficult to read from the spec which right way 20:28:23 NH: I think we have two options either we to assign ry if it's not specified and clamp that 20:28:36 ... or you should clamp all the way as my last email says 20:28:56 ED: Do you have a preference 20:29:04 NH: Actually it doesn't really matter for me 20:29:17 ... easiest way would be to not clamp "ry" 20:29:38 AG: I think in this case what is most intuitive when it comes to authoring 20:29:56 ED: For for authoring I'd expect to be whatever is clamped for rx and ry 20:30:21 ... then I'd expect that value to be used for the other attribute (not specified) 20:30:34 NH: It's not that obvious 20:34:13 ACTION: Erik to Propose an errata item for rx and ry 20:34:13 Created ACTION-2367 - Propose an errata item for rx and ry [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-12-08]. 20:38:06 ED: We can look at the current translate and current scale errata 20:38:10 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#currenttranslate-currentscale-nested-svg 20:38:12 ... it has a resolution 20:40:46 ... looks like Doug raised this 20:40:55 DS: Not sure what the spec says right now 20:41:15 ED: Probably only need to do changes in the structure chapter 20:42:27 ACTION: Doug to Propose wording for the change that addresses the errata item Current Translate Current Scale on nested SVG 20:42:27 Created ACTION-2368 - Propose wording for the change that addresses the errata item Current Translate Current Scale on nested SVG [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08]. 20:43:22 http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata 20:44:11 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#bzwidth 20:45:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0022.html 20:45:34 ED: There are no links there 20:45:38 ... would be useful 20:45:47 ... This is probably the start of it 20:46:53 ... Might be a good idea to go through 20:47:04 ... and find out if Tiny fixed this 20:47:25 DS: We should give this serious thought about how this interacts with CSS 20:47:50 ... we should start coordinating on little issues like this 20:48:02 ... will help create a better working relationship with CSS 20:48:26 ... The SVG spec should say what the width and height are and should also allow authors to use that more usefully 20:50:51 ED: There were some changes in Firefox and Opera where the width and height on the SVG were ignored if the SVG was being used in an object tag 20:51:03 ... we should definitely try to specify it better 20:52:16 if there was width and height AND a viewbox...and the object had width and height...IIRC 20:52:36 ACTION: Doug to Investigate if WICD addresses some of the issues about scaling size interaction between SVG and CSS 20:52:36 Created ACTION-2369 - Investigate if WICD addresses some of the issues about scaling size interaction between SVG and CSS [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-12-08]. 20:53:47 ACTION: Erik to Go through the e-mailing thread for errata item "Sizing of the outermost svg" and update the item discussion 20:53:47 Created ACTION-2370 - Go through the e-mailing thread for errata item \"Sizing of the outermost svg\" and update the item discussion [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-12-08]. 20:56:07 20:56:52 application/xslt+xml 20:59:54 -heycam 20:59:56 -ed 20:59:58 -anthony 20:59:59 -NH 21:00:19 -Shepazu 21:00:20 GA_SVGWG()2:30PM has ended 21:00:21 Attendees were Shepazu, heycam, anthony, NH, ed 21:00:27 Zakim, bye 21:00:27 Zakim has left #svg 21:00:34 RRSAgent, make minutes 21:00:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/01-svg-minutes.html anthony 21:01:41 ed: is there a published API for your bug tracker? 21:03:03 shepazu: what type of api? 21:04:31 well, some way of filing a bug with a script, and getting followups and responses back out (if you ever open it up to public) 21:05:43 bugs.opera.com, or bugs.opera.com/wizard is what's there now 21:06:26 unfortunately it's still sort of a black hole to the public 21:07:38 lhc? 21:09:00 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lhc 21:09:28 lol 21:09:57 the system is called JIRA, there might be some existing tools that interact with it 21:10:04 http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/ 22:22:55 heycam has joined #svg 22:24:46 ed__ has joined #svg 22:25:41 ed___ has joined #svg