20:54:18 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 20:54:18 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc 20:54:30 meeting: Media Annotations WG 20:54:39 chair: Felix 20:54:58 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0043.html 20:55:03 rrsagent, make log public 20:56:09 IA_MAWG()5:00PM has now started 20:56:16 +Frank 20:56:44 regrets: tobias, vassilis, davy 20:56:52 +Felix 20:57:57 +Davy 20:58:50 VeroM has joined #mediaann 21:00:11 +??P9 21:01:04 present: Frank, Veronique, Frank, Raphael 21:01:40 +??P10 21:01:43 -Davy 21:01:43 scribe: Veronique 21:02:07 present+ Joakim 21:02:09 +Davy 21:03:33 topic: Agenda review / approval of previous minutes 21:03:48 cgi-irc has joined #mediaann 21:03:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0043.html 21:03:57 +1 for accepting the minutes 21:04:12 http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html 21:04:12 +1 21:04:15 +1 21:04:19 +1 21:04:34 previous minutes approved 21:04:38 topic: Selection of scribe for next meeting 21:05:13 action: reminder to find scribe for next calls 21:05:13 Sorry, couldn't find user - reminder 21:05:17 topic: Future telephone conferences and f2f meetings / call time 21:05:28 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Meeting_Agenda_(DRAFT 21:05:59 zakim, ??P7 is Joakim" 21:05:59 I already had ??P7 as Felix, cgi-irc 21:06:13 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Meeting_Agenda_(DRAFT) 21:06:40 zakim, who is here? 21:06:40 On the phone I see Frank, Felix, Veronique, Joakim, Davy 21:06:41 Veronique has Raphael 21:06:43 On IRC I see cgi-irc, VeroM, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, wbailer, frank, raphael, trackbot 21:07:54 action: all look at the draft of the planning for the f2f 21:07:54 Sorry, couldn't find user - all 21:08:05 zakim, what is [on] [the] agenda? 21:08:05 I don't understand your question, cgi-irc. 21:08:12 The agenda sounds good to me. All depends what your idea is on 'discussion on use cases'. 21:08:14 zakim, what is agenda? 21:08:14 I see nothing on the agenda 21:09:54 Frank: later, we should discuss the use cases further 21:11:12 Felix: does someone want to present a specific format at the f2f? 21:11:49 Felix: any volunteer for IMM? 21:12:40 I has a look at it today, I guess I could summarize the content 21:12:46 action: Felix to confirm that there should be a presentation about IMM 21:12:47 Created ACTION-16 - Confirm that there should be a presentation about IMM [on Felix Sasaki - due 2008-10-21]. 21:13:20 topic: Action items 21:13:25 For me, it could be presented together with the IPTC photo metadata standard since there is a lot of overlap between these 2 21:13:58 good idea 21:14:16 rrsagent, show actions 21:14:16 I'm logging. I don't understand 'show actions ', cgi-irc. Try /msg RRSAgent help 21:14:28 rrsagent, show actions 21:14:28 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-actions.rdf : 21:14:28 ACTION: reminder to find scribe for next calls [1] 21:14:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-05-13 21:14:28 ACTION: all look at the draft of the planning for the f2f [2] 21:14:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-07-54 21:14:28 ACTION: Felix to confirm that there should be a presentation about IMM [3] 21:14:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-12-46 21:15:14 I volunteer for nothing ... but can improvise something the D day :-) 21:15:19 hmiao has joined #mediaann 21:15:47 +??P11 21:16:05 hui 21:17:47 Felix: propses to close action number 6 21:17:48 close ACTION-6 21:17:48 ACTION-6 Check WG participant mailing list subscription mechanism to make sure that new participants are subscribed automatically closed 21:18:05 zakim, what conference? 21:18:05 I don't understand your question, cgi-irc. 21:18:07 close ACTION-14 21:18:07 ACTION-14 Add text on video uc closed 21:18:45 close ACTION-15 21:18:45 ACTION-15 Elaborate on mobile uc closed 21:19:03 q+ 21:20:16 zakim, ack me 21:20:16 I see no one on the speaker queue 21:20:32 topic: Editing 21:20:56 Felix did drafts on the wiki 21:21:11 Felix: still looking for editors 21:21:30 topic: Open issues 21:21:33 Felix: keep it in mind 21:22:23 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Main_Page#Use_Cases__and_Requirements 21:22:31 Felix: discuss what Frank and Raphael after the discussion of the existing use cases 21:22:42 Felix: if time 21:23:09 Felix: thanks to the contributors, are there any comments? 21:24:07 Felix: differ the discussion about the IMM to the tpac meeting 21:24:18 s/differ/defer/ 21:24:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0041.html 21:25:42 Felix: discussion about the tasks about which we can think of 21:26:01 Frank: very general tasks in some use cases 21:26:10 Frank: like search 21:26:45 Frank: but also particular tasks for particular contexts and media 21:26:59 Frank: which will not occur often 21:27:55 Frank: separate tasks from processes to define better what elementary tasks we should enable to describe 21:28:42 Frank: example of the mobile example 21:29:06 Frank: 1st part about geotagging, automatically done 21:29:24 Frank: do we describe the location or the geo tag? 21:29:54 Excellent idea - very much what I had in mind 21:30:16 ?? use the use case description as a general container, check box 21:31:41 ?? says that the general question is how far do we go in the description 21:31:54 s/??/joakim/ 21:32:18 ?? says that descriptions shouls enable us to make pocesses work 21:32:45 s/shouls/should 21:32:54 Felix: bottom up vs top down approache 21:33:30 Felix: some people could try both appraches and see if we can meet in the middle 21:33:44 I like Felix idea of double direction approach 21:33:55 Felix: top down should lead to a minimal set of tasks 21:34:04 +1 to both 21:34:20 Felix: we can als start to work on the API 21:35:03 Felix: concrete effort related to the API could also bring a new view 21:35:23 Felix: developpers's need to search in video 21:35:54 ... is a point of view that could be taken into account 21:36:08 not sure if bottom up requires that we also start with the API - the basic methods are probably simple getter/setter for metadata elements available in many vocabularies 21:36:19 js has joined #mediaann 21:36:44 rrsagent, show actions 21:36:44 I'm logging. I don't understand 'show actions ', js. Try /msg RRSAgent help 21:37:18 zakim, who is here? 21:37:18 On the phone I see Frank, Felix, Veronique, Joakim, Davy, Hui 21:37:19 Veronique has Raphael 21:37:21 On IRC I see js, hmiao, cgi-irc, VeroM, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, wbailer, frank, raphael, trackbot 21:38:06 Felix: what is your opinion about working on the api already? 21:38:32 Felix: in parallel to the ontology, top-down approach? 21:39:04 I tend to think like Werner ... I think it is preferrable to start working on the API once a first draft of the ontoloy exists ... after TPAC 21:39:10 ... but before the end of the year 21:39:12 zakim, what is agenda? 21:39:12 I see nothing on the agenda 21:39:24 ?? says that we should first maybe collect more use cases to define the purpose of the API better 21:39:53 I am in favor of working on the API now - might help shaping the ongoing discussion due to its practicality 21:39:57 s/??/hui 21:40:05 Felix: starting from the API side gives a concrete application to the ontology to be developped 21:40:08 The purpose of the API is pretty clear: provide a programmatic access to the metadata represented by the ontology 21:40:52 zakim, what conference is this? 21:40:52 this is IA_MAWG()5:00PM conference code 6294 21:42:13 being sexy to the developers world is an argument I can buy :-) 21:43:23 zakim, who is on the phone? 21:43:23 On the phone I see Frank, Felix, Veronique, Joakim, Davy, Hui 21:43:24 Veronique has Raphael 21:43:26 Felix: starting early on the API work could makes our group more attractive for developpers/browsers 21:43:56 Felix: looking for volunteers for defining what we want to achieve in a top-down view 21:44:11 ... could take Frank's email as bases 21:44:11 I can do that - elaborate more 21:44:39 I would also interested in contributing 21:44:48 I put that on the wicki before the F2F 21:44:50 I think there are different engineering models we could follow to develop the API 21:45:04 show actions 21:45:08 ... an interesting one is the OWL API model, following the 'visitor' pattern 21:45:23 action: Frank and Vero to elaborate on the top-down approach about use cases 21:45:23 Created ACTION-17 - And Vero to elaborate on the top-down approach about use cases [on Frank Nack - due 2008-10-21]. 21:46:04 rrsagent, show actions 21:46:04 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-actions.rdf : 21:46:04 ACTION: reminder to find scribe for next calls [1] 21:46:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-05-13 21:46:04 ACTION: all look at the draft of the planning for the f2f [2] 21:46:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-07-54 21:46:04 ACTION: Felix to confirm that there should be a presentation about IMM [3] 21:46:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-12-46 21:46:04 ACTION: Frank and Vero to elaborate on the top-down approach about use cases [4] 21:46:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-irc#T21-45-23 21:46:05 Felix: can you elaborte on what you mean by visitor pattern? 21:46:15 The paper I'm talking about: "Cooking the Semantic Web with the OWL API" 21:46:40 http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/phillip.lord/download/publications/cooking03.pdf 21:47:05 Felix: Raphael, do you want to present tis paper at the tpac meeting? 21:47:14 Yes 21:47:36 who has already use the Manchester OWL API in this group? 21:47:51 I can explain the principles and some basic code 21:48:01 -Felix 21:48:09 I have not 21:48:16 Felix: stays on IRC and we are free to continue the discussion for the time remaining 21:48:36 frank, i've a meeting early afternoon, but after 15.30 it us possible 21:48:39 I did not use it either 21:49:02 the Manchester OWL api 21:49:22 me too 21:50:45 Sounds like a good idea if Raphael explains the most important aspects of the Man. Api 21:50:47 -Joakim 21:51:36 Felix, can you include in the agenda a time slot (20') for that? 21:52:43 Are we in the AOB topic ? 21:53:17 topic: AOB 21:53:36 is there any other business or can we adjourn the telecon? 21:54:11 adjourn seems to be it 21:54:19 ok, thanks all 21:54:24 [adjourn] 21:54:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:54:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-minutes.html raphael 21:54:37 -Veronique 21:54:41 rrsagent, make logs public 21:55:08 -Frank 21:55:21 -Davy 21:57:34 -Hui 21:57:35 IA_MAWG()5:00PM has ended 21:57:36 Attendees were Frank, Felix, Davy, Raphael, Joakim, Hui 22:09:50 present+ Felix 22:09:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 22:11:06 present+ Davy 22:11:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 22:11:40 present+ Werner 22:11:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 22:11:57 present+ Hui 22:12:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 22:24:55 action: Frank and others to elaborate on the top-down approach about use case 22:24:55 Created ACTION-18 - And others to elaborate on the top-down approach about use case [on Frank Nack - due 2008-10-21]. 22:25:30 close ACTION-17 22:25:30 ACTION-17 And Vero to elaborate on the top-down approach about use cases closed 22:26:08 action: Felix and others to look on the draft agenda for the TPAC meeting 22:26:08 Created ACTION-19 - And others to look on the draft agenda for the TPAC meeting [on Felix Sasaki - due 2008-10-21].