18:00:29 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rif-prd
18:00:29 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-prd-irc
18:00:40 <csma> rrsagent, make log public
18:00:45 <Zakim> SW_RIF(PRD)1:00PM has now started
18:00:50 <csma> rrsagent, make minutes
18:00:50 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-prd-minutes.html csma
18:00:52 <Zakim> +??P1
18:01:39 <Zakim> +??P4
18:02:22 <csma> zakim, ??P4 is me
18:02:22 <Zakim> +csma; got it
18:02:33 <Zakim> +??P5
18:02:35 <cke> cke has joined #rif-prd
18:03:48 <csma> zakim, clear agenda
18:03:48 <Zakim> agenda cleared
18:03:56 <csma> agendum+ Action review
18:04:05 <csma> agendum+ Conflict resolution
18:04:14 <csma> agendum+ Bind action
18:04:24 <csma> agendum+ Publication planning
18:04:41 <Zakim> +Gary
18:04:49 <Gary> Gary has joined #rif-prd
18:05:02 <csma> Scribe: Changhai
18:05:10 <csma> scribenick: cke
18:05:23 <csma> next item
18:07:31 <cke> review of the actions
18:07:50 <cke> Item 1: conflict resolution
18:08:09 <cke> Review and validate the CR proposal , as agreed in Orlando
18:09:21 <csma> PROPOSED: In RIF-PRD, the conflict resolution strategy that is intended for a set of rules will be indicated using keywords, at the group level. RIF-PRD 1.0 will specify one conflict resolution strategy (corresponding keyword to be determined) that can be summarize as follows: apply refraction to the conflict set, then order remaining instances by priority, the order top priority instances by recency (most recent first), then break remaing ties arbitrarily (precis
18:09:26 <cke> About csma's emmail, feedback from Changhai & Gary, but not others
18:09:43 <Gary> +1
18:12:26 <cke> The corner cases discussion
18:14:03 <cke> top level group vs. subgroups
18:15:08 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
18:15:48 <cke> CR strategy associated only to toplevel group?
18:17:10 <PaulVincent> PaulVincent has joined #rif-prd
18:17:40 <cke> Proposed: specify the CR only to the toplevel group. Any CR in subgroups can be rejected
18:18:55 <csma> PROPOSED: conflict resolution has to be associated with the top-level group, in PRD 1.0.
18:19:25 <csma> RESOLVED: conflict resolution has to be associated with the top-level group, in PRD 1.0.
18:20:04 <cke> What about one document with any CR strategy?
18:20:33 <cke> s/with any/without any/
18:21:36 <csma> PROPOSED: rif:standardForward is the mandatory default conflict resolution strategy is none is associated with the top level group.
18:22:12 <cke> s/is none/if none/
18:22:28 <csma> RESOLVED: rif:standardForward is the mandatory default conflict resolution strategy if none is associated with the top level group.
18:22:46 <cke> Now about priority...
18:23:59 <csma> priority can be any integer, positive or negative?
18:24:04 <Gary> how about xsd:int (or the closest we have in DTB)/
18:24:13 <csma> changhai: yes, and zero is the default
18:25:18 <cke> is a priority a signed integer? with positive or negative integer?
18:28:41 <csma> PROPOSED: priority is a signed integer, positive or negative and default is zero.
18:28:52 <csma> RESOLVED: priority is a signed integer, positive or negative and default is zero.
18:31:26 <Gary> [-1000..1000]
18:32:59 <csma> [-1000000..1000000]
18:33:00 <cke> I propose [-10000 ... 10000] to better suit coding convention
18:34:17 <csma> PROPOSED: range is [-100000..+10000]
18:34:48 <csma> PROPOSED: range is [-10000..+10000]
18:35:08 <csma> RESOLVED: range is [-10000..+10000]
18:38:00 <csma> rule R has priority 10
18:38:38 <csma> <Group>...<Priority>10</Priority> R </Group>
18:39:58 <Gary> PROPOSED: rule priority is given by the immediately containing Group.  If that group has no explicit priority, then the priority is 0
18:43:15 <csma> <Group><Group><Group>R</Group></Group></Group>
18:44:17 <Gary> group p=1 (group p=2( rule1) rule2) => rule1 has pri=2, rule2 has pri=1
18:45:12 <csma> <Group><Group>R1<Group>(priority = 1)R2</Group></Group></Group>
18:46:02 <cke> or we can have: <Group><Group>R1<Group>(priority = default)R2</Group></Group></Group> in this case, you don't write the priority
18:46:55 <csma> Group
18:47:01 <csma>   Group
18:47:08 <csma>      priority=1
18:47:12 <csma>       R1
18:47:19 <csma>       Group
18:47:26 <csma>         priority=2
18:47:31 <csma>         R2
18:48:20 <csma> Group
18:48:24 <csma>   Group
18:48:31 <csma>     priority=1
18:48:35 <csma>      R2
18:48:39 <csma>   Group
18:48:45 <csma>     priority=2
18:48:49 <csma>     R1
18:49:19 <csma> RESOLVED: rule priority is given by the immediately containing Group.  If that group has no explicit priority, then the priority is 0.
18:49:22 <cke> if "prority=2"is removed, then R2 will have the priority "default" (so zero)
18:50:42 <csma> next item
18:50:53 <csma> zakim, take up item 3
18:50:53 <Zakim> agendum 3. "Bind action" taken up [from csma]
19:07:48 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
19:07:50 <Zakim> -??P5
19:07:52 <Zakim> -Gary
19:07:53 <Zakim> -csma
19:07:53 <Zakim> -??P1
19:07:55 <Zakim> SW_RIF(PRD)1:00PM has ended
19:07:56 <Zakim> Attendees were csma, Gary, [IPcaller]
19:08:02 <csma> rrsagent, list attendees
19:08:02 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'list attendees', csma.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
19:08:11 <csma> zakim, list attendees
19:08:11 <Zakim> sorry, csma, I don't know what conference this is
19:08:20 <csma> zakim, this is rifprd
19:08:20 <Zakim> sorry, csma, I do not see a conference named 'rifprd' in progress or scheduled at this time
19:09:31 <csma> rrsagent, make minutes
19:09:31 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-prd-minutes.html csma