IRC log of tagmem on 2008-11-13

Timestamps are in UTC.

17:12:23 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #tagmem
17:12:23 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-tagmem-irc
17:12:29 [ht]
zakim, this will be TAG
17:12:29 [Zakim]
ok, ht; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 48 minutes
17:12:45 [ht]
Meeting: TAG telcon 2008-11-13
17:12:51 [ht]
Chair: Stuart Williams
17:12:57 [ht]
Scribe: Henry S. Thompson
17:13:02 [ht]
Scribenick: ht
17:13:29 [ht]
Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/11/13-agenda.html
17:41:25 [jar]
jar has joined #tagmem
17:55:01 [Stuart]
Stuart has joined #tagmem
17:55:46 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem
17:56:28 [Stuart]
Stuart has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/11/13-agenda
17:58:51 [Stuart]
zakim, this will be tag
17:58:51 [Zakim]
ok, Stuart; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
17:58:57 [Zakim]
TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started
17:59:04 [Zakim]
+??P3
17:59:13 [Stuart]
zakim, ?? is me
17:59:13 [Zakim]
+Stuart; got it
18:00:06 [Zakim]
+Norm
18:00:09 [Zakim]
-Stuart
18:00:10 [Zakim]
+Stuart
18:01:02 [Zakim]
+Jonathan_Rees
18:01:07 [noah]
noah has joined #tagmem
18:01:45 [noah]
As noted in my regrets, I have some conflicts with today's call, but I'll try to keep an occasional eye out for IRC, and dial in if something comes up for which I am needed. Thank you.
18:01:51 [Zakim]
+Danc
18:01:52 [noah]
zakim, who is here?
18:01:52 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Stuart, Norm, Jonathan_Rees, Danc (muted)
18:01:53 [Zakim]
On IRC I see noah, timbl, Stuart, jar, RRSAgent, Zakim, DanC_lap, ht, DanC, Norm, trackbot
18:02:03 [Zakim]
+Raman
18:02:19 [DanC]
noah, it's a bummer I can't seem to chat with you and ht at the same time about the dec ftf
18:02:29 [ht]
zakim, please call ht-781
18:02:29 [Zakim]
ok, ht; the call is being made
18:02:31 [Zakim]
+Ht
18:03:49 [ht]
Topic: Review of Agenda
18:03:53 [DanC]
+1 approve http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/10/16-minutes
18:03:57 [ht]
Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/11/13-agenda.html
18:04:15 [ht]
SW: Other topics?
18:04:31 [ht]
DC: Assume that ?? stuff would come up some time
18:04:40 [ht]
SW: Issue 61? We will add this
18:04:46 [DanC]
s/??/package URIs/
18:05:02 [ht]
Topic: Previous minutes
18:05:07 [DanC]
+1 approve http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/11/06-minutes
18:05:15 [ht]
SW: Minutes from 16 October: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/16-tagmem-minutes
18:05:29 [ht]
... and 6 Nov. f2f: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/11/06-minutes
18:05:37 [ht]
RESOLVED: Approved as circulated
18:05:46 [ht]
Topic: Next meetings
18:06:02 [DanC]
(noah, you're ok to scribe 20 Nov?)
18:06:04 [ht]
Meet next on 20 November, scribe duty to Noah, whom failing DanC
18:06:17 [ht]
Meeting of 27 November is cancelled
18:06:27 [ht]
Topic: Responding to "Content Transformation Guidelines" LC Review request
18:06:57 [ht]
NW: I've reviewed this, and as far as I understand it, I think they are using proxies in the way they are meant to be used
18:07:05 [dorchard]
dorchard has joined #tagmem
18:07:06 [Zakim]
+dorchard
18:07:15 [ht]
SW: What about relation to Generic Resources?
18:07:39 [ht]
NW: Didn't see that explicitly, but any transformation gives a new representation
18:07:48 [ht]
DC: Are there multiple URIs?
18:08:04 [ht]
NW: I think not
18:08:11 [ht]
DC: TV, any thoughts on that?
18:08:19 [ht]
TVR: Not at the moment
18:08:30 [ht]
SW: Anything we need to push on?
18:08:38 [ht]
... Last Call has actually expired
18:08:41 [DanC]
q+ to ask norm to tell me the typical use case/story
18:08:55 [Stuart]
ack danc
18:08:55 [Zakim]
DanC, you wanted to ask norm to tell me the typical use case/story
18:08:59 [ht]
NW: I see no need to do anything other than say "Fine"
18:09:10 [ht]
DC: Can you tell me a typical use case story?
18:09:58 [ht]
NW: There are proxies set up so that e.g. a rich web site goes through the proxy and is transformed to something viewable on your mobile -- I think sidekick exploits this
18:10:06 [ht]
DC: Any good recommendations
18:10:24 [ht]
NW: Well, yes, don't change request headers was one bit
18:10:39 [ht]
DC: Ah, perhaps the HTTP working party should look at this
18:10:45 [ht]
NW: Good idea
18:10:59 [Stuart]
q?
18:11:33 [ht]
SW: I will send a courtesy message saying we have nothing to say. . .
18:11:56 [ht]
Topic: Issue namespaceDocument-8 (ISSUE-8)
18:12:12 [ht]
DC: HST has the ball
18:13:10 [ht]
HST: I foresee progress in the new year
18:13:59 [ht]
HST: So we could close the issue w/o completing the action (yet)
18:14:07 [DanC]
ACTION-23 due 2008-02-01
18:14:07 [trackbot]
ACTION-23 track progress of #int bug 1974 in the XML Schema namespace document in the XML Schema WG due date now 2008-02-01
18:14:19 [ht]
DC: The two are now linked, via the Issue being in state Pending Review
18:14:38 [ht]
Topic: Dec F2F - Call for Agenda Items
18:15:37 [ht]
SW: Some items already suggested: Self-describing Web, Uniform Access to Metadata, ???
18:15:59 [ht]
... Wrt UAM, JR has an action to produce some words, but not due until next year
18:16:06 [noah]
I remain somewhat optimistic of having a new Self-Describing Web draft. Bad news:">news: unlikely to be as far ahead of F2F as I would like; Good news: I would expect changes to be well-isolated and easy to review, given thorough discussion we had in Bristol.
18:16:15 [ht]
JR: I will try to get something before us -- at least some slides
18:16:24 [ht]
SW: DO, what about Versioning?
18:16:47 [ht]
DO: I hope to get to it next week or the week after
18:17:08 [ht]
JR: I believe I'm waiting for some input from DO
18:17:16 [ht]
DO: I believe I'm waiting for JR
18:17:26 [ht]
SW: Sounds like you should talk
18:17:27 [DanC]
action-181?
18:17:27 [trackbot]
ACTION-181 -- Jonathan Rees to update versioning formalism to align with terminology in versioning compatibility strategies -- due 2008-10-16 -- OPEN
18:17:27 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/181
18:17:28 [DanC]
action-182?
18:17:28 [trackbot]
ACTION-182 -- David Orchard to provide example for jar to work into the formalism -- due 2008-10-23 -- OPEN
18:17:31 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/182
18:17:41 [ht]
SW: JR, DO will talk offline
18:17:54 [DanC]
action-183?
18:17:54 [trackbot]
ACTION-183 -- David Orchard to incorporate formalism into versioning compatibility strategies -- due 2008-10-23 -- OPEN
18:17:54 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/183
18:18:07 [DanC]
(indeed, the tracker state looks like... or is consistent with... deadlock)
18:18:28 [ht]
SW: I have suggested giving each member a slot to motivate a topic, one they care about, either new, ongoing or forgotten
18:19:38 [ht]
s/???/Versioning/
18:19:55 [ht]
SW: HST, URNsAndRegistries?
18:20:01 [DanC]
q+
18:20:05 [dorchard]
I'm muted on my cell as well.
18:20:06 [ht]
HST: Yes, I will have new prose in time for f2f
18:20:10 [Stuart]
ack danc
18:20:11 [DanC]
on tagSoup: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/markup-spec/
18:20:31 [ht]
DC: Mike Smith is working on a language spec. document for HTML 5
18:21:08 [ht]
... ref. TagSoupIntegration
18:21:42 [ht]
DC: New W3C travel policy would mean I might get this trip and no others until TPAC
18:22:00 [ht]
SW: So you are asking if we should meet?
18:22:02 [ht]
DC: Yes
18:22:49 [ht]
HST: I had assumed we would meet, planning to buy tickets soon
18:23:37 [dorchard]
dec 1st is end of period
18:24:46 [ht]
q+ to turn it around
18:25:23 [ht]
ack ht
18:25:23 [Zakim]
ht, you wanted to turn it around
18:27:18 [Stuart]
q?
18:28:46 [ht]
SW: NW and TVR will not be there, DO uncertain. NW and DO will join by 'phone
18:31:02 [ht]
HST: I believe we will have enough people to do useful work
18:31:17 [ht]
SW: We will meet, HST can buy tickets
18:32:27 [ht]
SW: I would request more responses when I ask for agenda input
18:32:33 [ht]
Topic: Review of action items
18:33:12 [Stuart]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/agenda
18:33:14 [noah]
I will be at the December meeting (which if course is convenient for me).
18:33:17 [ht]
SW: Let's look at the list of open actions, by issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/agenda
18:33:19 [raman]
raman has joined #tagmem
18:34:29 [ht]
SW: Is ACTION-24 a worthwhile thing for Tim to pursue
18:34:45 [ht]
DC: Well, TBL does say when asked that we should keep this open
18:35:03 [ht]
... I proposed to close on the basis of the XQuery spec.
18:35:16 [ht]
... and there's the HTML5 spec's new input on this
18:36:22 [ht]
SW: So the topic title asks a question
18:36:40 [ht]
DC: That's overtaken for sure: W3C specs _do_ support IRIs
18:36:58 [ht]
... What's at the heart of WebArch, IRIs or URIs -- answer 'yes'
18:37:13 [DanC]
ACTION-188?
18:37:13 [trackbot]
ACTION-188 -- Dan Connolly to investigate the URL/IRI/Larry Masinter possible resolution of the URL/HTML5 issue. -- due 2008-10-31 -- OPEN
18:37:13 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/188
18:37:23 [ht]
SW: Anyone want to work on this?
18:37:41 [ht]
DC: Even if not, OK to have the issue there as a marker
18:38:09 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-30 / ACTION-176 -- NM, DO, any progress?
18:38:10 [DanC]
(noah, are you OK to keep ACTION-176 open without Dave?)
18:38:15 [DanC]
action-176?
18:38:16 [trackbot]
ACTION-176 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with Dave to draft comments on exi w.r.t. evaluation and efficiency -- due 2008-09-30 -- OPEN
18:38:16 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/176
18:38:42 [ht]
DO: I think NM has made some progress, I request to be released from this, too much load elsewhere
18:38:59 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-34 / ACTION-113
18:39:05 [ht]
HST: Yes, it will happen someday
18:39:37 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-35 / ACTION-130 XHTML/GRDDL
18:39:47 [ht]
DC: Namespace doc't has been updated
18:40:14 [ht]
SW: If you think it can be closed, please do so, leave a pointer to where the action is addressed
18:40:17 [ht]
DC: OK
18:40:26 [ht]
... What about the issue?
18:40:30 [DanC]
action-130: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml rev 2008/10/14 22:08:29
18:40:31 [trackbot]
ACTION-130 Consult with Dan and Ralph about the gap between the XHTML namespace and the GRDDL transformation for RDFa notes added
18:40:46 [ht]
SW: XHTML + RDF has done it, right?
18:40:59 [ht]
s/RDFa/RDF/
18:41:18 [DanC]
close action-130
18:41:18 [trackbot]
ACTION-130 Consult with Dan and Ralph about the gap between the XHTML namespace and the GRDDL transformation for RDFa closed
18:41:41 [ht]
s/RDF/RDFa
18:41:43 [ht]
s/RDF/RDFa
18:42:00 [ht]
[note to self: fix RDFa]
18:42:05 [Stuart]
q?
18:42:18 [ht]
HST: As long as the issue is XHTML, we're good
18:42:29 [ht]
TVR: RFDa works fine with HTML
18:42:38 [ht]
HST: I dispute the 'fine'
18:42:48 [ht]
SW: and I wonder about the 'works'
18:43:01 [ht]
[TagSoup digression]
18:43:24 [ht]
SW: Propose to close ISSUE-35
18:43:37 [ht]
TVR: By pointing to RDFa
18:43:41 [ht]
DC: And GRDDL
18:43:43 [DanC]
(indeed, -1 on the empty proposal to close; we need a technical decision.)
18:44:27 [ht]
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-35 on the basis the RDFa and GRDDL provide the desired solution
18:45:08 [ht]
HST: We need an action
18:45:15 [ht]
DC: I will take it
18:45:27 [ht]
s/action/action to explain the resolution to the public/
18:45:37 [ht]
trackbot, status?
18:45:49 [DanC]
ACTION: Dan announce decision on rdf-in-html-35 and invite feedback
18:45:49 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-191 - Announce decision on rdf-in-html-35 and invite feedback [on Dan Connolly - due 2008-11-20].
18:45:50 [noah]
Am I right that we instructed me to include in next draft of Self-describing Web a story on how you could follow your nose from HTML media types to RDFa?
18:45:54 [ht]
ACTION: Dan to close ISSUE-35 with a public explanation
18:45:54 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-192 - Close ISSUE-35 with a public explanation [on Dan Connolly - due 2008-11-20].
18:46:14 [noah]
zakim, who is here?
18:46:15 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Stuart, Norm, Jonathan_Rees, Danc, Raman, Ht, dorchard
18:46:17 [Zakim]
On IRC I see raman, dorchard, noah, timbl, Stuart, jar, RRSAgent, Zakim, ht, DanC, Norm, trackbot
18:46:24 [ht]
ISSUE-41 / outstanding actions
18:46:33 [ht]
SW: Assuming there will be progress by the F2F
18:46:35 [ht]
JR: Yes
18:46:42 [DanC]
close action-192
18:46:42 [trackbot]
ACTION-192 Close ISSUE-35 with a public explanation closed
18:46:47 [ht]
s/ISSUE-41/SW: ISSUE-41/
18:47:02 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-50 / ACTION-33
18:47:07 [DanC]
action-192: dup of 191
18:47:07 [trackbot]
ACTION-192 Close ISSUE-35 with a public explanation notes added
18:47:42 [ht]
trackbot, close ACTION-189
18:47:43 [trackbot]
ACTION-189 S. Send public comment to www-tag about the XRI proposal and the establishment of base URI. closed
18:48:00 [ht]
HST: Others are indeed open
18:48:19 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-52 / ACTION-150
18:48:29 [ht]
SW: Finding published
18:48:33 [ht]
... and announced
18:49:01 [DanC]
action-150: done. see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Oct/0091.html
18:49:01 [trackbot]
ACTION-150 Finish refs etc on passwords in the clear finding [inc post Sept 2008 F2F updates] notes added
18:49:20 [DanC]
issue-52: finding: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/passwordsInTheClear-52-20081008.html
18:49:20 [trackbot]
ISSUE-52 Sending passwords in the clear notes added
18:50:06 [ht]
trackbot, close ACTION-150
18:50:06 [trackbot]
ACTION-150 Finish refs etc on passwords in the clear finding [inc post Sept 2008 F2F updates] closed
18:50:27 [ht]
DC: Did we hear back from anyone? Is there anyone we should be waiting on?
18:50:36 [ht]
SW: We could ask Ed Rice?
18:50:40 [ht]
DO: I will do so
18:51:42 [ht]
DC: Do we have any recent input from Security Context
18:51:47 [ht]
s/Context/Context?/
18:51:57 [ht]
SW: Not from the group, no
18:52:08 [ht]
DO: We did our best to address several individual comments
18:52:45 [ht]
SW: Any response to the publication announcement?
18:52:53 [ht]
DO: Not that I'm aware of
18:53:06 [DanC]
issue-52?
18:53:06 [trackbot]
ISSUE-52 -- Sending passwords in the clear -- RAISED
18:53:06 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/52
18:53:29 [DanC]
close issue-52
18:53:49 [ht]
SW: Close the issue now? Wait for Ed?
18:54:01 [DanC]
issue-52?
18:54:01 [trackbot]
ISSUE-52 -- Sending passwords in the clear -- CLOSED
18:54:01 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/52
18:54:11 [ht]
TVR: Not necessary, close it and notify him as a courtesy
18:54:28 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-54 / three actions wrt TagSoup
18:54:44 [ht]
DC: Recent progress on validator, some of it public. . .
18:54:50 [DanC]
action-7: http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/11/dreamimg_a_new_css_validator.html
18:54:50 [trackbot]
ACTION-7 draft a position regarding extensibility of HTML and the role of the validator for consideration by the TAG notes added
18:55:33 [ht]
DC: Blog posting by Olivier Theroux, which has attracted favourable comment
18:55:43 [ht]
SW: Waiting for Tim on the other two
18:56:20 [DanC]
s/Olivier Theroux/Olivier Théreaux/
18:57:19 [DanC]
ACTION-188 due 20 Nov 2008
18:57:19 [trackbot]
ACTION-188 Investigate the URL/IRI/Larry Masinter possible resolution of the URL/HTML5 issue. due date now 20 Nov 2008
18:57:46 [ht]
HST: Wrt ACTION-145, I still hope TBL will produce a publication from the positive parts of his paper and his TPAC slides
18:58:02 [ht]
DC: I'm about to get going on ACTION-188
18:58:11 [DanC]
(I'd like us to keep due dates in the future; if the chair expects tbl to continue work on 116, let's give it a due date in the future... e.g. the ftf agenda timeframe...)
18:58:12 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-57 / three actions
18:58:17 [DanC]
action-116 due 1 Dec 2008
18:58:17 [trackbot]
ACTION-116 Align the tabulator internal vocabulary with the vocabulary in the rules http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswDboothsRules, getting changes to either as needed. due date now 1 Dec 2008
18:58:38 [ht]
JR: ACTION-184 is about to be done
18:58:54 [ht]
SW: We're expecting something on ACTION-178 for the F2F
18:59:08 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-58 / ACTION-163
18:59:22 [ht]
NW: I still hope to work with Ted Guild on this, it is important
18:59:40 [ht]
SW: ISSUE-60 / three actions
18:59:50 [ht]
NW: I have sent TVR a review
19:00:20 [ht]
SW: I will do ACTION-143 at some point
19:00:34 [DanC]
(possible ftf fodder: the iphone urls thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Oct/0002.html )
19:00:53 [ht]
SW: ACTION-106
19:01:08 [ht]
NW: No progress, but I will try to get that ready for the f2f
19:01:27 [ht]
SW: I have done ACTION-190
19:01:36 [ht]
trackbot, close ACTION-190
19:01:36 [trackbot]
ACTION-190 Make the above resolution visible on www-tag closed
19:01:44 [Stuart]
close action-190
19:01:44 [trackbot]
ACTION-190 Make the above resolution visible on www-tag closed
19:02:26 [DanC]
agenda + ADsafe javascript
19:02:27 [ht]
ACTION-106: NW sent comments to TVR privately
19:02:28 [trackbot]
ACTION-106 Make a pass over the WebArch 2.0 doc't which adds a paragraph, and connects up to issues list notes added
19:02:43 [ht]
trackbot, close ACTION-106
19:02:43 [trackbot]
ACTION-106 Make a pass over the WebArch 2.0 doc't which adds a paragraph, and connects up to issues list closed
19:03:02 [ht]
TVR: I'm not sure about how to take this forward
19:03:37 [ht]
... I don't plan to pick it up, except to possibly add new uses
19:03:52 [ht]
TVR: I don't see how to get it to the right audience. . .
19:04:03 [ht]
SW, DC: Is there a blog article in there?
19:04:10 [DanC]
found it... http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url
19:04:10 [ht]
TVR: Perhaps. . .
19:05:06 [ht]
DC: Maybe I'll try to adapt it
19:05:10 [ht]
TVR: I will help
19:05:43 [ht]
ACTION: Dan to try to draft a blog posting adapted from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url, with help from TVR
19:05:43 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-193 - Try to draft a blog posting adapted from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url, with help from TVR [on Dan Connolly - due 2008-11-20].
19:06:29 [Stuart]
issue-61
19:06:32 [Stuart]
issue-61?
19:06:32 [trackbot]
ISSUE-61 -- URI Based Access to Packaged Items -- OPEN
19:06:32 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/61
19:07:23 [ht]
SW: We will discuss that next week
19:07:36 [ht]
Topic: December f2f topics
19:07:57 [DanC]
http://www.adsafe.org/
19:08:06 [ht]
DC: HTML5 and URLs, reread Doug Crockford's safe JavaScript
19:08:20 [ht]
... He's added a mode to JSLINT which verifies this
19:08:37 [ht]
... He's very critical of the work on cross-site access controls
19:08:51 [ht]
... He has an alternative, namely JSON-request
19:09:09 [ht]
... What could be the improvement, by using JSON instead of XML?
19:09:23 [ht]
... We could study that space, perhaps
19:09:39 [ht]
TVR: I tried to find the answer to that question, but didn't see it
19:10:24 [ht]
SW: DC, could you assemble a reading list?
19:10:45 [ht]
... If we scheduled this at the right time, could you join us by phone, TV?
19:11:25 [ht]
TVR: No, sorry, I will be travelling on the 11, and preparing on the day before
19:11:39 [ht]
SW: Sounds like a good idea in any case, DC, reading list please
19:11:45 [DanC]
iphone urls thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Oct/0002.html
19:11:56 [ht]
DC: There there's the iphone: URL thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Oct/0002.html
19:12:16 [ht]
... I can't get this started yet
19:12:47 [ht]
... MNot says [tongue in cheek?] "We need an Arch Group for this sort of thing"
19:13:09 [ht]
... I like tel: . . . blog entry: ???
19:13:39 [ht]
SW: We can talk about this on a call -- let's find a slot on one of the next two calls
19:13:48 [DanC]
(blog entry that celebrates tel: support http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/08/iphone_developer_guidelines_pr.html )
19:14:05 [ht]
TVR: We should maybe write down URI schemes we know about
19:14:13 [DanC]
(I try to garden http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes somewhat actively)
19:14:18 [ht]
... [lists some]
19:14:33 [ht]
TVR: It does help to look at these
19:14:53 [ht]
HST does review the registered and unregistered schemes lists with some regularity
19:15:08 [DanC]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes/ed2k
19:15:48 [ht]
DC: p2p ones are not lookup + hierarchy
19:16:12 [ht]
... I am bored by proposals which suggest replacing DNS
19:16:19 [ht]
... but these don't do that
19:16:41 [ht]
TVR: There are 4 parts to a URI: protocol, host, path and ??
19:17:08 [ht]
... But consider ??? -- doesn't change the host/DNS part, but changes the handler
19:17:34 [ht]
... Or ado:, as a protocol identifier for local work [missed some]
19:17:36 [DanC]
(ado isn't among the list in http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes . hmm.)
19:17:40 [Norm]
Yes, the fact that protocol handlers are easy to register is the interesting angle to me
19:18:03 [ht]
s/and ??/port/
19:18:14 [ht]
s/path port/path and port/
19:18:21 [Stuart]
kind of browser architecture stuff... maybe html5 should say something about plugin handlers...
19:19:01 [ht]
DC: SchemeProtocols is a good area to wander around periodically, not necessarly to try to draw hard conclusions
19:19:10 [ht]
SW: ADJOURNED
19:19:25 [Zakim]
-dorchard
19:19:31 [ht]
RRSAgent, make logs world-visible
19:19:32 [Zakim]
-Norm
19:19:34 [Zakim]
-Stuart
19:19:42 [ht]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
19:19:42 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-tagmem-minutes.html ht
19:19:44 [Zakim]
-Raman
19:19:55 [Zakim]
-Ht
19:20:03 [ht]
Take it easy Norm!
19:30:10 [DanC]
ACTION-145: see audio recording of tim's TPAC talk, to appear near http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/TPDay-Agenda
19:30:10 [trackbot]
ACTION-145 Add public prose around his slides at the AC meeting to make the case for extensiblity and flexible XML notes added
20:02:27 [Zakim]
-Jonathan_Rees
20:07:27 [Zakim]
disconnecting the lone participant, Danc, in TAG_Weekly()1:00PM
20:07:29 [Zakim]
TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended
20:07:30 [Zakim]
Attendees were Stuart, Norm, Jonathan_Rees, Danc, Raman, Ht, dorchard
20:12:01 [timbl]
timbl has joined #tagmem