IRC log of databinding on 2008-07-15

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:54:40 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #databinding
13:54:40 [RRSAgent]
logging to
13:54:42 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
13:54:42 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #databinding
13:54:44 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be DBWG
13:54:44 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see WS_DBWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
13:54:45 [trackbot]
Meeting: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference
13:54:45 [trackbot]
Date: 15 July 2008
13:59:05 [pauld]
zakim, code?
13:59:05 [Zakim]
the conference code is 3294 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152), pauld
13:59:49 [Zakim]
WS_DBWG()10:00AM has now started
13:59:54 [Zakim]
+ +0791888aaaa
14:00:00 [pauld]
zakim, aaaa is me
14:00:02 [Zakim]
+pauld; got it
14:01:44 [Zakim]
14:02:40 [Zakim]
14:02:50 [gcowe]
gcowe has joined #databinding
14:04:23 [Zakim]
14:04:52 [pauld]
zakim, Marks is really gcowe
14:04:52 [Zakim]
+gcowe; got it
14:07:05 [pauld]
discussion of what's required to make progress
14:07:31 [pauld]
pauld: need to reply to commenters, prepare issue list for Basic
14:08:01 [pauld]
pauld: having decided to publish Advanced as a note, we're freer to put more content
14:08:41 [pauld]
jonc: George, you need more feedback from the WG on the patterns you've prepared
14:08:55 [pauld]
gcowe: that would be nice
14:09:13 [pauld]
jonc: are we happy with the granularity of Advanced patterns
14:10:12 [pauld]
pauld: I'm mostly interested in Basic, are we comfortable with Advanced
14:10:31 [pauld]
jonc: I'd like a formal review of the Advanced patterns
14:11:31 [pauld]
jonc: are we confident the Advanced patterns haven't broken the Basic patterns
14:13:18 [pauld]
pauld: the patterns and examples pages flag up incorrect attribution as red "status"
14:14:24 [pauld]
AttributeTypeReference and SequenceSequenceElement seem to be "basic" but detected as "advanced"
14:15:20 [pauld]
14:16:44 [pauld]
SequenceSequenceElement should be Advanced
14:17:25 [JonC]
JonC has joined #databinding
14:23:35 [pauld]
AttributeTypeReference looks a little over engineered
14:27:35 [pauld]
concerned there's no canonical example for GlobalElementComplexType
14:29:34 [pauld]
pauld: worried we're going to have to rerun the test report
14:29:51 [pauld]
.. if we make wholesale changes to examples such this
14:32:36 [Yves]
if we need to add patterns to Basic, we still have the possibility to do a short CR
14:33:44 [pauld]
I don't think this example can be basic thanks to Decimal type
14:34:59 [pauld]
I suspect that GlobalElementComplexType is, however, basic
14:36:58 [pauld]
pauld: propose that the example put in the spec doesn't include Decimal
14:37:30 [pauld]
gcowe: need to rebuild the test report and other pages, seem inconsistent
14:39:42 [Yves]
Yves is rebuilding the report
14:43:04 [pauld]
draws the WG's attention to:
14:45:22 [Yves]
=> reports done
14:47:58 [pauld]
looking at
14:56:05 [pauld]
GlobalElementComplexType is a new pattern added by George
14:56:29 [pauld]
.. doesn't introduce any new schema elements, but has been flagged as "Advanced"
14:56:43 [pauld]
.. which flagging all examples as "Advanced"
14:56:57 [pauld]
This pattern should be "Basic"!
14:57:22 [pauld]
suddenly happy!
14:59:42 [pauld]
I don't think there is an issue, this is in *all* of our WSDL examples echoAttributeTypeReference etc introduced by test framework, therefore "Baisc"
15:00:03 [pauld]
suggest we meet same time next week
15:02:00 [pauld]
pauld: pick up a week today!
15:02:13 [Zakim]
15:02:16 [Zakim]
15:02:16 [Zakim]
15:02:18 [Zakim]
15:02:20 [Zakim]
WS_DBWG()10:00AM has ended
15:02:24 [Zakim]
Attendees were +0791888aaaa, pauld, Yves, Jonc, gcowe
15:27:24 [pauld]
pauld has joined #databinding
15:56:07 [pauld]
rrsagent, generate minutes
15:56:07 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate pauld
15:56:16 [pauld]
rrsagent, make logs public
16:24:49 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #databinding
16:34:21 [pauld]
pauld has joined #databinding
17:19:53 [pauld]
pauld has joined #databinding