14:53:58 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 14:53:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-bpwg-irc 14:54:00 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:54:00 Zakim has joined #bpwg 14:54:02 Zakim, this will be BPWG 14:54:02 ok, trackbot; I see MWI_BPWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 14:54:03 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 14:54:03 Date: 13 November 2008 14:54:27 zakim, ping me in 5 mins 14:54:27 ok, jo 14:55:59 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Nov/0030.html 14:56:23 yeliz has joined #bpwg 14:57:09 Regrets: Bryan, SangwhanMoon, rob, BruceLawson, Kai, DavidStorey 14:57:49 Regrets+ abel, nacho 14:59:08 zakim, code? 14:59:08 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jo 14:59:28 jo, you asked to be pinged at this time 14:59:40 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has now started 14:59:48 +??P4 15:00:02 zakim, ??P4 is me 15:00:02 +jo; got it 15:00:23 +Francois 15:00:35 cgi-irc has joined #bpwg 15:01:15 cgi-irc has joined #bpwg 15:01:50 +DKA 15:02:11 Chair: jo 15:02:34 +dom 15:02:41 DKA has joined #bpwg 15:02:46 zakim, who's here? 15:02:46 On the phone I see jo, Francois, DKA, dom 15:02:47 On IRC I see DKA, cgi-irc, yeliz, Zakim, RRSAgent, jo, francois, dom, trackbot 15:02:54 zakim, mute me 15:02:54 dom should now be muted 15:02:57 Hi all! 15:02:58 +Andrei 15:03:09 Ahem... Hello Mobile Web Fans! 15:03:12 miguel has joined #bpwg 15:03:23 +??P31 15:03:28 zakim, Andrei is really Adam 15:03:29 +Adam; got it 15:03:32 zakim, ??P31 is yeliz 15:03:35 +yeliz; got it 15:03:41 I am happy to scribe today. 15:03:50 Scribe: Dan 15:03:53 zakim, mute yeliz 15:03:53 yeliz should now be muted 15:03:54 ScribeNick: DKA 15:04:39 Topic: Korea poll 15:04:41 +[W3C-Spain] 15:04:58 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/BPWG-F2F-Seoul-2009/ Seoul Poll 15:05:26 SeanP has joined #bpwg 15:05:36 Jo: What do people think? 15:06:19 DKA: I'm a bit worried of organizing a long-haul travel for that F2F 15:06:26 ... getting a lot pressure on reducing travel cost 15:06:51 +SeanP 15:06:52 ... maybe we could revisit that plan 15:07:08 Dan: I'm worried about the wisdom of organizing a long-haul f2f. Positive about the idea and I feel it would be very valuable I am worried about it. 15:07:19 Jo: Suggest we reopen the poll. 15:07:33 Jo: We haven't had a full response so let's encourage people to do this for next week. 15:07:47 ACTION: Dan to encourage people to answer the poll. 15:07:48 Created ACTION-882 - Encourage people to answer the poll. [on Daniel Appelquist - due 2008-11-20]. 15:07:49 [I would also suggest revisiting that decision] 15:07:59 ack me 15:08:03 Jo: What do you mean? 15:08:35 s/What/Dom what/ 15:08:46 zakim, mute me 15:08:46 dom should now be muted 15:08:47 Dom: Having a f2f meeting in Korea might be problematic for many people to participate. It would be good explain this... 15:09:23 Topic: mobileOK Basic Tests in PR 15:09:27 Jo: Anything to report? 15:09:44 Francois: nothing to report - things going as smooth as possible. We received a few strongly supporting comments from AC. 15:09:50 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ 15:09:59 jsmanrique has joined #bpwg 15:09:59 Jo: Let's make sure everyone has expressed support. 15:10:14 Topic: ETSI 15:10:15 q+ DKA 15:10:22 ack dka 15:10:44 q- 15:11:00 Jo: Let's move on. 15:11:03 zakim, unmute yeliz 15:11:03 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:11:07 Topic: Update on Mobile Accessibility 15:11:27 Yeliz: not much to report. No update on the document. Not sure about the progress of the main technical document. 15:12:13 ACTION: Yeliz to take an action to talk to Alan and report back to group on status of technical doc. 15:12:14 Created ACTION-883 - Take an action to talk to Alan and report back to group on status of technical doc. [on Yeliz Yesilada - due 2008-11-20]. 15:12:31 Topic: BP 1.5 15:12:31 zakim, mute yeliz 15:12:31 yeliz should now be muted 15:12:37 ack me 15:12:38 Jo: anything to say here? 15:13:02 Dom: Didn't Kai ask for specific approval of the new proposed structure? 15:13:18 Jo: Maybe we can take that resolution. 15:13:39 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Kai please go ahead per the discussions under ACTION-871 and ACTION-872 15:14:04 Dom: He was asking if we wanted to go ahead with the new format for BP 1.5. 15:14:19 PhilA has joined #bpwg 15:14:24 +abel 15:14:25 Dom: I think he wanted more detail than that. 15:15:02 ACTION: Jo to ask Kai to summarise ACTION-871 and ACTGION-872 threads so we can take a resolution on it 15:15:04 Created ACTION-884 - Ask Kai to summarise ACTION-871 and ACTGION-872 threads so we can take a resolution on it [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-11-20]. 15:15:17 zakim, mute me 15:15:17 dom should now be muted 15:15:20 Topic: MobileOK Scheme 15:15:23 Jo: A draft today on that. 15:15:25 -abel 15:15:46 Jo: I proposed a resolution earlier today. There are more changes in the works to the draft. 15:15:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Trustmark/latest tomorrow's draft of mobileOK Scheme 15:16:20 Jo: What we've got now is better than what's there right now. 15:16:21 +1 15:16:28 +1 to publish the new draft 15:16:33 no 15:16:39 +abel 15:16:40 Jo: Any views - should we delay? 15:17:18 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: BPWG requests prublication of the mobileOK Scheme Dated 14 Nov 2008 as a Group Working Draft 15:17:26 ack me 15:17:43 Dom: For clarification this would mean this is not the final document just another working version. 15:18:05 Jo: Yes because we don't have a link to the license version. I wish it could be the final version. 15:18:10 +1 on new WD 15:18:16 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: BPWG requests publication of the mobileOK Scheme Dated 14 Nov 2008 as a Group Working Draft 15:18:16 +1 on the resolution 15:18:16 +1 15:18:18 zakim, mute me 15:18:18 dom should now be muted 15:18:19 +1 15:18:21 +1 15:18:23 +1 15:18:23 Jo: Any objections? 15:18:32 DKA: +1 on the resolution 15:18:33 jsmanrique: +1 15:18:33 dom: zakim, mute me 15:18:33 Zakim: dom should now be muted 15:18:33 francois: +1 15:18:33 adam: +1 15:18:35 yeliz: +1 15:18:37 DKA: Jo: Any objections? 15:18:54 :-) 15:19:07 RESOLUTION: BPWG requests publication of the mobileOK Scheme Dated 14 Nov 2008 as a Group working draft 15:19:27 Jo: Yay! 15:19:34 double yay! 15:19:49 Topic: Content Transformation 15:19:51 Jo: Francois? 15:20:04 Francois: there's a new draft in town 15:20:20 Francois: New draft includes all the changes we made due to last call comments. 15:20:25 PhilA has left #bpwg 15:20:31 Francois: Some comments in already. 15:20:34 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/081107 New draft of CT 15:20:59 Francois: New invited expert - Edwardo - he has sent constructive comments. 15:21:06 Zakim: abel is manrique 15:21:12 zakim, mute yeliz 15:21:12 yeliz was already muted, yeliz 15:21:16 s/Edwardo/Eduardo/ 15:21:47 Jo: So a few things to tidy up. But very little left open. Moderately positive about getting through all of these within next couple of weeks. 15:22:37 Jo: We've got a big hole in https where we need further clarification and have had no replies yet. 15:23:14 Francois: I sent an email to the IETF mailing list and didn't get any replies. I think that probably it also means there's not much more information that we're missing. I don't think we should worry too much. 15:23:26 Jo: Questions / comments? 15:23:55 Dan: Will CT be one of the documents released before end-of-year? 15:24:02 Jo: I'd like it to be. 15:24:04 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008AprJun/0066.html publication moratorium for the end of year 15:24:11 Francois: Yes but not sure it can be last call working draft. 15:24:17 Jo: Be positive! 15:24:31 Topic: BP2 15:25:10 Adam: Not much progress this and next week - after that things should pick up. Completed draft before meeting after next. 15:25:41 Jo: Looking at the timings, there's a publication moritorium before the end of the year - we should aim to have another public draft before that. 15:25:43 Adam: yes. 15:27:18 Dan: Should we consider mobile ajax styleguide from OAA? 15:27:31 http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/Mobile_Device_APIs_Style_Guide 15:27:39 Adam: I will review. 15:27:46 [I think this is for developing APIs, rather than developing content] 15:27:46 Topic: Issues & Actions 15:27:53 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/open 15:28:12 Yes but we should still review and see if there's anything relevant to bp2. 15:28:24 zakim, mute yeliz 15:28:24 yeliz was already muted, dom 15:28:27 ACTION-694? 15:28:27 ACTION-694 -- Scott Hughes to review apple document and summarise the parts that might be applicable to BP2 -- due 2008-07-29 -- OPEN 15:28:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/694 15:29:17 ack me 15:29:20 Jo: Scott member of the group? 15:29:31 Dan: Scott has had his time pulled away from the group unfortunately. 15:29:38 Jo: Can we transfer this action to someone else please? 15:29:53 cgi-irc has joined #bpwg 15:30:20 Dan: Please assign the action back to me and I will chase Scott. 15:30:31 ACTION-694? 15:30:31 ACTION-694 -- Daniel Appelquist to review apple document and summarise the parts that might be applicable to BP2 -- due 2008-11-20 -- OPEN 15:30:31 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/694 15:30:54 ACTION-697? 15:30:54 ACTION-697 -- Daniel Appelquist to summarize the points he can glean from examination of the frost library -- due 2008-09-10 -- OPEN 15:30:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/697 15:31:09 Dan: summarizes points as follows: 15:31:13 Dan: no points. 15:31:29 CLOSE ACTION-697 15:31:30 ACTION-697 Summarize the points he can glean from examination of the frost library closed 15:31:37 ACTION-710? 15:31:37 ACTION-710 -- François Daoust to test the Effect of HEAD Requests on Various Servers -- due 2008-07-16 -- OPEN 15:31:37 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/710 15:32:16 Francois: I did this - should I send a public report. 15:32:27 Dan: I think so - just for posterity's sake. 15:32:36 Francois: I will send as an email. 15:32:54 ACTION-711? 15:32:54 ACTION-711 -- Soonho Lee to provide Feedback on Content Transformation Document -- due 2008-07-10 -- OPEN 15:32:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/711 15:33:07 CLOSE ACTION-711 15:33:07 ACTION-711 Provide Feedback on Content Transformation Document closed 15:33:15 ACTION-721? 15:33:15 ACTION-721 -- François Daoust to prepare a report's form to fill to test Aaron static/dynamic example -- due 2008-08-14 -- OPEN 15:33:15 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/721 15:33:55 Francois: A long time ago, Aaron sent a couple of tests comparing static web page with dynamicly assembling the page. I haven't done this. 15:34:07 Francois: I think it's still a good idea. 15:34:16 ACTION-730? 15:34:16 ACTION-730 -- François Daoust to work with jo to figure out the details of a workshop on Content Transformation -- due 2008-08-28 -- OPEN 15:34:16 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/730 15:34:34 Jo: Postpone this until February ok? 15:34:54 jeffs has joined #bpwg 15:34:58 Jo: I will move it to February the 20th of next year. 15:35:22 ACTION-783? 15:35:22 ACTION-783 -- Daniel Appelquist to come up with alternative phrasing for Web 2.0 -- due 2008-07-31 -- OPEN 15:35:22 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/783 15:35:34 The whole general thingy you know? 15:35:41 ack me 15:36:15 Dom: the MWABP talks about Web 2.0 and this action was to find a better phrasing. 15:36:16 + +1.585.278.aaaa 15:36:31 zakim, mute me 15:36:31 dom should now be muted 15:36:31 zakim, aaaa is jeffs 15:36:32 +jeffs; got it 15:36:33 Jo: I vote for leaving it as is. 15:37:04 "Readers of this document are expected to be familiar with the creation of Web applications, and to have a general familiarity with the technologies involved, such as Web servers, HTTP, and Web 2.0." 15:37:11 in http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/BestPractices-2.0/ED-mobile-bp2-20081008#audience 15:37:49 http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/#audience 15:39:12 Adam: I will take it on - please close it. 15:39:23 ACTION-787? 15:39:24 ACTION-787 -- Scott Hughes to draft text re power efficiency -- due 2008-07-31 -- OPEN 15:39:24 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/787 15:39:56 Dan: I will chase Scott. 15:40:28 ACTION-788 15:40:30 ACTION-788? 15:40:30 ACTION-788 -- Daniel Appelquist to communicate with OpenAjax Alliance about the backlighting issue and null gestures -- due 2008-06-24 -- OPEN 15:40:30 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/788 15:41:30 Dan: I contacted OAA but didn't received a response yet. 15:41:43 Jo: We will re-action you to get a response [edits action] 15:41:57 ACTION-789? 15:41:57 ACTION-789 -- Scott Hughes to propose text for different interaction modes in discussion with Adam -- due 2008-06-24 -- OPEN 15:41:57 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/789 15:42:21 Close ACTION-789 15:42:21 ACTION-789 Propose text for different interaction modes in discussion with Adam closed 15:42:24 Adam: This turns into a section of BP2. 15:42:33 ACTION-791? 15:42:33 ACTION-791 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft some text on WICD -- due 2008-06-24 -- OPEN 15:42:33 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/791 15:42:54 Close ACTION-791 15:42:54 ACTION-791 Draft some text on WICD closed 15:43:05 ACTION-794? 15:43:05 ACTION-794 -- Adam Connors to lead off discussion on ISSUE-265 following completion of next draft BP2 -- due 2008-07-17 -- OPEN 15:43:05 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/794 15:43:11 ISSUE-265? 15:43:11 ISSUE-265 -- Discussion of Jonathan's Submission ref separation of structure presentation and behavior at http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dhpvgnmn_54d7cbhrhn -- OPEN 15:43:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/265 15:43:30 Jo: Adam? 15:43:52 Adam: Have not completed response - leave open. 15:43:53 zakim, who's making noise? 15:43:55 ACTION-796? 15:43:59 ACTION-796 -- Daniel Appelquist to contact BBC to see if they can make their mobile web site mobileOK -- due 2008-06-25 -- OPEN 15:43:59 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/796 15:44:04 dom, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: jsmanrique (38%), jo (39%), DKA (50%), Adam (4%) 15:44:26 ACTION-797? 15:44:27 ACTION-797 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to check on availability of data about the number of acceptable links in a focus-based browser -- due 2008-09-24 -- OPEN 15:44:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/797 15:44:38 Jo: Jeff? 15:45:09 Jeff: I've got a UI colleague looking for prior literature but hasn't found any yet. Think it's worth continuting looking. 15:45:16 Jo: Ok we'll leave it open for now. 15:45:26 ACTION-820? 15:45:26 ACTION-820 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to look at providing examples for accessibility document -- due 2008-10-01 -- OPEN 15:45:26 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/820 15:46:32 Jeff: In 2 weeks we will pick up after the group look at condensing down WCAG into something usable by mobile developers... 15:46:47 Jo: Let's leave it open for the time being. 15:46:51 ACTION-823? 15:46:52 ACTION-823 -- Adam Connors to stimulate another round of discussion on what is missing from BP-2 FPWD -- due 2008-08-07 -- OPEN 15:46:52 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/823 15:47:01 Close ACTION-823 15:47:01 ACTION-823 Stimulate another round of discussion on what is missing from BP-2 FPWD closed 15:47:08 ACTION-830? 15:47:10 ACTION-830 -- Bryan Sullivan to review correspondence with Dennis cf LC-2065 and to draft a) proposed changes to the document and b) a proposed response to Dennis -- due 2008-09-09 -- OPEN 15:47:10 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/830 15:47:16 ACTION-832? 15:47:16 ACTION-832 -- Sean Patterson to look at what the impact on the document would be if we removed the definitions referred to in LC-2050 -- due 2008-09-08 -- OPEN 15:47:16 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/832 15:48:04 ACTION-846? 15:48:04 ACTION-846 -- François Daoust to prepare an Implementation Conformance Statement -- due 2008-09-30 -- OPEN 15:48:04 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/846 15:48:24 ACTION-853? 15:48:24 ACTION-853 -- Adam Connors to re-write 3.1.1 along the lines discussed today. -- due 2008-10-03 -- OPEN 15:48:24 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/853 15:48:45 Adam: That came out of the editorial meeting. it's done. 15:48:52 close ACTION-853 15:48:53 ACTION-853 Re-write 3.1.1 along the lines discussed today. closed 15:49:02 ACTION-855? 15:49:03 ACTION-855 -- Adam Connors to add an appendix on device info based on Bryan's contribution with a placeholder for additional device capabilities that are implied by the BP2 BPs. -- due 2008-10-03 -- OPEN 15:49:03 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/855 15:49:32 Adam: better leave it open - I'll go through the minutes to clarify. 15:50:05 ACTION-866? 15:50:07 ACTION-866 -- Jo Rabin to include text referencing resolution to LC-2003 -- due 2008-10-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:50:07 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/866 15:50:09 ACTION-862? 15:50:09 ACTION-862 -- Adam Connors to send email about issues -- due 2008-10-15 -- OPEN 15:50:09 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/862 15:50:31 Close ACTION-862 15:50:31 ACTION-862 Send email about issues closed 15:50:39 ACTION-867? 15:50:41 ACTION-867 -- François Daoust to look into an appendix with relevant normative statements of RFC2616 and report back to the group. -- due 2008-10-27 -- OPEN 15:50:41 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/867 15:51:06 ACTION-870? 15:51:06 ACTION-870 -- Daniel Appelquist to liaise with Seungyun and Jonathan re setting up a call in 4 weeks with a view to having 2 weekly calls in the morning European time -- due 2008-10-28 -- OPEN 15:51:06 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/870 15:51:18 Dan: Not done yet. 15:51:36 ACTION-873? 15:51:41 ACTION-873 -- Daniel Appelquist to provide some words on conservative use of resources -- due 2008-10-28 -- OPEN 15:51:41 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/873 15:52:09 Adam: this is the plea to help the poor network operators. 15:52:13 Dan: not done. 15:52:16 ACTION-874? 15:52:16 ACTION-874 -- Adam Connors to refine the wording on graceful degradation trimming and making more explicit the text -- due 2008-10-27 -- OPEN 15:52:16 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/874 15:52:29 Adam: not done yet. 15:52:36 ACTION-876? 15:52:36 ACTION-876 -- Adam Connors to send to Jeff list of test cases that Jeff can inflict on a grad student. -- due 2008-10-27 -- OPEN 15:52:36 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/876 15:53:54 Jeff: The test cases have been received. We have a grad student lined up when we're back from break. 15:53:58 jeffs has joined #bpwg 15:54:16 Jo: Rest of the open actions were raised today or not overdue yet. 15:54:41 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/pendingreview Pending Review Actions 15:55:03 ScribeNick: adam 15:55:17 ACTION-762 15:55:26 ACTION-762 ? 15:55:26 ACTION-762 -- Jo Rabin to review ISSUE-250 with a view to how this affects content of mobileOK scheme -- due 2008-05-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:55:26 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/762 15:55:45 jo: going to close this one, I've done my bit. 15:55:53 Close ACTION-762 15:55:53 ACTION-762 Review ISSUE-250 with a view to how this affects content of mobileOK scheme closed 15:56:02 ACTION-786 ? 15:56:02 ACTION-786 -- Jo Rabin to draft wording for an appendix that identifies the aggregators and operator roles that are different in the mobile ecosystem. -- due 2008-06-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:56:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/786 15:56:32 ACTION 790 ? 15:56:32 Sorry, couldn't find user - 790 15:56:39 ACTION-790 ? 15:56:39 ACTION-790 -- Alan Chuter to produce some text around accessibility of Javascript for Web Application Best Practices -- due 2008-07-03 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:56:39 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/790 15:56:42 ACTION-792 ? 15:56:42 ACTION-792 -- Abel Rionda to propose some text on SVG -- due 2008-07-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:56:42 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/792 15:56:45 q+ 15:56:47 ack me 15:57:05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Jul/0090.html 15:57:47 ACTION-842 ? 15:57:47 ACTION-842 -- François Daoust to get back to aaron from google to see if he can get some stats for us -- due 2008-10-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:57:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/842 15:57:50 Scribe: Dan 15:57:51 Close ACtion-842 15:57:51 ACTION-842 Get back to aaron from google to see if he can get some stats for us closed 15:57:54 ScribeNick: DKA 15:58:00 ACTION-843? 15:58:00 ACTION-843 -- Jo Rabin to see if he can come up with wording on this section that might accommodate everyone -- due 2008-09-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:58:00 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/843 15:58:05 ACTION-844? 15:58:06 ACTION-844 -- Adam Connors to raise ISSUEs based on Bryan's comments -- due 2008-09-16 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:58:06 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/844 15:58:14 close action-844 15:58:14 ACTION-844 Raise ISSUEs based on Bryan's comments closed 15:58:47 ACTION-863? 15:58:47 ACTION-863 -- Jo Rabin to reword following WSC WG feedback on proposed changes to mobileOK Basic -- due 2008-10-14 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:58:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/863 15:58:53 Jo: that's done. 15:59:00 close ACTION-863 15:59:00 ACTION-863 Reword following WSC WG feedback on proposed changes to mobileOK Basic closed 15:59:52 ACTION-871? 15:59:52 ACTION-871 -- Jo Rabin to work with Kai on clarifying purpose text of bp 1.5 -- due 2008-10-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:59:52 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/871 16:00:01 ACTION-872? 16:00:01 ACTION-872 -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux to work on reformulating 4 "tests" of BP 1.5 -- due 2008-10-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:00:01 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/872 16:00:07 Close Action-872 16:00:07 ACTION-872 Work on reformulating 4 "tests" of BP 1.5 closed 16:00:08 Jo: both 871 and 872 are done. 16:00:22 close action-871 16:00:22 ACTION-871 Work with Kai on clarifying purpose text of bp 1.5 closed 16:00:32 ACTION-875? 16:00:32 ACTION-875 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to scope current draft and see what aspects may be of interest to us. -- due 2008-10-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:00:32 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/875 16:00:41 yeliz_ has joined #bpwg 16:00:55 Jo: We'll come back to ETSI review in a second. 16:01:12 ACTION-876? 16:01:12 ACTION-876 -- Adam Connors to send to Jeff list of test cases that Jeff can inflict on a grad student. -- due 2008-10-25 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:01:12 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/876 16:01:46 ACTION-877? 16:01:46 ACTION-877 -- François Daoust to create a poll on Alan's document once it's published as an updated working draft with a review period of 4 weeks -- due 2008-11-12 -- OPEN 16:01:46 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/877 16:02:00 ACTION-878? 16:02:00 ACTION-878 -- François Daoust to create a poll on having f2f in seoul on week of February 2nd -- due 2008-10-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:02:00 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/878 16:02:07 Jo: That's done. 16:02:10 close action-878 16:02:10 ACTION-878 Create a poll on having f2f in seoul on week of February 2nd closed 16:02:25 Jo: Stupendous! 16:02:41 Topic: Issues Pending Review 16:02:53 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/pendingreview Issues Pending Review 16:02:54 [silence] 16:03:22 ISSUE-256? 16:03:22 ISSUE-256 -- Call for 10 mobileOK sites -- RAISED 16:03:22 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/256 16:03:23 ISSUE-256? 16:03:23 ISSUE-256 -- Call for 10 mobileOK sites -- RAISED 16:03:23 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/256 16:03:30 Jo: It's done right? 16:03:40 Close ISSUE-256 16:03:52 +1 to closing 16:04:12 ISSUE-267? 16:04:12 ISSUE-267 -- Respond to ETSI liaison -- RAISED 16:04:12 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/267 16:04:26 Jo: that's closed - it was the other liaison. 16:04:43 ISSUE-269? 16:04:44 ISSUE-269 -- Need clarity on the meaning of a mobileOK Claim, Basic Tests or not? -- RAISED 16:04:44 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/269 16:04:52 Jo: That's done afaic 16:04:58 ISSUE-273? 16:04:59 ISSUE-273 -- Is the mobileOK Pro Tests document supposed to be an addendum to the Best Practices document or to the Basic Tests document? -- RAISED 16:04:59 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/273 16:05:13 Jo: The answer is both. 16:05:32 ack me 16:06:42 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ref ISSUE-273 the answer is both per AVTION-871 and ACTION-872 16:06:50 +1 16:06:56 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ref ISSUE-273 the answer is both per ACTION-871 and ACTION-872 16:06:59 +1 and stuff 16:07:09 RESOLUTION: ref ISSUE-273 the answer is both per ACTION-871 and ACTION-872 16:07:15 ISSUE-276? 16:07:15 ISSUE-276 -- 3.1.1 Retain Personalization Information -- RAISED 16:07:15 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/276 16:07:39 Adam: This has been rewritten so this should be closed. 16:07:43 ISSUE-282? 16:07:43 ISSUE-282 -- What to do about the "together" section in the accessibility doc? Remove it? Expand it? -- RAISED 16:07:43 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/282 16:07:53 Jo: This is a moot point. 16:07:59 Jo: So close. 16:08:05 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/pendingreview no pending review issues! 16:08:13 Topic: Open Issues 16:08:36 :-) 16:08:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/open Open Issues 16:08:57 ISSUE-116? 16:08:57 ISSUE-116 -- Thematic Consistency checking -- OPEN 16:08:57 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/116 16:09:42 Jo: It's no longer relevant. Objections to closing? 16:09:54 [no objections] 16:10:01 ISSUE-188? 16:10:02 ISSUE-188 -- Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? -- OPEN 16:10:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/188 16:10:13 achuter has joined #bpwg 16:10:18 kill 16:10:22 Jo: From march 2007. I suggest we close this as well. Objections? 16:10:26 [none] 16:10:31 Jo: It's closed. 16:10:37 ISSUE-248? 16:10:37 ISSUE-248 -- Can mobile device browsers make use of microformats? -- OPEN 16:10:37 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/248 16:10:44 Jo: Should we keep this open? 16:10:50 Dan: Close it. 16:11:20 Jo: Ok we'll kill it. 16:12:03 ISSUE-262? 16:12:03 ISSUE-262 -- Discuss the option to offer choices of presentation as a best practices for mobile web apps -- OPEN 16:12:03 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/262 16:12:59 +[IPcaller] 16:13:12 zakim, +[IPcaller] is me 16:13:12 sorry, achuter, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 16:13:22 zakim, IPcaller is me 16:13:22 +achuter; got it 16:13:28 Jo: Who would like to volunteer some text as choices of representation as a bp of mwabp. 16:13:35 Jo: Anybody? 16:14:21 Jo: I'd like to offer following as proposed text I prepared earlier. 16:14:40 http://mobiforge.com/designing/story/a-very-modern-mobile-switching-algorithm-part-i 16:15:20 Jo: let's leave this open for the time being. 16:15:28 think I need to read that first 16:15:43 ISSUE-263? 16:15:44 ISSUE-263 -- How to keep the screen alive (re null gestures) - what to recommend? -- OPEN 16:15:44 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/263 16:16:39 ISSUE-264? 16:16:39 ISSUE-264 -- How to rephrase progressive enhancement to make it fit as a BP? -- OPEN 16:16:39 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/264 16:16:56 go for the rewite 16:16:58 Adam: this is a conversation we had at last f2f - lots of good actions which are still being written up. 16:17:24 ISSUE-268? 16:17:25 ISSUE-268 -- Test cases to illustrate mobile web application best practices -- OPEN 16:17:25 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/268 16:17:39 useful 16:17:43 ISSUE-271? 16:17:43 ISSUE-271 -- Next steps on the conversion of mobileOK Pro to the Addendum to BP 1.0 -- OPEN 16:17:43 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/271 16:17:48 Jo: Can we close this one? 16:17:52 kill it 16:18:02 Jo: OK close it. 16:18:07 ISSUE-272? 16:18:11 ISSUE-272 -- What is the new name of document, currently called "mobileOK Pro Tests Version 1", which is supposed to be an addendum to the Best Practices document, to be? -- OPEN 16:18:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/272 16:18:18 Jo: We can close that one. 16:18:23 ISSUE-274 16:18:27 ISSUE-274? 16:18:28 ISSUE-274 -- Which texts are missing from the addendum that are needed to turn it into an addendum? -- OPEN 16:18:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/274 16:18:47 akim, mute me 16:18:51 zakim, mute me 16:18:51 achuter should now be muted 16:19:06 Jo: I think we can close this issue. 16:19:13 kill 16:19:19 Jo: Any objections? 16:19:20 [none] 16:19:26 Jo: Let's close. 16:19:27 ISSUE-275? 16:19:27 ISSUE-275 -- 4.2.1 Protect Personal Information -- OPEN 16:19:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/275 16:19:36 Adam: I rewrote this so it's done. 16:19:40 Jo: Close then. 16:19:48 [278 and 279 as well] 16:19:52 q+ 16:19:53 ack me 16:19:57 Jo: Ok everybodee! 16:20:10 Dom: On ISSUE-279, I think that Bryan has an open action it. 16:20:22 Adam: yes - well spoted. 16:20:43 Jo: So leave ISSUE-279 open [but close ISSUE-278] 16:20:48 Topic: Review of Jeff's ACTION-875 on ETSI Review 16:21:16 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2008Oct/0031.html Jeff's comments 16:21:23 ACTION-875? 16:21:23 ACTION-875 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to scope current draft and see what aspects may be of interest to us. -- due 2008-10-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:21:23 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/875 16:21:34 Jo: Take it away Jeff! 16:22:47 -achuter 16:23:23 Jeff: Basically the document refered to from ETSI is really something that refers to another quite a bit thicker document. Have sent out email with liittle response. Before I go into this document I want to get steer from the group. Some of the sections seem releavnt. Have sent email. 16:24:01 Jo: I think these documents are not review for very much longer. 16:24:21 Jeff: Reality check - I raised 2 issues - do you want me to address both of them in my response? 16:24:37 Jo: That's fine. 16:25:21 ACTION: Jeff to draft a response to ETSI ref his 2 main issues as discussed under ACTION-875 16:25:21 Sorry, couldn't find user - Jeff 16:25:22 -SeanP 16:25:35 ACTION: Jeffs to draft a response to ETSI ref his 2 main issues as discussed under ACTION-875 16:25:35 Sorry, couldn't find user - Jeffs 16:25:51 ACTION: sonstein to draft a response to ETSI ref his 2 main issues as discussed under ACTION-875 16:25:51 Created ACTION-885 - Draft a response to ETSI ref his 2 main issues as discussed under ACTION-875 [on Jeffrey Sonstein - due 2008-11-20]. 16:26:21 +SeanP 16:26:23 Jo: Thanks for that Jeff. 16:27:00 Topic: AOB 16:27:34 What do you call a problem like Luca? 16:27:49 -dom 16:27:51 -SeanP 16:27:52 -Francois 16:27:53 s/Luca/uh.. best practices/ 16:27:57 -Adam 16:27:58 -jo 16:28:00 -yeliz 16:28:02 -miguel 16:28:04 -DKA 16:28:04 miguel has left #bpwg 16:28:07 -jeffs 16:28:09 -jsmanrique 16:28:10 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended 16:28:12 Attendees were jo, Francois, DKA, dom, Adam, yeliz, miguel, SeanP, jsmanrique, +1.585.278.aaaa, jeffs, achuter 16:28:15 DKA, you there??? 16:28:21 That was a brilliant minimalist art piece. you just didn't get it. 16:28:44 Still here. 16:29:03 ?? 16:29:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:29:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-bpwg-minutes.html francois