IRC log of svg on 2008-09-04
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 10:30:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #svg
- 10:30:33 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/04-svg-irc
- 10:30:34 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 10:30:34 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #svg
- 10:30:36 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
- 10:30:36 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM scheduled to start now
- 10:30:37 [trackbot]
- Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
- 10:30:37 [trackbot]
- Date: 04 September 2008
- 10:30:58 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has now started
- 10:31:05 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 10:31:15 [ed]
- Zakim, ??P0 is me
- 10:31:15 [Zakim]
- +ed; got it
- 10:32:33 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 10:33:00 [anthony]
- Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 10:33:00 [Zakim]
- +anthony; got it
- 10:33:21 [Zakim]
- +Doug_Schepers
- 10:33:24 [nhagelro]
- nhagelro has joined #SVG
- 10:34:04 [ed]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0210.html
- 10:34:21 [Zakim]
- +Andrew_Sledd
- 10:34:47 [Zakim]
- +??P4
- 10:34:49 [heycam]
- Zakim, ??P4 is me
- 10:34:49 [Zakim]
- +heycam; got it
- 10:35:46 [anthony]
- scribe: anthony
- 10:35:54 [anthony]
- scribeNick: anthony
- 10:35:59 [anthony]
- chair: Erik
- 10:36:35 [anthony]
- Topic: Action Update
- 10:36:51 [ed]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/2
- 10:36:55 [anthony]
- Zakim, Andrew_Sledd is nhagelro
- 10:36:56 [Zakim]
- +nhagelro; got it
- 10:37:08 [anthony]
- ED: We can see all the open actions we have
- 10:37:14 [anthony]
- ... not all of these are vital to fix
- 10:37:23 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 10:37:29 [aemmons]
- zakim, ??p5 is me
- 10:37:29 [Zakim]
- +aemmons; got it
- 10:37:32 [anthony]
- ACTION-2024
- 10:37:47 [ed]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2024
- 10:37:48 [heycam]
- ACTION-2024?
- 10:37:48 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2024 -- Doug Schepers to add wording to the specification that content with circular references is not conformant -- due 2008-05-27 -- OPEN
- 10:37:48 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2024
- 10:37:52 [anthony]
- ED: Action-2024 might be important
- 10:38:03 [anthony]
- DS: I think I may have already done that
- 10:38:09 [anthony]
- ... if not I know what needs to be done
- 10:38:14 [anthony]
- ... I'll be closing that this week
- 10:38:24 [anthony]
- CM: When I was working on the refs section this week
- 10:38:33 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #svg
- 10:38:34 [anthony]
- ... what was it about?
- 10:38:42 [anthony]
- DS: It was about content
- 10:38:50 [anthony]
- ... to say authors shouldn't do that
- 10:39:05 [anthony]
- ... it was specified for implementations
- 10:39:21 [anthony]
- ACTION-2063?
- 10:39:21 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2063 -- Cameron McCormack to fix the spec by aligning the script element behavior with HTMLs script element behavior -- due 2008-06-19 -- OPEN
- 10:39:21 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2063
- 10:39:37 [anthony]
- CM: I just came up with something this afternoon
- 10:39:47 [anthony]
- ... that is pretty much what we discussed
- 10:39:50 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 10:40:00 [anthony]
- ... and what Maciej said
- 10:40:17 [anthony]
- ED: Do you have a link for the proposed text?
- 10:40:20 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0213.html
- 10:40:52 [anthony]
- ED: I haven't had time to read I through
- 10:40:56 [anthony]
- ... perhaps we should wait
- 10:41:03 [anthony]
- ... that's pending for now
- 10:41:26 [anthony]
- ACTION-2014?
- 10:41:26 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2014 -- Chris Lilley to review font-family selection e-mail, bring issues back to the group for discussion -- due 2008-05-20 -- OPEN
- 10:41:26 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2014
- 10:41:39 [anthony]
- CL: I've looked at that
- 10:41:46 [anthony]
- ... don't think there will be any changes to the spec
- 10:42:16 [anthony]
- ... I think it's just an explanation required
- 10:42:30 [anthony]
- ED: Is the schema something we need to do before we publish?
- 10:42:39 [anthony]
- DS: Something we can do while we are in last call
- 10:42:45 [ChrisL]
- Just explaining why we can't assume that there is a font with a glyph for 'a' on the system 9even though there almost always is)
- 10:43:03 [anthony]
- ACTION-2107?
- 10:43:03 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2107 -- Cameron McCormack to update the 1.2T spec with the reworded section on progressive rendering and tree construction -- due 2008-07-29 -- OPEN
- 10:43:03 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2107
- 10:43:17 [anthony]
- CM: Was about when nodes get inserted into the tree
- 10:43:21 [anthony]
- ... when parsing
- 10:43:29 [ChrisL]
- zakim, ??P6 is me
- 10:43:29 [Zakim]
- +ChrisL; got it
- 10:43:41 [anthony]
- ED: Well if you know what needs to be done
- 10:43:46 [anthony]
- ... then we can continue
- 10:43:54 [anthony]
- ACTION-2131?
- 10:43:54 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2131 -- Cameron McCormack to propose text regarding issue-274 (when animations can be interpolated) -- due 2008-08-21 -- OPEN
- 10:43:54 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2131
- 10:44:07 [anthony]
- CM: This one I thought we postponed
- 10:44:17 [anthony]
- ... I must no have changed the product
- 10:44:28 [anthony]
- ED: I'll change it now
- 10:44:41 [anthony]
- ACTION-2132?
- 10:44:41 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2132 -- Doug Schepers to propose text for UA indication in case a link is in scope -- due 2008-08-21 -- OPEN
- 10:44:41 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2132
- 10:44:52 [anthony]
- DS: Pretty minor, will be doing that today
- 10:45:03 [anthony]
- ... the same for 2133
- 10:45:08 [anthony]
- ACTION-2148?
- 10:45:08 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2148 -- Doug Schepers to take up ISSUE-2031 with the HTML WG -- due 2008-08-28 -- OPEN
- 10:45:08 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2148
- 10:45:15 [anthony]
- DS: I did send something to them
- 10:45:22 [anthony]
- ... but there hasn't been a reply
- 10:45:35 [anthony]
- ... I'll also ask Ian
- 10:45:51 [anthony]
- ACTION-2155?
- 10:45:52 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2155 -- Doug Schepers to add the keyboard events from DOM 3 Events to an SVGT12 appendix -- due 2008-08-29 -- OPEN
- 10:45:52 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2155
- 10:46:00 [anthony]
- ED: About adding keyboard events
- 10:46:05 [anthony]
- DS: I've started doing that
- 10:46:12 [anthony]
- ... I noticed that we already have the stuff in there
- 10:46:29 [anthony]
- ... but we also refer to DOM 3 Events
- 10:46:48 [anthony]
- ... We said we were sub-setting things from DOM 3 Events
- 10:46:57 [anthony]
- ... I may or may not keep the sub-setting part
- 10:47:01 [anthony]
- ... I'll have that done this week
- 10:47:58 [anthony]
- ACTION-2156?
- 10:47:59 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2156 -- Cameron McCormack to fix transition from DOM 3 Events to DOM 2 Events and uDOM, and to fix testsuite -- due 2008-08-29 -- OPEN
- 10:47:59 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2156
- 10:48:21 [anthony]
- CM: This one which is changing the rest of the spec to refer to DOM 2
- 10:48:27 [anthony]
- ... and remove DOM 3 refs
- 10:48:32 [anthony]
- ... I was waiting for Doug to be done
- 10:48:44 [anthony]
- CL: DOM 3 Events is not in the refs section
- 10:48:49 [anthony]
- ... and neither is DOM 2
- 10:49:00 [anthony]
- ... I was editing the references today
- 10:49:16 [anthony]
- ... Element traversal is a working progress
- 10:49:22 [anthony]
- ... what's happening with it?
- 10:49:25 [anthony]
- DS: In CR
- 10:49:30 [anthony]
- ... multiple implementations
- 10:49:41 [anthony]
- ... just need to create a test suite
- 10:50:10 [anthony]
- CL: That's the only one that says working progress in our normative refs
- 10:50:20 [anthony]
- ED: What's the status of the test suite?
- 10:50:25 [anthony]
- DS: There is none
- 10:50:34 [anthony]
- ... once I finish my SVG edit actions
- 10:50:36 [anthony]
- ... I'll make one
- 10:50:44 [anthony]
- ED: Ok
- 10:51:06 [anthony]
- ACTION-2159?
- 10:51:06 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2159 -- Erik Dahlström to do progress event name change to Tiny 1.2 -- due 2008-08-28 -- OPEN
- 10:51:06 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2159
- 10:51:12 [anthony]
- ED: I committed the event name changes
- 10:51:20 [anthony]
- ... for SVGKeyLoad and SVGProgress
- 10:51:53 [ed]
- s/SVGKeyLoad/SVGPreLoad
- 10:51:58 [anthony]
- ... I have to ask Charles to see if we can get a common name for SVGPostLoad
- 10:52:09 [anthony]
- ... so I guess that's the only thing left
- 10:52:23 [anthony]
- ... I'd prefer if the event names were in some form of alignment
- 10:52:35 [anthony]
- ... I think it would be useful to have it in the progress events spec as well
- 10:52:55 [anthony]
- ... I'll be asking Charles because he's the editor of the progress events spec
- 10:53:03 [anthony]
- ACTION-2164?
- 10:53:03 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2164 -- Doug Schepers to add 'role' attribute (and informative reference to XHTML Role attribute module) and to change the content model of the title and desc elements to be text -- due 2008-08-30 -- OPEN
- 10:53:03 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2164
- 10:53:15 [anthony]
- DS: I have added role and title
- 10:53:19 [anthony]
- ... I've done this
- 10:53:23 [anthony]
- ... but waiting for feedback
- 10:53:28 [anthony]
- ... on title
- 10:53:39 [anthony]
- ... from Dr Olaf and Jeff
- 10:53:49 [anthony]
- ACTION-2174?
- 10:53:50 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2174 -- Erik Dahlström to remove the 'this' keyword binding in the 'handler' element, and investigate if the execution of the handler content is actually like a Function object or if the contents are put in the global scope -- due 2008-08-31 -- OPEN
- 10:53:50 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2174
- 10:54:03 [anthony]
- ED: I had a look at what Opera is doing for this one
- 10:54:12 [anthony]
- ... and I'm wondering if this is a good action
- 10:54:44 [anthony]
- ... Opera treats the element handler sort of like script element
- 10:54:49 [anthony]
- ... but we don't bind this
- 10:54:53 [anthony]
- ... or the arguments
- 10:55:03 [anthony]
- ... it's not really like a function in Opera
- 10:55:33 [anthony]
- ... if you define a variable in the handler it won't be defined anywhere else
- 10:55:43 [anthony]
- CM: That's different to what Batik does
- 10:55:52 [anthony]
- ED: I can see the point to having it as it is
- 10:56:04 [anthony]
- ... although that's not what Opera is doing currently
- 10:56:10 [anthony]
- ... it could be changed
- 10:56:24 [anthony]
- ... but I don't know when I'll get time
- 10:56:36 [anthony]
- CM: Would be nice to see what other players do
- 10:56:38 [ed]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/script-handler-201-t.svg
- 10:56:52 [anthony]
- ED: So it's testing the keywords
- 10:56:58 [anthony]
- ... and scoping and so on
- 10:57:26 [anthony]
- CM: That test the arguments?
- 10:57:29 [anthony]
- ED: I think that was 202
- 10:58:29 [anthony]
- ... I would prefer if more implementers have more comments on this?
- 10:58:37 [anthony]
- NH: We fail the first
- 10:58:49 [anthony]
- ... it's not equal to document
- 10:59:05 [anthony]
- ... I'm not really sure I'll have to investigate this
- 10:59:11 [anthony]
- ED: I guess I can postpone this
- 10:59:19 [anthony]
- ... and wait for feedback on the public list
- 10:59:26 [anthony]
- NH: Both tests?
- 10:59:28 [anthony]
- ED: Yes both
- 10:59:48 [anthony]
- ACTION-2176?
- 10:59:48 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2176 -- Cameron McCormack to replace Global with Abstract View and add the reference -- due 2008-08-31 -- OPEN
- 10:59:48 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2176
- 11:00:09 [anthony]
- AG: You sent an email about this?
- 11:00:18 [anthony]
- CM: I did haven't had any replies about it
- 11:00:41 [heycam]
- http://www.w3.org/mid/20080903060135.GD21745@arc.mcc.id.au
- 11:00:53 [shepazu]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0206.html
- 11:01:26 [anthony]
- DS: The last wording there
- 11:01:37 [anthony]
- ... that's pretty much derived from HTML5 right?
- 11:01:45 [anthony]
- CM: Yes same sort of thing
- 11:02:04 [anthony]
- ... I guess it's not really necessary for us to go into the Window object
- 11:02:20 [anthony]
- ED: What exactly is your suggestion?
- 11:02:40 [anthony]
- NH: Your last sentence in the email
- 11:02:50 [anthony]
- ... we can leave but shouldn't be SVGGlobal
- 11:02:58 [anthony]
- ... necessary for us to keep
- 11:03:04 [anthony]
- ... current content will not work
- 11:03:18 [anthony]
- CM: So they are saying gobal.document.parsexml
- 11:03:26 [anthony]
- NH: We do that
- 11:03:34 [anthony]
- CM: Could be left in without any problem
- 11:03:44 [anthony]
- ... if you leave that in then you don't need default view
- 11:03:53 [anthony]
- ... maybe we could subset DOM 2 Views a bit
- 11:04:19 [anthony]
- ED: I guess sub-setting would be cleaner
- 11:04:39 [anthony]
- NH: what would SVGGlobal inherit from?
- 11:04:48 [anthony]
- CM: I'd think I'd prefer it not to inherit
- 11:05:08 [anthony]
- ED: In that case is that enough information to go doing this action?
- 11:05:24 [anthony]
- CM: That was not what the original action was to do
- 11:05:49 [anthony]
- ... it was just to replace Global with Abstract View
- 11:06:02 [anthony]
- ED: Would referring to DOM 2 Views be ok
- 11:06:12 [anthony]
- ... subset that
- 11:06:22 [anthony]
- CM: I has no impact on what properties are around
- 11:06:28 [anthony]
- ... just the structure
- 11:06:39 [anthony]
- NH: I think I'm fine with that
- 11:06:54 [anthony]
- ... can you send an email with what you're going to introduce?
- 11:07:04 [anthony]
- DS: Might be easier to make the change and send the link
- 11:07:13 [anthony]
- CL: As long as it doesn't effect content
- 11:08:06 [heycam]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0206.html
- 11:08:25 [anthony]
- NH: You're going to remove parent?
- 11:08:30 [anthony]
- CM: No moving it
- 11:08:40 [anthony]
- DS: Will this still satisfy the browser vendors?
- 11:08:55 [anthony]
- CM: Don't know, but it will satisfy them more than before
- 11:09:11 [anthony]
- ... I could ask see what they think
- 11:09:59 [anthony]
- RESOLUTION: Do what it says in the email sent Cameron regarding removal of SVGGlobal::parent, except don't add Default View and leave the Global attribute
- 11:10:18 [anthony]
- CM: I can just continue my current action
- 11:10:34 [anthony]
- ACTION-2179?
- 11:10:34 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2179 -- Cameron McCormack to move timer from Global to the SVG Module and remove the Global Module -- due 2008-08-31 -- OPEN
- 11:10:34 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2179
- 11:10:43 [anthony]
- CM: I did this one
- 11:10:54 [anthony]
- ... but I left it open because of the question about SVTimer
- 11:11:02 [anthony]
- s/SVTimer/SVGTimer/
- 11:11:22 [anthony]
- ED: If we are keeping it I'd prefer it to be moved to SVGTimer
- 11:11:48 [anthony]
- CM: The name change the content
- 11:12:07 [anthony]
- s/change/ does not change/
- 11:12:17 [anthony]
- AG: Is that ok?
- 11:12:23 [anthony]
- NH: I'm happy with that
- 11:12:39 [anthony]
- CM: What's the name of the event?
- 11:12:52 [anthony]
- ... SVGTimer is the event type
- 11:13:15 [anthony]
- ED: That's the last of the open actions set for Tiny
- 11:13:28 [anthony]
- ... I guess we should try to decide a deadline date for edits
- 11:13:47 [anthony]
- ... Doug you'll probably know the publication schedule
- 11:13:54 [anthony]
- ... is next Friday ok?
- 11:23:49 [anthony]
- DS: Shooting for publication date of next Friday
- 11:24:24 [anthony]
- ... needs to be done well before then, 2 or 3 days before then
- 11:24:40 [anthony]
- ... everyone should have action items done before the 11th
- 11:25:32 [ChrisL]
- publication moratorium for tpac
- 11:25:34 [ChrisL]
- 13 October, 12pm ET: Deadline for publication requests
- 11:25:34 [ChrisL]
- before moratorium
- 11:25:34 [ChrisL]
- 16 October: Last publications before moratorium
- 11:25:34 [ChrisL]
- 17 - 26 October: No publications
- 11:25:34 [ChrisL]
- 27 October: Publications resume
- 11:28:31 [anthony]
- Topic: Test Suite
- 11:29:06 [anthony]
- CL: I sent an email before about XMLRI
- 11:29:16 [anthony]
- ... I've finished that now
- 11:29:35 [anthony]
- DS: Fantastic
- 11:29:46 [anthony]
- ED: We need to make a publication of the test suite
- 11:30:04 [anthony]
- ... need to make sure the reference images are correct
- 11:30:12 [anthony]
- ... we didn't make any in the last f2f
- 11:30:17 [anthony]
- ... still a bit of work there
- 11:30:43 [anthony]
- AE: Do we still rely on Batik to make some of the automatic reference images?
- 11:30:46 [anthony]
- ED: I think so
- 11:30:52 [anthony]
- ... but you can drop any other binary in there
- 11:31:02 [anthony]
- ... as long as the syntax is correct
- 11:31:19 [anthony]
- ... we could use Inkscape but it wont work on any scripting ones
- 11:31:30 [anthony]
- AE: Do we have an idea of how Batik goes on some of the new tests?
- 11:31:36 [anthony]
- CM: Not very well
- 11:31:57 [anthony]
- AE: We'll probably need some patch images made
- 11:32:35 [anthony]
- ... it looks like Anthony and I to do the test suite stuff
- 11:32:46 [heycam]
- trackbot, close ACTION-2179
- 11:32:46 [trackbot]
- ACTION-2179 Move timer from Global to the SVG Module and remove the Global Module closed
- 11:33:41 [anthony]
- AG: I can generate a new version of the test suite and create the images
- 11:33:59 [anthony]
- ED: So this has to be done when?
- 11:34:04 [anthony]
- ... same time as the spec?
- 11:34:18 [anthony]
- DS: I'd prefer it be done before?
- 11:36:26 [anthony]
- ED: I think we do have a bunch of actions left on the test suite
- 11:36:35 [anthony]
- ... but we still need to publish on a regular basis
- 11:36:51 [anthony]
- ... even if we still haven't finished all the actions we should still go ahead
- 11:37:09 [anthony]
- AE: I think turning the crank on this
- 11:41:24 [anthony]
- DS: Monday or Tuesday we should have the test suite ready
- 11:42:12 [ed]
- Topic: Removing Document::Implementation http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0204.html
- 11:42:41 [anthony]
- ED: If we have some empty interfaces I don't see any reason to keep them around
- 11:42:55 [anthony]
- ... unless I hear something about keeping them around
- 11:43:04 [anthony]
- ... Cameron you can go ahead and remove them
- 11:43:35 [anthony]
- CM: It's a pretty useless thing to have if there is nothing on the interfaces
- 11:44:05 [anthony]
- AG: I'm ok with it
- 11:44:19 [anthony]
- NH: I'm fine with it
- 11:44:24 [anthony]
- DS: I'm fine with it
- 11:45:19 [anthony]
- ACTION: Cameron to remove Document:Implementation from the interface and the DOM implementation interface
- 11:45:19 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2182 - Remove Document:Implementation from the interface and the DOM implementation interface [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-09-11].
- 11:45:45 [ed]
- Topic: Pragmas and extended attributes at the top of the uDOM IDL
- 11:45:50 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0207.html
- 11:46:30 [anthony]
- CM: I could find nothing on the web about these particular names
- 11:46:39 [anthony]
- ... who worked on most of the uDOM at the start?
- 11:47:01 [anthony]
- ... I can only assume there are some IDL compiler specific things
- 11:47:33 [anthony]
- ED: If there is no definition of what it does then I don't see a reason to keep it around
- 11:48:07 [anthony]
- AG: So you'll just remove it from the IDL?
- 11:48:10 [anthony]
- CM: Ok
- 11:49:30 [anthony]
- ACTION: Cameron to Remove the square-bracketted extended attributes at the top of the uDOM IDL
- 11:49:30 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2183 - Remove the square-bracketted extended attributes at the top of the uDOM IDL [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-09-11].
- 11:50:32 [anthony]
- ED: I didn't notice anyone with an action to do the change log
- 11:50:41 [anthony]
- ... and we cannot do it before all the changes are done
- 11:50:49 [anthony]
- CM: Someone can start
- 11:51:24 [anthony]
- ... we were thinking at the F2F to add links of the diffs from the previous publication
- 11:51:32 [anthony]
- ED: I guess that's fine for catching everything
- 11:51:46 [anthony]
- ... we also discussed getting a high level description of the change
- 11:51:55 [anthony]
- ... I did write a script for getting the diff version
- 11:52:06 [anthony]
- ... so it will fetch of all the diff HTML pages
- 11:53:09 [ed]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/tools/htmldiff/
- 11:53:13 [anthony]
- CM: It would be nice if someone who has time to go through and do that
- 11:53:24 [anthony]
- ED: I've committed a small tool for getting all the difs
- 11:53:31 [anthony]
- s/difs/diffs/
- 11:53:45 [anthony]
- DS: Let me do my editing actions this week
- 11:54:24 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to Make sure have the HTML diff marked pages from the spec in the changes chapter
- 11:54:24 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2184 - Make sure have the HTML diff marked pages from the spec in the changes chapter [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-09-11].
- 11:55:13 [Zakim]
- -aemmons
- 11:55:14 [Zakim]
- -ChrisL
- 11:55:15 [Zakim]
- -nhagelro
- 11:55:17 [Zakim]
- -Doug_Schepers
- 11:55:19 [Zakim]
- -ed
- 11:55:21 [Zakim]
- -heycam
- 11:55:22 [Zakim]
- -anthony
- 11:55:23 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has ended
- 11:55:24 [Zakim]
- Attendees were ed, anthony, Doug_Schepers, heycam, nhagelro, aemmons, ChrisL
- 11:55:35 [anthony]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 11:55:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/04-svg-minutes.html anthony
- 12:18:21 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #svg
- 12:43:29 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #svg
- 13:01:35 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #svg