15:50:56 RRSAgent has joined #css 15:50:56 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/10/01-css-irc 15:51:03 Zakim, this will be Style 15:51:03 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 15:58:27 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:58:35 + +1.206.324.aaaa 15:58:51 This will be my 4th conf call in a row, please excuse if some of my neurones fused... 15:59:16 +plinss 15:59:30 + +95089aabb 15:59:37 Zakim, +95089aabb is me 15:59:37 +glazou; got it 16:00:11 sylvaing has joined #css 16:01:17 jason_cranfordtea has joined #css 16:01:30 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:01:30 On the phone I see +1.206.324.aaaa, plinss, glazou 16:01:47 + +1.425.533.aacc 16:01:58 Zakim, +1.206.324.aaaa is sylvaing 16:01:58 +sylvaing; got it 16:02:26 +[Mozilla] 16:02:37 Zakim, [Mozilla] has David_Baron 16:02:37 +David_Baron; got it 16:02:46 Zakim, who is noisy? 16:02:48 + +1.703.265.aadd 16:02:52 regrets from molly and jeffrey 16:02:57 dbaron, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: glazou (66%), ??P22 (38%) 16:03:20 Zakim, +1.703.265.aadd is jason_cranfordtea 16:03:20 +jason_cranfordtea; got it 16:03:25 -glazou 16:03:39 yeah, the tapping noise was glazou 16:03:53 +glazou 16:04:09 +??P31 16:04:13 +DaveS 16:04:23 Zakim, +??P31 is fantasai 16:04:23 sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named '+??P31' 16:04:30 Zakim, ??P31 is fantasai 16:04:30 +fantasai; got it 16:04:39 I'm only on IRC today. 16:04:40 +Bert 16:05:31 fantasai_ has joined #css 16:05:42 hi arronei, np 16:06:26 ScribeNick: fantasai_ 16:06:26 Hi, its my birthday today so I am trying to take it easy. 16:06:34 Happy Birthday :) 16:06:35 happy birthday arronei!!!!! 16:06:45 Congratulations! 16:06:46 what are doing here then ? 16:06:54 you 16:06:56 SaloniR has joined #css 16:06:56 I still love CSS. 16:07:07 ROTFL 16:07:08 :-) 16:07:10 ...against all odds... 16:07:12 well why don't you marry it then 16:07:19 lol 16:07:22 lol 16:07:26 zakim, +1.425.533 is SaloniR 16:07:26 +SaloniR; got it 16:07:32 no marriage is a bit too far for me right now 16:08:15 Daniel: Any other items for agenda? 16:08:41 Daniel: I tried to get agenda items from both mailing lists, let me know if I missed any 16:08:45 Topic: Charter 16:08:55 Daniel: Charter was sent by IJ to list of AC reps for approval and vote 16:09:14 Daniel: In case they missed it, I suggest you ping your AC reps to let them know that the charter is up for approval 16:09:26 Daniel: In the voter form, the AC rep needs to indicate intent or not to join WG 16:09:32 Daniel: It's important, please don't miss it 16:09:45 Topic: CSS3 Marquee 16:09:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2008JulSep/0248.html 16:10:14 Daniel: First issue is about potential change in 'direction' of marquee 16:10:48 Note that the 'direction' property is often set by rules 16:10:49 in the UA style sheet based on mark-up in the document, as 16:10:49 recommended in CSS 2.1 [CSS21] section 9.10 ("Text direction: 16:10:49 the 'direction' and 'unicode-bidi' properties"). 16:12:31 fantasai has joined #css 16:12:42 fantasai: works for me, I think we should add it 16:13:01 RESOLVED: Accepted to add Bert's note 16:13:29 Daniel: Question is shall we publish css3-marquee as CR. 16:13:41 Daniel: Got 2 comments from i18n, above and one other, both are resolved. 16:13:52 Daniel: Any objections to moving to CR? 16:14:15 RESOLVED: Publish CSS3 Marquee as CR 16:14:38 ACTION: Bert publish CSS3 Marquee as CR 16:14:38 Created ACTION-109 - Publish CSS3 Marquee as CR [on Bert Bos - due 2008-10-08]. 16:14:47 ScribeNick: fantasai 16:15:00 Topic: CSS2.1 16:15:14 Daniel: Many recent comments about spec, mostly from Saloni 16:15:16 Daniel: First one 16:15:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0198.html 16:15:43 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2008OctDec/0000.html 16:15:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0198.html 16:15:50 (Publishing moratorium is 13 Oct - 27 Oct) 16:16:01 Peter: The more I think about it, the more I think we should not allow comments in URLs 16:16:16 Peter: comment delimiters are valid URL syntax, and URLs have a special tokenization 16:16:25 Peter: you're not in normal CSS rules 16:16:39 Peter: There are places where you can determine whether it's a comment or part of URL 16:16:46 Peter: other places where you can't 16:17:05 dbaron: Are there any browsers that don't do what you think we should do? 16:17:19 Peter: I talked with zweinberg 16:17:38 Peter: Opera does not allow comments within parentheses 16:17:44 dbaron: I'm ok with the proposal given that 16:18:06 Jason: I did a quick search, don't see anyone using it as a hack either 16:18:13 I agree with Peter about how it should work. 16:18:13 dbaron: IE7 and Gecko allow comments 16:18:22 s/dbaron:/Peter:/ 16:18:53 Daniel: So if proposal is accepted, there's no change for Opera, slight change for Mozilla and IE 16:18:59 Daniel: David is ok with it 16:19:03 Daniel: What about MS? 16:19:22 dsinger: Anyone know about webkit? 16:19:25 Konqueror seems not to allow comments. 16:19:50 ACTION: Saloni return to WG with response about whether proposal is accepted 16:19:50 Created ACTION-110 - Return to WG with response about whether proposal is accepted [on Saloni Mira Rai - due 2008-10-08]. 16:20:01 Webkit seems the same as Konqueror. 16:20:01 dbaron: So my understanding is no change to the spec 16:20:10 Daniel: We might need a note saying that it's explicitly forbidden 16:20:30 Peter: There are various bits of text in the spec that talk about comments 16:20:36 Peter: Saying that they're allowed between any tokens 16:20:57 Peter: and URL is one token 16:21:27 ACTION: Peter create note about how URL has its own syntax and parsing rules 16:21:27 Created ACTION-111 - Create note about how URL has its own syntax and parsing rules [on Peter Linss - due 2008-10-08]. 16:21:42 Peter: I also noticed that the grammar for URL leaves out a-z and 0-9 16:21:52 dbaron: There might be a range in there that doesn't look like a range 16:22:01 Peter: I didn't see one 16:22:12 dbaron: *-~ is a range, and includes everything you mentioned 16:22:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0228.html 16:23:46 fantasai: I am strongly in agreement with the proposal 16:25:22 MoZ has joined #css 16:25:25 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-74 16:25:29 RESOLVED: Accepted 16:25:30 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0152.html 16:25:58 dsinger has joined #css 16:25:59 Saloni: With fixed table layout in CSS, if a row has more columns than the first row 16:26:14 Saloni: The spec says you shouldn't render those columns, but the browsers actually do render those cells 16:26:28 Saloni: I understand the value of fixed layout, I think it's important 16:26:42 np Moz 16:26:56 Saloni: So I propose relaxing the requirement in CSS2.1, and then clarify in CSS3 what exactly should happen 16:27:06 regrets now: molly, jeffrey, mohamed 16:28:06 dbaron: That would leave internal contradictions in the spec 16:28:16 fantasai: we could say that if there are extra cells, rendering is undefined 16:28:40 fantasai: or at least the widths of columns and the table are undefined 16:29:11 agrees with Elika+Saloni 16:29:16 Saloni: So we'd be saying if you have fixed table layout, and extra cells, the layout is undefined 16:31:36 ACTION: Saloni propose text for CSS2.1 Issue 75 16:31:36 Created ACTION-112 - Propose text for CSS2.1 Issue 75 [on Saloni Mira Rai - due 2008-10-08]. 16:31:38 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0153.html 16:32:02 -DaveS 16:32:09 Saloni: That's resolved, we got an explanation of why this rule is in place 16:32:12 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0229.html 16:32:59 +DaveS 16:33:58 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-76 16:34:39 -DaveS 16:35:29 at&t signal trouble, sorry 16:35:36 np dsinger 16:35:38 +jcraig 16:36:01 no, the apple call is not jcraig but dsinger 16:36:08 anne has joined #css 16:37:03 When formatting content in the page model, some content may end up outside the *current* page box. For example, an element whose 'white-space' property has the value 'pre' may generate a box that is wider than the page box. Also, when boxes are positioned absolutely *or relatively*, they may end up in "inconvenient" locations. For example, images may be placed on the edge of the page box or 100,000 meters below the page box. 16:38:24 Daniel: Change "Also" to "As another example" 16:38:53 RESOLVED: Accepted above proposal 16:38:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0233.html 16:40:48 Daniel: "Parts of the fixed position box that are not visible in the initial containing block will not print" 16:41:24 RESOLVED: Proposal accepted with above change. 16:41:39 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0232.html 16:42:09 anne has left #css 16:42:28 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-77 16:43:43 plinss, can you take the floor for a minute please ? 16:44:35 or Bert ? 16:46:29 Added to agenda for TPAC 16:46:30 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0230.html 16:48:38 fantasai: Jason, I think we'll want your feedback on this issue 16:51:34 (Prince shows a third option: the box is 500px high on *both* pages. I don't particularly like that solution.) 16:51:47 s/third/fourth/ 16:52:30 fantasai: So I think the distance between the bottom of the last content on the page that fit and the bottom of the page should not count as part of the used height 16:52:43 fantasai: So in this case you would still have used height left over that you use on the next page 16:52:52 fantasai: Whether the background prints in that space is a separate issue 16:54:26 Jason: I should be able to be online 9-5 EST during TPAC 16:54:34 Daniel: Postponed to TPAC 16:55:01 Topic: Media Queries 16:55:07 postponed 16:55:11 dbaron: Given that anne isn't here, we should postpone that one 16:56:23 -SaloniR 16:56:24 -jason_cranfordtea 16:56:25 -[Mozilla] 16:56:26 -jcraig 16:56:26 -plinss 16:56:27 -fantasai 16:56:27 -sylvaing 16:56:29 -glazou 16:56:30 plinss: ping 16:56:33 -Bert 16:56:35 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 16:56:35 ack 16:56:36 Attendees were plinss, glazou, +1.425.533.aacc, sylvaing, David_Baron, jason_cranfordtea, DaveS, fantasai, Bert, SaloniR, jcraig 16:56:41 Oh, the TPAC is a week further away than I was thinking it was. 16:56:49 jcraig was an illusion 16:56:56 that was me 16:57:27 dsinger: tss tss :-) 16:59:03 I don't know how to tell Zakim that that is the apple corporate line (I re-dialed from my desk) 17:10:43 I emailed dsinger with the URL http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/info/name.php3 17:37:57 RRSAgent: make logs public 17:59:54 Bert, let me know when you get around to making all the outstanding CSS2.1 edits 18:06:44 RRSAgent: make minutes 18:06:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/10/01-css-minutes.html fantasai 18:19:14 Zakim has left #css 19:08:58 nickshanks has joined #css 19:54:28 anne has joined #css 19:55:38 my apologies, I was at the Ajax Experience