17:34:02 RRSAgent has joined #ua 17:34:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-irc 17:34:21 Zakim has joined #ua 17:36:15 chair: Judy Brewer & Jim Allan 17:36:34 scribe Simon Harper 17:36:57 scribe: Simon Harper 17:38:01 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JulSep/0046.html 17:38:33 ScribeNick: sharper 17:39:01 meeting: User Agent Teleconference for 24 July 2008 17:39:17 jeanne has joined #ua 17:42:23 AllanJ has joined #ua 17:46:15 agenda+ Regrets, agenda requests, comments? 17:46:29 agenda+ Participant schedule for remainder of July, August 17:46:41 agenda+ Schedule for Publication of next draft (and related Charter issues) 17:46:58 agenda+ Keyboarding refocus 17:47:35 zakim, save agenda 17:47:41 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-agenda.rdf 17:48:13 agenda? 17:55:18 present: James Allan, Simon Harper, Jeanne Spellman 17:58:00 zakim, code? 17:58:00 sorry, jeanne, I don't know what conference this is 17:58:16 zakim, this is really WAI-UA 17:58:16 sorry, jeanne, I do not see a conference named 'really WAI-UA' in progress or scheduled at this time 17:58:28 zakim, this is WAI_UA 17:58:28 ok, jeanne; that matches WAI_UAWG()2:00PM 17:58:35 +??P4 17:58:38 zakim, code? 17:58:38 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jeanne 17:59:02 KFord has joined #ua 17:59:06 +Jeanne 17:59:46 present+ Kelly Ford 17:59:49 zakim, ??P4 is really Kelly 17:59:49 +Kelly; got it 18:00:05 zakim, who is here? 18:00:05 On the phone I see [Microsoft], Kelly, Jeanne 18:00:05 Judy has joined #ua 18:00:06 On IRC I see KFord, AllanJ, jeanne, Zakim, RRSAgent, sharper 18:00:09 zakim, code? 18:00:09 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Judy 18:00:28 zakim, kelly is really sharper 18:00:28 +sharper; got it 18:00:28 present+ Judy Brewer 18:00:29 +Judy 18:00:43 +Jim_Allan 18:00:45 zakim, [Microsoft] is kelly 18:00:45 +kelly; got it 18:01:34 zakim, who is here? 18:01:34 On the phone I see kelly, sharper, Jeanne, Judy, Jim_Allan 18:01:36 On IRC I see Judy, KFord, AllanJ, jeanne, Zakim, RRSAgent, sharper 18:01:51 +Cantor 18:02:05 zakim, sharper is really Simon 18:02:05 +Simon; got it 18:03:50 present+ Alan Cantor 18:05:22 regrets: Mark Hakkinen, Gregory Rosmaita 18:05:32 agenda? 18:06:15 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/UAWG20080723/results 18:09:09 regrets+ Jan Richards 18:09:36 close agendum 1 18:10:29 JB: Meetings to continue through July and August 2008 18:10:55 Alan has joined #ua 18:11:05 Hello... 18:11:09 JB: Results available at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/UAWG20080723/results 18:11:20 close agendum 2 18:11:44 JB: How close to Heartbeat 1 18:12:00 JB: Towards end of August 2008 18:12:46 action: jb check on the pending question about timing of next publication vs timing of charter review for rechartering obligation 18:13:41 JA: W3C Process - WG must put a new working draft out every 3 months to make sure the group is still working - means not working in the dark 18:13:58 JA: first Draft at CSUN in March 2008 18:14:32 JB: Plan for the end of August for the next draft. 18:16:01 close agendum 3 18:16:55 RESOLVED: Group aims for the end of August to publish next draft. 18:17:44 http://www.tsbvi.edu/technology/uawg/thrashing.htm 18:18:05 JA: Did everyone see http://www.tsbvi.edu/technology/uawg/thrashing.htm 18:20:03 JS: Listed principles and success criteria, went through and refined them and assigned a level now a much more focused list. Final results then split into levels. Then we have a list of everything removed (and more). 18:20:53 JA: Some of the removed ones (say 3rd) - have target destinations (just a feeling) - no specific place to drop it in. 18:21:06 JS: Concerned these may be lost. 18:21:48 ACTION: JA: Place these possible lost items into the 'correct' locations. 18:25:04 http://www.w3.org/tr/uaag20 18:26:51 JB: Any of the items flagged with 'SHOULD' need to be in a new list / location. 18:27:35 Moving through Guideline 4.1 Ensure full keyboard access 18:27:58 JA: Sequential keyboard commands (tab, arrow, etc.) can be used to navigate between every UI operable control and interactive element in the rendered content. Level A 18:27:58 NOTE: These follow conventions, see 1.1 18:28:56 JA: Like hitting alt and then arrow keys to move through 18:29:44 JB: Maybe good as a test of these to read it out and see if there are any questions - may miss understanding, if concentrating on interpretation. 18:30:34 AC: Question - did we agree keyboard commands was a code-word / short hand for interaction by keyboard. 18:30:45 JS: I think so - do you have concerns. 18:31:08 AC: possible - lets wait - may need a small change later. 18:31:28 AC: Doesn't see tab etc as a command as opposed to a keypress 18:31:32 JS: Agree 18:31:36 JB: Agree 18:32:31 KF: OK to replace terminology 18:32:42 ALL: Good change. 18:33:41 JB UI better than chrome but what is 'UI operable control and interactive element' 18:34:23 JA: Phrase-ology to indicate they must be operable - no tabbing through greyed out items on a menu. 18:35:40 AC: Windows menus now - can navigate to a greyed out item - is a good thing as the menu isn't growing and shortening in length. Maintains consistent behaviour - suggest 'every control' - not operable control 18:35:48 JB: Very different things 18:36:24 JA: Need to keep software and content separate. 18:36:44 JA: Lets agree on AC point and remove operable - objects? 18:37:48 KF: Default behaviour for inactive controls can't tab to them always - menus you can - dialogues you can't. 18:39:26 JB: Is one way to look at this - this is a level A requirement - identify it as every operable control - at this level, does that help? 18:41:08 KF: Akin to the philosophy used on Tuesday. Add a second one for AA to remove the operable - also want to follow OS conventions - Advocate leaving it as is, if we want to tab to all make this a level 2 option? 18:42:12 AC: struggling with this... 18:43:45 SH: say: unless overridden by operating system convetion 18:44:30 KF: Gives an out, by adding confusion. 18:45:24 JA: OK for changes including AC changes wording just 'Key presses' 18:46:37 Key presses (tab, arrow, etc.) can be used to navigate between every UI operable control, and interactive element in the rendered content. 18:47:12 Key presses (tab, arrow, etc.) can be used to navigate between every UI operable control, and between every interactive element in the rendered content. 18:48:01 JB: Objections... None. 18:48:02 Caret browse and select can be used to navigate between characters in rendered text content (incremental - character, word, line, element, all). 18:50:39 AC: What is it? Allows keyboard navigation to all content that you a browsing. 18:51:08 A Possible Definition: 18:51:29 The term caret is used in graphical user interface terminology where it means a text insertion point indicator, frequently represented by a blinking vertical bar. In this context, it may be used interchangeably with the word cursor, although the latter term is often reserved for a mouse pointer. 18:52:25 JS: Any text in the rendered context... 18:52:55 AC refinement - break into 2: navigation and select? 18:53:55 Any text in the rendered content can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard. 18:56:14 AC: Any text or picture: 18:56:39 JS: Any element? Object? 18:56:57 JA: Some elements could be a problem - re flash 18:57:53 Text in the rendered content can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard. 18:58:12 KF: That is not beyond user agents control. 19:00:31 JB: does this gives us the meaning we think it does 19:01:39 AC: need some generic phrase to capture this 19:02:26 SH: don't we really mean CUT/PASTE 19:04:16 SH: replace TEXT with RENDERED CONTENT 19:04:56 JS: text is too important., Rendered content does't mean character, etc. 19:05:19 SH: put the parenthetical back in (incremental ...) 19:05:32 Rendered content (character, word, line, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard. 19:06:48 Rendered content (e.g.character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard. 19:08:11 KF: Too complicated, paragraph selection is above and beyond - what you want is to select as implemented in the OS - see 1.1 19:08:26 JA: Do we really need to say this on everyone? 19:08:36 Rendered content (e.g.character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard. See 1.1 19:09:56 JB: should it be see guideline 1.1 or a full phrase re OS conventions? 19:10:01 JS: last 19:10:23 KF: none - let's not repeat ourselves. 19:11:01 KF: should say at the beginning (in one spot) which? 19:11:20 Rendered content (e.g.character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard consistent with operating system conventions. 19:11:46 Rendered content (e.g.character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard (consistent with operating system conventions). 19:12:48 JB: Tend to want to move on right now - 19:13:09 Rendered content (e.g. by character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard (consistent with operating system conventions). 19:13:52 ACTION: KFord Clarify - Rendered content (e.g. by character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard (consistent with operating system conventions). 19:14:16 No keyboard trap. The user agent provides at least one hot key to restore keyboard focus to a known location. 19:15:56 AC: known location - ambiguous - if long page, if only way to restore focus is (alt+D) could be a problem. 19:17:07 JB: Other provisions are sentences to introduce the point - should be consistent - frame the checkpoint - shorthand to the group - not suitable for general. 19:17:32 JA: remove No keyboard trap is OK? 19:17:45 JB: Still not right? 19:18:11 JA: Any developers will understand keyboard trap? 19:18:16 KF: No 19:18:37 KF: Do we need to get this down to letter perfect level? 19:18:40 JB: no 19:19:02 JB: checking inadvertant interpretations - not letter perfect 19:19:19 JA: Issue Kelly? 19:19:24 KF: No 19:19:50 JB: looks sloppy compared to others 19:19:56 AC: agree 19:20:26 JA: Anyone does not know? 19:21:01 The user agent provides at least one keyboard command to restore keyboard focus to a default location. 19:22:12 JA: Escape is critical 19:22:52 The user agent provides at least one prominent keyboard command (e.g. escape key) to move keyboard focus to a default location. 19:23:05 JB: not obscure hot key - what about escape? 19:24:26 ACTION: Allanj Clarify- The user agent provides at least one prominent keyboard command (e.g. escape key) to move keyboard focus to a default location. 19:24:57 KF: don't want to see escape key - not appropriate 19:25:06 Direct keyboard commands can be used to activate the following important functions 19:25:41 JA: the List is already mentioned elsewhere. 19:26:26 JA: this just says you have to have a keyboard control for the list (defined elsewhere) 19:26:39 JB: Maybe forgo the list, thoughts? 19:27:19 AC: should we use keyboard presses as opposed to commands 19:27:37 JA: term needed for browser control 19:27:59 JS: would like to get away from sequential and direct 19:28:28 AC: key-presses would get you the entire list - except maybe volume control? 19:28:43 Key press can be used to activate the following important functions (list) Level A 19:28:52 AC: lets go to 5 and return to 4 at the end of the telecon 19:28:59 User has the option to configure the keyboard processing order (UI, extensions, recognized content (Access key, AT), unrecognized content) 19:29:53 JB: all in () could be interpreted differently by different people - can we clarify? 19:30:05 JB: is it intended to be a flat list? 19:30:09 JA: yes 19:30:52 JA: should start on 4 next week 19:31:18 JA: thrash wording next week as opposed to section review? 19:31:50 JA: Regarding (Remove - should be in...) items 19:32:31 JB: address A.4 A.5 and AA.1 next week 19:33:43 -kelly 19:34:03 -Cantor 19:34:17 -Simon 19:34:47 rrsagent, create minutes 19:34:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-minutes.html sharper 19:35:06 -Judy 19:35:08 -Jeanne 19:35:10 -Jim_Allan 19:35:11 WAI_UAWG()2:00PM has ended 19:35:12 Attendees were Jeanne, Judy, Jim_Allan, kelly, Cantor, Simon 19:35:33 zakim, please part 19:35:33 Zakim has left #ua 19:36:01 RRSagent, draft minutes 19:36:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-minutes.html sharper 19:36:12 #cg 19:38:00 rrsagent, set logs public 19:43:00 rrsagent, please part 19:43:00 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-actions.rdf : 19:43:00 ACTION: jb check on the pending question about timing of next publication vs timing of charter review for rechartering obligation [1] 19:43:00 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-irc#T18-12-46 19:43:00 ACTION: JA: Place these possible lost items into the 'correct' locations. [2] 19:43:00 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-irc#T18-21-48 19:43:00 ACTION: KFord Clarify - Rendered content (e.g. by character, word, line, paragraph, image, element, all) can be navigated and/or selected using the keyboard (consistent with operating system conventions). [3] 19:43:00 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-irc#T19-13-52 19:43:00 ACTION: Allanj Clarify- The user agent provides at least one prominent keyboard command (e.g. escape key) to move keyboard focus to a default location. [4] 19:43:00 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-ua-irc#T19-24-26