11:00:52 RRSAgent has joined #wam 11:00:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-wam-irc 11:01:27 +Art_Barstow 11:01:53 Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference 11:01:54 +??P2 11:01:58 claudio has joined #wam 11:02:01 zakim, ??p2 is me 11:02:01 +marcos; got it 11:02:02 Date: 21 August 2008 11:02:08 Chair: Art 11:02:11 Scribe: Art 11:02:16 ScribeNick: ArtB 11:02:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0445.html 11:02:57 Zakim, call Mike 11:02:57 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 11:02:59 +Mike 11:03:01 +??P3 11:03:37 Present: Art, Arve, Marcos, Mike, Claudio 11:03:48 Eataly! :D 11:06:13 Topic: Turin Logistics 11:06:46 CV: taxis from airport to hotel cost about 30-40 euros depending on the hotel 11:06:52 ... expect mild weather 11:07:10 ... Regarding dress code, short pants are OK for the meeting 11:07:27 ... Be careful to only use official taxis, typically white or yellow 11:08:07 ... Trains from Milan to Turin are pretty easy to take 11:09:04 marcos: you're difficult to hear 11:09:46 Arve, will try to sit closer to the mic 11:10:52 Zakim, mute Mike 11:10:52 Mike should now be muted 11:11:04 CV: to walk from Art hotel to meeting location should take about 30 mins 11:11:24 AB: who is staying at the Art hotel? 11:11:30 I am 11:11:39 I am too 11:12:18 AB: Marcos, Arve, me too; we can take a taxi to the meeting ~ 9:30 on Tues morn? 11:14:00 Topic: Agenda Review 11:14:12 AB: agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0445.html 11:14:18 AB: any change requests? 11:14:33 MC: Krzy sent some comments right before the meeting 11:14:53 ... we can talk about his new comments 11:15:11 Topic: Turing Agenda 11:15:19 AB: I updated it a bit last week 11:15:28 AB: any general comments? 11:15:55 CV: can Telecom Italia send some observers to parts of the meeting? 11:16:07 AB: yes, that's fine 11:18:18 AB: I've asked Thomas Landsburg to do a short preso on Webwag mobile 11:18:59 Topic: Comments from Krzy 11:19:17 MC: new comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0449.html 11:20:03 AB: any comments about Marcos original response to Krzy? 11:20:43 [None] 11:21:15 AB: Marcos, please summarize Krzy's latest comments 11:21:37 MC: a few of his comments are quite complicated 11:22:13 ... e.g. IRI versus URI usage is a bit conflated and I need to fix that in both the Reqs doc and at least the P&C spec 11:23:24 ... He recommends we de-emphasize "web widgets" aka gadgets 11:23:41 ... I think we just need to make a distinction 11:26:17 AB: I agree we need a clear distinction 11:26:44 CV: during WWW2008 Art made a presentation about Widgets 11:27:12 ... I think that definition removed "web widgets" from our definition of Widgets 11:27:31 ... They are indeed two different things 11:27:43 Arve: we could call this a Widget runtime spec 11:28:00 MC: yes, that would be more specific 11:28:23 Widget Runtime 1.0? 11:28:33 AB: people have used the term "WAF Widgets" 11:28:37 claudio has joined #wam 11:28:49 ... that would now be "WebApps Widgets" 11:28:53 Art said: a specification covering various aspects of Web applications that can be installed to a local computer and still access the Web 11:29:17 MC: I like the idea of adding "runtime" 11:29:50 -marcos 11:29:51 AB: we would need a good definition of runtime 11:30:22 ... it could also includes some implementation context 11:30:30 +??P2 11:30:35 Arve: I think in one paragraph of text we can clarify this 11:30:48 zakim, ??P2 is I 11:30:48 +marcos; got it 11:31:42 MC: we have a lot of text already 11:31:50 ... I think the problem is the Name 11:32:21 ... my fear is the name becomes a gate and people don't enter/read based on the name 11:32:58 ACTION: marcos propose a new name for the Widget spec that helps separate our model from the "web widget" model aka gadets 11:32:58 Created ACTION-24 - Propose a new name for the Widget spec that helps separate our model from the \"web widget\" model aka gadets [on Marcos Caceres - due 2008-08-28]. 11:33:54 MC: MIME is raised as an alternative way to package the Widgets 11:34:09 ... I think we need to consider this but perhaps not until v2 11:35:19 AB: I want to continue to use ZIP 11:35:54 MC: agree that based on what has been implemented, ZIP makes senese 11:36:06 ... However, using MIME could help address some issues 11:36:33 Arve: I want to stay with ZIP; MIME has not been considered by Opera 11:36:49 ... I would expect MIME to introduce a new set of problems 11:37:01 Zakim, unmute Mike 11:37:01 Mike should no longer be muted 11:37:18 CV: I don't have any comments; I can live with ZIP 11:37:42 ... I would need to see some compelling use cases to consider an alternative packaging format 11:38:00 MS: I agree with Claudio's comments re use cases 11:38:21 ... Without some additional motiviation I'm OK with ZIP 11:38:56 AB: Propose: we stay with ZIP as the packaging format; we will analyze MIME for v2 11:39:24 AB: any objections to this proposal? 11:39:48 [None] 11:40:09 RESOULTION: we will stay with ZIP as the packaging format for v1; we will analyze MIME for v2 11:41:21 Zakim, mute Mike 11:41:21 Mike should now be muted 11:42:23 ArtB has joined #wam 11:42:51 AB: any other comments we should discuss now? 11:43:05 MC: I recommend everyone read his comments 11:43:10 ... I will respond in due time 11:43:16 ... Others should respond too 11:44:10 MC: I am very thankful to Krzysztof for his comments 11:44:17 ... they were very useful! 11:45:09 CV: regarding life cycle and events, can you summarize his comments, especially if he is proposing something different then our model? 11:45:29 MC: I think his model is similar to ours but he wants to add a small addition 11:45:57 ... He isn't proposing any changes to what I've put in the spec 11:46:05 ... Just an addition 11:47:21 AB: so everyone, please read Krzy's comments and respond on public-webapps 11:47:40 Topic: Benoit's comments 11:48:02 AB: what is the status Marcos? 11:48:12 MC: I've responded to all of Benoit's comments 11:48:43 AB: OK; great 11:49:02 MC: I just need him to confirm my responses; most of his comments were Editorial 11:49:15 Topic: AOB 11:49:43 Regrets: Nick, David, Benoit, Thomas 11:50:01 AB: please remember to bring your passport to the meeting! 11:50:43 Zakim, unmute Mike 11:50:43 Mike should no longer be muted 11:50:54 AB: what are your plans for remote participation? 11:51:04 MS: I should be available for most of the meeting 11:52:39 -arve 11:52:42 -??P3 11:52:43 Zakim, drop Mike 11:52:43 Mike is being disconnected 11:52:44 -Mike 11:52:48 AB: Meeting adjourned; see you in Turin on Tuesday! 11:52:49 -marcos 11:52:57 rrsagent, make logs public 11:53:00 timeless has joined #wam 11:53:03 rrsagent, make minutes 11:53:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-wam-minutes.html ArtB 11:53:11 -Art_Barstow 11:53:13 IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended 11:53:15 Attendees were +47.23.69.aaaa, arve, Art_Barstow, marcos, Mike 11:53:25 restarting to recover bridge connection 11:54:23 s/RESOULTION/RESOLUTION/ 11:54:29 rrsagent, make minutes 11:54:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-wam-minutes.html ArtB 12:07:50 rrsagent, bye 12:07:50 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-wam-actions.rdf : 12:07:50 ACTION: marcos propose a new name for the Widget spec that helps separate our model from the "web widget" model aka gadets [1] 12:07:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-wam-irc#T11-32-58