11:01:27 RRSAgent has joined #wam 11:01:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-irc 11:01:28 trackbot, start meeting 11:01:29 RRSAgent, make logs public 11:01:29 Zakim has joined #wam 11:01:31 Zakim, this will be WAPP 11:01:31 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 11:01:32 Meeting: Web Applications Working Group Teleconference 11:01:32 Date: 09 October 2008 11:01:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 11:01:38 WAPP? 11:01:40 Zakim, this will be WAPP 11:01:40 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 11:01:42 Meeting: Web Applications Working Group Teleconference 11:01:44 Date: 09 October 2008 11:01:51 zakim, this will be wam 11:01:51 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, tlr 11:01:55 zakim, show conferences 11:01:55 I don't understand 'show conferences', tlr 11:01:59 zakim, list conferences 11:01:59 I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM, IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM active 11:02:01 also scheduled at this time is VB_SSML()7:00AM 11:02:07 wtf 11:02:11 Zakim, list conferences 11:02:11 I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM, IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM active 11:02:13 also scheduled at this time is VB_SSML()7:00AM 11:02:35 zakim, this is widgets 11:02:35 ok, ArtB; that matches IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM 11:02:35 gah,IA_WebApps(Widgets) 11:02:37 zakim, this will be widgets 11:02:37 ok, tlr, I see IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM already started 11:02:39 mpriestl has joined #wam 11:02:43 zakim, call thomas-781 11:02:43 ok, tlr; the call is being made 11:02:45 +Thomas 11:02:57 zakim, who is on the phone? 11:02:57 On the phone I see Caroline, Art_Barstow, Thomas 11:03:02 Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference 11:03:04 ugh 11:03:05 Chair: Art 11:03:09 Scribe: Art 11:03:11 -Thomas 11:03:13 ScribeNick: ArtB 11:03:13 +??P5 11:03:22 zakin, ??P5 is I 11:03:22 zakim, call thomas-skype 11:03:22 ok, tlr; the call is being made 11:03:23 +Thomas 11:03:39 zakim, ??P5 is I 11:03:39 +marcos; got it 11:03:44 Regrets: DavidR 11:03:45 arve has joined #wam 11:03:47 + +39.011.228.aaaa 11:03:48 zakim, I am thomas 11:03:48 ok, tlr, I now associate you with Thomas 11:03:49 zakim, mute me 11:03:49 Thomas should now be muted 11:04:04 + +44.771.751.aabb 11:04:07 +??P8 11:04:08 claudio has joined #wam 11:04:16 zakim, aabb is Mark 11:04:16 +Mark; got it 11:04:16 Zakim, PP8 is me 11:04:17 sorry, arve, I do not recognize a party named 'PP8' 11:04:19 -Caroline 11:04:24 Zakim, P8 is me 11:04:24 sorry, arve, I do not recognize a party named 'P8' 11:04:27 Zakim, ??P8 is me 11:04:27 +arve; got it 11:04:38 [I'll never get Zakim's syntax right] 11:04:43 +Caroline 11:05:01 Present: Art, Arve, Benoit, Mark, Marcos, Thomas, Claudio 11:05:32 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0051.html 11:05:42 Topic: Agenda Tweaking 11:05:50 AB: any change requests for the agenda? 11:05:52 [None] 11:06:00 Topic: Annoucements 11:06:10 AB: any annoucements? 11:07:21 zakim, unmute me 11:07:21 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:08:01 [None] 11:08:08 Topic: API and Events spec 11:08:14 AB: Arve, what's the status? 11:08:28 Arve: I think we are ready to publish 11:08:47 ... I haven't done much since last week except to remove prefs API 11:08:55 ... I need some help getting it "pub ready" 11:09:16 ACTION: Barstow talk to Mike about helping Arve getting the API and Events spec "pub ready" 11:09:17 Created ACTION-254 - Talk to Mike about helping Arve getting the API and Events spec \"pub ready\" [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-16]. 11:09:23 hai 11:09:34 I can deal with that of course 11:09:40 Arve: HTML5 defines a similar API 11:09:53 ... but the semantics and UCs are a bit diff 11:10:02 ... e.g. showNotification 11:10:45 ACTION: Barstow submit FPWD request for API and Events spec 11:10:45 Created ACTION-255 - Submit FPWD request for API and Events spec [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-16]. 11:11:04 Topic: DigSig spec 11:11:33 AB: what's the status Mark and Marcos? 11:11:42 MC: we haven't done any work in the last week 11:11:55 AB: where is this in your priorities Mark and Marcos? 11:12:00 MC: my priority is the P&C spec 11:12:06 ... but I can help Mark 11:12:27 MP: from the VF and BONDI point of view, we want to use the DigSig spec 11:12:34 ... it is important to progress it 11:12:48 ... I hope to do some work on it next week 11:13:05 ... it is a priority for us 11:13:30 MC: the P&C spec is being update to include multiple signatures 11:14:06 ... If Mark could start a dialog with XMLSec WG that could help 11:15:41 AB: it would be good to get more specific on the agenda for our joint meeting 11:15:52 MC: I have some questions for them re our model 11:15:54 zakim, mute me 11:15:54 Thomas should now be muted 11:17:04 +1 to having specific issues. However, note that I won't have much bandwidth available between now and TPAC. 11:17:13 AB: I would like MC and MP to be prepared to drive the discussion with XML Sec WG 11:17:23 nope 11:17:32 ... we want specific questions, in advance if possible 11:18:05 AB: what is the status of the latest ED http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ - says May 27 11:18:25 ... do you have a copy that reflects discussions in Turin 11:18:51 s/nope// 11:19:05 MC: we have done some brainstorming but haven't put those ideas into CVS 11:19:31 AB: will there be an update before the f2f meeting? 11:19:41 MC: yes; at a min we will add some UC data 11:20:49 ... I will need Mark's help 11:21:39 Topic: I18N issue 11:21:49 RRSAgent, please make minutes 11:21:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-minutes.html MikeSmith 11:22:16 AB: have you Marcos and Felix converged on a solution? 11:22:52 MC: Felix provided some good feedback re ITS 11:23:04 ... I added optional support for ITS to the ED 11:23:14 ... Felix says my latest changes are OK 11:23:33 ... he recommended some minor changes in the Relax NG schema and I've added those 11:23:51 AB: can we now close this issue i.e. ISSUE #46? 11:24:14 ... http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/46 11:24:37 MC: no I don't think we can close this yet 11:24:48 ... want to make sure I18N WG is OK with our solution 11:25:19 Topic: widget URI scheme aka Issue #16 11:26:38 AB: we will meet with some TAG members on Monday Oct 20 14:00-15:00 to discuss this issue 11:26:53 MC: I have been responding to Mark Baker's comments 11:27:14 widget-uri = "http://" widget-engine [":" instance-id] "/"package-name path-absolute ["#" fragment] 11:27:42 mpriestl has joined #wam 11:27:44 zakim, who is making noise? 11:27:50 Arve: this seems like a breakage with HTTP 11:27:55 marcos, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 7 (9%), +39.011.228.aaaa (38%), arve (51%) 11:28:06 zakim, unmute me 11:28:06 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:28:06 q+ 11:28:14 zakim, mute +39.011.228.aaaa 11:28:14 +39.011.228.aaaa should now be muted 11:28:28 ... I think using this is a locator issue 11:28:38 Arve: I think file: has lots of problems 11:28:47 ... e.g. not interoperable in current browsers 11:29:02 ... as well as no formal definition 11:29:23 ... it is also overloaded in Windows (e.g. file share) 11:29:35 MC: your arguments are reflected here http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hoffman-file-uri-03.txt 11:30:01 TR: http URI as posted by Marcos is broken 11:30:13 ... uses a domain-based authority 11:30:23 ... but it isn't domain-based 11:31:05 marcos: yes 11:31:25 TR: if the HTTP URI scheme could be used would facilitate Widgets and Gadgets 11:31:38 ... think we need to consider this more 11:31:41 zakim, mute me 11:31:41 Thomas should now be muted 11:32:35 ack me 11:32:39 MC: want to know if my example is broken or not 11:32:49 Arve: there are lots of servers that respond to localhost 11:33:44 zakim, mute me 11:33:44 Thomas should now be muted 11:34:03 zakim, unmute me 11:34:03 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:34:07 MC: the arch question - is what is the origin 11:34:36 TR: does a widget have a canonical location 11:34:49 ... are the pieces addressable on the web 11:35:06 zakim, mute me 11:35:06 Thomas should now be muted 11:35:15 ... Could be useful to compare the various design options 11:35:18 zakim, unmute me 11:35:18 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:35:31 zakim, mute me 11:35:31 Thomas should now be muted 11:35:55 zakim, unmute me 11:35:55 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:36:23 TR: is the widget addressable through http or not 11:36:40 Arve: some widgets may never be served over http 11:36:48 ... e.g. are installed on a device 11:37:03 TR: but that wouldn't preclude use of http uri 11:37:13 ... could still mint something 11:37:32 ... the configuration file could address the issue 11:37:55 ... It isn't so much about whether the widget is download-able from the Web 11:38:05 ... but more about identification via URIs 11:38:55 zakim, mute me 11:38:55 Thomas should now be muted 11:39:23 I don't think I have an answer, and I suspect it will be useful for Arve, MArcos and myself to sit down with a piece of paper or a whiteboard 11:40:44 +1 to Art 11:41:03 AB: want to get a plan for using the time with the TAG wisely 11:41:23 ... seems like we need to start with a high level discussion of our UC and our Reqs 11:41:32 ... and then talk about different ways to address those reqs 11:42:13 AB: do we have a clear UC and Reqs? 11:42:52 MC: I think the reqs doc provides sufficient information 11:42:52 http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r6.-addressing 11:43:44 cid: 11:43:45 http: 11:43:47 file: 11:43:49 MC: I can present the various solutions 11:43:56 ... and explain why they don't work for us 11:45:05 AB: OK, that's the plan then 11:45:15 Topic: Widget Testing 11:45:53 AB: we have at least Carmelo and others from MWTS WG to join us 11:46:07 MC: do we need to create some reqs? 11:46:17 AB: what do people think? 11:46:33 ... I don't think that is a high priority 11:46:53 ... but that may be one of Carmelo's first questions to us 11:47:07 MC: thinking about things like automated harness, etc. 11:47:17 ... what methodology do we want to use? 11:47:25 ... CSS has a model we could use 11:47:47 ... Naming conventions, ... 11:47:57 ... I think we need some guidance 11:48:53 MC: will it be a web based thing? or just a bunch of files that can be downloaded? 11:49:36 Topic: Requirement doc - Req #21 - New req "Feature Access Declarations" 11:50:12 AB: Marcos proposed this new req: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0053.html 11:50:18 http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r21.- 11:50:43 q+ to ask that Marcos present this at the December workshop 11:51:01 zakim, unmute me 11:51:01 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:51:07 MC: the basic idea is to rationalize the element we've added to the P&C spec 11:51:15 zakim, mute me 11:51:15 Thomas should now be muted 11:51:29 q= 11:51:32 TR: please present this in the December secuity WS 11:51:37 q+ 11:51:49 AB: are you planning a PP for that WS Marcos? 11:51:50 marcos++ 11:51:52 marcos++ 11:51:54 ;-) 11:51:58 MC: yes 11:53:17 MP: last call there was discussion about access element and feature element 11:53:41 ... we have had discussion about that in BONDI and VF and can share that during the upcoming f2f meeting 11:54:13 AB: send comments to the mail list; Marcos has already added this to the ED 11:54:34 Topic: Requirements LC #2 11:54:48 AB: deadline for comments is October 13 11:55:02 ... what is the rate of comments? 11:55:12 MC: only Krzy has responded 11:55:22 ... we could ping David Orchard 11:55:28 ... TR said it looks OK 11:56:08 ACTION: Barstow ask David Orchard (again) to review Requirement LC #2 11:56:08 Created ACTION-256 - Ask David Orchard (again) to review Requirement LC #2 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-16]. 11:56:40 AB: what changes have you made? 11:56:49 MC: not too many 11:56:56 ... the only new req is #21 11:57:19 Topic: AOB 11:57:31 ack tlr 11:57:36 ack thomas 11:57:37 Thomas, you wanted to ask that Marcos present this at the December workshop 11:57:44 AB: any : any topics? 11:58:06 TR: please drum up support from the WS 11:58:08 zakim, mute me 11:58:08 Thomas should now be muted 11:58:19 ... not just from you and your company but otherss outside of W3C are welcome 11:58:37 ack thomas 11:58:46 AB: what is the deadlien for PP? 11:58:49 TR: October 30 11:58:59 zakim, mute me 11:58:59 Thomas should now be muted 11:59:05 zakim, unmute me 11:59:05 Thomas should no longer be muted 11:59:36 TR: the level of interest has been rising 11:59:48 ... now have MS and Google on the Program Committee 11:59:57 zakim, mute me 11:59:57 Thomas should now be muted 12:00:30 AB: meeting adjourned 12:00:33 -Caroline 12:00:34 -Mark 12:00:35 -arve 12:00:36 -Art_Barstow 12:00:37 -Thomas 12:00:37 - +39.011.228.aaaa 12:00:56 -marcos 12:00:57 IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended 12:00:58 Attendees were Caroline, Art_Barstow, Thomas, marcos, +39.011.228.aaaa, +44.771.751.aabb, Mark, arve 12:01:02 RRSAgent: make log public 12:01:22 rrsagent: make minutes 12:01:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-minutes.html ArtB 12:11:08 arve has left #wam 13:40:33 s/Meeting: Web Applications Working Group Teleconference/Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference/ 13:40:43 RRSAgent, make minutes 13:40:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-minutes.html ArtB 14:04:02 rrsagent, bye 14:04:02 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-actions.rdf : 14:04:02 ACTION: Barstow talk to Mike about helping Arve getting the API and Events spec "pub ready" [1] 14:04:02 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-irc#T11-09-16 14:04:02 ACTION: Barstow submit FPWD request for API and Events spec [2] 14:04:02 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-irc#T11-10-45 14:04:02 ACTION: Barstow ask David Orchard (again) to review Requirement LC #2 [3] 14:04:02 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-irc#T11-56-08