IRC log of tagmem on 2008-07-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:26:28 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tagmem
- 16:26:28 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-tagmem-irc
- 16:26:38 [ht]
- Meeting: TAG telcon
- 16:26:42 [ht]
- Chair: Stuart Williams
- 16:27:08 [ht]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/24-agenda.html
- 16:27:14 [ht]
- Scribe: Henry S. Thompson
- 16:27:19 [ht]
- Scribenick: Henry S. Thompson
- 16:51:24 [Stuart]
- Stuart has joined #tagmem
- 16:52:22 [Stuart]
- Stuart has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/24-agenda
- 16:58:53 [ht]
- All set
- 16:58:59 [Stuart]
- thx
- 16:59:00 [ht]
- Rssagent is ready and waiting
- 16:59:07 [Zakim]
- TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started
- 16:59:14 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 16:59:24 [Stuart]
- zakim, ?? is me.
- 16:59:24 [Zakim]
- +Stuart; got it
- 16:59:51 [Ashok]
- Ashok has joined #tagmem
- 17:00:12 [Zakim]
- -Stuart
- 17:00:12 [Zakim]
- +Stuart
- 17:00:13 [Zakim]
- +DanC
- 17:02:12 [ht]
- zakim, please call ht-781
- 17:02:12 [Zakim]
- ok, ht; the call is being made
- 17:02:14 [Zakim]
- +Ashok_Malhotra
- 17:02:14 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 17:06:01 [ht]
- Topic: Administrivia
- 17:06:15 [ht]
- Regrets: Noah, TimBL, DaveO, Norm
- 17:06:24 [ht]
- Approve agenda as circulated
- 17:06:53 [ht]
- Resolved: Approve and publish minutes of joint call with OASIS XRI TC: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/03-tag-xri-minutes
- 17:06:54 [Zakim]
- +jar
- 17:07:36 [ht]
- Resolved: Minutes from 10 July telcon approved: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/10-minutes
- 17:07:57 [ht]
- SW: Next telcon: 28 August
- 17:08:35 [DanC]
- q+
- 17:08:43 [ht]
- Future regrets: TimBL 28 August
- 17:08:47 [ht]
- ack DanC
- 17:08:47 [Stuart]
- ack danc
- 17:10:03 [ht]
- DanC: News from IETF
- 17:10:06 [DanC]
- IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg52473.html
- 17:10:37 [ht]
- Topic: News
- 17:10:45 [DanC]
- "In order to make the transition as smooth as possible, IANA will continue to
- 17:10:45 [DanC]
- maintain the legacy plain text formats until 30 November 2008. After this
- 17:10:45 [DanC]
- date, plain text versions will only be provided that are derived from the
- 17:10:45 [DanC]
- XML formats. However, implementors who intend to parse the contents of an
- 17:10:45 [DanC]
- IANA protocol registry should migrate to using the XML versions, rather than
- 17:10:46 [DanC]
- the plain text version.
- 17:10:47 [ht]
- SW: Instead of text files?
- 17:10:48 [DanC]
- "
- 17:10:55 [ht]
- DC: In addition to
- 17:11:32 [ht]
- DC: XHTML could have killed two bullets with one stone there. . .
- 17:11:56 [DanC]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 17:11:56 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Stuart, DanC, Ashok_Malhotra, Ht, jar
- 17:12:19 [ht]
- Topic: Issue contentTypeOverride-24 (ISSUE-24)
- 17:12:27 [ht]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/24
- 17:12:54 [ht]
- SW: Suggestion to re-open this, not yet decided
- 17:13:13 [ht]
- DC: Straw poll: re-open, possibly patch the finding?
- 17:13:17 [ht]
- SW: yes
- 17:13:24 [ht]
- AM: pass
- 17:13:29 [ht]
- HT: yes
- 17:13:38 [ht]
- ... there's new information
- 17:13:48 [ht]
- JR: yes, in light of HTML5
- 17:14:03 [ht]
- DC: yes
- 17:14:43 [ht]
- DC: Anyone likely to speak against. . .TimBL might, so not willing to put the question
- 17:14:59 [ht]
- SW: Will bring this back to the agenda on TimBL's return
- 17:15:11 [ht]
- Topic: Issue tagSoupIntegration-54 (ISSUE-54)
- 17:15:21 [ht]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/54
- 17:15:46 [ht]
- SW: See threads linked from the agenda: SVG in HTML, data-*
- 17:16:10 [Stuart]
- ack danc
- 17:16:14 [ht]
- ... HTML5 and URLs
- 17:17:03 [ht]
- DC: Wrt HTML5, editor has said he's going to using 'URL' in a fairly simple way
- 17:17:29 [Stuart]
- q?
- 17:18:04 [ht]
- ... which didn't sound so bad, until another spec. editor, Anne van Kesteren, decided to reference that definition from another spec., ???, but that turned out to be wrong
- 17:18:09 [ht]
- q+ to mention XSI
- 17:19:03 [DanC]
- s/???/access control/
- 17:19:21 [Stuart]
- zakim, open queue.
- 17:19:21 [Zakim]
- ok, Stuart, the speaker queue is open
- 17:19:49 [ht]
- SW: How about IRI?
- 17:20:01 [Stuart]
- q+ ht to mention XSI
- 17:20:33 [ht]
- DC: Not that either, because you sometimes use the document encoding, not UTF-8, and indeed that happens with some big Chinese search site
- 17:20:52 [ht]
- SW: Is there a spec. reference for using the document encoding?
- 17:21:16 [ht]
- DC: I don't think it's ever been specced, considered ugly to do that before now
- 17:21:20 [DanC]
- http://www.baidu.com/
- 17:21:36 [Stuart]
- ack ht
- 17:21:36 [Zakim]
- ht, you wanted to mention XSI
- 17:22:54 [ht]
- HST: [explains X.S.I.]
- 17:23:42 [ht]
- ... [pointer to LEIRI]
- 17:24:46 [DanC]
- q+ to respond yes, I'm familiar with that, and that's what I meant by IRI; HTML 5 URL is different; HTML 5 URL is actually a pair of a string and a document-character-encoding
- 17:25:18 [ht]
- DC: That won't work for HTML5, because of the encoding part
- 17:25:18 [DanC]
- ack danc
- 17:25:18 [Zakim]
- DanC, you wanted to respond yes, I'm familiar with that, and that's what I meant by IRI; HTML 5 URL is different; HTML 5 URL is actually a pair of a string and a
- 17:25:22 [Zakim]
- ... document-character-encoding
- 17:25:53 [ht]
- SW: I heard DC say he was comfortable, anyone uncomfortable
- 17:25:55 [ht]
- HT: Me
- 17:26:43 [Stuart]
- q+
- 17:26:56 [DanC]
- (for record-keeping purposes, we're somewhat into IRIEverywhere)
- 17:27:52 [ht]
- HT: But how can this work at the server end -- does Apache know about Big5?
- 17:28:14 [ht]
- DC: The doc-encoding bit only happens in the query string
- 17:28:33 [DanC]
- yes, the specs all say that you use utf-8 to get from IRIs to URIs, but when you see %xx in a URI, you don't necessarily know it came from utf-8
- 17:28:35 [Ashok]
- Isn't the character encoding another case od 'additional metadata'?
- 17:28:40 [ht]
- SW: Anyway, HT, I think you're mistaken about path encoding as well, that is not specified in the old URI spec and doesn't apply retrospectively
- 17:28:50 [Ashok]
- s/od/of/
- 17:29:18 [ht]
- DC: Apache has to take %xx off the wire and look up filenames, I'm not sure what happens at that point
- 17:29:47 [ht]
- ... Browsers have a flag that says whether to use doc't encoding or UTF-8 for path part
- 17:30:23 [ht]
- ... Firefox sets that to 'UTF-8' for path, but leaves the equivalent query flag to 'off' == 'use doct encoding'
- 17:30:36 [Stuart]
- Yep... RFC3986 is much more prescriptive of the use of UTF-8 in new scheme specs. but is not retrospective on earlier schemes.
- 17:30:56 [ht]
- HST: I don't know what to think, in that case
- 17:31:00 [Stuart]
- ...more than rfc2396
- 17:31:35 [ht]
- HST: Is there anybody pushing back?
- 17:31:54 [ht]
- SW: There's a big thread, but I haven't read it in detail. . .DC, you following it?
- 17:32:18 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 17:32:41 [Zakim]
- +jar
- 17:32:51 [ht]
- DC: There is pushback from the IETF, e.g. Roy Fielding, saying that this is broken wrt IETF RFCs
- 17:32:55 [Stuart]
- mute jar
- 17:33:23 [DanC]
- there's "rough consensus" in the IETF sense; I don't all it consensus, but somewhat stable status quo
- 17:33:24 [ht]
- ... But the browsers are unlikely to move in a way which reduces their functionality
- 17:33:40 [ht]
- SW: What about SVG in HTML
- 17:34:03 [ht]
- DC: Two proposals, one edited into the HTML5 spec. and then commented out
- 17:34:33 [ht]
- ... It changed the parsing algorithm, to deal with 'foreign content', w/o talking about circles, but did cover SVG and MATHML
- 17:34:48 [ht]
- ... MathML people liked it, SVG people pushed back
- 17:35:13 [ht]
- ... So the editor commented out the SVG part
- 17:36:04 [ht]
- ... Then the SVG people put forward a proposal to do it per their specs, which would require a stricter handling
- 17:36:20 [ht]
- ... of well-formedness bugs in the SVG
- 17:36:34 [ht]
- SW: Relevant to us?
- 17:36:55 [ht]
- DC: For sure, it's all about points on TV's options wrt integration
- 17:37:20 [DanC]
- Andrew Sidwell <w3c@andrewsidwell.co.uk>
- 17:37:24 [ht]
- ... Someone popped up with a C-language implementation of the HTML5 algorithm, and said the commented-out part was OK
- 17:37:41 [ht]
- ... but could go with the SVG alternative as well
- 17:37:49 [Stuart]
- ?q
- 17:37:56 [DanC]
- s/could go with/showed interest in implementing/
- 17:38:03 [DanC]
- s/SVG alternative/SVG WG alternative/
- 17:38:07 [ht]
- HST: I'd look to look at the two options, haven't done so yet
- 17:38:46 [ht]
- SW: TV has asked that we spend up to half our F2F time on TagSoup -- is that OK?
- 17:38:48 [ht]
- HST: Yes
- 17:38:59 [ht]
- SW: Custom Data?
- 17:39:36 [ht]
- HST: I just thought it was validation of our fear for the effect of aria-
- 17:40:33 [ht]
- DC: And RDFa is in Candidate Rec --- I gather the question of how to do RDFa in non-XML HTML (4, 5, ...) has blown up
- 17:40:51 [DanC]
- RDFa in HTML 4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jul/0050.html
- 17:40:59 [DanC]
- ^ allegedly-long thread; I haven't read it
- 17:41:07 [ht]
- ... because the spec. very carefully _only_ talks about application/html+xml documents, but in reality people are using it in other docs
- 17:41:30 [ht]
- HST: I think we need to talk about namespaces for HTML5 at the f2f
- 17:41:43 [ht]
- ... and this is grist for that mill
- 17:41:59 [DanC]
- On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility Chris Wilson (Thursday, 17 July) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0197.html
- 17:42:00 [ht]
- DC: Decentralized extensibility is live on public-html
- 17:42:07 [ht]
- Chris Wilson is engaged
- 17:42:38 [DanC]
- SVG in HTML proposal Erik Dahlström (Monday, 14 July) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0179.html
- 17:42:53 [DanC]
- Sivonen http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0250.html
- 17:43:21 [DanC]
- ^ the SVG WG proposal and the biggest argument against that I've seen
- 17:45:25 [ht]
- SW: Some informal discussion could happen on this topic during this timeslot between now and 2008-08-28
- 17:45:35 [ht]
- Topic: Issue UrnsAndRegistries-50 (ISSUE-50)
- 17:45:42 [ht]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/54
- 17:46:29 [ht]
- SW: There has been some discussion with the XRI TC, as well as some private conversation with their chairs, to the effect that we would take things forward via www-tag
- 17:46:42 [ht]
- ... which has largely happened, whether we started it or not
- 17:47:09 [ht]
- HST: [started drafting -- DNS]
- 17:47:58 [ht]
- ... [threads linked agenda]
- 17:49:11 [ht]
- ... [conventions between Domain owners?]
- 17:49:42 [DanC]
- q+
- 17:49:45 [Stuart]
- q-
- 17:51:00 [DanC]
- ack danc
- 17:51:01 [ht]
- ack DanC
- 17:51:12 [ht]
- DC: I think the ARK scheme is good
- 17:51:33 [ht]
- ... It does promote aliases, and suffers the consequent downside: caching may not work
- 17:51:34 [Stuart]
- Henry did you see the most recent Bradley proposal based on dns namess like boeing.com.xri.net (ie. it is under xri.net).
- 17:52:10 [ht]
- ... But that was necessitated by the lack of a single domain holder who could do the job
- 17:52:16 [ht]
- ... So I think it's OK
- 17:53:40 [ht]
- ... It's fine for e.g. Univ. of Minnesota to say "We will use ark: per the ARK spec.", it's _not_ fine for any client to interpret the presence of ark: to mean "this URI is an ARK"
- 17:54:33 [Stuart]
- q?
- 17:54:33 [ht]
- ... There has to be an independent channel, e.g. to the client developer, that UM has commited to the ARK story, and this was a UM URI that had ark: in add
- 17:55:05 [ht]
- s/in add/in it/
- 17:55:43 [ht]
- ... Is the ARK spec on the right side of that line? I.e. does it expect clients to treat all ark: as ARKs?
- 17:55:52 [ht]
- HST: I think it's on the right side, but we should check
- 17:56:46 [ht]
- DC: Similarly you don't want to use xri.... as a domain-based key w/o getting IANA to reserve that subdomain
- 17:57:38 [ht]
- SW: Right, hence the xri.net, or, following a suggestion from me, boeing.com.xri.net, using subregistrations under xri.net
- 17:58:42 [Stuart]
- http://xri.net/=jbradley
- 17:58:44 [DanC]
- he signs his message Marty Schleiff
- 17:58:47 [DanC]
- hphpht
- 17:58:55 [DanC]
- I meant http://xri.net/=jbradley
- 17:58:57 [ht]
- ... There seems to be some willingness, e.g. on the part of John Bradley, to shift from using a scheme to using subdomains
- 17:59:33 [DanC]
- >> Regards
- 17:59:33 [DanC]
- >> John Bradley
- 17:59:33 [DanC]
- >> OASIS IDTRUST-SC
- 17:59:33 [DanC]
- >> http://xri.net/=jbradley
- 18:00:16 [DanC]
- "OASIS IDtrust Steering Committee is a special group" -- http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=idtrust-sc
- 18:01:41 [ht]
- SW: Of course Bradley doesn't speak for the TC
- 18:01:42 [DanC]
- (hm... http://idtrust.xml.org/ ...)
- 18:02:01 [ht]
- ... I asked Shleiff if he could live with the 'booth-bradley' proposal, and
- 18:02:15 [Stuart]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Jul/0096
- 18:02:49 [DanC]
- (and now http://www.oasis-idtrust.org/ ...)
- 18:03:14 [ht]
- ... he has replied that although preferring a scheme, he could live with booth-bradley
- 18:03:42 [ht]
- SW: DC, what do you think?
- 18:04:13 [ht]
- DC: As long as it's ??? or xri., yes
- 18:04:18 [ht]
- SW: HST?
- 18:04:27 [ht]
- HST: Yes, maybe, behind on my reading
- 18:04:52 [ht]
- SW: I think DO might be on board, but that was a way back. . .
- 18:05:08 [ht]
- s/way back/while ago/
- 18:05:16 [DanC]
- aha! found a full URL for "OASIS IDTRUST-SC": http://www.oasis-idtrust.org/steering-committee
- 18:05:17 [ht]
- ... we would need to check with him
- 18:05:27 [DanC]
- and http://www.oasis-idtrust.org/bradley
- 18:06:36 [ht]
- SW: So this is coming down to: Is the TAG's concern entirely around the new scheme?
- 18:06:53 [ht]
- ... Metadata is perhaps another area
- 18:07:09 [ht]
- ... We don't have critical mass for that discussion right now
- 18:07:36 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 18:08:07 [DanC]
- (re representations vs metadata, well... if they go with http://xri.net/... , then I think that problem will take care of itself; they'd hardly be the wierdest web site out there.)
- 18:08:12 [ht]
- ... Formats for messages, which encourage e.g. the use of =iname, and don't allow URIs, is an over-constraining position which we might have to object to
- 18:08:44 [Zakim]
- +jar
- 18:10:39 [DanC]
- q+ to make a note on email discussion
- 18:10:41 [ht]
- SW: I've agreed to meet with Peter ?? and Drummond Reed to discuss how the discussion is going
- 18:11:06 [ht]
- ... I'd like to have someone with me if I can't have TimBL
- 18:11:15 [ht]
- ... I'd suggest HST
- 18:11:23 [ht]
- ... They've suggested 4 August
- 18:11:55 [ht]
- HST: I will be on holiday then
- 18:12:18 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 18:12:34 [ht]
- s/Peter ??/Peter Davis/
- 18:12:53 [Stuart]
- ack danc
- 18:12:53 [Zakim]
- DanC, you wanted to make a note on email discussion
- 18:14:08 [ht]
- DC: Wrt emails, I'm not sure to what extent the main participants speak for the TC
- 18:14:25 [ht]
- ... Is there a critical mass of the TC participating?
- 18:15:25 [Zakim]
- +jar
- 18:15:30 [ht]
- SW: I think the participants are influential, but until a specific proposal is framed and put to the TC for approval
- 18:15:56 [ht]
- ... we can't really make any assumptions
- 18:16:25 [DanC]
- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/
- 18:17:27 [ht]
- SW: AM?
- 18:17:51 [ht]
- AM: I haven't looked into details, but the sense of progress towards a compromise is certainly encouraging
- 18:18:00 [ht]
- SW: JR?
- 18:19:00 [ht]
- JR: A lot of the problem is that the TAG's position is not well-communicated, or very sophisticated, and so is hard to get across to this group, who don't share our interests
- 18:19:20 [ht]
- s/or very/or is very/
- 18:19:39 [ht]
- ... I think it is beginning to get across
- 18:20:37 [DanC]
- fwiw, I took a stab at this URI persistence stuff in http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-urlni.html
- 18:20:56 [ht]
- SW: Back to the chair-to-chair meeting, I propose to postpone this to the end of the summer, would welcome HST and/or DC as well
- 18:21:15 [DanC]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/09/ftfkc.html
- 18:21:29 [ht]
- Topic: F2F information
- 18:21:49 [ht]
- DC: Meeting space courtesy of Kaufman Foundation, for free
- 18:22:19 [ht]
- ... About 1 mile from Country Club Plaza, where the hotel I will recommend
- 18:22:40 [ht]
- ... is located
- 18:22:54 [DanC]
- Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
- 18:23:05 [ht]
- s/Kaufman/Kauffman/
- 18:24:13 [ht]
- [unminuted logistics discussion]
- 18:31:13 [ht]
- DC, SW: Quarterly Summary for Ian Jacobs -- DanC has the ball, will circulate
- 18:31:20 [Zakim]
- -Ashok_Malhotra
- 18:31:32 [Zakim]
- -Stuart
- 18:31:34 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 18:31:35 [ht]
- ACTION: Dan to circulate draft of our next Quarterly Summary
- 18:31:35 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-168 - Circulate draft of our next Quarterly Summary [on Dan Connolly - due 2008-07-31].
- 18:31:44 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 18:31:54 [ht]
- zakim, bye
- 18:31:54 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were Stuart, DanC, Ashok_Malhotra, Ht, jar
- 18:31:54 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tagmem
- 18:32:04 [ht]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 18:32:04 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-tagmem-minutes.html ht
- 18:32:09 [ht]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 20:17:47 [Norm]
- Norm has joined #tagmem