11:03:37 RRSAgent has joined #wam 11:03:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-irc 11:04:05 +Josh_Soref 11:04:11 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0670.html 11:04:14 Chair: Art 11:04:19 Scribe: Art 11:04:52 ScribeNick: ArtB 11:05:20 Present: Art, Arve, Claudio, Richard_Tibbett(Orange), Josh 11:05:38 Meeting: 18 September 2008 11:05:44 + +44.777.183.aadd 11:05:48 Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference 11:05:55 Date: 18 September 2008 11:06:06 Present+ David_Rogers 11:06:17 zakim, aadd is David_Rogers 11:06:17 +David_Rogers; got it 11:07:07 marcos has joined #wam 11:07:58 Topic: Agenda Review 11:08:09 AB: Agenda is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0670.html 11:08:17 AB: any changes? 11:08:23 [None] 11:08:27 Benoit has joined #wam 11:08:32 Topic: Annoucements 11:08:39 Present+ Benoit 11:08:48 +??P14 11:09:19 zakim, ??P14 is me 11:09:19 +Caroline 11:09:19 +marcos; got it 11:09:31 Present+ Marcos 11:10:34 DR: how to we proceed with OMTP's Dependency input? 11:11:05 AB: we can discuss that on the mail list since it is directed to the P&C spec 11:11:19 DR: I'm OK with using the mail list to discuss 11:11:27 RT: OK with me too 11:12:02 MikeSmith has joined #wam 11:12:07 s/Topic: Annoucements/Topic: OMTP Dependency/ 11:12:33 Zakim, call Mike-Mobile 11:12:33 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 11:12:35 +Mike 11:13:33 MC: do you think the reqs are OK in this regard? 11:13:39 DR: yes 11:13:47 Zakim, drop Mike 11:13:47 Mike is being disconnected 11:13:49 -Mike 11:13:56 Zakim, call Mike-Mobile 11:13:56 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 11:13:58 +Mike 11:14:09 RT: can I start a discussion about Dependencies now on the mail list? 11:14:22 MC: yes; comments at any time on any spec are always welcome 11:14:32 - +44.797.352.aaaa 11:14:46 Topic: Annoucements 11:14:54 Zakim, drop Mike 11:14:54 Mike is being disconnected 11:14:55 -Mike 11:14:57 Zakim, call Mike-Mobile 11:14:57 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 11:14:59 +Mike 11:15:08 RT: he was OMTP's author for the dependency input 11:15:11 drogersuk has joined #wam 11:15:14 ... he works at Orange 11:15:31 + +44.208.849.aaee 11:15:50 AB: can we get a short update of the BONDI highlights from last week's meeting? 11:16:03 DR: I can try to send something out by the end of the week 11:16:48 ... We need to update the BONDI doc to reflect the latest Widgets work that has been done 11:17:18 ... We will continue to work on the DigSig spec; mostly via Mark Priestly 11:17:40 ... If Marcos needs some help, please ask us 11:17:56 Present+ Mike 11:18:13 Topic: Requirement #1 LC 11:18:18 OMTP are happy to offer assistance to webapps during the XML digital signature discussions 11:18:42 AB: what remains to be done to get the LC #1 DoC doc up-to-date 11:19:14 MC: I just need to align the document with the latest emails on the list 11:19:26 ... Still need to get some feedback from the MWBP 11:19:41 ... They haven't replied to my deadline with any objections 11:19:56 ... They can of course submit comments for LC #2 11:20:08 ... The DoC doc is 90% complete. 11:20:58 AB: I want to complete the DoC #1 doc before we start the LC #2 review period 11:21:16 Topic: Core API & Events Status 11:21:46 AB: during Turin we agreed to publish this doc in September 11:21:51 ... What's the status? 11:22:22 Arve: what remains to be done 11:22:29 ... the update event 11:23:02 and one of the features 11:23:39 AB: the latest ED is http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/ 11:24:35 -Josh_Soref 11:24:54 MC: what do you need to define the states? 11:25:08 Arve: I'll need to check the P&C spec 11:25:11 +Josh_Soref 11:25:45 ... I think I have the info I need (from P&C) 11:26:28 AB: what about the Icons issue? 11:26:51 Arve: I'm not comfortable with our current level of support but we can live with this as an open issue for FPWD 11:27:02 -marcos 11:27:28 AB: what about the WindowWindow Interface issue? 11:27:31 +??P14 11:27:36 Arve: I talked to Cameron about this 11:27:42 s/WindowWindow/WindowWidget 11:27:52 zakim +??P14 is marcos 11:28:11 ... we may need to add some related text to the P&C spec 11:28:40 AB: do we need to make the link before FPWD? 11:28:45 MC: no, I don't think so 11:28:51 Arve: I agree with Marcos 11:29:56 AB: I think it would be good to provide a bit more detail about the Issues identified in the spec 11:30:31 zakim, +??P14 is marcos 11:30:31 sorry, timeless, I do not recognize a party named '+??P14' 11:30:45 Arve: what is the process for agreeing on FPWD? 11:30:48 zakim, ??P14 is marcos 11:30:48 +marcos; got it 11:31:42 AB: we need to record an agreement to publish 11:32:00 AB: I propose we publish the API and Event Editor's Draft as a FPWD 11:32:06 AB: any objections? 11:32:10 [None] 11:33:03 CV: I'd like a clarification about message exchange between widgets 11:33:13 ... Is this related to the widget context? 11:33:22 ... Also is this related to HTML5 postMessage? 11:33:52 Arve: cross-widget communication is something that belongs in an Extended API 11:34:24 ... there are some security implications as well 11:34:41 ... UA should have some configuration mechanism about its usage (or not) 11:37:20 RESOLUTION: we will publish the API and Events Editor's Draft as a FPWD 11:38:10 ACTION: Arve notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication 11:38:10 Created ACTION-247 - Notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication [on Arve Bersvendsen - due 2008-09-25]. 11:38:52 Topic: Status of Automatic Updates spec 11:39:06 AB: would like a brief status 11:39:27 MC: I've had some other higher priority stuff come up 11:39:44 ... hope to have it ready by early next week 11:39:57 AB: are you blocked on anyone? 11:40:05 MC: no 11:40:17 ... Mark Baker's etag concerns could affect it 11:41:05 Topic: Proposal to Rename the Widget specs 11:41:31 AB: what is the motivation and rationale for a change? 11:41:48 MC: there is confusion about WebApps' widgets and "web widgets" 11:42:17 ... the new proposal will force the reader to seek clarity by reading the Abstract and/or Intro 11:42:35 Widget Packages and User Agents 1.0: 11:42:36 ... it makes "Package" primary 11:43:04 AB: what do people think? 11:44:10 BS: some of the specs are not generic to the UA 11:44:50 CV: I share Benoit's concern 11:45:06 the user Agent defined elements are only related to the packaging 11:45:25 Arve: I'm not too fond of either of these proposals 11:45:26 "Widget Packages 1.0 and User Agents conformance criteria: xxxx" 11:45:38 ... I'm afraid there could be confusion with those too 11:46:08 Arve: how about dropping Widgets altogether 11:46:21 BS: we need to keep Widgts 11:46:30 Arve: use Web Apps rather than Widgets 11:46:49 ... I understand the Marketing usefulness of Widgets 11:47:28 ... We are specifiying stuff for Web Apps that we call "widgets" 11:47:28 proposition: "User Agent Widget Pakaging format" 11:47:56 AB: any other opinions? 11:47:57 Packages for Client-side Web Applications and User Agent Conforming Criteria 11:48:10 DR: we've had similar discussions in OMTP 11:48:10 (word bloat) 11:48:22 ... the point of agreement is that we are talking about Web Applications 11:48:27 s/conforming/conformance 11:50:14 AB: without some compelling reasons I think we should stay with the names we already use 11:50:26 ... If we make a change, it would be the third name 11:50:43 ... We already have at least one doc in LC and it seems too late to make a change 11:50:53 Arve: I tend to agree with Art 11:51:05 ... We need to make our definition the mainstream name that is used 11:52:18 MC: OK, let's keep it as is 11:52:35 ... We need to keep educating people about our definition 11:52:57 ... I agree we can have the most authoritative definition in the industry 11:53:31 Arve: FWIW, Google already agrees with our definition 11:53:43 ... take a look at wikipedia 11:53:44 -Josh_Soref 11:54:07 AB: I propose we keep the names of our documents as is 11:54:12 AB: any objections? 11:54:15 [None] 11:54:21 +Josh_Soref 11:54:29 RESOLUTION: we will not change the names of our Widgets specs 11:54:49 Topic: Widgets V2/NextGen Feature List 11:55:15 AB: want to get consensus on how we move forward 11:55:59 -Josh_Soref 11:56:09 CV: there is some prelim work that needs to be done first 11:56:19 ... for example, need to get some type of scope around V2 11:56:32 +Josh_Soref 11:56:36 - +44.208.849.aaee 11:56:55 the cell network here is giving me network busy and kicking me off 11:57:23 ... We may get lots of additional requirements 11:57:52 ... Regarding a doc or wiki, I think we need to know what we plan to add 11:58:39 ... Regarding V1.0 reqs, we didn't do a lot of Use Case work 11:58:50 ... We should probably do some UC work for v2.0 11:59:04 MC: I agree with Claudio re UCs for v2.0 11:59:27 AB: so you support doing some UC work for v2.0? 11:59:29 MC: yes 12:00:04 AB: any other comments? 12:00:13 AB: I support doing UC work for v2.0 12:00:45 ... My only concern is that it not take away time/resources from our 1.0 work 12:00:59 MC: agree on the resource issue 12:02:30 AB: seems like we should document the general ideas we have now for v2.0 12:02:43 ... but not do any detailed work until next year 12:03:05 ... Don't want to disrupt v1.0 spec work 12:04:30 AB: Claudio, Marcos - can we start using a wiki now? 12:04:51 ... And defer the question about using a document for a few months? 12:04:57 CV: that's OK with me 12:05:02 MC: yes, that's OK 12:05:14 ... and if Claudio wants to take the initial lead that's OK 12:05:52 MS: Claudio should be able to gain access without me getting involved 12:06:40 Topic: etag attr 12:06:52 AB: we don't have time to discuss this today 12:07:03 ... if you have any comments, send them to public-webapps 12:07:10 Topic: AOB 12:07:14 AB: any topics? 12:08:27 -David_Rogers 12:08:28 -marcos 12:08:29 -Josh_Soref 12:08:30 -Caroline 12:08:30 -arve 12:08:32 - +39.011.228.aacc 12:08:33 Zakim, drop Mike 12:08:33 Mike is being disconnected 12:08:35 -Mike 12:08:56 drogersuk has left #wam 12:08:58 AB: regarding TAG joint meeting, Roy Fielding isn't a member of the TAG any more; Stuart Williams will not be in Mandelieu 12:09:17 ... that means it may be difficult to get some f2f time with at TAG member but I will try 12:09:23 AB: anything else? 12:09:26 [No] 12:09:32 AB: Meeting Adjourned 12:09:37 arve has left #wam 12:09:40 RRSAgent, make log public 12:10:12 RRSAgent, make minutes 12:10:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-minutes.html ArtB 12:11:30 -Art_Barstow 12:11:31 IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended 12:11:32 Attendees were +44.797.352.aaaa, Art_Barstow, +47.23.69.aabb, arve, +39.011.228.aacc, Josh_Soref, +44.777.183.aadd, David_Rogers, Caroline, marcos, Mike, +44.208.849.aaee 12:12:10 Regrets: Thomas 12:12:18 RRSAgent, make minutes 12:12:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-minutes.html ArtB 12:13:51 zakim, bye 12:13:51 Zakim has left #wam 12:14:06 RRSAgent, bye 12:14:06 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-actions.rdf : 12:14:06 ACTION: Arve notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication [1] 12:14:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-irc#T11-38-10