18:00:38 RRSAgent has joined #sml 18:00:38 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/10/02-sml-irc 18:00:44 Zakim has joined #sml 18:01:30 Agenda at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/0002.html 18:01:52 John's update to agenda at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/0003.html 18:02:37 I am trying to dial in but zakim keeps on disconnecting me. 18:03:09 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:03:09 sorry, Kirk, I don't know what conference this is 18:03:10 On IRC I see RRSAgent, pratul, Kirk, Kumar, MSM, trackbot 18:03:33 zakim, this is #sml 18:03:33 sorry, Kirk, I do not see a conference named '#sml' in progress or scheduled at this time 18:03:49 zakim, this is sml 18:03:49 ok, Kirk; that matches XML_SMLWG()2:00PM 18:04:10 Sandy has joined #sml 18:04:35 +johnarwe_ 18:04:52 johnarwe_ has joined #sml 18:05:15 +Kumar 18:05:28 +[Microsoft] 18:05:40 Zakim, Microsoft is me 18:05:40 +pratul; got it 18:05:54 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:05:54 On the phone I see ??P10, johnarwe_, Kumar, pratul 18:06:01 Sandy_ has joined #sml 18:06:22 +Sandy 18:06:33 +Ginny_Smith 18:06:34 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:06:34 On the phone I see ??P10, johnarwe_, Kumar, pratul, Sandy, Ginny_Smith 18:06:45 ginny has joined #sml 18:06:56 zakim, ??P10 is me 18:06:56 +Kirk; got it 18:07:40 meeting: W3C SML Teleconference of 2008-10-02 18:07:47 scribenick: Sandy 18:07:49 scribe: Sandy Gao 18:09:01 chair: Pratul Dublish 18:09:35 zakim, please call MSM-617 18:09:35 ok, MSM; the call is being made 18:09:36 +MSM 18:10:11 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/0002.html 18:10:46 topic: Approval of minutes from previous meeting 18:11:05 Kumar: Kirk has a suggestion. 18:11:21 Krik: didn't mean to update the minutes. 18:11:34 kirk's suggestion is in the email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/0001.html 18:11:54 RESOLUTION: approve 2008-09-25 telecon minutes at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/att-0000/2008-09-25-minutes.htm 18:12:33 note also agenda updates requested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Oct/0003.html 18:16:53 topic: Action items 18:18:14 Neither action is done. ETA Oct. F2F. 18:22:10 topic: F2F logistics 18:23:10 All: would like a WG dinner. Tentatively prefer Monday. 18:23:41 topic: Interop test plan discussion 18:24:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/02-sml-minutes.html Sandy 18:26:03 9/25 draft is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Sep/0022.html 18:27:18 The latest draft is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Sep/0022.html 18:27:57 John: on issue #5 Need test cases for validation of SML-IF format 18:28:07 Kumar: answer should be "yes". 18:28:12 Ginny: I agree. 18:29:11 RESOLUTION: WG agreed that we need test cases for validation of SML-IF format. 18:29:41 topic: Review of test cases 18:29:49 Current test cases available at http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_SML_Test_Plan 18:31:37 Kumar: I'm OK with adopting whatever COSMOS has. 18:32:12 John: Paul has concerns with pointing to COSMOS repository. 18:32:23 Ginny: what if the test case changes 18:32:43 John: it's OK as long as the URL has the correct revision information. 18:33:31 Ginny: do the test cases focus on particular features, or do they tend to test multiple features in a single test? 18:33:49 John: they generally only test a single feature. 18:34:09 Ginny: and the tests are self-contained? i.e no sharing of test documents. 18:34:11 John: yes 18:35:46 MSM: I think we should include tests that ensures that SML constraints and schematron rules are applied to the right element instances? 18:36:43 MSM: naive implementation may apply these constraints to element instances that have the correct name but do not match the declaration/definition that carries the constraints. 18:38:07 Ginny: Want to spend time to review the list of features covered by COSMOS tests. 18:38:12 Pratul: I agree. 18:38:26 Pratul: are there tests that are specific to testing IF? 18:38:39 John: think so, those to do with aliases, locators, etc. 18:41:28 John: and there are tests for xml:base 18:44:31 Pratul: everyone should look at these tests, to determine whether any addition, deletion, or modification is needed. 18:45:36 Kumar: if a feature is not adequately covered, what's the process to improve the coverage? We draft the tests and submit to COSMOS? 18:47:29 Pratul: may be better to keep the additional tests we write in W3C repositories. 18:47:59 MSM: that would also have less legal complications. 18:48:55 RESOLUTION: point to COSMOS test cases; keep our own tests in W3C repositories. 18:51:32 John: suggest 2-pass approach. first look through the list and decide to include, exclude, or possibly modify. then in the second pass decide what to change for each test. 18:51:36 Pratul: I agree. 18:51:53 -MSM 18:51:58 -Kirk 18:52:00 -Ginny_Smith 18:52:00 -Kumar 18:52:02 -Sandy 18:52:03 -pratul 18:52:04 -johnarwe_ 18:52:04 XML_SMLWG()2:00PM has ended 18:52:05 Attendees were johnarwe_, Kumar, pratul, Sandy, Ginny_Smith, Kirk, MSM 18:52:14 rrsagent, generate minutes 18:52:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/02-sml-minutes.html Sandy 18:53:07 rrsagent, bye 18:53:07 I see no action items