IRC log of rif on 2008-09-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:58:50 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rif
- 14:58:50 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/23-rif-irc
- 14:59:01 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:59:01 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/23-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 14:59:13 [ChrisW]
- Meeting: RIF Telecon 23 Sep 2008
- 14:59:21 [ChrisW]
- Chair: Chris Welty
- 14:59:50 [ChrisW]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/0139.html
- 15:00:02 [ChrisW]
- ChrisW has changed the topic to: 23 Sept RIF Telecon Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/0139.html
- 15:00:17 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 15:00:36 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Admin
- 15:00:40 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Liason
- 15:00:44 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Publicity
- 15:00:54 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Action Review
- 15:00:59 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ F2F11
- 15:01:13 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Core task force debrief
- 15:01:18 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ PRD task force debrief
- 15:01:26 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started
- 15:01:33 [Zakim]
- +[NRCC]
- 15:01:34 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Dean
- 15:01:37 [Zakim]
- -[NRCC]
- 15:01:38 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Test Cases
- 15:01:39 [Zakim]
- +[NRCC]
- 15:01:44 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ AOB
- 15:01:52 [StellaMitchell]
- StellaMitchell has joined #rif
- 15:02:43 [DaveReynolds]
- DaveReynolds has joined #rif
- 15:03:04 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif
- 15:03:19 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:03:30 [ChrisW]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:03:30 [Zakim]
- +ChrisW; got it
- 15:03:32 [Zakim]
- + +1.212.781.aaaa
- 15:03:46 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, aaaa is me
- 15:03:46 [Zakim]
- +LeoraMorgenstern; got it
- 15:03:48 [Zakim]
- +??P51
- 15:03:54 [Zakim]
- +Dave_Reynolds (was ??P51)
- 15:04:19 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:04:23 [StellaMitchell]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:04:29 [Zakim]
- +StellaMitchell; got it
- 15:04:31 [Zakim]
- + +1.503.533.aabb
- 15:04:50 [Hassan]
- Hassan has joined #rif
- 15:04:59 [Zakim]
- +Hassan_Ait-Kaci
- 15:05:47 [Zakim]
- +Sandro
- 15:06:14 [sandro]
- sandro has joined #rif
- 15:06:24 [sandro]
- f
- 15:06:27 [sandro]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:06:27 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [NRCC], Mike_Dean, ChrisW, LeoraMorgenstern, Dave_Reynolds, StellaMitchell, +1.503.533.aabb, Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Sandro
- 15:06:28 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:06:30 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see sandro, Hassan, LeoraMorgenstern, DaveReynolds, StellaMitchell, RRSAgent, Zakim, mdean, ChrisW, Harold, trackbot
- 15:06:32 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [NRCC], Mike_Dean, ChrisW, LeoraMorgenstern, Dave_Reynolds, StellaMitchell, +1.503.533.aabb, Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Sandro
- 15:06:48 [ChrisW]
- zakim, aabb is GaryHallmark
- 15:06:48 [Zakim]
- +GaryHallmark; got it
- 15:07:37 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:07:37 [Zakim]
- LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted
- 15:07:42 [ChrisW]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 15:07:42 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose LeoraMorgenstern (muted)
- 15:07:49 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- yes, I can scribe
- 15:07:53 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:07:53 [Zakim]
- LeoraMorgenstern should no longer be muted
- 15:07:55 [ChrisW]
- Scribe: LeoraMorgenstern
- 15:08:03 [ChrisW]
- zakim, take up item 1
- 15:08:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:08:17 [ChrisW]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/att-0111/00-part
- 15:08:26 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Accept last week's telecon minutes
- 15:08:29 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Above, minutes from last week's telecon
- 15:08:31 [Zakim]
- +Sandro.a
- 15:08:40 [Zakim]
- -Sandro
- 15:08:41 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: Accept last week's telecon minutes
- 15:09:45 [StellaMitchell]
- double quotes in PS
- 15:09:48 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Agenda amendments? Harold may have something --- possibly to be determined later in the call, since neither Harold nor chris remembers
- 15:09:59 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:09:59 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:10:32 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Dave Reynolds had started to do some work looking on OWL rule profile
- 15:10:56 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Dave: Translation ought to be possible, but there are two issues:
- 15:11:06 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Dave: First issues: data type mismatch
- 15:11:34 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Dave: But can restrict to datatypes that both OWL and RIF support
- 15:12:01 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Dave: so there is a way to generate safe RIF Core rule set
- 15:12:23 [DaveReynolds]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/OWLRL#Datatypes_supported
- 15:13:05 [Gary]
- Gary has joined #rif
- 15:13:24 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Above link gives types that are and are not supported in OWL RL
- 15:13:26 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:13:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Publicity" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:13:42 [sandro]
- (excellent work Dave, thank you.... thinking about the issues you raise, and how to progress with them.....)
- 15:13:54 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Chris: Good number of public comments
- 15:14:11 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Sandro: probably okay. (11 public comments)
- 15:14:21 [PaulVincent]
- PaulVincent has joined #RIF
- 15:14:42 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Chris: There are a couple of new comments, for which I've set up wiki pages; I've sent 3 responses out; Also have emailed a draft of response to Peter Patel-Schneider
- 15:15:36 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Chris: responses are accessible from rif wiki home page
- 15:15:53 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:15:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Action Review" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:17:21 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Action 576 on Leora: continued until tomorrow night
- 15:17:21 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - 576
- 15:19:04 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Action 573 on Sandro to ask for review from OWL wg on RDF & OWL
- 15:19:04 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - 573
- 15:19:18 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Sandro's action 573 is continued
- 15:19:58 [Hassan]
- yes
- 15:20:06 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Sandro's action 565 depends on Adrian sending ssh key: will straighten it out at f2f
- 15:20:43 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- actions 563, 564, and 565 are continued
- 15:21:13 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:21:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "F2F11" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:21:13 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: pending review: some prd issues still under discussion: hopefully will be discussed at f2f
- 15:21:16 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- same for ??
- 15:21:28 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- f2f11 starts this Friday.
- 15:21:42 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- q
- 15:21:46 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- q+
- 15:23:02 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Kifer
- 15:23:33 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:23:33 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisW
- 15:23:38 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- q-
- 15:23:39 [ChrisW]
- ack l
- 15:23:42 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:23:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Core task force debrief" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:23:59 [csma]
- csma has joined #rif
- 15:24:15 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Harold's update on Core task force (telecon on Monday, Sept. 22)
- 15:24:26 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Harold: We went through all open issues, most of which came from Dave.
- 15:24:38 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Harold: Much of it had already been resolved by David's previous emails.
- 15:24:59 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Harold: In our notes can be found current state of resolution to proposed issues.
- 15:25:40 [ChrisW]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/att-0140/2008-09-22-rif-core-minutes.html
- 15:26:13 [DaveReynolds]
- Issue 76 is actually special case of Issue 71 which is also agreed within the task force
- 15:26:47 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: RIF Core will include member (#) but syntactically restricted its use in rule bodies.
- 15:27:10 [DaveReynolds]
- There was an extra clause in the PROPOSED member resolution.
- 15:27:31 [Zakim]
- +Christian
- 15:27:46 [csma]
- zakim, christian is me
- 15:27:46 [Zakim]
- +csma; got it
- 15:27:53 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:27:53 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 15:28:19 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Harold will have action to list in email proposals on which there is consensus.
- 15:28:26 [ChrisW]
- action: harold to summarize proposed resolutions from Core task force
- 15:28:26 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-578 - Summarize proposed resolutions from Core task force [on Harold Boley - due 2008-09-30].
- 15:28:47 [Gary]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 15:28:47 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [NRCC], Mike_Dean, ChrisW, LeoraMorgenstern, Dave_Reynolds, StellaMitchell, GaryHallmark, Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Sandro.a, Michael_Kifer, csma (muted)
- 15:28:50 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: are there any that are still contentious?
- 15:29:02 [DaveReynolds]
- Issue 72 is still open
- 15:29:07 [Gary]
- zakim, GaryHallmark is me
- 15:29:07 [Zakim]
- +Gary; got it
- 15:29:56 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- harold: existing contentious issues include: haven't worked out how inclusion of or in rule bodies affects safety.
- 15:30:35 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: issues 74, 71, 76 are prety clear.
- 15:30:36 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Dean
- 15:31:40 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: issue 48 --- membership issue --- still needs discussion, but within core group, there is compromise resolution. Issues 70, 72 still need discussion
- 15:33:01 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Core will have unrestricted equality in conditions, closing ISSUE-76
- 15:33:56 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: issue 76 was special case of issue 71, so worth rephrasing and then closing 71
- 15:34:19 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: (that is, 71 was rephrased)
- 15:34:20 [DaveReynolds]
- PROPOSED: Core should keep unrestricted equality and external function and predicate calls in rule bodies and keep external functions calls in rule heads.
- 15:34:43 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: above covers both 71 and 76
- 15:34:58 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: but this is more extensive than what was in agenda today.
- 15:35:09 [DaveReynolds]
- ok
- 15:35:10 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: Let's wait on this, and pass it at f2f.
- 15:35:37 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: any discussion about this broader resolution, which covers external calls as well as equality?
- 15:35:47 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- no questions, no discussion about this.
- 15:36:00 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: this looks pretty good. No problems; we should be able to pass it at f2f.
- 15:36:12 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 15:36:17 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:36:17 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "PRD task force debrief" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:36:44 [csma]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:36:45 [Zakim]
- csma should no longer be muted
- 15:37:02 [csma]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/0116.html
- 15:37:37 [csma]
- http://www.w3.org/2008/09/16-rif-prd-minutes.html
- 15:39:24 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- csma: we have a (quasi) frozen draft, but it doesn't have everything that we want to have in it.
- 15:40:24 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- gary: we'd need someone to show us how FLD can do aggregation.
- 15:40:58 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- me/ gary, you need to know how fld can do aggregation in order to share condition language?
- 15:41:08 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- me/ gary, or in order to share something else?
- 15:41:26 [Harold]
- Aggregation in DLV, SPARQL, etc.
- 15:42:16 [Hassan]
- Aggregates as used in PRD is operational - see: http://lambda.uta.edu/monoid.ps.gz
- 15:42:55 [Hassan]
- s/Aggregates /Aggregation /
- 15:43:16 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- mkifer: rather complicated to do this in FLD.
- 15:43:32 [Hassan]
- q+
- 15:43:45 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- mkifer: complicated in logical languages because of recursion.
- 15:44:58 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Hassan: Should not be that complicated because aggregates as used in P
- 15:45:34 [Hassan]
- q-
- 15:45:44 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Hassan: in PRD are operational, as posted above.
- 15:46:00 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- michael: probably what is being asked for will be feasible.
- 15:47:54 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 15:47:57 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Gary: Need to work on conflict resolution issues on PRD
- 15:48:26 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Dean
- 15:48:50 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:48:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "Test Cases" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:49:58 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:49:58 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 15:50:30 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- [Note: conflict resolution is issue 64]
- 15:50:38 [ChrisW]
- *PROPOSED:* Each RIF test case MUST, eventually, be provided in RIF XML, and MAY be provided in some syntax for which a translator-to-XML has been promised. The translator SHOULD be available for use by the WG to check the translation.
- 15:53:29 [csma]
- to clarify: I am not against normative PS, for dialect where the stakeholder want one, and provided that a PS is not normative accross dialects. But even for BLD, where people seem to want a normative PS, I think very strongly that it is not a priority for this WG
- 15:54:43 [Hassan]
- q+
- 15:55:01 [csma]
- ack hassan
- 15:55:19 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: this does depend on Hassan finishing up the translator.
- 15:55:41 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: it is somewhat more difficult than expected to work on the P
- 15:55:45 [DaveReynolds]
- q+
- 15:55:45 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: on the P
- 15:56:05 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: on the PS to xml translator, because the spec/requirements aren't clear
- 15:56:20 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: I had a prototype of translator with strict PS syntax
- 15:56:25 [csma]
- q+
- 15:56:37 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: because tokenizing was sound: everything was put into double quotes, and you didn't have to worry about weird syntax
- 15:56:49 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: but currently, there is some inconsistency which needs to be fixed.
- 15:56:57 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: we need t have an understanding of what a token means.
- 15:57:16 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: people do understand this --- just must iron out errors
- 15:57:51 [csma]
- q?
- 15:57:54 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: yes, I am confident that it will be straightened out.. Due to my schedule (traveling through month of October), will be hard to totallly finish up, but am trying to get something working.
- 15:58:02 [DaveReynolds]
- ack me
- 15:58:51 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- dave: Jeff Pan has a student Stuart Taylor, who had an implementation of early PS syntax, and is now trying to work on updates to PS syntax; perhaps those efforts can be merged, but possibly not.
- 15:59:07 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: Good. Perhaps we should have a task force on this issue.
- 15:59:21 [csma]
- ack me
- 15:59:26 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: Okay, we'll send out msg to find out how many are interested in participating
- 15:59:51 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- csma: real priority is finding test cases that we recommend ... rather than working on an implementation.
- 16:00:10 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- csma: we will finally converge, but I'm afraid it will take some time.
- 16:02:10 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- hassan: we could use the original PS to express test cases. For that, the tool is already available.
- 16:03:06 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- csma: let's take whatever Hassan already has, and just use it.
- 16:03:09 [Harold]
- q+
- 16:03:47 [Gary]
- we don't need a tool to write more test cases. Just to execute them, if at some time someone has something that can execute BLD-RIF-XML.
- 16:04:04 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Hassan: but admittedly, the examples are hard to write in original PS
- 16:04:19 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- csma: but easier to write the examples in original PS than in xML.
- 16:04:44 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Hassan: I've posted the documentation and results; I can also provide and package the code.
- 16:05:00 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Hassan: this takes some time off other thing.
- 16:05:13 [StellaMitchell]
- yes, this sounds good
- 16:05:27 [Harold]
- q
- 16:05:31 [Gary]
- I'd rather hope that we'll have a tool for the APS
- 16:05:46 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- I am afraid that fewer people will submit test cases if they know they must submit them in original PS.
- 16:06:01 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- As it is, most cases that have been submitted are not in original PS.
- 16:06:16 [StellaMitchell]
- leora, they don't have to submit in original PS, we will fix them up for them
- 16:06:26 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Or at least, were not first submitted in original PS.
- 16:06:34 [sandro]
- Sandro: We have to have names for these two different versions of the PS, so they can be named in the Test Case
- 16:06:44 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- stella, yes, I realize.
- 16:06:52 [csma]
- q?
- 16:07:01 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro, don't you think that will be more confusing
- 16:07:23 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- No, I agree with Sandro; it's good to make the distinction clear.
- 16:08:38 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- mkifer: Original PS is not subsumed by new PS
- 16:08:42 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:08:42 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 16:08:56 [ChrisW]
- in "abridged" PS: "aaa" is equivalient to "aaa"^^xsd:string
- 16:09:31 [csma]
- ack harold
- 16:10:25 [Hassan]
- ok
- 16:10:32 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: so we move forward in parallel: we continue working on test cases, and as presentation syntax improves, changes are incorporated into test change document, and in parallel, we work on implementation of translation using new spec.
- 16:10:33 [Hassan]
- :-)
- 16:11:34 [csma]
- q+ about keeping open the possibility to submit in any language provided someone commits to a translator
- 16:11:59 [csma]
- q+ to ask about keeping open the possibility to submit in any language provided someone commits to a translator
- 16:12:06 [StellaMitchell]
- yes
- 16:12:09 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- okay
- 16:12:37 [sandro]
- The question is how many of the current test cases are in which syntax?
- 16:13:13 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Sandro, Stella is pretty much the only one who has been careful to work in original PS.
- 16:13:18 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- The rest of us have been much sloppier.
- 16:13:21 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:13:24 [ChrisW]
- ack c
- 16:13:24 [Zakim]
- csma, you wanted to ask about keeping open the possibility to submit in any language provided someone commits to a translator
- 16:13:27 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- So we'll need to rework our cases.
- 16:13:34 [StellaMitchell]
- leora, most of the test cases are in ps
- 16:13:38 [sandro]
- I guess when we have Hassan's code we can see which test cases actually parse. :-)
- 16:13:53 [csma]
- ack csma
- 16:14:00 [Hassan]
- Suspense ... :-)
- 16:14:06 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- chris: no need for resolution, this will just be our mode of operation.
- 16:14:18 [sandro]
- (we could call the the PS's PS1/ and PS/2 :-)
- 16:14:56 [StellaMitchell]
- it just makes it harder for reviewers
- 16:15:04 [StellaMitchell]
- but ok with me
- 16:15:16 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Stella, It makes it harder for us.
- 16:15:21 [StellaMitchell]
- right
- 16:15:24 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Not just the reviewers.
- 16:15:31 [StellaMitchell]
- we are part of the reviewers
- 16:15:47 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Right, but we're also the translators.
- 16:15:54 [csma]
- satella, why does it meke it more diffivcult for you?
- 16:16:05 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- The reviewers will presumably be getting the translated cases?
- 16:16:17 [ChrisW]
- *PROPOSED:* Each RIF test case MUST, eventually, be provided in RIF XML, and MAY be provided in some syntax for which a translator-to-XML has been promised. The translator SHOULD be available for use by the WG to check the translation.
- 16:16:23 [csma]
- language->xml->ps
- 16:16:24 [StellaMitchell]
- csma, if we have the reverse translator, it's ok
- 16:16:38 [csma]
- hassan just said we have
- 16:18:45 [DaveReynolds]
- I think Stuart's old tool worked both ways, might be able to adapt that.
- 16:19:01 [sandro]
- ACTION: Sandro implement RIF-XML to PS translator
- 16:19:01 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-579 - Implement RIF-XML to PS translator [on Sandro Hawke - due 2008-09-30].
- 16:19:10 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Each RIF test case MUST, eventually, be provided in RIF XML, and MAY be provided in some syntax for which a translator-to-XML has been promised. The translator SHOULD be available for use by the WG to check the translation.
- 16:19:11 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:19:11 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 16:19:20 [Gary]
- sandro, the only "tricky" part is divining the Prefix() to make CURIEs look good
- 16:19:22 [StellaMitchell]
- the discussino has covered it
- 16:19:25 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Chris, the resolution seems fine.
- 16:19:25 [StellaMitchell]
- seems fine
- 16:19:43 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- It's the mode of operation --- working in original PS --- that makes life somewhat harder for Stella, Adrian, and me.
- 16:19:50 [StellaMitchell]
- no, leora
- 16:19:52 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: Each RIF test case MUST, eventually, be provided in RIF XML, and MAY be provided in some syntax for which a translator-to-XML has been promised. The translator SHOULD be available for use by the WG to check the translation.
- 16:19:57 [sandro]
- Gary, it's not hard if you don't care how good they look. :-) (seriously, I've written that kind of code 20 times.)
- 16:20:31 [DaveReynolds]
- Gary, Jena has a "localname" algorithm that splits off the NCName end off a URI just a few lines of code.
- 16:20:40 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:20:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 9. "AOB" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:20:54 [csma]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:20:54 [Zakim]
- csma should no longer be muted
- 16:21:32 [Hassan]
- +1 on the telcon
- 16:22:05 [csma]
- +1 to adjourn
- 16:22:14 [Zakim]
- -[NRCC]
- 16:22:17 [Zakim]
- -Gary
- 16:22:18 [Zakim]
- -Dave_Reynolds
- 16:22:19 [Zakim]
- -StellaMitchell
- 16:22:21 [Zakim]
- -Hassan_Ait-Kaci
- 16:22:22 [ChrisW]
- zakim, list attendees
- 16:22:22 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been [NRCC], Mike_Dean, ChrisW, +1.212.781.aaaa, LeoraMorgenstern, Dave_Reynolds, StellaMitchell, +1.503.533.aabb, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, Sandro,
- 16:22:26 [Zakim]
- ... Michael_Kifer, csma, Gary
- 16:22:40 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Dean
- 16:22:42 [ChrisW]
- Regrets: JosDeBruijn AxelPolleres AdrianPaschke MohamedZergaoui ChanghaiKe
- 16:22:50 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Kifer
- 16:22:52 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:22:52 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/23-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 16:23:03 [csma]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:23:03 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ChrisW, LeoraMorgenstern, Sandro.a, csma
- 16:23:11 [Zakim]
- -LeoraMorgenstern
- 16:27:23 [Zakim]
- -Sandro.a
- 16:27:57 [Zakim]
- -csma
- 16:27:58 [Zakim]
- -ChrisW
- 16:27:58 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended
- 16:27:59 [Zakim]
- Attendees were [NRCC], Mike_Dean, ChrisW, +1.212.781.aaaa, LeoraMorgenstern, Dave_Reynolds, StellaMitchell, +1.503.533.aabb, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, Sandro, Michael_Kifer, csma, Gary
- 16:28:20 [csma]
- csma has left #rif