07:36:41 RRSAgent has joined #svg 07:36:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/10/24-svg-irc 07:36:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 07:36:43 Zakim has joined #svg 07:36:45 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 07:36:45 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 07:36:46 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 07:36:46 Date: 24 October 2008 07:37:29 zakim, dial exec_7 07:37:29 sorry, ChrisL, I don't know what conference this is 07:37:34 zakim, this is svg 07:37:34 sorry, ChrisL, I do not see a conference named 'svg' in progress or scheduled at this time 07:37:44 zakim, room for 3? 07:37:45 ok, ChrisL; conference Team_(svg)07:37Z scheduled with code 26631 (CONF1) for 60 minutes until 0837Z 07:37:50 zakim, dial exec_7 07:37:50 I am sorry, ChrisL; I do not know a number for exec_7 07:37:54 heycam: and I still see a missingglyph(which I assume is the BOM) if I load http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/struct.html#PrefetchElement (prefetch02 example) 07:37:58 zakim, dial Exec_7 07:37:58 I am sorry, ChrisL; I do not know a number for Exec_7 07:38:14 zakim, dial executive_7 07:38:14 ok, ChrisL; the call is being made 07:38:15 Team_(svg)07:37Z has now started 07:38:16 +Executive_7 07:39:03 -Executive_7 07:39:04 Team_(svg)07:37Z has ended 07:39:04 Attendees were Executive_7 07:40:34 zakim, dial executive_7 07:40:34 ok, ChrisL; the call is being made 07:40:35 Team_(svg)07:37Z has now started 07:40:37 +Executive_7 07:40:57 +??P8 07:40:58 -??P8 07:40:58 +??P8 07:41:01 Zakim, ??P8 is me 07:41:01 +heycam; got it 07:42:06 Topic: ISSUE-2158 07:42:15 ISSUE-2158? 07:42:15 ISSUE-2158 -- get and setTrait with url() syntax -- RAISED 07:42:15 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2158 07:42:36 Scribe: Chris 07:43:09 ED: In Opera I get url() from getTrait on fill 07:43:25 ... for setTrait we parse the value so you clearly need url() 07:43:37 CL: So we agree with the proposed clarification 07:44:32 ACTION: Cameron to correct spec re ISSUE-2158 07:44:32 Created ACTION-2331 - Correct spec re ISSUE-2158 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 07:46:20 Topic: ISSUE-2159 07:46:23 ISSUE-2159? 07:46:24 ISSUE-2159 -- Invalid path data error/unsupported -- RAISED 07:46:26 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2159 07:47:03 ED: Its an SVG11 leftover, should be unsupported not an error 07:47:07 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/implnote.html#PathElementImplementationNotes 07:48:09 CMcC: So remove the last bullet point in that appendix 07:48:49 We agree 07:49:12 ACTION: Cameron to remove last bullet point about path data being an error from the path implementation notes 07:49:12 Created ACTION-2332 - Remove last bullet point about path data being an error from the path implementation notes [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 07:51:54 Topic: ISSUE-2160 07:51:56 ISSUE-2160? 07:51:58 ISSUE-2160 -- Throwing INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when setting -- RAISED 07:51:58 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2160 07:52:05 ED: I agree with the conclusion, and I think we should remove the wording for the 'use' element case 07:52:37 CMcC: Woried about always throwing here especially for elements not in the tree yet 07:54:20 ED: I think it would make it hard to use traitaccess if you were not allowed to use settraitns with some xlink:href that points to something you put into the tree later on 07:57:36 ED: I propose then to remove "This exception is also thrown when the 'use' 07:57:36 element is hooked into the document tree and the the value of 07:57:36 'xlink:href' is set invalid." 07:57:43 ACTION: Cameron to remove the second sentence, on throwing with setTrait if an aivalid IRI is given 07:57:43 Created ACTION-2333 - Remove the second sentence, on throwing with setTrait if an aivalid IRI is given [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 07:59:36 Topic: ISSUE-2161 07:59:39 ISSUE-2161? 07:59:39 ISSUE-2161 -- SVG element namespace requirement -- RAISED 07:59:39 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2161 08:02:29 chaals has joined #svg 08:03:10 chaals has left #svg 08:05:07 Proposed wording at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0248.html 08:06:21 ED: Like the proposed wording 08:07:54 CMcC: Looks good 08:08:34 ACTION: Cameron to fix SVG element ns requirements per Chris suggested wording 08:08:34 Created ACTION-2334 - Fix SVG element ns requirements per Chris suggested wording [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 08:09:34 Liam has joined #svg 08:10:10 Topic: ISSUE-2162 08:10:12 ISSUE-2162? 08:10:13 ISSUE-2162 -- Remove "SVG viewport" definition -- RAISED 08:10:13 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2162 08:10:29 CL: Yes, if the definition is not used it should be removed 08:10:47 need to check for links to it 08:11:15 ACTION: Cameron remove unused SVG viewport definition, leaving the 'viewport' definition which is used 08:11:15 Created ACTION-2335 - Remove unused SVG viewport definition, leaving the 'viewport' definition which is used [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 08:13:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008OctDec/0189.html 08:13:47 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081021113831.GA16336@arc.mcc.id.au 08:15:23 Topic: ISSUE-2163 08:15:25 ISSUE-2163? 08:15:25 ISSUE-2163 -- role="contexthelp" -- RAISED 08:15:25 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2163 08:15:35 ED: Need Doug for this one probably 08:15:54 CMcC: Just wanted to point it out. Seems odd, not sure what the resolution should be 08:16:41 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081022004450.GA14281@arc.mcc.id.au 08:17:17 shepazu has joined #svg 08:17:28 Wording for non-invertable CTMs with ref() (for ISSUE-2073) 08:17:42 CL: Lets keep this with the same issue 08:17:51 ISSUE-2073? 08:17:51 ISSUE-2073 -- inverse and constrained transformations -- CLOSED 08:17:51 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2073 08:18:08 CMcC: Wording is not fluent English 08:19:15 CL: Much prefer your explicit wording to the vague 'may cause problems' 08:21:45 ACTION: Cameron to improve wording on non-invertible CTMs 08:21:45 Created ACTION-2336 - Improve wording on non-invertible CTMs [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 08:23:46 Topic: ISSUE-2094 08:23:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0219.html 08:23:57 ISSUE-2094? 08:23:57 ISSUE-2094 -- accessing rules for traitAccess -- RAISED 08:23:57 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2094 08:24:41 ED: On first poont he is satisfied. On second he is too, but then raises additional questions 08:25:31 ... some part of this is covered in SMIL but not all, especially changing IDs while animating 08:27:29 ... not clear for animations that have a resolved begin tiome, it cant become unresolved 08:30:11 CL: So I think the answer is the first option "no effect the animation continue. 08:30:11 " as the element has already been located. 08:32:03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081022035131.GF14281@arc.mcc.id.au - Feature strings for buffered-rendering and color-rendering 08:32:03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081022230648.GC20693@arc.mcc.id.au - New wording for @attributeType 08:32:03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081023004437.GF20693@arc.mcc.id.au - Animating @transform with 08:32:03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20081023005712.GH20693@arc.mcc.id.au - Paced rotation transform 08:32:58 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/feature.html 08:33:34 Topic: ISSUE-2164 08:33:37 ISSUE-2164? 08:33:37 ISSUE-2164 -- Feature strings for buffered-rendering and color-rendering -- RAISED 08:33:37 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2164 08:34:12 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/painting.html#paint-att-mod 08:34:24 ED: color-rendering should be in paint same as 1.1 08:34:49 so we disagree 08:35:00 CMcC: Yeah, okay 08:35:10 ED: Agree on buffered-rendering 08:37:21 ACTION: Cameron to fix buffered-rendering feature string 08:37:21 Created ACTION-2337 - Fix buffered-rendering feature string [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-10-31]. 08:39:22 Topic: ISSUE-2082 08:39:29 ISSUE-2082? 08:39:29 ISSUE-2082 -- attributeType auto -- CLOSED 08:39:29 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2082 08:39:56 Liam has joined #svg 08:43:15 This new wording is a) poor and b) contradicts what the attributeName says just above 08:45:16 DS: Yes, thats bogus 08:48:14 Suggested wording" if the attributeName value has a prefix, it is resolved as described above 08:49:03 ED: yes, that looks fine, and keep the sentences around it 08:49:15 Zakim, give me some of the cake 08:49:15 I don't understand 'give me some of the cake', heycam 08:52:09 ACTION: Erik to fix the namespace wording for attributeName as described in the minutes for 24 Oct 2008 08:52:10 Created ACTION-2338 - Fix the namespace wording for attributeName as described in the minutes for 24 Oct 2008 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-10-31]. 08:54:09 -heycam 08:54:10 -Executive_7 08:54:10 Team_(svg)07:37Z has ended 08:54:11 Attendees were Executive_7, heycam 09:25:13 Topic: XSL Liaison 09:25:53 Next SVG f2f - week of 16 Feb 2009, Sydney 09:26:07 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Meetings#F2F_Meeting_Information 09:26:13 kbals has joined #svg 09:26:17 kbals has left #svg 09:26:21 kbals has joined #svg 09:26:39 after that, Juneish, Raleigh-Durham 09:28:55 LQ: XML CG approves XSL meetings. Coordinated with other WGs 09:34:53 Topic: ISSUE-2152 09:34:58 ISSUE-2152? 09:34:58 ISSUE-2152 -- Less Emphasis on 'xml:id' -- RAISED 09:34:58 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2152 09:35:13 DS: Too late to do something drastic 09:38:08 chaals has joined #svg 09:38:56 chaals has left #svg 09:46:06 http://www.schepers.cc/xmlid/svgxmlid.html 10:03:30 RESOLUTION: we will remove the sentence about deprecating the 'id' attribute 10:04:27 RESOLUTION: we will not change the part about setting xml:id and id from the element.id DOM property 10:06:15 RESOLUTION: we recommend using 'id' instead of xml:id on elements in the svg namespace 10:07:04 RESOLUTION: if you use arbitrary xml markup it's recommended to use xml:id 10:08:49 ACTION: DS to implement the above four resolutions in the spec (ISSUE-2152) 10:08:49 Created ACTION-2339 - Implement the above four resolutions in the spec (ISSUE-2152) [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-10-31]. 10:15:49 ISSUE-2147? 10:15:49 ISSUE-2147 -- Section on externally referenced documents confusing -- OPEN 10:15:49 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2147 10:19:15 jun has joined #svg 10:28:43 ACTION: DS to commit the proposed changes for ISSUE-2147 (ED to review those), and respond 10:28:43 Created ACTION-2340 - Commit the proposed changes for ISSUE-2147 (ED to review those), and respond [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-10-31]. 10:57:15 Zakim has left #svg 11:34:38 i see shepazu is on the www.w3.org homepage 11:54:59 ChrisL has joined #svg 12:27:14 jun has joined #svg 12:28:50 ChrisL has joined #svg 12:51:45 jun has joined #svg 13:17:36 ChrisL has joined #svg 13:20:28 jun has left #svg 13:23:17 ed has joined #svg 13:24:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Aug/0069.html 14:11:27 ChrisL has joined #svg 14:21:45 shepazu has joined #svg 15:32:40 jdaggett has joined #svg