16:54:57 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 16:54:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-tagmem-irc 16:55:15 zakim, this will be tag 16:55:15 ok, Stuart; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 16:55:26 Meeting: TAG Weekly 16:55:44 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/10-agenda 16:55:58 Chair: Stuart Williams 16:56:08 Scribe: Jonathan Rees 16:56:40 trackbot, status 16:57:09 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started 16:57:16 +TimBL 16:57:54 +??P9 16:58:01 zakim, ??P9 is me 16:58:01 +Stuart; got it 16:58:35 Ashok has joined #tagmem 16:59:26 + +1.617.253.aaaa 16:59:58 zakim, +1 is jar 16:59:58 +jar; got it 17:01:32 +Ashok_Malhotra 17:01:58 ht_wylie has joined #tagmem 17:02:25 DanC has joined #tagmem 17:02:32 +DanC.a 17:02:35 Getting started. 17:02:45 Comments on agenda? No. 17:02:59 Minutes re 26 June telecon. OK? 17:03:20 (not the joint call, the one before it) 17:03:37 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/06/26-tagmem-minutes 17:03:42 approved. 17:04:07 Henry to scribe next week 17:04:13 Stuart, regrets from next week's call 17:04:32 s/from/for/ 17:05:05 Ashok and Tim express regrets for next week. 17:06:33 Henry: Let's meet next week anyhow 17:06:55 ok by me to cxl 31 Jul, 7 Aug, 14 Aug 17:07:15 Resolved: skip those three. 17:09:28 Now discussing how to continue OASIS/XRI interaction 17:09:52 Ashok volunteering to talk to Marty about data integration use case in about 2 weeks 17:11:39 stuart: Concerned that maybe nothing will get done over the summer 17:12:20 shoot. lost my phone link 17:12:30 hang on 17:12:43 -jar 17:12:46 HT: I hope to use the summer break to do the drafting I was planning to do 17:12:52 or someone else scribe please... 60 seconds 17:13:16 +jar 17:13:20 ahh... back. 17:14:14 timbl has joined #tagmem 17:14:22 HT: Missing: a serious analysis of why http doesn't meet their requirements. 17:14:33 q+ 17:14:40 ack timb 17:15:02 -jar 17:15:22 timbl: The problem is not how to evolve the mechanism 17:15:26 TimBl: Who is the design authority? 17:15:48 ... it's a social problem -- they don't trust, or want to work with, ICANN and the rest of the authority structure 17:15:54 +Jonathan_Rees 17:15:58 ask them is is that it cannot be done technically or socially 17:16:07 ... This kind of group wants to be _socially_ independent of ICANN and so on 17:16:13 do you want to be independent of ICANN 17:16:42 q+ to think about the "independent naming system" 17:16:44 stuart: Have you seen latest decision from ICANN, re TLDs for sale? 17:16:51 yes 17:17:24 impact of lots more top level domains on the Web? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 26 June) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Jun/0113.html 17:17:48 ack Danc 17:18:48 danc: XRIs are showing up in oauth namespace declarations. Namespaces are given as URIs. 17:19:26 danc: (Therefore XRIs need to be URIs, for that purpose.) 17:19:38 (I tried to say IRI; but since IRIs and URIs share a scheme registry.) 17:20:10 but XRI not registered as URI scheme 17:20:28 ht: If an XRI URI scheme is applied for, then it will have to meet the bar for new URI schemes 17:21:09 ht: What can we do to help meet our obligations here? 17:21:40 At some point on the call, I said "Now _that's_ a technical question we could dig into . . ." . . . what was that? 17:21:41 stuart: Shall we: frame questions and encourage conversation? 17:22:08 danc: Not sure that will help keep things alive over the summer. 17:22:16 poll 17:22:41 danc: Discussion should take place on www-tag 17:23:10 ashok: Yes, encouraging summer conversation is a good idea 17:23:12 Found it: 'HST thinks that addressing the "http scheme did not allow us to to use non-DNS authority resolution" is a very concrete challenge that we could focus on' 17:24:13 s/Discussion should take place on www-tag/Discussion on www-tag is convenient for me, though I wonder whether it'll reach critical mass/ 17:24:38 ht: Maybe we can dig in on at least one definite issue, the one about distributed authority. 17:25:48 stuart: Looking for ways to make it not fall silent and lose context 17:27:31 timbl: Maybe put the argument on a wiki, lay it out there 17:28:11 timbl: Let's consider priorities w.r.t. other activities, maybe recruit others to help 17:28:29 We could spend an hour of the next meeting to state our position 17:28:46 but that wouldn't be any better. 17:30:08 HST is willing to try to start a thread 17:30:21 danc: A real back and forth would be better than presentations 17:31:28 ACTION: Henry S to start a thread on non-DNS authority resolution on www-tag 17:31:28 Created ACTION-167 - S to start a thread on non-DNS authority resolution on www-tag [on Henry S. Thompson - due 2008-07-17]. 17:32:40 danc: Let's drop video 17:32:50 Item 4, contentTypeOverride-24 17:32:51 -TimBL 17:32:53 http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/07/life_without_mime_type_sniffin.html 17:33:05 http://www.w3.org/blog/tag/ 17:33:42 danc: How visible is the TAG blog? 17:35:07 danc: TAG finding says sniffing is security risk. But HTML5 says do sniff sometimes. 17:35:41 danc: Economics of following http spec are hopeless - doing the right thing loses market share. 17:36:13 ht_yoyo has joined #tagmem 17:36:48 danc: Now, there's the "I mean it" flag 17:38:02 Hixie's response was interesting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0079.html 17:40:09 ... and somtimes there's a browser configuration switch that says "follow the spec" 17:40:21 s/somtimes/sometimes/ 17:41:14 ... and maybe things are getting better with compliance 17:41:24 DanC I you can point me a the 'controls' I'll be happy to 'live dangerously'. 17:41:34 ... I think the TAG should talk about this some more 17:41:47 (Note no quorum now) 17:44:19 q? 17:45:41 danc: Details on sniffing in html5 are reasonable, not just a wholesale endorsement of some popular browser's behavior 17:46:15 ... e.g. 17:46:46 stuart: Would you be willing to take on editor role? 17:46:51 danc: yes 17:48:29 issue-34? 17:48:29 ISSUE-34 -- XML Transformation and composability (e.g., XSLT,XInclude, Encryption) -- OPEN 17:48:29 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34 17:48:43 ... example: content type xhtml+xml, but then treated by client as atom feed due to namespace in the xml file 17:48:49 issue-33? 17:48:49 ISSUE-33 -- Composability for user interface-oriented XML namespaces -- OPEN 17:48:49 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/33 17:49:10 Dave Baron's msg was about the boundary between CDF and the TAG, about which I'm curious 17:53:34 Moving on. F2F prep? 17:53:48 Meeting formally adjourned. 17:54:19 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:55:50 rrsagent, make logs public 17:56:48 rrsagent, pointer 17:56:48 See http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-tagmem-irc#T17-56-48 18:07:16 http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=10903+NW+45+Highway+Parkville,+MO&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=81.220239,111.972656&ie=UTF8&ll=39.272398,-94.805489&spn=0.080798,0.109348&t=h&z=13 18:08:12 http://www.missouririverpaddling.com/TheRivers.html 18:09:28 Big rapid at: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=10903+NW+45+Highway+Parkville,+MO&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=81.220239,111.972656&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=39.257213,-94.831967&spn=0.014289,0.043087&z=15&iwloc=cent 18:12:45 -Stuart 18:12:53 -Jonathan_Rees 18:13:21 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:13:23 Attendees were TimBL, Stuart, +1.617.253.aaaa, jar, Ashok_Malhotra, DanC.a, Jonathan_Rees 19:21:56 timbl has joined #tagmem 20:41:07 timbl has joined #tagmem 22:17:37 timbl has joined #tagmem