IRC log of wam on 2008-09-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 11:03:37 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wam
- 11:03:37 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-irc
- 11:04:05 [Zakim]
- +Josh_Soref
- 11:04:11 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0670.html
- 11:04:14 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 11:04:19 [ArtB]
- Scribe: Art
- 11:04:52 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 11:05:20 [ArtB]
- Present: Art, Arve, Claudio, Richard_Tibbett(Orange), Josh
- 11:05:38 [ArtB]
- Meeting: 18 September 2008
- 11:05:44 [Zakim]
- + +44.777.183.aadd
- 11:05:48 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
- 11:05:55 [ArtB]
- Date: 18 September 2008
- 11:06:06 [ArtB]
- Present+ David_Rogers
- 11:06:17 [ArtB]
- zakim, aadd is David_Rogers
- 11:06:17 [Zakim]
- +David_Rogers; got it
- 11:07:07 [marcos]
- marcos has joined #wam
- 11:07:58 [ArtB]
- Topic: Agenda Review
- 11:08:09 [ArtB]
- AB: Agenda is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0670.html
- 11:08:17 [ArtB]
- AB: any changes?
- 11:08:23 [ArtB]
- [None]
- 11:08:27 [Benoit]
- Benoit has joined #wam
- 11:08:32 [ArtB]
- Topic: Annoucements
- 11:08:39 [ArtB]
- Present+ Benoit
- 11:08:48 [Zakim]
- +??P14
- 11:09:19 [marcos]
- zakim, ??P14 is me
- 11:09:19 [Zakim]
- +Caroline
- 11:09:19 [Zakim]
- +marcos; got it
- 11:09:31 [ArtB]
- Present+ Marcos
- 11:10:34 [ArtB]
- DR: how to we proceed with OMTP's Dependency input?
- 11:11:05 [ArtB]
- AB: we can discuss that on the mail list since it is directed to the P&C spec
- 11:11:19 [ArtB]
- DR: I'm OK with using the mail list to discuss
- 11:11:27 [ArtB]
- RT: OK with me too
- 11:12:02 [MikeSmith]
- MikeSmith has joined #wam
- 11:12:07 [ArtB]
- s/Topic: Annoucements/Topic: OMTP Dependency/
- 11:12:33 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, call Mike-Mobile
- 11:12:33 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
- 11:12:35 [Zakim]
- +Mike
- 11:13:33 [ArtB]
- MC: do you think the reqs are OK in this regard?
- 11:13:39 [ArtB]
- DR: yes
- 11:13:47 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, drop Mike
- 11:13:47 [Zakim]
- Mike is being disconnected
- 11:13:49 [Zakim]
- -Mike
- 11:13:56 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, call Mike-Mobile
- 11:13:56 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
- 11:13:58 [Zakim]
- +Mike
- 11:14:09 [ArtB]
- RT: can I start a discussion about Dependencies now on the mail list?
- 11:14:22 [ArtB]
- MC: yes; comments at any time on any spec are always welcome
- 11:14:32 [Zakim]
- - +44.797.352.aaaa
- 11:14:46 [ArtB]
- Topic: Annoucements
- 11:14:54 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, drop Mike
- 11:14:54 [Zakim]
- Mike is being disconnected
- 11:14:55 [Zakim]
- -Mike
- 11:14:57 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, call Mike-Mobile
- 11:14:57 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
- 11:14:59 [Zakim]
- +Mike
- 11:15:08 [ArtB]
- RT: he was OMTP's author for the dependency input
- 11:15:11 [drogersuk]
- drogersuk has joined #wam
- 11:15:14 [ArtB]
- ... he works at Orange
- 11:15:31 [Zakim]
- + +44.208.849.aaee
- 11:15:50 [ArtB]
- AB: can we get a short update of the BONDI highlights from last week's meeting?
- 11:16:03 [ArtB]
- DR: I can try to send something out by the end of the week
- 11:16:48 [ArtB]
- ... We need to update the BONDI doc to reflect the latest Widgets work that has been done
- 11:17:18 [ArtB]
- ... We will continue to work on the DigSig spec; mostly via Mark Priestly
- 11:17:40 [ArtB]
- ... If Marcos needs some help, please ask us
- 11:17:56 [ArtB]
- Present+ Mike
- 11:18:13 [ArtB]
- Topic: Requirement #1 LC
- 11:18:18 [drogersuk]
- OMTP are happy to offer assistance to webapps during the XML digital signature discussions
- 11:18:42 [ArtB]
- AB: what remains to be done to get the LC #1 DoC doc up-to-date
- 11:19:14 [ArtB]
- MC: I just need to align the document with the latest emails on the list
- 11:19:26 [ArtB]
- ... Still need to get some feedback from the MWBP
- 11:19:41 [ArtB]
- ... They haven't replied to my deadline with any objections
- 11:19:56 [ArtB]
- ... They can of course submit comments for LC #2
- 11:20:08 [ArtB]
- ... The DoC doc is 90% complete.
- 11:20:58 [ArtB]
- AB: I want to complete the DoC #1 doc before we start the LC #2 review period
- 11:21:16 [ArtB]
- Topic: Core API & Events Status
- 11:21:46 [ArtB]
- AB: during Turin we agreed to publish this doc in September
- 11:21:51 [ArtB]
- ... What's the status?
- 11:22:22 [ArtB]
- Arve: what remains to be done
- 11:22:29 [ArtB]
- ... the update event
- 11:23:02 [ArtB]
- and one of the features
- 11:23:39 [ArtB]
- AB: the latest ED is http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/
- 11:24:35 [Zakim]
- -Josh_Soref
- 11:24:54 [ArtB]
- MC: what do you need to define the states?
- 11:25:08 [ArtB]
- Arve: I'll need to check the P&C spec
- 11:25:11 [Zakim]
- +Josh_Soref
- 11:25:45 [ArtB]
- ... I think I have the info I need (from P&C)
- 11:26:28 [ArtB]
- AB: what about the Icons issue?
- 11:26:51 [ArtB]
- Arve: I'm not comfortable with our current level of support but we can live with this as an open issue for FPWD
- 11:27:02 [Zakim]
- -marcos
- 11:27:28 [ArtB]
- AB: what about the WindowWindow Interface issue?
- 11:27:31 [Zakim]
- +??P14
- 11:27:36 [ArtB]
- Arve: I talked to Cameron about this
- 11:27:42 [marcos]
- s/WindowWindow/WindowWidget
- 11:27:52 [timeless]
- zakim +??P14 is marcos
- 11:28:11 [ArtB]
- ... we may need to add some related text to the P&C spec
- 11:28:40 [ArtB]
- AB: do we need to make the link before FPWD?
- 11:28:45 [ArtB]
- MC: no, I don't think so
- 11:28:51 [ArtB]
- Arve: I agree with Marcos
- 11:29:56 [ArtB]
- AB: I think it would be good to provide a bit more detail about the Issues identified in the spec
- 11:30:31 [timeless]
- zakim, +??P14 is marcos
- 11:30:31 [Zakim]
- sorry, timeless, I do not recognize a party named '+??P14'
- 11:30:45 [ArtB]
- Arve: what is the process for agreeing on FPWD?
- 11:30:48 [timeless]
- zakim, ??P14 is marcos
- 11:30:48 [Zakim]
- +marcos; got it
- 11:31:42 [ArtB]
- AB: we need to record an agreement to publish
- 11:32:00 [ArtB]
- AB: I propose we publish the API and Event Editor's Draft as a FPWD
- 11:32:06 [ArtB]
- AB: any objections?
- 11:32:10 [ArtB]
- [None]
- 11:33:03 [ArtB]
- CV: I'd like a clarification about message exchange between widgets
- 11:33:13 [ArtB]
- ... Is this related to the widget context?
- 11:33:22 [ArtB]
- ... Also is this related to HTML5 postMessage?
- 11:33:52 [ArtB]
- Arve: cross-widget communication is something that belongs in an Extended API
- 11:34:24 [ArtB]
- ... there are some security implications as well
- 11:34:41 [ArtB]
- ... UA should have some configuration mechanism about its usage (or not)
- 11:37:20 [ArtB]
- RESOLUTION: we will publish the API and Events Editor's Draft as a FPWD
- 11:38:10 [ArtB]
- ACTION: Arve notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication
- 11:38:10 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-247 - Notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication [on Arve Bersvendsen - due 2008-09-25].
- 11:38:52 [ArtB]
- Topic: Status of Automatic Updates spec
- 11:39:06 [ArtB]
- AB: would like a brief status
- 11:39:27 [ArtB]
- MC: I've had some other higher priority stuff come up
- 11:39:44 [ArtB]
- ... hope to have it ready by early next week
- 11:39:57 [ArtB]
- AB: are you blocked on anyone?
- 11:40:05 [ArtB]
- MC: no
- 11:40:17 [ArtB]
- ... Mark Baker's etag concerns could affect it
- 11:41:05 [ArtB]
- Topic: Proposal to Rename the Widget specs
- 11:41:31 [ArtB]
- AB: what is the motivation and rationale for a change?
- 11:41:48 [ArtB]
- MC: there is confusion about WebApps' widgets and "web widgets"
- 11:42:17 [ArtB]
- ... the new proposal will force the reader to seek clarity by reading the Abstract and/or Intro
- 11:42:35 [marcos]
- Widget Packages and User Agents 1.0:
- 11:42:36 [ArtB]
- ... it makes "Package" primary
- 11:43:04 [ArtB]
- AB: what do people think?
- 11:44:10 [ArtB]
- BS: some of the specs are not generic to the UA
- 11:44:50 [ArtB]
- CV: I share Benoit's concern
- 11:45:06 [Benoit]
- the user Agent defined elements are only related to the packaging
- 11:45:25 [ArtB]
- Arve: I'm not too fond of either of these proposals
- 11:45:26 [claudio]
- "Widget Packages 1.0 and User Agents conformance criteria: xxxx"
- 11:45:38 [ArtB]
- ... I'm afraid there could be confusion with those too
- 11:46:08 [ArtB]
- Arve: how about dropping Widgets altogether
- 11:46:21 [ArtB]
- BS: we need to keep Widgts
- 11:46:30 [ArtB]
- Arve: use Web Apps rather than Widgets
- 11:46:49 [ArtB]
- ... I understand the Marketing usefulness of Widgets
- 11:47:28 [ArtB]
- ... We are specifiying stuff for Web Apps that we call "widgets"
- 11:47:28 [Benoit]
- proposition: "User Agent Widget Pakaging format"
- 11:47:56 [ArtB]
- AB: any other opinions?
- 11:47:57 [marcos]
- Packages for Client-side Web Applications and User Agent Conforming Criteria
- 11:48:10 [ArtB]
- DR: we've had similar discussions in OMTP
- 11:48:10 [arve]
- (word bloat)
- 11:48:22 [ArtB]
- ... the point of agreement is that we are talking about Web Applications
- 11:48:27 [marcos]
- s/conforming/conformance
- 11:50:14 [ArtB]
- AB: without some compelling reasons I think we should stay with the names we already use
- 11:50:26 [ArtB]
- ... If we make a change, it would be the third name
- 11:50:43 [ArtB]
- ... We already have at least one doc in LC and it seems too late to make a change
- 11:50:53 [ArtB]
- Arve: I tend to agree with Art
- 11:51:05 [ArtB]
- ... We need to make our definition the mainstream name that is used
- 11:52:18 [ArtB]
- MC: OK, let's keep it as is
- 11:52:35 [ArtB]
- ... We need to keep educating people about our definition
- 11:52:57 [ArtB]
- ... I agree we can have the most authoritative definition in the industry
- 11:53:31 [ArtB]
- Arve: FWIW, Google already agrees with our definition
- 11:53:43 [ArtB]
- ... take a look at wikipedia
- 11:53:44 [Zakim]
- -Josh_Soref
- 11:54:07 [ArtB]
- AB: I propose we keep the names of our documents as is
- 11:54:12 [ArtB]
- AB: any objections?
- 11:54:15 [ArtB]
- [None]
- 11:54:21 [Zakim]
- +Josh_Soref
- 11:54:29 [ArtB]
- RESOLUTION: we will not change the names of our Widgets specs
- 11:54:49 [ArtB]
- Topic: Widgets V2/NextGen Feature List
- 11:55:15 [ArtB]
- AB: want to get consensus on how we move forward
- 11:55:59 [Zakim]
- -Josh_Soref
- 11:56:09 [ArtB]
- CV: there is some prelim work that needs to be done first
- 11:56:19 [ArtB]
- ... for example, need to get some type of scope around V2
- 11:56:32 [Zakim]
- +Josh_Soref
- 11:56:36 [Zakim]
- - +44.208.849.aaee
- 11:56:55 [timeless]
- the cell network here is giving me network busy and kicking me off
- 11:57:23 [ArtB]
- ... We may get lots of additional requirements
- 11:57:52 [ArtB]
- ... Regarding a doc or wiki, I think we need to know what we plan to add
- 11:58:39 [ArtB]
- ... Regarding V1.0 reqs, we didn't do a lot of Use Case work
- 11:58:50 [ArtB]
- ... We should probably do some UC work for v2.0
- 11:59:04 [ArtB]
- MC: I agree with Claudio re UCs for v2.0
- 11:59:27 [ArtB]
- AB: so you support doing some UC work for v2.0?
- 11:59:29 [ArtB]
- MC: yes
- 12:00:04 [ArtB]
- AB: any other comments?
- 12:00:13 [ArtB]
- AB: I support doing UC work for v2.0
- 12:00:45 [ArtB]
- ... My only concern is that it not take away time/resources from our 1.0 work
- 12:00:59 [ArtB]
- MC: agree on the resource issue
- 12:02:30 [ArtB]
- AB: seems like we should document the general ideas we have now for v2.0
- 12:02:43 [ArtB]
- ... but not do any detailed work until next year
- 12:03:05 [ArtB]
- ... Don't want to disrupt v1.0 spec work
- 12:04:30 [ArtB]
- AB: Claudio, Marcos - can we start using a wiki now?
- 12:04:51 [ArtB]
- ... And defer the question about using a document for a few months?
- 12:04:57 [ArtB]
- CV: that's OK with me
- 12:05:02 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, that's OK
- 12:05:14 [ArtB]
- ... and if Claudio wants to take the initial lead that's OK
- 12:05:52 [ArtB]
- MS: Claudio should be able to gain access without me getting involved
- 12:06:40 [ArtB]
- Topic: etag attr
- 12:06:52 [ArtB]
- AB: we don't have time to discuss this today
- 12:07:03 [ArtB]
- ... if you have any comments, send them to public-webapps
- 12:07:10 [ArtB]
- Topic: AOB
- 12:07:14 [ArtB]
- AB: any topics?
- 12:08:27 [Zakim]
- -David_Rogers
- 12:08:28 [Zakim]
- -marcos
- 12:08:29 [Zakim]
- -Josh_Soref
- 12:08:30 [Zakim]
- -Caroline
- 12:08:30 [Zakim]
- -arve
- 12:08:32 [Zakim]
- - +39.011.228.aacc
- 12:08:33 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, drop Mike
- 12:08:33 [Zakim]
- Mike is being disconnected
- 12:08:35 [Zakim]
- -Mike
- 12:08:56 [drogersuk]
- drogersuk has left #wam
- 12:08:58 [ArtB]
- AB: regarding TAG joint meeting, Roy Fielding isn't a member of the TAG any more; Stuart Williams will not be in Mandelieu
- 12:09:17 [ArtB]
- ... that means it may be difficult to get some f2f time with at TAG member but I will try
- 12:09:23 [ArtB]
- AB: anything else?
- 12:09:26 [ArtB]
- [No]
- 12:09:32 [ArtB]
- AB: Meeting Adjourned
- 12:09:37 [arve]
- arve has left #wam
- 12:09:40 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make log public
- 12:10:12 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 12:10:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-minutes.html ArtB
- 12:11:30 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 12:11:31 [Zakim]
- IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended
- 12:11:32 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +44.797.352.aaaa, Art_Barstow, +47.23.69.aabb, arve, +39.011.228.aacc, Josh_Soref, +44.777.183.aadd, David_Rogers, Caroline, marcos, Mike, +44.208.849.aaee
- 12:12:10 [ArtB]
- Regrets: Thomas
- 12:12:18 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 12:12:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-minutes.html ArtB
- 12:13:51 [ArtB]
- zakim, bye
- 12:13:51 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wam
- 12:14:06 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 12:14:06 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-actions.rdf :
- 12:14:06 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Arve notify Art when the API and Events API is ready for Publication [1]
- 12:14:06 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-wam-irc#T11-38-10