<marc> agendum+ Future of EMOXG

<marc> agendum+ Next meetings

<marc> agendum+ XML discussion continued: scale value requirements

hello

<marc> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/group/IRC-Cheat-Sheet.html#scribe

<marc> next item

Marc explains the 3 possibilites for the future of EMOXG (stop, continue as its own working group, join the multimodal interaction as a sub-group)

all the participants of today meeting agree on the 3rd option (join MM interaction as a sub-group)

ask in the mailing list if there are other opinions on this issue

<marc> next item

<Enrico> Thursday 4 September, 14:00 UTC

<Enrico> Thursday 18 September, 14:00 UTC

<Enrico> Thursday 2 October, 14:00 UTC

next phone meetings: 4 sept, 2PM UTC; 18 sept 2PM UTC; 2 Oct 2PM UTC

<felix> i will attend the f2f only on the friday 24th

<marc> next item

Marc: ask the participants who can come to the meeting in Cannes

<marc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-emotion/2008Jul/0008.html

<cgi-irc> Dylan

Marc presents the different issues regarding scales specification: numerical and linguistic

Enrico: proposes to restrict the linguistic values to 5. pb of subjectivity arises with using higher number of linguistic scales

<marc> unipolar scale:

<marc> ... +

<marc> ... ++

<marc> ... +++

<marc> ... ++++

<marc> ... +++++

<cgi-irc> unipolar scale:

<cgi-irc> 0

<cgi-irc> +

<cgi-irc> ++

<cgi-irc> +++

Some conclusions were made: we tend to prefer 5 numbers for verbal cateogry

<cgi-irc> ++++

open issue to be discussed: use abstract scale or linguistic scale

<marc> <emotion>

<marc> <dimensions set="Arousal-and-Valence">

<marc> <arousal value="very much" confidence="0.9"/>

<marc> <valence value="slightly positive" confidence="0.3"/>

<marc> </dimensions>

<marc> </emotion>

<marc> <emotion>

<marc> <action-tendencies set="Frijda">

<marc> <approach activation="(unipolar scale)"/>

<marc> <avoidance activation="(unipolar scale)"/>

<marc> <being-with activation="(unipolar scale)"/>

<marc> ...

<marc> </action-tendencies>

<marc> </emotion>

Regarding sub-element of Core 3, 4, ...: need to verify the values (eg appraisal dimensions) from a repository

Core 5: we should stick to values

<marc> <emotion>

<marc> <intensity value="(unipolar scale)"/>

<marc> </emotion>

<marc> <emotion>

<marc> <intensity value="0.1" confidence="0.8"/>

<marc> <category set="everyday" name="boredom" confidence="0.1"/>

<marc> </emotion>

Core 6: Intensity should be a separate element rather than an attribute

Confidence: use same type of scale

<felix> bye

<Enrico> bye

<cgi-irc> #quit

<cgi-irc> \quit

<scribe> Scribe: catherine

<scribe> ScribeNick: cath

<catherine> ScribeNick: catherine

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: catherine
Inferring ScribeNick: catherine
Found ScribeNick: cath
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching ScribeNick pattern: <cath> ...
Found ScribeNick: catherine
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching ScribeNick pattern: <catherine> ...
ScribeNicks: catherine, cath

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Present: Catherine Felix Enrico Dylan Marc
Regrets: Ian Bill Bjoern Paolo
Got date from IRC log name: 21 Aug 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/21-emotion-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report