20:46:55 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 20:46:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/11/11-mediaann-irc 20:47:02 meeting: media annotations WG 20:47:05 chair: Felix 20:47:32 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Nov/0048.html 20:47:48 regrets: Daniel, Raphael, Thierry, Erik, Davy 20:50:32 wbailer has joined #mediaann 20:53:44 I'm affraid I won't be able to be on the phone, only IRC 20:54:52 present: dave, felix, joakim, pierre, ruben, werner 20:55:15 wonsuk has joined #mediaann 20:55:24 present+ wonsuk 20:55:35 tobiasbuerger has joined #mediaann 20:55:42 present+ tobias 20:56:52 IA_MAWG()4:00PM has now started 20:56:59 +AndreaP 20:58:03 +??P1 20:58:14 Zakim, P1 is me 20:58:14 sorry, tobiasbuerger, I do not recognize a party named 'P1' 20:58:26 +Felix 20:58:29 +??P2 20:59:04 Zakim, ??P1 20:59:04 I don't understand '??P1', tobiasbuerger 20:59:06 +jcraig 20:59:13 zakim, jcraig is dsinger 20:59:13 +dsinger; got it 20:59:38 sorry for my newbieness, but can zakim call me? 20:59:53 + +43.316.876.aaaa 21:00:16 zakim, aaaa is me 21:00:16 +wbailer; got it 21:02:31 scribe: werner 21:02:35 scribeNick: wbailer 21:02:43 +??P5 21:03:18 ??P7 21:03:27 ??p7 21:03:47 zakim, ??p7 21:03:47 I don't understand '??p7', js 21:03:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Nov/0048.html 21:04:16 topic: Agenda review / approval of previous minutes 21:04:24 http://www.w3.org/2008/10/23-mediaann-minutes.html 21:04:29 http://www.w3.org/2008/10/24-mediaann-minutes.html 21:04:33 ??P2 is joakim 21:05:11 minutes approved 21:05:21 topic: Selection of scribe for next meeting. 21:05:28 joakim 21:05:34 topic: Future telephone conferences and f2f meetings / call time 21:06:46 see admin page 21:06:51 topic: Action items 21:07:02 by the way, Eric Carlson is also here on the same line and IRC with me 21:07:21 present+ ericCarlson 21:07:49 cgi-irc has joined #mediaann 21:08:10 introduction eric carlson (Apple) 21:08:19 frank has joined #mediaann 21:08:53 close ACTION-20 21:08:53 ACTION-20 Add a link from WG page to the "still alive" MMSEM wiki pages and to make sure that everybody can edit the pages closed 21:09:10 action-20 done 21:09:10 hello everybody, Veronique and I call in now (we share a phone) 21:09:34 close ACTION-21 21:09:34 ACTION-21 Create a liaison to Geolocation WG closed 21:10:01 ACTION-22 Go back to Karen and check about " IPTV metadata specification" - what is it, is it available for us? - pending 21:10:30 close ACTION-23 21:10:30 ACTION-23 Explain XMLSPEC to wonsuk closed 21:10:42 + +31.20.612.aabb 21:11:17 close ACTION-24 21:11:17 ACTION-24 Get CVS accounts for veronique and wonsuk closed 21:11:40 close ACTION-25 21:11:40 ACTION-25 Review XMP basic schema closed 21:11:58 close ACTION-26 21:11:58 ACTION-26 Review XMP Dublin Core schema closed 21:12:07 close ACTION-27 21:12:07 ACTION-27 Review XMP Rights Management schema closed 21:12:17 close ACTION-28 21:12:17 ACTION-28 Review XMP Media Management schema closed 21:12:24 close ACTION-29 21:12:24 ACTION-29 Tell Wonsuk to review XMP Basic Job Ticket schema and Paged-Text schema closed 21:12:37 close ACTION-30 21:12:37 ACTION-30 Review XMP Dynamic Media schema closed 21:12:49 close ACTION-31 21:12:49 ACTION-31 Contact tom baker about dc liaison closed 21:13:14 action-32 Make a liaison with MPEG using information from the XP homepage - pending 21:13:30 action-33 Evaluate if contact to IPTV Japan is valuable - pending 21:13:47 action-34 Contact Open IPTV forum - pending 21:14:03 close ACTION-35 21:14:03 ACTION-35 Check contacts to OMA closed 21:15:01 action: Felix to make a liaison with OMA 21:15:01 Created ACTION-36 - Make a liaison with OMA [on Felix Sasaki - due 2008-11-18]. 21:15:37 topic: New use case "Digital imaging lifecycle" 21:15:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0078.html 21:15:52 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Nov/0000.html 21:16:45 ruben: jpeg in process of defining metadata for digital image lifecycle 21:17:01 ... specific type of search/retrieval uc 21:18:31 felix: keep use case and discuss in future call 21:18:39 or via mail 21:18:57 topic: New use case "life log" 21:19:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0073.html 21:20:57 maybe it can be an interesting use case for checking how the interoperability across media can be achieved 21:21:24 veronique = cgi-irc 21:21:30 +1 veronique 21:22:07 veronique: consider in second stage of ontology dvelopment 21:22:38 topic: XMP review 21:22:44 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP 21:23:55 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#Dublin_Core_schema 21:24:21 thierry: dublin core: everything could be adopted 21:25:49 felix: some fields (eg data) quite general, might conflict with fields from other standards 21:26:29 +1, I think for most dc fields we need to specify how we use them 21:27:04 ruben: granularity of fields (eg name, more structured eg in mpeg-7) 21:27:56 david: string is general, everything else might cause eg internationalisation problems 21:29:10 it may be solved, but it can be a tarpit 21:29:28 goal is to keep simple 21:29:43 veronique: pointing to vocbulary (eg artist names) 21:29:54 wouldn't that be interesting, nevertheless, to allow the URI of another resource (possibly defined elswhere), insread of a plain string? 21:30:30 felix: need to decide whether internationalistation of names is an issue or we just map to simple strings 21:30:45 topic: XMP Basic schema 21:30:45 it's intriguing to think that anything can be a value or a URI 21:30:57 but what happens if I say "my name is" "URI to jpeg image" 21:31:00 ? 21:31:30 I was rather suggesting "the creator is (string|URI)" 21:31:44 david: uri issues brings us back to foaf 21:32:20 I'm not suggesting that we should embed the descrition of that URI... 21:32:23 friend of a friend? 21:33:50 http://www.foaf-project.org/ 21:33:51 you mean? 21:34:22 A string is not less ambigious than a URI (I could write name = sjdhfqflf 21:34:59 I would say a string is *much more* ambiguous 21:35:06 joakim: foaf is used in imdb 21:35:25 But we can not assume every person to have a URI with appropriate FOAF properties 21:35:31 in terms of presentation, it's very clear; a URI ("gopher:" ?) is much less obviously presentable 21:35:33 foaf is used by linked movie database 21:37:08 felix: string may be meaningful or not, additional uri (need to ensure that uri points to suitable resource) 21:37:16 also a problem with "address" field 21:37:41 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Basic_schema 21:38:13 felix: going through elements 21:39:40 topic: XMP Rights Management schema 21:39:41 topic: XMP Rights Management schema 21:39:43 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Rights_Management_schema 21:41:28 dave: even simple copyright can become complex (eg composition of media) 21:41:51 ... simple copyright cannot be ignored 21:42:23 felix: does that require to include properties into ontology 21:42:49 dave: simple copyright, global to media 21:43:21 I thought we had decided in the last f2f meeting that we simply go for one slot 21:43:38 joakim: dynamic temporal metadata support (for real time apps) 21:43:59 I am tempted to say that ALL metadata is temporal, but the first version only allows you to ask "right now" what is...? 21:44:19 which covers a radio station where it varies by song... 21:44:26 topic: XMP Media Management schema 21:44:28 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Media_Management_schema 21:46:15 veronique: 3 levels: content - realisation -instance 21:46:35 ... still to be decided whether 3 or 1 level 21:47:25 yes, use cases are essential: we'll never decide what we want if we don't know what we want it to be useful for 21:47:37 Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FRBR 21:47:44 ruben: different levels could simplify things (e.g. content description such as title vs tech metadata like encoding) 21:48:07 +1 ruben 21:48:23 we can also check out how many models go for 3 levels and how many go for 1 21:48:57 VRA has also 3 levels 21:49:08 mpeg-7 has two 21:49:18 I'm still not sure there should be a *constant* level of models... 21:49:25 two is good enough 21:49:31 what are the 3 levels? (sorry...) 21:49:41 content - realisation -instance 21:49:48 thx 21:50:06 what about the photo of a painting? 21:50:13 felix: volunteers for looking at how standards handle this issue? 21:50:18 or a movie making of? 21:50:22 I can do that 21:50:51 action: ruben to survey how other standards handle the issue of levels of description 21:50:51 Sorry, couldn't find user - ruben 21:51:05 action: rtous to survey how other standards handle the issue of levels of description 21:51:06 well, basically "content: beethoiven's 5th; realisation: berlin phil, 1962; instance: cassette tape from DG 1964"??? 21:52:05 who do these three levels relate to the levels defined in FRBR (work-expression-manifestion-item)? content:==work, expression==realisation, manifestation==instance; item is not existing?) 21:52:18 topic: XMP Basic Job Ticket schema 21:53:08 you can also look at the music ontology who has adopted the idea 21:53:27 yes, the music ontology adapted FRBR I guess 21:53:53 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Basic_Job_Ticket_schemaa 21:54:26 topic: XMP Paged-text schema 21:54:38 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Paged-text_schema 21:55:26 I guess we do not need it in our current use cases 21:55:32 topic: XMP Dynamic Media schema 21:55:34 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/XMP#XMP_Dynamic_Media_schema 21:55:38 (I meant the basic job ticket information) 21:56:23 joakim: many detailed technical aspects included 21:57:00 xmpDM:logComment User’s log comments. 21:57:19 veronique: does this refer to tagging? 21:57:37 felix: little information in xmp spec 21:58:18 veronique: slot for tags needed - could this field by used? 21:59:34 all to look at xmp reviews, discussion continues next week 22:00:06 topic: Draft for Use cases and requirements document 22:00:50 veronique: more ideas/comments about general structure should be sent to list 22:01:31 action: Felix to write a mail about the general structure of the use cases / req document 22:01:31 Created ACTION-37 - Write a mail about the general structure of the use cases / req document [on Felix Sasaki - due 2008-11-18]. 22:02:08 topic: API/Ontology draft proposal 22:02:16 all to review and comment 22:03:29 felix: formal definition of ontology, complexity of api, etc 22:03:56 thx, bye! 22:04:01 -dsinger 22:04:03 -joakim 22:04:03 bye 22:04:06 bye 22:04:06 -wbailer 22:04:07 -Felix 22:04:09 -Frank 22:04:13 -wonsuk 22:04:13 wonsuk has left #mediaann 22:04:15 bye 22:04:25 bye 22:04:26 -ruben 22:04:33 -tobias 22:04:35 IA_MAWG()4:00PM has ended 22:04:36 Attendees were Felix, dsinger, +43.316.876.aaaa, tobias, wbailer, joakim, wonsuk, ruben, +31.20.612.aabb, veronique 22:04:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/11-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 22:05:44 pchampin has left #mediaann 22:23:09 wonsuk has joined #mediaann