IRC log of rdfa on 2008-09-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:55:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 14:55:06 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc
- 14:55:14 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdfa
- 14:55:24 [msporny]
- zakim, this will be rdfa
- 14:55:24 [Zakim]
- ok, msporny; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
- 14:55:41 [msporny]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML Task Force
- 14:55:55 [msporny]
- Scribe: Manu_Sporny
- 14:56:08 [msporny]
- ScribeNick: msporny
- 14:56:18 [msporny]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML Task Force
- 14:56:32 [msporny]
- Chair: Ben_Adida
- 14:56:33 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
- 14:56:40 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM
- 14:57:09 [msporny]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Sep/0098.html
- 14:57:09 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Hausenblas
- 14:57:31 [msporny]
- Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html
- 14:58:12 [msporny]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 14:58:20 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:58:20 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 15:00:07 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, code?
- 15:00:07 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
- 15:00:17 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 15:00:17 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 15:00:18 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 15:00:38 [Zakim]
- + +0208761aaaa
- 15:00:44 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am aaaa
- 15:00:45 [Zakim]
- +markbirbeck; got it
- 15:00:54 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 15:00:58 [msporny]
- zakim, I am ??P12
- 15:00:58 [Zakim]
- +msporny; got it
- 15:04:25 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.338.aabb
- 15:05:22 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 15:05:24 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #rdfa
- 15:06:15 [msporny]
- Topic: Action Items
- 15:07:05 [msporny]
- Present: Ben_Adida, Michael_Hausenblas, Manu_Sporny, Shane_McCarron, Steven_Pemberton, Mark_Birbeck
- 15:07:20 [msporny]
- Regrets: Ralph_Swick
- 15:07:57 [msporny]
- Present+ Jeremy_Carroll
- 15:08:13 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ben to figure out *how* to do the namespace-doc GRDDL thing [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action18]
- 15:08:25 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:11:11 [msporny]
- ACTION: Jeremy review and consider expanding the description of TopBraid in the RDFa wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action02]
- 15:11:21 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:11:32 [msporny]
- ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action03]
- 15:11:36 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:11:41 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:11:41 [Zakim]
- markbirbeck should now be muted
- 15:11:49 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action04]
- 15:11:54 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:12:06 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to create test cases for testing relative URI resolution (href/CURIEs/etc). [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 15:12:09 [msporny]
- -- done
- 15:12:25 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to upload test harness source code to W3C CVS. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 15:12:27 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:12:59 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to work with Microformats community to address RDFa as unified markup for uFs. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 15:13:02 [msporny]
- -- drop
- 15:13:18 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]
- 15:13:21 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:13:30 [msporny]
- Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/0Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action10]9/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action10]
- 15:13:32 [JeremyCarroll]
- JeremyCarroll has joined #rdfa
- 15:13:43 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action10]
- 15:13:45 [msporny]
- -- done
- 15:13:53 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]
- 15:13:57 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:14:15 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, aabb is me
- 15:14:16 [Zakim]
- +JeremyCarroll; got it
- 15:14:30 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:14:30 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should now be muted
- 15:16:00 [msporny]
- ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:16:20 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:16:20 [Zakim]
- markbirbeck should no longer be muted
- 15:16:57 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:17:57 [msporny]
- ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action13]
- 15:18:04 [Steven]
- I found Steve Williams's mails and authorized them
- 15:19:02 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:19:15 [msporny]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action14]
- 15:20:22 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:20:38 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action15]
- 15:20:47 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:21:00 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action16]
- 15:21:02 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:21:13 [msporny]
- ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action17]
- 15:21:14 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 15:21:22 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html
- 15:21:27 [msporny]
- Michael: One tiny question, TPAC
- 15:21:44 [msporny]
- Michael: Do we want to try and promote RDFa at that point?
- 15:21:45 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 15:21:50 [Steven]
- huh
- 15:21:57 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 15:21:57 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 15:22:01 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 15:22:01 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 15:22:09 [msporny]
- Ben: Don't know, there might be a publishing moratorium.
- 15:22:15 [msporny]
- zakim, pick on Steven.
- 15:22:15 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'pick on Steven', msporny
- 15:22:20 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 15:22:20 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 15:22:22 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 15:22:23 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 15:22:27 [JeremyCarroll]
- I haven't yet decided
- 15:22:33 [Steven]
- zakim, code?
- 15:22:33 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Steven
- 15:22:34 [JeremyCarroll]
- will decide next week
- 15:22:47 [msporny]
- Ben: It would be nice to make some sort of announcement.
- 15:23:04 [msporny]
- Ben: Mark will you be there, or are you still working on it?
- 15:23:11 [msporny]
- Mark: Almost certainly, but not sure.
- 15:23:29 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 15:23:33 [benadida]
- ACTION: Ben to determine how to highlight RDFa at TPAC
- 15:24:00 [msporny]
- Ben: Yes, we should say something.
- 15:24:31 [msporny]
- Topic: Danny Ayer's comments on PR Draft
- 15:24:44 [msporny]
- Ben: is is mostly moot since Toby said that he didn't have any problems implementing?
- 15:24:56 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+
- 15:25:01 [msporny]
- Shane: Procedurally, it's 100% moot since you can't make those comments against a PR draft.
- 15:25:07 [msporny]
- Ben: What kind of comments can you make at this point?
- 15:25:18 [msporny]
- Shane: Basically, spelling errors, ship it, or throw it away.
- 15:25:34 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:25:34 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted
- 15:25:36 [msporny]
- Shane: There is no way to make substantiative changes after PR.
- 15:25:46 [msporny]
- Shane: So, that's procedural.
- 15:26:02 [msporny]
- Jeremy: It is possible to make substantiative comments that are sufficiently compelling.
- 15:26:13 [msporny]
- Jeremy: There may be minor comments that are small changes between PR and REC.
- 15:26:23 [msporny]
- Shane: My understanding is that those can only be editorial changes.
- 15:26:48 [msporny]
- Jeremy: I have seen it happen before, the team can make such a call.
- 15:27:18 [msporny]
- Mark: Obviously we can discuss the finer points of procedure, but there were other issues there.
- 15:27:36 [msporny]
- Mark: Most of his issues were gradually whittled down and he ended up agreeing with most of them.
- 15:27:45 [msporny]
- Mark: There was one final comment, I think.
- 15:28:14 [msporny]
- Mark: I think he has agreed with all but one comment.
- 15:28:23 [msporny]
- Mark: There is one outstanding comment that I didn't reply to.
- 15:29:19 [benadida]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Sep/0063.html
- 15:29:26 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:29:26 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should now be muted
- 15:29:50 [msporny]
- Mark: That's not the right link.
- 15:29:52 [Steven]
- Yes, I authorised them
- 15:30:01 [mhausenblas]
- Steven++
- 15:30:22 [msporny]
- Mark: woops, wrong link, the 0063.html link is correct.
- 15:30:27 [msporny]
- Mark: I replied to it.
- 15:30:38 [benadida]
- Mark responded with long email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Sep/0065.html
- 15:31:38 [msporny]
- Mark: Hmm, I remember a different e-mail.
- 15:31:58 [msporny]
- Mark: Nevermind, I responded to it.
- 15:32:17 [benadida]
- ACTION: Ben to log Danny's issue to tracker.
- 15:32:18 [msporny]
- Ben: Looks like we might be done.
- 15:32:45 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:32:45 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted
- 15:32:50 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+
- 15:33:10 [benadida]
- ACTION: Ben to close loop with Danny.
- 15:33:26 [benadida]
- zakim, ack Jeremy
- 15:33:26 [Zakim]
- I see no one on the speaker queue
- 15:34:01 [msporny]
- Jeremy: The RDFa document should not stop other RDFa style processing such as GRDDL.
- 15:34:24 [msporny]
- Jeremy: I think we could make a small editorial change to make this clearer that we permit GRDDL.
- 15:34:48 [msporny]
- Mark: We need to get a response from him - we said that we explicitly went out of our way to make this possible.
- 15:35:17 [msporny]
- Mark: How do you get the graphs to talk to each other - our point is that you don't. You can have as many processors as you like running on the document.
- 15:35:23 [msporny]
- Mark: We need to make sure that he's clear on that.
- 15:35:45 [msporny]
- Jeremy: He's saying that instead of using 'default graph' that we use the term 'RDFa graph'.
- 15:36:05 [msporny]
- Jeremy: That feels like a minor editorial change that makes things clearer.
- 15:36:19 [msporny]
- Mark: It's not - an RDFa processor can derive as many graphs as it likes.
- 15:36:42 [msporny]
- Mark: The tricky part is one processor + triples that are not immediately derivable from our processing rules.
- 15:36:58 [msporny]
- Mark: For example, generating a triple for @alt.
- 15:37:23 [msporny]
- Jeremy: What about if default graph, RDFa default graph?
- 15:37:32 [ShaneM]
- +1 for RDFa default graph - seems harmless if it helps comprehension
- 15:37:46 [msporny]
- Mark: I don't really mind, but we named it because of what direction we thought SPARQL was headed in.
- 15:38:09 [msporny]
- Mark: I was trying to link this into SPARQL.
- 15:38:47 [msporny]
- Mark: In SPARQL I can run a query against multiple graphs, or I can run a query against the default graph if I don't specify a graph.
- 15:39:14 [msporny]
- Jeremy: I like that, it's tidy and neat.
- 15:39:31 [msporny]
- Jeremy: I think the problem is that it hasn't been properly formalized in SPARQL.
- 15:39:54 [msporny]
- Jeremy: If you look at how GRDDL spec is written, it is not making use of name/graph concepts.
- 15:40:16 [msporny]
- Jeremy: partly because there isn't a name/graph transform - GRDDL says that we merge all graphs together.
- 15:40:41 [msporny]
- Mark: Which is fine, because GRDDL is a way of extracting triples using multiple different types of extractors.
- 15:40:50 [msporny]
- Mark: RDFa is addressing something different.
- 15:41:19 [msporny]
- Mark: We want to keep things separate in the spec.
- 15:41:34 [msporny]
- Mark: We hoped that people would know what we were doing, but they haven't gotten the hint.
- 15:41:43 [msporny]
- Mark: I don't think we should get any more specific in the spec.
- 15:42:02 [msporny]
- Mark: We can't refer to the term "default graph" because it's not defined anywhere yet, but we expect it to be.
- 15:42:13 [msporny]
- Mark: We should ask Danny before we go ahead and change anything.
- 15:42:22 [msporny]
- Ben: We'd rather not change wording if Danny is okay with it.
- 15:42:34 [msporny]
- Jeremy: Good plan - small preference for RDFa default graph.
- 15:42:48 [msporny]
- Jeremy: Mark's points make a lot of sense, but default graph is unstandardized as is.
- 15:43:06 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:43:06 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should now be muted
- 15:43:21 [msporny]
- Ben: That should close Danny's issue.
- 15:43:36 [Steven]
- scribe: Steven
- 15:43:59 [msporny]
- http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
- 15:44:07 [Steven]
- Manu: We've got the test harness
- 15:44:16 [Steven]
- ... you'll see some new tests
- 15:44:38 [Steven]
- ... click on "show detail"
- 15:45:02 [Steven]
- ... test 113
- 15:45:34 [Steven]
- ... (under 'unreviewed')
- 15:45:53 [Steven]
- ... "element with @property and no child nodes generates empty plain literal"
- 15:46:02 [Steven]
- Ben: Looks good
- 15:46:14 [ShaneM]
- I like it.
- 15:46:50 [mhausenblas]
- +1
- 15:47:26 [Steven]
- Ben: shouldn't an empty and a closed element be identical?
- 15:47:34 [Steven]
- Shane: Depends on the DOM, HTML or XML
- 15:48:04 [Steven]
- Ben: The test looks good
- 15:49:05 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: test 113 approved
- 15:49:14 [Steven]
- Manu: Test 114
- 15:49:35 [Steven]
- ... Relative URI
- 15:49:48 [mhausenblas]
- RFC3986 sec 5
- 15:51:13 [Steven]
- Manu: Not a complete coverage
- 15:51:53 [Steven]
- Steven: Text should say "Previous test case"
- 15:52:38 [Steven]
- Shane: I'm not convinced that going up over the top of the tree flattens to nothing
- 15:53:00 [Steven]
- Steven: Wouldn't it also be interesting to do it with about?
- 15:53:14 [Steven]
- Manu: And the predicate?
- 15:53:19 [Steven]
- Steven: I'm in favour
- 15:54:35 [Steven]
- Shane: I would exercise all data types - CURIE CURIES URI URIS URI-OR-SAFE-CURIE
- 15:55:42 [Steven]
- Michael: Approve?
- 15:55:48 [Steven]
- Manu: Not sure.
- 15:56:28 [Steven]
- Mark: The N3 is indeed wrong
- 15:56:47 [JeremyCarroll]
- pls paste a url for the n3
- 15:56:58 [Steven]
- http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
- 15:57:06 [Steven]
- @prefix cc: <http://creativecommons.org/ns#> .
- 15:57:06 [Steven]
- @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
- 15:57:07 [Steven]
- @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
- 15:57:09 [Steven]
- @prefix xhv: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#> .
- 15:57:11 [Steven]
- @prefix xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> .
- 15:57:13 [Steven]
- @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
- 15:57:15 [Steven]
-
- 15:57:17 [Steven]
-
- 15:57:19 [Steven]
- <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0114.xhtml> cc:attributionURL <http://www.w3.org/../../../../> ;
- 15:57:22 [Steven]
- xhv:prev <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0113.xhtml> ;
- 15:57:23 [Steven]
- xhv:up <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/rdfa-xhtml1-test-manifest.rdf> .
- 15:57:38 [Steven]
- Manu: Put on hold?
- 15:58:03 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt
- 15:58:06 [mhausenblas]
- section 5
- 15:58:06 [Steven]
- Mark: Let me look at the spec
- 15:58:51 [Steven]
- ... look at 5.4.2
- 15:59:08 [msporny]
- Spec states this:
- 15:59:18 [msporny]
- "../../../g" = "http://a/g"
- 15:59:22 [msporny]
- "../../../../g" = "http://a/g"
- 15:59:55 [Steven]
- Ben: So we agree that many ".."s only go up to the top?
- 16:00:02 [Steven]
- Mark: That's what the spec says
- 16:00:06 [markbirbeck]
- "Parsers must be careful in handling cases where there are more ".."
- 16:00:07 [markbirbeck]
- segments in a relative-path reference than there are hierarchical
- 16:00:07 [markbirbeck]
- levels in the base URI's path. Note that the ".." syntax cannot be
- 16:00:07 [markbirbeck]
- used to change the authority component of a URI."
- 16:00:20 [markbirbeck]
- oh...Manu already pasted. :)
- 16:00:23 [Steven]
- Shane: If a CURIE prefix is a relative URI
- 16:00:30 [JeremyCarroll]
- i agree. test ok. n3 is not. but n3 processing is not part of test being approved
- 16:00:31 [Steven]
- ... we say that it is possible but a bad idea
- 16:00:36 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to write up relative URL resolution targetting @about, @resource etc. for regular URLs, CURIE, and CURIEs
- 16:00:49 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+
- 16:01:11 [Steven]
- Shane: do we think that it gets resolved at declaration time or when the CURIE is resolved
- 16:01:25 [Steven]
- Mark: I think the spec is clear on this
- 16:01:54 [Steven]
- ... so relative URLs are resolved late
- 16:02:12 [msporny]
- RESOLVED: Accept TC 113 as is.
- 16:02:19 [msporny]
- scribe: msporny
- 16:02:21 [Steven]
- ... namespaces can be relative, but is thought to be a bad idea
- 16:02:26 [msporny]
- thanks steven :)
- 16:02:29 [Steven]
- np
- 16:02:31 [msporny]
- RESOLVED: Accept TC 113 as is.
- 16:02:37 [msporny]
- RESOLVED: Accept TC 114 as is.
- 16:02:43 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:02:43 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 16:03:07 [msporny]
- Shane: I think we do have a clear mapping here.
- 16:03:22 [msporny]
- Shane: Look at section 5.4.2 - good idea not to use relative paths in namespace declarations.
- 16:03:33 [mhausenblas]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 16:04:17 [msporny]
- Mark: It's the reason we leave XML base out of there.
- 16:04:27 [msporny]
- Shane: it does solve this problem
- 16:04:38 [msporny]
- Mark: It does create some new potential problems.
- 16:04:51 [JeremyCarroll]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:04:51 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted
- 16:04:55 [msporny]
- Ben: Issue that Jeremy brought up.
- 16:04:56 [Steven]
- i/Scribe: Steven/Topic: Test cases
- 16:05:08 [msporny]
- Shane: let's leave it, big topic.
- 16:05:14 [msporny]
- Ben: On vacation next week.
- 16:05:57 [mhausenblas]
- Michael: I've done the approval now in the test harness - http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ should refelect it already ...
- 16:06:01 [msporny]
- Ben: We need to publish primer too and need publication schedule.
- 16:06:05 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 16:06:06 [Zakim]
- -markbirbeck
- 16:06:07 [Zakim]
- -JeremyCarroll
- 16:06:07 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 16:06:08 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 16:06:09 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Hausenblas
- 16:06:17 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:06:17 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 16:07:13 [mhausenblas]
- [adjourned]
- 16:07:26 [mhausenblas]
- Zakim, bye
- 16:07:26 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were ShaneM, Michael_Hausenblas, Steven, +0208761aaaa, markbirbeck, msporny, +1.408.338.aabb, Ben_Adida, JeremyCarroll
- 16:07:26 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa
- 16:07:32 [mhausenblas]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- I see 20 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to figure out *how* to do the namespace-doc GRDDL thing [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action18] [1]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-08-13
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jeremy review and consider expanding the description of TopBraid in the RDFa wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action02] [2]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-11-11
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] [3]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-11-32
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action04] [4]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-11-49
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to create test cases for testing relative URI resolution (href/CURIEs/etc). [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [5]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-12-06
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to upload test harness source code to W3C CVS. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [6]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-12-25
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to work with Microformats community to address RDFa as unified markup for uFs. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [7]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-12-59
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] [8]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-13-18
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action10] [9]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-13-43
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] [10]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-13-53
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [11]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-16-00
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action13] [12]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-17-57
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action14] [13]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-19-15
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action15] [14]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-20-38
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action16] [15]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-21-00
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action17] [16]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-21-13
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to determine how to highlight RDFa at TPAC [17]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-23-33
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to log Danny's issue to tracker. [18]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-32-17
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to close loop with Danny. [19]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T15-33-10
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to write up relative URL resolution targetting @about, @resource etc. for regular URLs, CURIE, and CURIEs [20]
- 16:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/18-rdfa-irc#T16-00-36
- 16:08:09 [msporny]
- Michael, I'll clean up the minutes and send them to Ralph
- 16:08:46 [mhausenblas]
- yeah, Manu - if he's around and reads it ;)
- 16:08:54 [msporny]
- :)