14:46:14 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 14:46:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc 14:46:25 Zakim has joined #rdfa 14:46:28 zakim, this will be rdfa 14:46:44 ok, msporny; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 14 minutes 14:46:55 wow, nice 30 second delay there, zakim. 14:47:06 Scribe: Manu_Sporny 14:47:13 ScribeNick: msporny 14:47:26 Meeting: RDF in XHTML Task Force 14:47:34 Chair: Ben_Adida 14:48:50 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Sep/0030.html 14:49:06 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/09/04-rdfa-minutes.html 14:49:35 rrsagent, make log public 14:49:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:49:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html msporny 14:50:26 Regrets: Mark_Birbeck, Michael_Hausenblas 14:50:49 Present: Ben_Adida, Manu_Sporny, Steven_Pemberton 14:50:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:50:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html msporny 14:51:56 ShaneM1 has joined #rdfa 14:54:10 Present+ Shane_McCarron 15:01:13 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started 15:01:16 +??P3 15:01:20 +ShaneM 15:01:23 zakim, dial steven-617 15:01:23 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:01:24 +Steven 15:01:26 zakim, I am ??P3 15:01:26 +msporny; got it 15:02:53 benadida has joined #rdfa 15:03:07 +Ben_Adida 15:05:59 prefix [ : [ resource] ] 15:06:33 [ prefix [ : ] ] resource <--- this is what we have right now. 15:07:30 prefix="hcard=http://microformats.org/vocab#hcard" 15:07:44
...
15:09:26 benadida: Don't know if I like that. 15:09:36 ShaneM1: Me neither. 15:09:51 Wellm i think it is quite clever. I like it, it solves a problem in a neat way 15:09:58 benadida: This is the hGRDDL approach that we talked about some time ago - we shouldn't stuff it into the prefix mapping. 15:10:19 Steven: I think it's clever. We do something special already with a CURIE that doesn't have a value without a prefix. 15:14:37 Manu: I think the approach could work if we merge it with the @profile approach. 15:14:47 ShaneM1: It's inconsistent with the definition of CURIE in the spec. 15:15:52 benadida: Mark's saying that we flip it around, but why isn't there a way to create a auto-prefix, like Pascal "with" statement. 15:16:11 Steven: That is another solution. 15:16:23 Steven: The thing with Mark's solution is that you don't need more syntax. 15:16:39 Steven: There is a problem to be solved, and I thought that Mark's solution, while it's too late, is a neat one. 15:16:59 benadida: Forget that it might be too late, it's still important, but it requires that we define a whole bunch of prefixes. 15:18:29 prefix extension proposal is at http://www.rdfa.info/wiki/RDFa_Vocabularies 15:20:49 ShaneM1: This proposal stands whether you use @profile or @prefix. 15:20:52 s/Wellm i/Well, I/ 15:25:45 benadida: You're building a DTD for HTML4? 15:25:48 ShaneM1: That's done. 15:25:53 ShaneM1: We need to separate the discussions. 15:26:06 ShaneM1: How do we generate documents that support HTML4 is one discussion. 15:26:20 ShaneM1: How do we support Microformats-like approaches, is the other. 15:26:30 http://www.rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4 15:26:45 benadida: What do we do with HTML4? How do you validate? Do we want to make it more official? 15:27:16 ShaneM1: We're producing a member submission, which is a profile of RDFa for HTML4. 15:27:23 benadida: Creative Commons would be happy to support as a member. 15:29:47 benadida: This is a great approach - we should move faster on it. 15:30:56 benadida: We're doing this to allow people that want validation in HTML4 and want to use RDFa. 15:38:38 Topic: Action Items 15:38:45 ACTION: Ben ask SWD to approve publication of an updated RDFa Primer 15:38:50 -- continues 15:38:53 -- done 15:39:09 ACTION: Jeremy review and consider expanding the description of TopBraid in the RDFa wiki 15:39:17 -- continues 15:39:22 ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. 15:39:24 -- continues 15:39:33 ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece 15:39:35 -- continues 15:39:39 ACTION: Manu talk with Michael Smethurst at BBC about RDFa 15:39:45 -- done 15:40:20 ACTION: Manu to create test cases for testing relative URI resolution (href/CURIEs/etc). 15:40:22 -- continues 15:40:28 ACTION: Manu to upload test harness source code to W3C CVS. 15:40:32 -- continues 15:40:42 ACTION: Manu to work with Microformats community to address RDFa as unified markup for uFs. 15:42:24 -- continues 15:43:03 "Note. For versions of HTTP that define a Link header, user agents should handle these headers exactly as LINK elements in the document. HTTP 1.1 as defined by [RFC2616] does not include a Link header field (refer to section 19.6.3)." 15:43:09 http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.4.1 15:43:13 ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. 15:43:16 -- continues 15:43:42 ACTION: Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. 15:43:47 -- continues 15:43:57 ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. 15:44:01 -- continues 15:44:25 ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning 15:44:28 -- continues 15:44:34 ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki 15:44:36 -- continues 15:44:40 ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki 15:44:42 -- continues 15:44:47 ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa 15:44:48 -- continues 15:44:55 ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen 15:44:57 -- continues 15:45:05 ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI 15:45:07 -- continues 15:45:40 Topic: TAG finding (NoahM) 15:45:54 benadida: This is just to make sure we're in sync with TAG, great response to Noah, Steven. 15:46:06 Steven: I don't quite grasp the issue he is having. 15:46:34 benadida: It's critical - if TAG finding notes that we're not compliant, even if we are, it would be bad. 15:46:39 benadida: I don't think there is an issue. 15:47:18 benadida: Noah is asking, how do you follow your nose. 15:47:32 benadida: We declare @version at the top of the document. 15:47:47 benadida: I think we said that we're modifying the XHTML namespace? 15:47:57 benadida: It's been agreed upon that it will be done. 15:48:13 benadida: That's how we follow our nose, right? We go to the namespace document and we're done, right? 15:48:27 Steven: Is this machine follow your nose, or human follow your nose? 15:48:31 ShaneM1: Machine. 15:48:58 Steven: The namespace document is pure english at the moment, it's not yet RDFa annotated, but it will be. 15:49:38 ShaneM1: nope. The change to the XHTML document is a GRDDL-compliant @profile addition - that's the machine part of this. 15:49:52 benadida: It is follow-your-nose in-so-far as GRDDL is follow-your-nose. 15:50:03 ShaneM1: That's what TimBL told us to do. 15:50:35 ShaneM1: It doesn't point to RDFa, it points to XSLT transformation. 15:50:58 ShaneM1: Tim's declaration is that everything with an xmlns declaration is RDF. 15:51:24 benadida: is there another path to the RDFa specification. 15:51:31 benadida: There is @version. 15:51:37 ShaneM1: There is a doctype declaration. 15:51:41 benadida: What's the normative one? 15:51:54 benadida: The canonical one is the XHTML namespace. 15:52:20 benadida: I'll follow it up, but we want to make sure that they know it is follow-your-nose compliant. 15:52:52 benadida: I believe that we use version="XHTML+RDFa1.0" 15:53:16 ShaneM1: I think Noah's argument is more arcane. His reading of the RFC is that it doesn't permit the interpretation of documents of that media type as containing RDF. 15:53:39 benadida: If that's the case, GRDDL is broken, because GRDDL is supposed to apply to XHTML. 15:53:50 benadida: What we're doing with the namespace document is 100% GRDDL compliant. 15:54:12 benadida: GRDDL is REC and we're GRDDL compliant. 15:54:20 benadida: If GRDDL is okay, why is RDFa not okay? 15:55:06 benadida: @profile says this is GRDDL, rel="transformation" states that is how you extract triples. 15:56:42 ShaneM1: There is no normative Schema document for XHTML 1.0 15:56:49 benadida: Then it's not the same thing as the namespace document. 15:57:12 ShaneM1: The namespace document is the thing at the end of @xmlns 15:57:44 ACTION: Ben to figure out *how* to do the namespace-doc GRDDL thing 15:57:46 http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#ns-bind 16:01:36 benadida: I will continue TAG discussion. 16:02:10 ShaneM1: RFC alludes to modularization, but doesn't point to it. 16:02:16 ShaneM1: Modularization doesn't point to RDFa. 16:02:25 ShaneM1: I think that is Noah's argument. 16:02:32 benadida: Yes, but GRDDL. 16:03:03 ShaneM1: He hasn't incorporated GRDDL into his thinking. 16:04:17 benadida: We'll talk about Danny's comment later. 16:04:22 -Steven 16:04:24 -ShaneM 16:04:25 (Good call) 16:04:25 -Ben_Adida 16:04:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:04:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html msporny 16:05:28 Regrets+ Ralph_Swick 16:06:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:06:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html msporny 16:07:51 -msporny 16:07:52 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended 16:07:53 Attendees were ShaneM, Steven, msporny, Ben_Adida 16:08:07 zakim, bye 16:08:07 Zakim has left #rdfa 16:08:12 rrsagent, make log public 16:08:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:08:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-minutes.html msporny 16:08:34 rrsagent, bye 16:08:34 I see 18 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-actions.rdf : 16:08:34 ACTION: Ben ask SWD to approve publication of an updated RDFa Primer [1] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-38-45 16:08:34 ACTION: Jeremy review and consider expanding the description of TopBraid in the RDFa wiki [2] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-39-09 16:08:34 ACTION: Jeremy to demonstrate GRDDL with XHTML/RDFa once the NS URI is set up. [3] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-39-22 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu talk with Jamie McCarthy about an AskSlashdot piece [4] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-39-33 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu talk with Michael Smethurst at BBC about RDFa [5] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-39-39 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu to create test cases for testing relative URI resolution (href/CURIEs/etc). [6] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-40-20 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu to upload test harness source code to W3C CVS. [7] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-40-28 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu to work with Microformats community to address RDFa as unified markup for uFs. [8] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-40-42 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu to write summary for Semantic Web Use Cases for Ivan. [9] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-43-13 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu write a pending test case for literal property and no child nodes. [10] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-43-42 16:08:34 ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot. [11] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-43-57 16:08:34 ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [12] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-44-25 16:08:34 ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [13] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-44-34 16:08:34 ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [14] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-44-40 16:08:34 ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [15] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-44-47 16:08:34 ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen [16] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-44-55 16:08:34 ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI [17] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-45-05 16:08:34 ACTION: Ben to figure out *how* to do the namespace-doc GRDDL thing [18] 16:08:34 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-rdfa-irc#T15-57-44