14:46:02 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:46:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/29-rif-irc 14:46:17 Zakim, this will be rif 14:46:17 ok, csma; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 14 minutes 14:46:31 Meeting: RIF telecon 29 July 2008 14:46:52 Chair: Christian de Sainte Marie 14:47:28 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jul/0193.html 14:48:16 csma has changed the topic to: 29 July 2008 RIF telecon agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jul/0193.html 15:00:41 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 15:01:43 josb has joined #rif 15:02:40 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 15:02:42 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:02:50 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:02:58 +josb 15:03:17 +??P39 15:03:21 -??P39 15:03:23 +??P39 15:03:25 IgorMozetic has joined #rif 15:03:39 Hassan has joined #rif 15:03:43 +Dave_Reynolds (was ??P39) 15:03:50 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:03:53 Igor, would you scribe, please? 15:04:05 +Stella_Mitchell 15:04:18 csma, sorry I have to phone connection, just IRC 15:04:21 +Hassan_Ait-Kaci 15:04:25 +??P43 15:04:32 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:04:38 s/to phone/no phone/ 15:04:53 +csma; got it 15:05:05 +??P53 15:05:38 zakim, mute me 15:05:40 csma should now be muted 15:05:47 zakim, unmute me 15:05:52 csma should no longer be muted 15:06:00 zakim, who is on the ^phone? 15:06:04 I don't understand your question, csma. 15:06:09 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:06:12 On the phone I see josb, Dave_Reynolds, Stella_Mitchell, Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), csma, AxelPolleres (muted) 15:06:21 who is 6? 15:06:49 +[IBM] 15:06:55 -Dave_Reynolds 15:07:22 +Gary_Hallmark 15:07:24 -csma 15:07:39 +??P39 15:07:58 +??P43 15:08:20 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:08:20 +csma; got it 15:09:54 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:09:56 On the phone I see josb, Stella_Mitchell (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IBM], Gary_Hallmark, DaveReynolds (muted), csma 15:09:59 -Gary_Hallmark 15:10:33 very recently :-) 15:10:55 I can scribe 15:11:17 scribenick: StellaMitChell 15:11:32 scribenick: StellaMitchell 15:11:38 Scribe: Stella Mitchell 15:11:42 zakim, Stella_Mitchell is StellaMitchell 15:11:42 +StellaMitchell; got it 15:11:55 topic: Admin 15:11:55 +MichaelKifer 15:12:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jul/att-0175/2008-07-22-rif-minutes.html 15:12:06 zakim, mute me 15:12:06 MichaelKifer should now be muted 15:12:19 csma: any objections to accepting minutes from last week? 15:12:20 PROPOSED: accept minutes of telecon July 22 15:12:40 RESOLVED: eccept minutes of telecon July 22 15:12:48 s/eccept/accept 15:12:57 scribenick: StellaMitchell 15:13:07 csma: any agenda ammendments? 15:13:09 ...none 15:13:10 +[NRCC] 15:13:16 q+ 15:13:19 topic: Liaisons 15:13:22 ack josb 15:13:55 zakim, [NRCC] is me. 15:13:56 +Harold; got it 15:14:06 no, no news 15:14:21 jos: Asking details about F2F11...where it will be held? 15:14:42 csma: It will be either in NYC or at Watson in Hawthorne 15:15:03 csma: the date is Sept 26-27 15:15:13 jos: It would be good to know which location it will be at 15:15:31 csma: Chris will be back next week, we will discuss it 15:16:24 csma: next week will still be within the 8 week advance rule 15:17:13 csma: any news from liaisons? ... none 15:17:30 Topic: Action review 15:17:51 csma: sandro not here 15:18:10 csma: action 5?? about review of BLD 15:18:31 leora: hard drive crashed, has been without a computer for awhile, not able to review 15:18:34 q+ 15:18:38 ack josb 15:18:43 s/5??/530/ 15:19:07 jos: sept 26th is 8 weeks from this Friday 15:19:28 csma: we have the date and airport set, do we still have a problem 15:20:06 jos: only if w3c rules make it one 15:20:20 csma: should be ok, will try to get this resolved as soon as possible 15:20:36 +Gary_Hallmark 15:21:04 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 15:21:11 action-516, chris not here 15:21:21 action-492 complete 15:21:36 (Sorry, I'm in an OWL F2F meeting now.) 15:22:23 Topic: Publication plan 15:22:57 csma: have reviews on BLD and SWC 15:23:03 zakim, unmute me 15:23:03 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 15:23:05 ...mk, harold, jos, do you want to comment? 15:23:16 q+ 15:23:17 mk: took care of stella's comments 15:23:24 ack josb 15:24:08 jos: the comments were after july 23rd freeze, and the resolutions were about 23rd version, so do we want to take these last changes into account in the publications? 15:24:21 zakim, who is talking 15:24:21 I don't understand 'who is talking', GaryHallmark 15:24:27 zakim, who is talking? 15:24:38 GaryHallmark, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: josb (24%) 15:24:40 csma: yes, sandro made new drafts yesterday. what kind of changes are they? 15:24:49 Micheal fixed some broken links in DTB still and I fixed the few remaining ones only yesterday ... but that is purely editorial of course. 15:25:00 mk: they are stylistic. 23rd versions had formatting problems, they are not publishable 15:26:50 csma: jos, bld ok with you? 15:27:05 jos: I didn't look closely at changes since 23rd, Michael? 15:27:24 mk: added new signatures in section 6.1 (for external), but I would still consider it editorial 15:27:30 jos: yes, I'm ok with this 15:27:51 mk: still some things to fix, links etc 15:28:21 jos: these are not substantial changes that would affect publication. still a list numbering problem in section 6.1 15:29:03 zakim, who is talking? 15:29:05 mk: I think I fixed the 6.1 numbering problem yesterday, but I don't know how to make a new frozen version to check it 15:29:14 GaryHallmark, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: josb (32%), csma (47%), MichaelKifer (9%) 15:29:43 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as BLD LC, after correction of the HTML problem in section 6.1 15:30:00 +1 15:30:44 :-) 15:31:16 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:31:16 On the phone I see josb, StellaMitchell (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IBM], DaveReynolds (muted), csma, MichaelKifer, Harold, Gary_Hallmark 15:31:23 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as BLD LC, after correction of the HTML problem in section 6.1 15:31:35 +1, DERI 15:31:37 +1 (FUB) 15:32:14 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as BLD LC, after correction of the HTML problems 15:32:28 +1 (FUB) 15:32:30 +1 (NRC) 15:32:32 +1 15:32:40 +1, DERI 15:32:42 +1 (JSI) 15:32:44 +1 (HP) 15:32:48 +1 Oracle 15:32:50 +1 15:33:21 +1 (ILOG) 15:33:23 +1 by Leora 15:34:08 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as BLD LC, after correction of the HTML problem in section 6.1 15:34:31 you resolved not the lastest versin 15:34:43 s/versin/version/ 15:34:49 zakim, mute me 15:34:49 MichaelKifer should now be muted 15:34:54 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as BLD LC, after correction of the HTML problems. 15:35:18 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as SWC LC. 15:35:42 +1 (NRC) 15:35:45 +1 (FUB) 15:35:49 +1, DERI 15:35:51 +1 Oracle 15:35:53 +1 (JSI) 15:35:56 +1 15:36:02 +1 (ILOG) 15:36:09 +1 (HP) 15:36:45 +1, IBM (Leora by phone) 15:36:56 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as SWC LC. 15:37:25 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as UCR 3rd public WD 15:37:37 q+ 15:37:37 +1 (NRC) 15:37:43 ack josb 15:37:53 jos: when are we going to publish LC of UCR? 15:38:05 csma: I think we decided to keep it a living document 15:38:18 jos: so it will forever be a working draft? 15:38:27 (The final state of UCR could be Working Group Note. It doesn't need to go to Rec.) 15:38:38 csma: not necessarily forever, but for now, at least 15:39:18 csma: at the end of the working group, we will publish it as a working group note 15:39:25 +1 (FUB) 15:39:28 +1 (ILOG) 15:39:30 +1 (DERI) 15:39:34 +1 (JSI) 15:39:34 +1 15:39:36 +1 Oracle 15:39:47 +1 (HP) 15:39:51 +1, IBM (Leora by phone) 15:40:11 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as UCR 3rd public WD 15:40:34 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapchot as FLD 2nd public WD 15:40:39 zakim, unmute me 15:40:39 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 15:40:55 mk: I found lots of html errors 15:40:56 s/snapchot/snapshot/ 15:41:12 mk: can we resolve it subject to correcting html errors? 15:41:36 csma: I would like us to have a deadline for fixing these errors. Sandro prefers to publish all documents in one batch. 15:42:18 mk: I will fix the html today, and will send Sandro a message. It will take a few iterations. Is there a way I can produce a frozen draft myself? 15:42:21 +q 15:42:42 zakim, unmute me 15:42:42 AxelPolleres should no longer be muted 15:42:48 ack axel 15:43:19 axel: is it true that if wiki version validates, the frozen version also validates? 15:43:29 mk: you are supposed to validate the version that Sandro produces 15:43:49 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/FLD,validate 15:43:59 you should fix it in the wiki version! 15:45:27 mk: I validated the frozen version 15:45:48 jos, csma: you have to validate and checklinks the wiki version 15:45:51 q? 15:46:03 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapchot as FLD 2nd public WD, after correction of HTML errors 15:46:33 mk: bld wiki version also has problems when I run validate 15:46:39 ...several pages of them 15:47:15 mk: the tool doesn't seem to refer to the right line numbers 15:47:16 click "show source" 15:47:19 rigtht. 15:47:22 jos: use the "show source" option 15:47:50 mk: I will work on validation of wiki versions of bld and fld today 15:48:00 csma: send me a message when you're done 15:48:05 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapchot as FLD 2nd public WD, after correction of HTML errors 15:48:16 +1 (DERI) 15:48:23 +1 (JSI) 15:48:27 +1 (FUB) 15:48:31 +1 (NRC) 15:48:33 +1 (ILOG) 15:48:47 +1 15:48:47 +1 (HP) 15:48:49 +1 (IBM) (Leora by phone) 15:48:57 +1 Oracle 15:49:11 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapchot as FLD 2nd public WD, after correction of HTML errors 15:49:25 s/snapchot/snapshot/ 15:49:28 s/chot/shot/ 15:49:54 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as DTB FPWD 15:50:03 small issue: http://www.w3.org/2007/rif#iri is not dereferenceable, do we want it to redirect to DTB? (not critical path) 15:50:06 q+ 15:50:24 ack axel 15:51:02 q+ 15:51:51 ack josb 15:52:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jul/0203.html 15:52:26 jos: I sent email about this, that there should not be links to non-human-readable content 15:53:03 zakim, mute me 15:53:05 MichaelKifer should now be muted 15:53:32 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as DTB FPWD 15:54:10 axel: I made some link fixes in the wiki version, so need a few frozen draft of this 15:54:43 OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Semantic of OWL DL 15:54:45 OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Semantic of OWL Full 15:54:56 oops wrong channel! 15:55:01 sandro, wrong chat? 15:55:03 :-) 15:55:04 csma: publication is made from wiki, not snapshots 15:55:15 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as DTB FPWD, after the links are fixed 15:55:20 jos: resolution is worded about snapshot 15:55:48 csma: snapshot just refers to which version we are talking about 15:56:02 +1 Oracle 15:56:04 +1 (DERI) 15:56:05 +1 (FUB) 15:56:05 +1 (JSI) 15:56:06 +1 (ILOG) 15:56:12 +1 (HP) 15:56:22 +1 (NRC) 15:56:22 +1 (IBM) (leora by phone) 15:56:27 +1 15:56:40 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as DTB FPWD, after the links are fixed 15:56:58 PROPOSED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as PRD FPWD. 15:57:13 +1 Oracle 15:57:22 +1 (ILOG) 15:57:23 +1 (FUB) 15:57:31 +1 15:57:33 +1 (HP) 15:57:33 +1 (JSI) 15:57:36 +1 (NRC) 15:57:54 +1 (IBM) (Leora by phone) 15:58:08 +1 (DERI) 15:58:27 RESOLVED: Publish the July 28 snapshot as PRD FPWD. 15:58:50 Outstanding ed notes can be fixed with the extended wd2 eds list of PRD. 15:59:00 yes, links are already fixed 15:59:30 -josb 16:00:00 Topic: DTB for PRD 16:00:17 csma: I don't think that much needs to be changed in either 16:00:29 ... Axel, others, do you have an idea of the changes required? 16:00:29 Zakim, unmute me 16:00:29 AxelPolleres was not muted, AxelPolleres 16:00:57 axel: whether you would need additional ?? 16:01:27 csma: I was asking a different question: does DTB depend on BLD and FLD having a model theoretic semantics? 16:01:57 axel: we define semantics of built-ins in model theoretic way 16:02:47 csma: so, if we want to adapt DTB for dialects that don't have model theoretic semantics, we would have to give an equivalent definition 16:03:30 axel: it would basically be reversing what we did. xpath/xqeury were defined in terms of operational semantics, we adapted for BLD 16:03:40 q+ 16:03:41 Zakim, list attendees 16:03:42 As of this point the attendees have been josb, Dave_Reynolds, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, csma, AxelPolleres, [IBM], Gary_Hallmark, DaveReynolds, StellaMitchell, MichaelKifer, Harold 16:03:48 zakim, draft minutes 16:03:50 I don't understand 'draft minutes', sandro 16:03:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:03:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/29-rif-minutes.html sandro 16:03:57 zakim, unmute me 16:03:57 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 16:04:07 ack michael 16:04:13 RRSAgent, make record public 16:04:20 gary: matching theory (as bridge) needs to be related to BLD 16:04:55 ...bld shows how fixed interpreations are viewed in model theory 16:05:18 csma: but bridge is in DTB it would serve for all dialects that have operational semantics 16:05:39 mk: I'm not sure that every dialect that doesn't have MT semantics will need the same bridge 16:06:15 q- 16:06:19 gary: we need see if DTB can be generalized to work for both PRD and BLD 16:07:10 csma: yes, anything specific to PRD should be in PRD, but common things should be described in DTB in a way that works for both (and for future dialects) 16:07:55 mk: I thik the current description is fairly applicable to PRD 16:08:01 if you implement the built-ins (in an operational way... namely e.g. calling an xqath/xquery compliant library, you do get results that are compliant with the semantics). I have to admit that I still owe a proper review of PRD. 16:08:21 s/thik/think/ 16:08:44 +1 to mk 16:08:48 mk: don't have to make big changes, just change the way you talk about it 16:08:52 csma: I see your point 16:10:04 csma: can you post this to the list, about grounding, etc? 16:10:20 mk: I was thinking of extending FLD so it would cover PRD 16:10:31 gary: it just provides a model for the expressions, not the rules 16:12:01 I agree with Gary - there seems to be no issue w/ regards to PRD expressions comply with BLD's semantics 16:12:20 action: Michael to provide a draft of how PRD expressions comply with FLD semantics 16:12:20 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Michael 16:12:20 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. mkifer, msintek, merdmann) 16:12:45 action: mkifer to provide a draft of how PRD expressions comply with FLD semantics 16:12:45 Created ACTION-546 - Provide a draft of how PRD expressions comply with FLD semantics [on Michael Kifer - due 2008-08-05]. 16:13:02 zakim, mute me 16:13:02 MichaelKifer should now be muted 16:13:03 Topic: AOB 16:13:12 +1 16:13:17 +1 16:13:17 +1 16:13:18 csma: propose to adjourn 16:13:24 +1 16:13:30 -Gary_Hallmark 16:13:31 -Hassan_Ait-Kaci 16:13:35 -DaveReynolds 16:13:38 -Harold 16:13:39 -MichaelKifer 16:13:39 -[IBM] 16:13:41 -AxelPolleres 16:13:45 rrsagent, make log public 16:14:24 Regrets: Sandro Hawke ChrisWelty MohamedZergaoui AdrianPaschke 16:14:31 zakim, list attendees 16:14:31 As of this point the attendees have been josb, Dave_Reynolds, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, csma, AxelPolleres, [IBM], Gary_Hallmark, DaveReynolds, StellaMitchell, MichaelKifer, Harold 16:14:40 rrsagent, make minutes 16:14:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/29-rif-minutes.html csma 16:15:13 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:15:13 On the phone I see StellaMitchell (muted), csma 16:15:17 zakim, unmute mje 16:15:17 sorry, StellaMitchell, I do not know which phone connection belongs to mje 16:15:24 zakim, unmute me 16:15:24 StellaMitchell should no longer be muted 16:15:32 csma, it looks like I should go ahead and start to turn the publishing crank. 16:21:16 -StellaMitchell 16:21:18 -csma 16:21:18 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:21:19 Attendees were josb, Dave_Reynolds, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, csma, AxelPolleres, [IBM], Gary_Hallmark, DaveReynolds, StellaMitchell, MichaelKifer, Harold 16:21:34 sandro, can we talk (now or later)? 16:21:48 There are a few things I'd like to discuss with you 16:21:56 and that would be easier by phone 16:30:10 Re the publishing crank: MK has still to do some corrections for the HTML in BLD and FLD (he was validating on your snapshots :-) 16:31:18 He will send me an email as soon as BLD and FLD validate (or any remaining HTML problems are resolved) 17:23:39 Sandro? 17:23:53 Do I need to do something, re the publications? 17:24:08 And/or can I help in any way? 18:04:39 Um, help me think about / write some SOTD text? That's the only non-mechanical thing, I think. 18:04:45 csma, 18:05:35 What meta-information do people want/need to know, that's not in the docs itself.....? 18:07:30 Including explaining how DTB came out of BLD. 18:07:42 We never did write that Overview web page. :-( 18:17:56 Zakim has left #rif