IRC log of rif on 2008-08-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:29:54 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rif
- 14:29:54 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-rif-irc
- 14:30:05 [ChrisW]
- zakim, this will be rif
- 14:30:05 [Zakim]
- ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 30 minutes
- 14:30:36 [ChrisW]
- Meeting: RIF Telecon 5-Aug-08
- 14:30:45 [ChrisW]
- Chair: Chris Welty
- 14:30:57 [ChrisW]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0003.html
- 14:31:09 [ChrisW]
- ChrisW has changed the topic to: 5 Aug RIF Telecon Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0003.html
- 14:31:36 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Admin
- 14:31:40 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Liason
- 14:31:46 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Action Review
- 14:31:51 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ F2F11
- 14:31:56 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Core
- 14:32:00 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Test Cases
- 14:32:04 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ FLD
- 14:32:08 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ DTB
- 14:32:11 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ PRD
- 14:32:15 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ AOB
- 14:32:25 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:32:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 14:32:37 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 15:00:21 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif
- 15:00:45 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started
- 15:00:52 [Zakim]
- + +1.212.781.aaaa
- 15:01:02 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, aaaa is me
- 15:01:02 [Zakim]
- +LeoraMorgenstern; got it
- 15:01:19 [DaveReynolds]
- DaveReynolds has joined #rif
- 15:01:24 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:01:30 [ChrisW]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:01:30 [Zakim]
- +ChrisW; got it
- 15:02:17 [StellaMitchell]
- StellaMitchell has joined #rif
- 15:02:58 [AxelPolleres]
- AxelPolleres has joined #rif
- 15:03:26 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:03:27 [Zakim]
- +??P27
- 15:03:32 [josb]
- josb has joined #rif
- 15:03:33 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see LeoraMorgenstern, ChrisW, ??P27
- 15:03:43 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see josb, AxelPolleres, StellaMitchell, DaveReynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, RRSAgent, Zakim, ChrisW, Harold, sandro, trackbot
- 15:03:48 [csma]
- csma has joined #rif
- 15:03:50 [Zakim]
- + +39.047.101.aabb
- 15:04:10 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:04:15 [StellaMitchell]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:04:18 [Zakim]
- +StellaMitchell; got it
- 15:04:29 [AdrianP]
- AdrianP has joined #rif
- 15:04:30 [Zakim]
- +??P30
- 15:04:34 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is talking?
- 15:04:50 [Zakim]
- +??P31
- 15:04:52 [Zakim]
- ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: LeoraMorgenstern (29%), ChrisW (42%)
- 15:05:03 [csma]
- zakim, ??P31 is me
- 15:05:03 [Zakim]
- +csma; got it
- 15:05:50 [Zakim]
- + +49.351.463.4.aacc
- 15:06:00 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, aacc is me
- 15:06:00 [Zakim]
- +AdrianP; got it
- 15:06:05 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:06:05 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should now be muted
- 15:06:20 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- I'll volunteer.
- 15:06:23 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:06:23 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see LeoraMorgenstern, ChrisW, ??P27, josb, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres (muted), csma, AdrianP (muted)
- 15:06:42 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:06:42 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should no longer be muted
- 15:06:52 [ChrisW]
- Scribe: AdrianP
- 15:06:58 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:06:58 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:07:00 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:07:00 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should now be muted
- 15:07:21 [MichaelKifer]
- MichaelKifer has joined #rif
- 15:07:26 [ChrisW]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jul/att-0217/29-July-2008-rif-minutes.html
- 15:07:35 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Objections to accepting minutes?
- 15:07:52 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Accept minutes of 29-July telecon
- 15:08:00 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: Accept minutes of 29-July telecon
- 15:08:21 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:08:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:35 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Status of SBVR?
- 15:09:51 [Zakim]
- +[NRCC]
- 15:09:53 [AdrianP]
- Christian: SBVR currently an adopted standard
- 15:10:33 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Large document, 400 pages, it is computer independent level specification of business rules
- 15:10:39 [Harold]
- Zakim, [NRCC] is me
- 15:10:39 [Zakim]
- +Harold; got it
- 15:10:51 [AdrianP]
- Christian: RIF is at the execution level, SBVR is not
- 15:11:25 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Framework for analysing the business semantics of rules
- 15:11:28 [Zakim]
- +Gary_Hallmark
- 15:11:30 [Harold]
- http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.0/
- 15:12:17 [AdrianP]
- Harold: use common logic as underlying logic as far as I know
- 15:12:29 [AdrianP]
- Christian: there is a mapping at least part of it
- 15:12:55 [Harold]
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics_of_Business_Vocabulary_and_Business_Rules
- 15:13:19 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Translation between SBVR and RIF?
- 15:13:26 [Harold]
- "Common Logic – draft standard 24707, currently being fast-tracked by ISO."
- 15:13:43 [Harold]
- "SBVR is aligned with Common Logic – draft standard 24707, currently being fast-tracked by ISO."
- 15:13:53 [AdrianP]
- Christian: If you could map SBVR to executable rules it can be mapped to RIF
- 15:13:57 [Zakim]
- + +1.631.833.aadd
- 15:14:10 [MichaelKifer]
- zakim, aadd is me
- 15:14:10 [Zakim]
- +MichaelKifer; got it
- 15:14:18 [AxelPolleres]
- q+
- 15:14:23 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:14:23 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should no longer be muted
- 15:14:53 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:14:53 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should now be muted
- 15:15:08 [AdrianP]
- Adrian: HCLS has recharted and will start again in September
- 15:15:21 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:15:21 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisW
- 15:15:29 [ChrisW]
- ack a
- 15:15:30 [AdrianP]
- Axel: will talk about rif:text next week with the OWL group
- 15:15:31 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:15:31 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Action Review" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:16:34 [AdrianP]
- Michael: Send an eMail to the list about FLD semantics for PRD
- 15:16:51 [MichaelKifer]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:16:51 [Zakim]
- MichaelKifer should now be muted
- 15:17:04 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:17:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "F2F11" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:17:37 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: most prefer to have meeting in Manhattan
- 15:17:57 [AxelPolleres]
- Are there any Hotel recommendations?
- 15:18:06 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: not far from Central Park and Broadway
- 15:18:17 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Will put information on the webpage this week
- 15:18:59 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:18:59 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Core" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:20:31 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Core is one of the documents on the list. What do we do with it? Is it is on priority?
- 15:21:06 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: DTB, PRD, FLD, BLD
- 15:21:32 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: TestCases and Core just some initial work
- 15:22:16 [AdrianP]
- Christian: We had a discussion in July about Core
- 15:22:59 [AdrianP]
- Christian: concensus was that we could need a Core document if we have a use case for Core
- 15:23:13 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Something smaller than the intersection of PRD and BLD
- 15:23:26 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Is the intersection clear?
- 15:23:48 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Not completely yet. But can be figured out from the current working drafts
- 15:24:28 [AdrianP]
- Dave: Core something minimum Horn Clause, no equality, ..
- 15:24:40 [AxelPolleres]
- no function symbols?
- 15:25:08 [AdrianP]
- Christian: We would need a seperate document, we would need a use case for Core
- 15:25:41 [AdrianP]
- Christian: if there is no use case for core we might question the need for a seperate document
- 15:25:49 [AdrianP]
- Dave: right
- 15:26:53 [AdrianP]
- Dave: We would be interested into interchange from Jena, simple Jena rules
- 15:27:04 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: What aspects of BLD would you drop?
- 15:27:15 [AdrianP]
- Dave: Core question is function symbols or not
- 15:27:23 [AdrianP]
- Dave: recursion
- 15:27:58 [csma]
- Dave proposed interchange between simple Jean rules and N3 as a use case for Core
- 15:28:00 [AdrianP]
- Dave: ability to call built-ins, but not unrestricted functions and data structures
- 15:28:10 [csma]
- s/Jean/Jena/
- 15:28:23 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Other features which should be droped?
- 15:28:43 [josb]
- q+
- 15:28:44 [AdrianP]
- Christian: You mentioned membership and classification
- 15:28:57 [AdrianP]
- Dave: Depends on the goa of Core
- 15:29:24 [AdrianP]
- Dave: If minimum intersection it should be removed
- 15:29:50 [AdrianP]
- s/intersection/intersection is the goal/
- 15:30:10 [AdrianP]
- Christian: You can not remove the ability to call built-ins from PRD
- 15:30:44 [AdrianP]
- Christian: You can not remove frames, named arguments from PRD
- 15:31:00 [AdrianP]
- Christian: to be compatible with Clips using named arguments
- 15:31:31 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Frames seem to be in the intersection
- 15:31:37 [AdrianP]
- Dave: right
- 15:32:24 [AdrianP]
- Christian: PRD in the first WD has named arguments since they are in BLD
- 15:32:50 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: list, frames should be in Core?
- 15:32:55 [josb]
- q?
- 15:33:00 [AdrianP]
- Harold: Yes, I think so
- 15:34:04 [AdrianP]
- Dave: Have to think about it, if I can be editor
- 15:34:11 [AdrianP]
- Harold: I would be also interested
- 15:34:34 [csma]
- ack josb
- 15:34:53 [AdrianP]
- Jos: Removing atomic formulas like classification, member, equality is good idea
- 15:35:03 [AdrianP]
- Jos: Remove also disjunction from the body of rules
- 15:35:11 [AdrianP]
- Jos: Makes processing easier
- 15:35:18 [AxelPolleres]
- +1 to keep out disjunction ats well
- 15:35:29 [AxelPolleres]
- s/ats/as/
- 15:35:29 [Harold]
- I totally agree with removing disjunction from bodies of rules in Core.
- 15:35:37 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:35:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Test Cases" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:36:08 [Harold]
- Adrian, I could scribe temporarily
- 15:36:09 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Test Cases are important since we are a standardization body
- 15:36:34 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: People need well-documented test cases
- 15:36:53 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: We need a test cases document
- 15:37:07 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: We postponed it to finish last call
- 15:37:13 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:37:13 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should no longer be muted
- 15:37:19 [Zakim]
- -Gary_Hallmark
- 15:37:39 [csma]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Test_Case
- 15:37:47 [Zakim]
- +Gary_Hallmark
- 15:37:48 [Harold]
- Adrian: Two wiki pages: old and new wiki pages
- 15:37:52 [csma]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/Test_Cases
- 15:38:28 [csma]
- action: ChristopherW to add a link to test cases pages on the RIF front page
- 15:38:28 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - ChristopherW
- 15:38:44 [Harold]
- Chris: Links from main pages should be added.
- 15:38:48 [csma]
- action: chris to add a link to test cases pages on the RIF front page
- 15:38:48 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-547 - Add a link to test cases pages on the RIF front page [on Christopher Welty - due 2008-08-12].
- 15:38:53 [Harold]
- Adrian: Added interface for test cases.
- 15:38:55 [GaryHallmark]
- GaryHallmark has joined #rif
- 15:39:04 [AdrianP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Test_Case
- 15:39:10 [Harold]
- ... Concrete implementation is platform-specific.
- 15:39:30 [Harold]
- ... But general interface is independent.
- 15:39:32 [AdrianP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/Test_Cases
- 15:40:52 [Harold]
- Adrian: Ex. in section "Categories of RIF Dialect test cases" at above URL.
- 15:41:20 [Harold]
- ... Can test if all test cases succeed.
- 15:41:45 [AxelPolleres]
- Do you have something like SPROT in mind? i.e. we'd need to define an interface, result format, etc.
- 15:41:50 [Harold]
- ... E.g. built-in tests ares done in each rule engine, reached from the interface.
- 15:41:58 [Zakim]
- -StellaMitchell
- 15:42:03 [StellaMitchell]
- sorry, wrong button
- 15:42:10 [StellaMitchell]
- calling back
- 15:42:13 [Harold]
- s/ares/are/
- 15:42:49 [Harold]
- Chris: Time and bandwidth? Both test cases editor and PRD editor?
- 15:42:53 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:43:01 [AxelPolleres]
- cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/
- 15:43:02 [Harold]
- Adrian: Depends a bit on kinds of test cases.
- 15:43:08 [StellaMitchell]
- zakim, ibm it temporarily me
- 15:43:08 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'ibm it temporarily me', StellaMitchell
- 15:43:24 [Harold]
- ... E.g., there are very general test cases.
- 15:43:24 [StellaMitchell]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:43:24 [Zakim]
- +StellaMitchell; got it
- 15:43:40 [Harold]
- Chris: Contingent on what we want to do with test cases document.
- 15:43:47 [GaryHallmark]
- q+
- 15:44:04 [Harold]
- Adrian: Yes, depends a bit on how general these test cases are.
- 15:44:44 [Harold]
- Stella: Agree with Adrian.
- 15:44:54 [Harold]
- Chris: Would you contribute to doc?
- 15:45:15 [Harold]
- Stella: Yes, but cannot pile up all these test cases.
- 15:45:29 [Harold]
- Chris: Of course, collaborative.
- 15:45:52 [Harold]
- Stella: We should test both RIF consumers and producers.
- 15:46:04 [Harold]
- Chris: Good point.
- 15:46:16 [Harold]
- Gary: Do we have any (new) test cases?
- 15:46:28 [Harold]
- ... interesting ones?
- 15:46:41 [Harold]
- ... Corner cases of BLD and PRD.
- 15:47:20 [Harold]
- Adrian: The idea is that only the interface is given, from which specific ones are generated.
- 15:47:37 [Harold]
- Chris: Tricky to do test cases for an interchange format.
- 15:47:57 [Harold]
- Adrian: Idea like for Built-ins. Library + Specific.
- 15:48:33 [Harold]
- ... Could also contribute to use case doc with Stella. But first place in my priorities is PRD.
- 15:48:40 [Harold]
- Chris: OK
- 15:49:02 [Harold]
- Gary: E.g. you could write ground facts and rules and test these.
- 15:49:04 [AdrianP]
- here are some examples http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Test_Case
- 15:49:25 [Harold]
- Chris: Not so much translation test cases.
- 15:49:59 [Harold]
- Gary: Right. Need entailment test to help with understanding spec.
- 15:50:09 [AxelPolleres]
- By entailment tests we mean just *qround* queries? but no non-ground queries?
- 15:50:14 [Harold]
- Christian: We need to make sure that what we specify works.
- 15:50:22 [Harold]
- ... need exanples.
- 15:50:46 [Harold]
- Gary: Yes, good test cases can show model-theoretic semantics.
- 15:50:57 [Harold]
- ... another way to show the implementation.
- 15:51:39 [Harold]
- Christian: We should have test cases but they cannot say how things must be.
- 15:51:48 [Harold]
- ... You have to say something about semantics.
- 15:52:00 [Harold]
- Chris: No one is for translation test cases?
- 15:52:22 [Harold]
- Christian: Well, we need them but it's tricky: Several ways to translate some rules.
- 15:53:12 [Harold]
- Chris: Just want to clarify if test cases are for exemplifying entailments or translations.
- 15:53:38 [Harold]
- Christian: Mostly translation. Semantics must be linked to translation, too.
- 15:53:42 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- If Stella is interested in help, I could help out.
- 15:54:13 [Harold]
- Chris: Any one else interested become a test cases co-editor? Please let chairs know.
- 15:54:22 [StellaMitchell]
- yes
- 15:54:25 [StellaMitchell]
- yes Leora
- 15:54:28 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Okay, great.
- 15:54:41 [Harold]
- Adrian: Will move the wiki page as discussed.
- 15:55:15 [ChrisW]
- action: stella to work on test cases
- 15:55:15 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-548 - Work on test cases [on Stella Mitchell - due 2008-08-12].
- 15:55:20 [AdrianP]
- ok
- 15:55:25 [ChrisW]
- action: adrian to work on test cases
- 15:55:25 [trackbot]
- Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - adrian
- 15:55:25 [trackbot]
- Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. agiurca, apaschke)
- 15:55:37 [ChrisW]
- action: apaschke to work on test cases
- 15:55:37 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-549 - Work on test cases [on Adrian Paschke - due 2008-08-12].
- 15:55:44 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:55:44 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisW
- 15:55:47 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 15:55:50 [ChrisW]
- ack g
- 15:55:53 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:55:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "FLD" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:55:57 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:55:57 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should now be muted
- 15:56:07 [MichaelKifer]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:56:07 [Zakim]
- MichaelKifer should no longer be muted
- 15:56:35 [AdrianP]
- Michael: FLD needs some improvement in the ways it is defined
- 15:56:45 [AdrianP]
- Michael: right now it is not extensible enough
- 15:57:24 [AdrianP]
- Michael: e.g. connectives can not be easily added
- 15:57:38 [AdrianP]
- Michael: define signatures for connectives
- 15:57:58 [AdrianP]
- Michael: treat connectives like symbols
- 15:58:27 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: should we start trying to get people from other communities to look at FLD
- 15:58:37 [AdrianP]
- Michael: yes, would be good
- 15:59:10 [AxelPolleres]
- I could contact ALP (Association of Logic Programming)
- 15:59:24 [AdrianP]
- Michael: I don't know how lively this publication has been circulated
- 15:59:45 [AdrianP]
- Michael: Sandro's announcement has not been widely circulated
- 16:00:19 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: advertising and circulation is our job. We should send it to the lists
- 16:00:33 [AdrianP]
- Michael: also BLD
- 16:01:05 [Harold]
- Sandro had sent this http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008Aug/0002.html
- 16:01:26 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: send an announcement to the mailing where you are on
- 16:02:07 [AdrianP]
- Christian: we must make sure that any interested group gets informed about last call
- 16:02:36 [AdrianP]
- Christian: If you know any group who might be interested, please inform them
- 16:02:50 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: you might use the text from Sandro's mail
- 16:03:01 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Let's compile a list of experts
- 16:04:07 [AdrianP]
- Christian: We should start a page so that people and mailing lists are not contacted twice
- 16:04:31 [MichaelKifer]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:04:31 [Zakim]
- MichaelKifer should now be muted
- 16:04:44 [ChrisW]
- action: christian to start a wiki page for recording mailing list announcements sent
- 16:04:44 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-550 - Start a wiki page for recording mailing list announcements sent [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:04:56 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:04:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "DTB" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:05:22 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:05:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 8 was just opened, ChrisW
- 16:05:57 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Casting function described in DTB from IRI to String is not a function
- 16:06:14 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: We discussed it some weeks ago; no strong oppinion
- 16:06:34 [AdrianP]
- Axel: Preferd to leave it as it is defined in DTB now
- 16:06:53 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: 3 people prefered to remove it; drafted a resolution
- 16:06:53 [AxelPolleres]
- q+
- 16:06:56 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Remove section 4.3.5 (casting function for rif:iri) from DTB.
- 16:07:39 [AdrianP]
- Axel: I wanted to have it published in the working draft and see if there is any feedback
- 16:07:46 [Harold]
- I agree.
- 16:07:59 [AdrianP]
- Axel: I would not drop it immediately and wait for feedback
- 16:08:05 [AxelPolleres]
- :-)
- 16:08:18 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: alternative would be to drop it and then wait for feedback
- 16:08:27 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: We can later reopen it
- 16:08:56 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: Remove section 4.3.5 (casting function for rif:iri) from DTB.
- 16:09:18 [josb]
- +1
- 16:09:34 [AxelPolleres]
- -\epsilon
- 16:09:39 [Harold]
- 0
- 16:09:42 [AdrianP]
- 0
- 16:09:50 [DaveReynolds]
- 0
- 16:09:53 [ChrisW]
- +1
- 16:10:01 [GaryHallmark]
- 0
- 16:10:08 [MichaelKifer]
- +1
- 16:10:17 [StellaMitchell]
- +1
- 16:10:24 [ChrisW]
- CSMA: +1
- 16:10:38 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: Remove section 4.3.5 (casting function for rif:iri) from DTB.
- 16:10:48 [ChrisW]
- action: axel to remove section 4.3.5 from dtb
- 16:10:48 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-551 - Remove section 4.3.5 from dtb [on Axel Polleres - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:12:11 [AdrianP]
- Axel: Editor notes need to be done
- 16:12:28 [AdrianP]
- Axel: I would summarize then and categorize them in an eMail
- 16:13:02 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Guard predicates need to be discussed as far as I remember
- 16:13:11 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Yes, please summarize them
- 16:13:25 [ChrisW]
- action: axel to summarize open DTB issues in editors notes
- 16:13:25 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-552 - Summarize open DTB issues in editors notes [on Axel Polleres - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:13:31 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:13:31 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisW
- 16:13:34 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:13:36 [ChrisW]
- ack a
- 16:13:38 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:13:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 9. "PRD" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:14:00 [AdrianP]
- Christian: lots of issues, editor notes
- 16:14:10 [AdrianP]
- Christian: we started to discuss one of them
- 16:14:22 [AdrianP]
- Christian: still many things to do till last call
- 16:14:53 [AdrianP]
- Christian: all issues need to be discussed and we need to find a consensus
- 16:15:41 [AdrianP]
- Christian: I will be on vacations by the end of August; other ILog staff members
- 16:15:55 [AdrianP]
- Christian: so no input from the ILog side
- 16:16:05 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:16:05 [Zakim]
- AdrianP should no longer be muted
- 16:16:24 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Gary and Adrian have voluntiered to help as editors
- 16:17:03 [AdrianP]
- Christian: DTB should work for PRD as well
- 16:17:26 [AdrianP]
- Michael: Semantics for conditions is the same for PRD and BLD
- 16:17:40 [AdrianP]
- Michael: rephrase the semantics of PRD according to BLD
- 16:18:15 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: update semantics of condition part of PRD
- 16:18:17 [ChrisW]
- action: adrian to work on making PRD conditions equivalent to BLD conditions
- 16:18:17 [trackbot]
- Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - adrian
- 16:18:17 [trackbot]
- Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. agiurca, apaschke)
- 16:18:32 [ChrisW]
- action: apaschke to work on making PRD conditions equivalent to BLD conditions
- 16:18:32 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-553 - Work on making PRD conditions equivalent to BLD conditions [on Adrian Paschke - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:19:22 [AdrianP]
- Adrian: What about presentation syntax? Open questions use :- or =>
- 16:19:31 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Wait for feedback
- 16:19:46 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: Shall we lively ask for feedback
- 16:20:06 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Get as many as much early feedback as we can
- 16:20:27 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: People should start to disseminate to groups, companies, people
- 16:22:51 [AdrianP]
- Christian: On the actions side we need a strawman about expressive actions
- 16:22:56 [AdrianP]
- Christian: Gary?
- 16:23:03 [AdrianP]
- Gary: Skolem functions
- 16:23:17 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: action about object creation action
- 16:23:18 [ChrisW]
- action: gary to work on object creation action for PRD
- 16:23:18 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-554 - Work on object creation action for PRD [on Gary Hallmark - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:25:20 [AdrianP]
- Gary: interoperate and exchange frame axioms
- 16:26:10 [AdrianP]
- ChrisW: I would be concerened, since we would define RIF in RIF
- 16:26:43 [ChrisW]
- action: gary to draft email on "frame axioms" for capturing semantics of PRD frames
- 16:26:43 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-555 - Draft email on \"frame axioms\" for capturing semantics of PRD frames [on Gary Hallmark - due 2008-08-12].
- 16:27:36 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:27:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 10. "AOB" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:27:54 [Zakim]
- -MichaelKifer
- 16:27:58 [Zakim]
- -josb
- 16:27:59 [ChrisW]
- zakim, list attendees
- 16:27:59 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been +1.212.781.aaaa, LeoraMorgenstern, ChrisW, +39.047.101.aabb, josb, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, csma, +49.351.463.4.aacc, AdrianP,
- 16:28:01 [Zakim]
- ... DaveReynolds, Harold, Gary_Hallmark, +1.631.833.aadd, MichaelKifer
- 16:28:03 [Zakim]
- -StellaMitchell
- 16:28:03 [Zakim]
- -Gary_Hallmark
- 16:28:07 [Zakim]
- -DaveReynolds
- 16:28:07 [AdrianP]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:28:08 [Zakim]
- -LeoraMorgenstern
- 16:28:08 [Zakim]
- AdrianP was not muted, AdrianP
- 16:28:10 [Zakim]
- -Harold
- 16:28:13 [Zakim]
- -AxelPolleres
- 16:28:32 [ChrisW]
- Regrets: Sandro Hawke MohamedZergaoui
- 16:28:41 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:28:41 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 16:28:56 [AdrianP]
- \ChrisW: I would be concerened, since we would define RIF in RIF\Christian: I would be concerened, since we would define RIF in RIF\
- 16:29:07 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:29:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ChrisW, csma, AdrianP
- 16:30:37 [Zakim]
- -ChrisW
- 16:31:07 [Zakim]
- -csma
- 16:31:09 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended
- 16:31:10 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.212.781.aaaa, LeoraMorgenstern, ChrisW, +39.047.101.aabb, josb, StellaMitchell, AxelPolleres, csma, +49.351.463.4.aacc, AdrianP, DaveReynolds, Harold,
- 16:31:12 [Zakim]
- ... Gary_Hallmark, +1.631.833.aadd, MichaelKifer