14:45:12 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:45:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-rif-irc 14:45:18 zakim, this will be rif 14:45:18 ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 15 minutes 14:45:32 Meeting: RIF Telecon 26-Aug-08 14:45:36 Chair: Chris Welty 14:45:50 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0127.html 14:46:05 ChrisW has changed the topic to: 26 Aug RIF Telecon Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0127.html 14:46:28 zakim, clear agenda 14:46:28 agenda cleared 14:46:33 agenda+ Admin 14:46:38 agenda+ Liason 14:46:44 agenda+ Action review 14:46:50 agenda+ F2F11 14:46:55 agenda+ DTB 14:46:58 agenda+ Core 14:47:03 agenda+ Test Cases 14:47:14 agenda+ Publicity 14:47:22 agenda+ Pick Scribe for next week 14:47:27 agenda+ AOB 14:47:35 rrsagent, make minutes 14:47:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 14:47:54 rrsagent, make logs public 15:00:03 mdean has joined #rif 15:00:26 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:00:31 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:00:34 +[IBM] 15:00:38 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:00:44 +Mike_Dean 15:00:45 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 15:00:45 +ChrisW; got it 15:00:56 zakim, list agenda 15:00:57 I see 10 items remaining on the agenda: 15:00:57 1. Admin [from ChrisW] 15:00:59 2. Liason [from ChrisW] 15:01:02 3. Action review [from ChrisW] 15:01:02 4. F2F11 [from ChrisW] 15:01:04 5. DTB [from ChrisW] 15:01:06 6. Core [from ChrisW] 15:01:10 7. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 15:01:12 8. Publicity [from ChrisW] 15:01:14 9. Pick Scribe for next week [from ChrisW] 15:01:16 10. AOB [from ChrisW] 15:01:37 zakim, next item 15:01:48 + +1.631.833.aaaa 15:01:49 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 15:01:50 zakim, who is talking? 15:01:52 agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:01:54 +Sandro 15:02:05 zakim, aaaa is me 15:02:12 ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisW (16%) 15:02:14 +MichaelKifer; got it 15:02:24 +??P40 15:02:26 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 15:02:30 zakim, who is talking? 15:02:30 -MichaelKifer 15:02:32 + +1.212.781.aabb 15:02:41 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.212.781.aabb (37%) 15:02:43 zakim, aabb is me 15:02:44 +LeoraMorgenstern; got it 15:03:05 +MichaelKifer 15:03:10 zakim, who is talking? 15:03:20 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisW (58%), MichaelKifer (94%), Sandro (39%) 15:03:26 -MichaelKifer 15:03:33 zakim, who is talking? 15:03:44 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisW (14%), Sandro (43%) 15:03:46 +[IBM] 15:03:51 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 15:03:53 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 15:03:53 +StellaMitchell; got it 15:03:55 StuartTaylor has joined #rif 15:03:58 +MichaelKifer 15:04:16 csma has joined #rif 15:04:32 yuting has joined #rif 15:04:41 +??P44 15:05:09 Scribe: MichaelKifer 15:05:28 + +0122427aacc 15:05:39 zakim, aacc is me 15:05:39 +yuting; got it 15:06:00 zakim, StuartTaylor is with me 15:06:00 +StuartTaylor; got it 15:06:08 +??P49 15:06:12 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/att-0107/19082008-rif-minutes.html 15:06:18 zakim, ??P40 is me 15:06:18 I already had ??P40 as DaveReynolds, csma 15:06:26 +[NRCC] 15:06:35 zakim, ??P49 is me 15:06:35 +csma; got it 15:06:36 PROPOSED: Accept minutes of Aug 19 telecon 15:06:42 RESOLVED: Accept minutes of Aug 19 telecon 15:06:44 zakim, mute me 15:06:46 csma should now be muted 15:07:05 AdrianP has joined #rif 15:07:14 zakim, mute me 15:07:14 yuting should now be muted 15:07:19 zakim, next item 15:07:19 agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:08:05 JeffP has joined #rif 15:08:41 + +49.351.463.4.aadd 15:08:43 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 15:08:50 Zakim, aadd is me 15:08:51 +AdrianP; got it 15:08:52 -MichaelKifer 15:09:00 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:09:01 On the phone I see ChrisW, Mike_Dean, Sandro, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, yuting (muted), csma (muted), [NRCC], AdrianP 15:09:05 Zakim, mute me 15:09:06 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 15:09:08 AdrianP should now be muted 15:09:22 Scribe: Harold 15:09:27 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:09:32 +Harold; got it 15:10:03 Sandro: OWL-RL is a profile for OWL coupled with rule engines. 15:10:23 ... It may fit BLD or FLD. 15:10:38 +yuting.a 15:10:39 I would hope OWL-RL fits within Core 15:10:52 zakim, yuting.a is me 15:10:52 +JeffP; got it 15:11:08 Chris: Can we ask them to publish such rule bases in RIF XML syntax. 15:11:10 + +1.503.533.aaee 15:11:25 Sandro: Yes. at some point. 15:11:25 zakim, aaee is me 15:11:25 +GaryHallmark; got it 15:12:08 QL 15:12:10 URL? 15:12:24 Mike: Is it renamed from earlier name? 15:12:51 Sandro: Evocative of RuLes. 15:13:08 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Profiles 15:13:57 yeah, more specifically: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Profiles#OWL_2_RL 15:14:06 zakim, next item 15:14:07 agendum 3. "Action review" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:14:19 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec 15:14:36 ... need to check the implications of Botris Motik's reply to me. 15:14:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Response_to_PPS4 15:15:18 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:15:18 On the phone I see ChrisW, Mike_Dean, Sandro, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, yuting (muted), csma (muted), Harold, AdrianP (muted), JeffP, 15:15:20 ... GaryHallmark 15:15:20 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 15:15:32 Chris: Axel keep looking at comments wrt DTB relationships. 15:15:40 action: axel to look at DTB comments in Peters message 15:15:41 Created ACTION-568 - Look at DTB comments in Peters message [on Axel Polleres - due 2008-09-02]. 15:16:29 ok, thanks Sandro 15:17:23 Zakim, unmute me 15:17:23 AdrianP should no longer be muted 15:18:32 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/PRD#Rules_instantiation:_INSTANTIATE 15:18:54 Adrian: Have reformulated, interacting with Christian, the semantics of instantiate function. 15:19:00 zakim, next item 15:19:00 agendum 4. "F2F11" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:19:11 Zakim, mute me 15:19:11 AdrianP should now be muted 15:19:54 zakim, list agenda 15:19:54 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda: 15:19:55 4. F2F11 [from ChrisW] 15:19:55 5. DTB [from ChrisW] 15:19:56 6. Core [from ChrisW] 15:19:56 7. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 15:19:58 8. Publicity [from ChrisW] 15:19:59 9. Pick Scribe for next week [from ChrisW] 15:20:01 10. AOB [from ChrisW] 15:20:21 Harold: Who is in which hotel? 15:20:34 Holiday Inn Midtown at $306/night 15:21:12 Mike: NJ, $169 15:21:21 Holiday Inn Midtown at $306/night 440 WEST 57TH ST 1-212-5818100 15:21:46 Portland Square Hotel (47th street), sharing with jos... makes it cheaper. 15:22:08 zakim, take up item 7 15:22:08 agendum 7. "Test Cases" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:22:49 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:24:06 Leora: Issue of more user friendly PS. 15:24:33 ... Adrian has proposed improvements. 15:24:47 ... We want to bring up this issue. 15:25:06 Chris: Current PS makes it difficult to talk about RIF. 15:25:17 Hear, hear! 15:25:25 Leora: It's plain hard. Extra burdon on users. 15:25:41 ... Would be good to have other syntax. 15:25:53 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/UCR#Use_Cases 15:25:55 ... Maybe with preprocessor to map to current PS. 15:26:00 Zakim, unmute me 15:26:00 AdrianP should no longer be muted 15:26:35 Chris: What us use is a bunch of shortcuts with if...do.. production rules. 15:26:37 I had some comments on the shortcuts suggested for arithmetics and comparison... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0124.html not sure whether the mail was clear, but I can explain it. 15:26:41 q+ 15:27:07 Adrian: Currently Prolog symbol for "is implied by". 15:27:17 What about triple syntax a la N3? 15:27:30 Chris: Also "->" is not a good symbol for slots. 15:28:04 Axel: Some examples use arithm shortcuts. 15:28:18 what about colon instead of ->, e.g. ?o[k1:v1 k2:v2] 15:28:26 you mean, e.g. ">" "<" "!=" "=" "<=" ">=" as in programming languages 15:28:36 instead of e.g. External(pred:numeric-less-than(1 2)) 15:29:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:29:31 On the phone I see ChrisW, Mike_Dean, Sandro, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, yuting (muted), csma (muted), Harold, AdrianP, JeffP, GaryHallmark 15:29:34 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 15:29:46 Why not =, since we currently have only an equality accessor (for slots)? 15:30:01 as in object[property=value]? 15:30:11 q? 15:30:14 ack ax 15:30:58 Adrian: Parser can figure out distinctions via arg types (e.g. two numbers). 15:31:08 Axel: Makes sense. 15:31:44 -Mike_Dean 15:31:44 Sandro: I'm highly dubious. 15:31:52 q+ 15:31:58 ... It would be a half-way rule language. 15:32:04 q+ 15:32:07 ... Either XML or real rule language. 15:32:26 ... Run UC: Only XML 15:32:27 the main intention of the abridged syntax is to make it easy to write down and read rules 15:32:36 in xpath, etc you have '+','-', but type-checking of the operators is supposed to take place before it is chosen which add or subtract function is actually meant. 15:32:50 ... Read UC: Use your own favorite syntax 15:33:04 Chris: Requires a tool. 15:33:24 Sandro: Yes. Need bootstrapping. 15:33:26 ack csma 15:33:29 q- 15:33:29 ack c 15:33:37 Christian: Two questions. 15:34:04 ... same for comparisons, i.e., any xpath processor should be able to deal with +,-, >, <, etc. for various datatypes. 15:34:14 ... 1) What's purpose of non-abridged syntax if we have an abridged one. 15:34:15 PS is normative, I think 15:34:25 Christian, the semantics have been defined in terms of the presentation syntax, no? 15:34:37 So it makes sense to keep that. 15:34:51 But you still want something that's easier to read and write. 15:35:22 ... 2) There is a case where you need to translate/produce RIF doc with a specific rule that is not in XML 15:35:36 Zakim, mute me 15:35:36 AdrianP should now be muted 15:35:45 ... When you need to produce a rule set. 15:35:53 Stella - the "mathematical english" is normative, the presentation syntax and it's EBNF is non-normative, the semantics actually refers to the mathematical English - at least that's how I understand it. 15:36:17 Chris: Not transl. test cases now. But entailment test cases. 15:36:35 ... Otherwise we would need whole suites of cases for each language. 15:36:41 zakim, mute me 15:36:41 csma should now be muted 15:37:25 Axel: Uneasy with +, -, *, / etc. only for numbers. 15:37:43 ... Other languages have such symbols also for other datatypes. 15:37:45 dave, the spec just says "the presenation syntax is normative" (but not the ebnf) 15:37:57 such abriviations are quite common in nearly all programming languages 15:37:59 Chris: Issue is if it's better than current PS. 15:38:25 Axel: Agree, but kind of half-way. 15:38:28 Stella - yes, sorry. 15:38:29 still not clear why we need another syntax 15:38:48 Chris: Alternative would be to define a new syntax. 15:38:58 JeffP, it's because the current PS is really hard to read and write. 15:39:17 and we are afraid it will affect adoption of RIF. 15:39:37 LeoraMorgenstern, thanks - is PS going to be replaced by the new one? 15:39:40 Axel: Should we use the Abridged Syntax but mark it as not covering more than numerics. 15:39:44 Leora - in that case it needs a formal definition, the current defn is ambiguous 15:39:51 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:39:54 Dave, I agree. 15:40:02 Chris: Will need to make status of Abridged Syntax more explict. 15:40:08 Axel: yes. 15:41:00 Leora: Discussed various more cases. 15:41:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Test_Case 15:41:12 ... Quite comprehensive now. 15:41:32 We should mention explicit that our abbreviations for comparison operators and arithmetic operators *only* apply to numeric datatypes, *as opposed to* the more generic use of these abbreviations in languages such as XPATH 15:41:44 e.g. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Chaining_strategy_numeric-add-1 15:41:44 ... Chaining strategy UC brought in by Axel. 15:42:38 Axel: Dual versions, behaving different in (naive) forward and backward engines. 15:43:10 ... Cannot just materialize. 15:43:46 q? 15:44:05 Leora: It would help if people make the "discussion" slot more explicit. 15:44:15 ... Distinguish various cases. 15:44:23 ... Overarching argument. 15:44:44 ... Otherwise people can get lost. 15:44:54 I would propose to group test cases to test suites which have a context 15:45:05 Zakim, unmute me 15:45:05 AdrianP should no longer be muted 15:45:07 Chris: E.g., what Axel just described on the phone should be in the document. 15:45:10 Axel: Fine. 15:45:22 and maybe we can use seeAlso field to reference related test cases from test cases 15:45:30 Sandro: Description vs. Discussion, with linking. 15:45:47 +Mike_Dean 15:45:49 Adrian: Concept of test suite. Once can refer to the other. 15:46:21 Gary: Axel's are also legal PRD, which is good. 15:46:41 Leora: Stella and I translated a number of UCs. 15:46:42 gary: cases that apply to BLD and PRD could be of dialect CORE 15:46:57 ... Dave has a named-arg uniterm ex. 15:47:11 ... Next week more. 15:47:26 zakim, list agenda 15:47:26 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda: 15:47:27 4. F2F11 [from ChrisW] 15:47:27 5. DTB [from ChrisW] 15:47:28 6. Core [from ChrisW] 15:47:28 7. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 15:47:29 8. Publicity [from ChrisW] 15:47:30 9. Pick Scribe for next week [from ChrisW] 15:47:31 10. AOB [from ChrisW] 15:47:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:47:32 zakim, take up item 5 15:47:33 On the phone I see ChrisW, Sandro, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, yuting (muted), csma (muted), Harold, AdrianP, JeffP, GaryHallmark, Mike_Dean 15:47:36 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 15:47:38 agendum 5. "DTB" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:48:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0074.html 15:48:21 Chris: Let's go over eds note list. 15:48:22 Other open issues of Test Cases are e.g. the set of properties which we have define or the translation from the WIKI version into a concrete XML syntax 15:49:29 Chris: All shortcuts should ultimately be in one place. 15:50:22 Axel: Section 2.2 should explain rdf:text shortcut. 15:50:50 ... in abridged it would already be it. 15:51:12 Chris: Separate wiki page? 15:51:24 +1 for having the shortcuts and abridged syntax all in one place, and that is not DTB 15:51:32 Axel: No problem, but then remove it from all other places. 15:51:48 yes, good idea 15:51:58 YES 15:52:00 yes 15:52:18 action: adrian to create page that documents abridged syntax 15:52:18 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - adrian 15:52:18 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. agiurca, apaschke) 15:52:25 it will make it easier for programmers 15:52:30 action: apaschke to create page that documents abridged syntax 15:52:30 Created ACTION-569 - Create page that documents abridged syntax [on Adrian Paschke - due 2008-09-02]. 15:53:44 q+ 15:53:50 Axel: Predicate that takes rdf:text and language tags, matching eg all "en" tags. 15:54:30 Dave: In SPARQL there is also a lang matcher. 15:54:44 s/ language tags/ language range/ 15:55:11 Axel: A bit awkward. 15:55:18 q- 15:55:26 Chris: Can you extract lang. tag? 15:55:38 Axel: Yes, but not typical use case. 15:56:21 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:56:23 Dave: Fine. Alg the same, just args different. 15:57:02 ... Can lang tag be empty xs:string? 15:57:17 Axel: We agreed this should not cause any harm. 15:57:35 Chris: Does this change anything in the def of matching lang tag? 15:57:53 Axel: We could define it for only non-empty lang tags. 15:59:15 Dave: Same for func:lang(...)? 15:59:23 Axel: Dont see a problem. 15:59:59 Dave: Normally no need for testing non-emptiness. 16:00:16 ... How does this affact RDF Compatiblity? 16:00:27 Axel: We already have different treatment there. 16:01:11 ... treat plain literals same as those type with xs:string. 16:01:27 ... which is different from RDF. 16:02:20 Dave: According to D-entailment it is the same. 16:02:41 ... But yours not. 16:03:21 Axel: Empty lang tags do not occur in RDF, so it doesnt matter. 16:03:30 Sandro: Syntax error in RDF. 16:03:59 Chris: OK. So in RDF? 16:04:08 Axel: Plain literals. 16:04:46 ... So the rdf:text task force is looking into unifying them. 16:05:20 Sandro: No problem because rdf:text does not normally occur in RDF. 16:07:37 Dave/Sandro/Axel: More discussion about datatype system, performance issues, ... 16:07:56 Chris: Record as an issue and move on? 16:08:11 ... Dave you are not sure? 16:08:52 Dave: No formal objection, need to think more about it. Feels awkward, perhaps raise an error instead. 16:09:44 Sandro: Regarding impacts: More on OWL than on Jena. 16:10:00 -ChrisW 16:10:01 -StellaMitchell 16:10:02 -AxelPolleres 16:10:10 curious 16:10:15 zakim, unmute me 16:10:15 csma should no longer be muted 16:10:26 s/on Jena/on RIF in Jena/ 16:10:30 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:10:30 On the phone I see Sandro, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, yuting (muted), csma, Harold, AdrianP, JeffP, GaryHallmark, Mike_Dean 16:10:33 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 16:10:33 +[IBM] 16:10:56 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 16:10:56 +ChrisW; got it 16:11:02 AxelPolleres, how were you dialed in....? 16:11:16 oops 16:11:26 redialing 16:11:26 +[IBM] 16:11:38 Dave: Consult with my group and come back if there is a concern. 16:11:44 zakim, list agenda 16:11:44 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda: 16:11:44 zakim, mute me 16:11:45 4. F2F11 [from ChrisW] 16:11:45 5. DTB [from ChrisW] 16:11:46 6. Core [from ChrisW] 16:11:46 7. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 16:11:47 8. Publicity [from ChrisW] 16:11:48 9. Pick Scribe for next week [from ChrisW] 16:11:49 10. AOB [from ChrisW] 16:11:51 csma should now be muted 16:11:52 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 16:11:53 +StellaMitchell; got it 16:12:05 +??P12 16:12:08 zakim, take up item 8 16:12:08 agendum 8. "Publicity" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:12:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Publicity 16:12:44 Chris: Much more active PR need be done. 16:12:49 see for contrast http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Publicity 16:13:32 zakim, unmute me 16:13:32 csma should no longer be muted 16:13:35 old version.... http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Outreach 16:13:51 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 16:14:15 ... Use it to record who sent which msg where. 16:14:37 ... What advertising has anyone done? 16:14:38 zakim, who is on the call? 16:14:38 -LeoraMorgenstern 16:14:39 Re rif:text and RDF compatibility - there isn't a problem. In the RDF spec there is the statement "The xml:lang="" form indicates the absence of a language identifier" which is therefore compatible with the proposed approach. Sorry to have diverted the discussion. 16:14:41 On the phone I see Sandro, DaveReynolds, yuting (muted), csma, Harold, AdrianP, JeffP, GaryHallmark, Mike_Dean, ChrisW, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres 16:14:43 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 16:14:50 I contacted some LP related lists... will add on the wiki 16:15:15 ... No one. We need to start doing it NOW. 16:15:38 Zakim, unmute me 16:15:38 AdrianP was not muted, AdrianP 16:15:41 ... Can we find Press Release? 16:15:47 Press release: http://www.w3.org/News/2008#item132 16:15:54 Adrian: Some LP lists. 16:16:34 Axel: Sent to Enrico, the editor of the LP Newsletter. 16:16:50 xsb-development@lists.sourceforge.net 16:17:04 ... If we have a Press Release, we can bring it in faster, otherwise 3 months. 16:17:11 I did the following: 16:17:11 Dear all, 16:17:11 I would like to draw your attention to the recent drafts published by 16:17:11 the World Wide Web Consortium's Rule Interchange Format (RIF) working 16:17:11 group, towards an interchange format for rules languages: 16:17:12 The current specification is a collection of 6 documents published at 16:17:14 the following URLs: 16:17:16 1. RIF Use Cases and Requirements 16:17:18 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-ucr-20080730/ 16:17:20 2. RIF Basic Logic Dialect 16:17:22 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-bld-20080730/ 16:17:24 3. RIF Framework for Logic Dialects 16:17:26 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-fld-20080730/ 16:17:28 4. RIF RDF and OWL Compatibility 16:17:30 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-rdf-owl-20080730/ 16:17:32 5. RIF Production Rule Dialect 16:17:34 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-prd-20080730/ 16:17:35 Sandro: You have to target your audience / your community's mailing list. 16:17:36 6. RIF Datatypes and Built-Ins 1.0 16:17:37 zakim, unmute me 16:17:37 csma was not muted, csma 16:17:38 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rif-dtb-20080730/ 16:17:40 The Working Group seeks public feedback and comments on these drafts on 16:17:42 the following mailinglist at the following email-address: 16:17:44 public-rif-comments@w3.org 16:17:46 with best regards, 16:17:48 Axel 16:18:28 zakim, mute me 16:18:28 csma should now be muted 16:18:29 Christian: Not BCC but FWD. 16:18:55 Chris: We have to stress that BLD is in LC. 16:19:10 Dave: Main semweb lists. 16:19:26 ... Jena Dev list, too 16:19:53 I did publicize inside HP as well. 16:20:43 Gary: Send it to Oracle list and to Jess. 16:20:53 zakim, unmute me 16:20:53 csma should no longer be muted 16:21:28 yes there is RIF demo at the Orlando conference 16:21:46 yes, can send it to the RuleML-2008 board 16:22:01 my posting to semantic-web@w3.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008Aug/0002.html 16:22:28 I'll send to swi-prolog@iai.uni-bonn.de 16:22:44 semantic-web@w3.org done. 16:22:44 Harold: NRC and RR Board/Conf 16:22:46 Sandro: SWI Prolog list 16:22:54 Hi 16:23:37 Jeff: Rule-related projects 16:24:03 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:24:03 On the phone I see Sandro, DaveReynolds, yuting (muted), csma, Harold, AdrianP, JeffP, GaryHallmark, Mike_Dean, ChrisW, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres 16:24:05 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 16:24:14 Mike: semweb list we covered already 16:24:22 Yuting, do you have any other suggestions? 16:24:49 ... DARPA projects 16:25:50 no, no lists 16:26:00 :-) 16:26:01 No idea at the moment, beside the MOST project partners 16:26:02 Sandro: Even if we don't get much feedback, we have to present evidence that we mailed it out widely. 16:26:05 I'll try 16:26:36 I plan to send an announcement on the JavaRules list, the Business Rules community list, the various PRR lists, the MISMO BREW list 16:26:45 zakim, unmute me 16:26:45 csma was not muted, csma 16:27:46 Adrian: XSB and JBoss. 16:28:27 Christian: see above. Yahoo Group. 16:28:31 chris: odm, common-logic, 16:28:40 Chris: ODM, Common Logic. 16:28:56 sparql-dev? 16:29:11 Christian: Mark could mention it on his blog. 16:29:38 Chris: Other blogs. Sandro, Linked-Data community? 16:29:58 public-lod@w3.org 16:30:23 Zakim, mute me 16:30:23 AdrianP should now be muted 16:30:25 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 16:30:54 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:30:54 On the phone I see Sandro, DaveReynolds, yuting (muted), csma, Harold, AdrianP (muted), JeffP, GaryHallmark, Mike_Dean, ChrisW, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres 16:30:57 scribe for next week: GaryHallmark 16:30:58 yuting has yuting, StuartTaylor 16:31:12 zakim, list agenda 16:31:12 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda: 16:31:13 4. F2F11 [from ChrisW] 16:31:13 5. DTB [from ChrisW] 16:31:15 6. Core [from ChrisW] 16:31:15 7. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 16:31:16 8. Publicity [from ChrisW] 16:31:17 9. Pick Scribe for next week [from ChrisW] 16:31:18 10. AOB [from ChrisW] 16:31:21 zakim, take up item 10 16:31:21 agendum 10. "AOB" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:31:27 I could also send it to the ai-and-web-in-china, a google group 16:31:32 -StellaMitchell 16:31:33 bye 16:31:34 -AdrianP 16:31:35 thanks, bye 16:31:36 -DaveReynolds 16:31:38 -GaryHallmark 16:31:42 bye 16:31:43 -Mike_Dean 16:31:51 zakim, list attendees 16:31:51 As of this point the attendees have been Mike_Dean, ChrisW, +1.631.833.aaaa, Sandro, MichaelKifer, +1.212.781.aabb, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, 16:31:55 ... +0122427aacc, yuting, StuartTaylor, csma, +49.351.463.4.aadd, AdrianP, Harold, JeffP, +1.503.533.aaee, GaryHallmark 16:31:57 -JeffP 16:32:08 -AxelPolleres 16:32:12 Regrets: JosDeBruijn Hassan Aït-Kaci 16:32:17 rrsagent, make minutes 16:32:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 16:32:53 -Harold 16:32:54 zakim, unmute me 16:32:54 csma was not muted, csma 16:33:16 -yuting 16:33:23 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:33:23 On the phone I see Sandro, csma, ChrisW 16:33:59 -Sandro 16:34:01 -ChrisW 16:34:02 -csma 16:34:04 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:34:05 Attendees were Mike_Dean, ChrisW, +1.631.833.aaaa, Sandro, MichaelKifer, +1.212.781.aabb, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, +0122427aacc, yuting, 16:34:07 ... StuartTaylor, csma, +49.351.463.4.aadd, AdrianP, Harold, JeffP, +1.503.533.aaee, GaryHallmark 16:55:10 csma has left #rif 17:14:23 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 17:32:56 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 18:44:38 sandro has joined #rif