IRC log of svg on 2008-07-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 10:31:59 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #svg
- 10:31:59 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-svg-irc
- 10:32:01 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 10:32:01 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #svg
- 10:32:03 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
- 10:32:03 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago
- 10:32:04 [trackbot]
- Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
- 10:32:04 [trackbot]
- Date: 03 July 2008
- 10:32:15 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has now started
- 10:32:22 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 10:32:28 [aemmons]
- zakim, ??p0 is me
- 10:32:28 [Zakim]
- +aemmons; got it
- 10:32:38 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 10:32:40 [heycam]
- Zakim, ??P1 is me
- 10:32:40 [Zakim]
- +heycam; got it
- 10:32:54 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 10:33:08 [anthony]
- Zakim, ??P2 is me
- 10:33:08 [Zakim]
- +anthony; got it
- 10:35:30 [ed_]
- ed_ has joined #svg
- 10:36:07 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 10:36:32 [ed_]
- Zakim, ??P3 is me
- 10:36:32 [Zakim]
- +ed_; got it
- 10:36:58 [ed_]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 10:36:58 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see aemmons, heycam, anthony, ed_
- 10:36:59 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ed_, Zakim, RRSAgent, anthony, aemmons, ed_work, shepazu, heycam, trackbot
- 10:38:03 [Zakim]
- +shadi
- 10:38:19 [ed_]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0168.html
- 10:38:21 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #svg
- 10:38:50 [ed_]
- Agenda+ test-fest
- 10:38:55 [ed_]
- Agenda+ svginhtml
- 10:39:31 [anthony]
- Scribe: anthony
- 10:39:33 [anthony]
- Chair: Erik
- 10:39:41 [anthony]
- Regrets: Doug
- 10:39:58 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 10:40:21 [shepazu]
- ??P is me
- 10:40:22 [ed_]
- Agenda+ XHTML access module
- 10:40:25 [anthony]
- s/Doug/None/
- 10:40:37 [shepazu]
- Zakim, ??P is me
- 10:40:37 [Zakim]
- +shepazu; got it
- 10:42:29 [ChrisL]
- zakim, who is here?
- 10:42:30 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see aemmons, heycam, anthony, ed_, shadi, shepazu
- 10:42:30 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ChrisL, ed_, Zakim, RRSAgent, anthony, aemmons, ed_work, shepazu, heycam, trackbot
- 10:42:42 [anthony]
- Zakim, move to next agendum
- 10:42:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "test-fest" taken up [from ed_]
- 10:42:48 [shepazu]
- Zakim, shadi is ChrisL
- 10:42:48 [Zakim]
- +ChrisL; got it
- 10:42:53 [ChrisL]
- zakim, shadi is ChrisL
- 10:42:53 [Zakim]
- sorry, ChrisL, I do not recognize a party named 'shadi'
- 10:43:04 [anthony]
- AE: I made the request to discuss this
- 10:43:12 [anthony]
- ... so we could have a test fest before SVG open
- 10:43:16 [anthony]
- ... time is running out for that
- 10:43:28 [anthony]
- ... wanted to see what the group thought about a test fest
- 10:43:37 [anthony]
- CL: So I thought we decided not to do it
- 10:43:48 [anthony]
- ... because of difficulties with people traveling
- 10:44:02 [anthony]
- AE: Wasn't sure, because on a call you could send someone
- 10:44:11 [anthony]
- CL: Just wondering if it's a bit late to do one
- 10:44:16 [anthony]
- ... but I can see value in doing it
- 10:44:22 [anthony]
- AE: It's all a bit connected
- 10:44:29 [anthony]
- ... because I thought we'd have the test suite published
- 10:44:39 [anthony]
- ... it's probably too late to have travel for sure
- 10:44:54 [anthony]
- ... so maybe there's another way of doing it if we are still keen
- 10:45:04 [anthony]
- ... even then there may not be time to do that
- 10:45:13 [anthony]
- ... because we have to send a request for implementations
- 10:45:43 [anthony]
- CL: We need to give people advanced notice
- 10:45:53 [anthony]
- ... in some ways I'd rather we organise something later
- 10:45:59 [anthony]
- ... just to give people the notice they need
- 10:46:08 [anthony]
- ... first thing is to get the test suite published
- 10:46:27 [anthony]
- AE: We also said there would be a Beta
- 10:46:31 [anthony]
- ... with a link with known issues
- 10:46:41 [anthony]
- ... the blocking item is simply putting it up
- 10:47:04 [anthony]
- ED: So what's the hold up with the test suite?
- 10:47:08 [anthony]
- ... it's not published?
- 10:47:27 [anthony]
- AE: Is it something that only a team or staff contact can do?
- 10:47:30 [anthony]
- CL: Yes it is
- 10:47:38 [anthony]
- ... planning to fix that
- 10:47:45 [anthony]
- ... once it's in the public repository
- 10:48:01 [anthony]
- ... I guess I could ask Sys Team to give access
- 10:48:20 [anthony]
- AE: I guess Doug is busy with a lot of other stuff
- 10:48:39 [anthony]
- ... if it was in the public repository
- 10:48:45 [anthony]
- ... might be able to be published
- 10:48:56 [anthony]
- CL: Problem is when you check it into the new place
- 10:49:03 [anthony]
- ... the revision numbering is lost
- 10:49:41 [anthony]
- AE: Would be great if we get the test suite published
- 10:49:57 [anthony]
- ... is there a ball park date for holding the test fest
- 10:52:05 [anthony]
- ED: Ball park date would be after SVG Open?
- 10:52:17 [anthony]
- CL: Yeah, after it
- 10:52:27 [anthony]
- ... would the test fest be a face-to-face meeting?
- 10:52:35 [anthony]
- ED: I guess it would be useful
- 10:52:43 [anthony]
- CL: September was mentioned
- 10:53:04 [anthony]
- ... but I have a management meeting 15 - 17 Sep
- 10:53:14 [anthony]
- ... something around that is ok
- 10:53:29 [anthony]
- ... either the beginning or end is fine with me
- 10:53:42 [anthony]
- DS: We are having a F2F before SVG Open
- 10:53:47 [anthony]
- ... what are we doing there?
- 10:54:05 [anthony]
- ED: We could have some time allocated for it
- 10:54:17 [anthony]
- AE: We'd want this test fest to be the final one
- 10:54:21 [anthony]
- ... so it could take some time
- 10:54:37 [anthony]
- ... so at the F2F we should focus on getting the test suite
- 10:54:39 [anthony]
- ... done
- 10:54:51 [anthony]
- ED: So it sounds like we should work on tests
- 10:54:56 [anthony]
- ... to get the suite done
- 10:55:04 [anthony]
- ... at the F2F
- 10:55:55 [anthony]
- AE: If we release a Beta 2 some time soon
- 10:56:08 [anthony]
- ... we could work on the test suite
- 10:56:18 [anthony]
- CL: Would be good to announce a Beta 3 at the F2F
- 10:56:50 [anthony]
- ... I'm think the 20th - 24th Oct is the TP
- 10:57:06 [anthony]
- ... one possibility is to organise the test fest near that
- 10:57:14 [anthony]
- ... not sure if that is too far in advance
- 10:57:32 [anthony]
- AG: Not a bad idea
- 10:57:48 [anthony]
- CL: We'd be talking about the week around the 13th Oct
- 10:57:53 [anthony]
- ... how long will we need?
- 10:57:59 [anthony]
- ED: 4 - 5 days probably
- 10:58:17 [anthony]
- AE: Are people good for going 2 weeks at a time
- 10:58:34 [anthony]
- DS: I think being worn out before the TP might not be a good idea
- 10:58:43 [anthony]
- CL: If we did the test fest Mon - Thur
- 10:58:54 [anthony]
- ... it would give us 3 days before TPac
- 10:59:52 [anthony]
- AE: Is the date mid Oct too late for publication of the spec
- 11:00:11 [anthony]
- CL: Whether is too late depends on how many pass we have
- 11:00:16 [anthony]
- ... at the test fest
- 11:00:51 [anthony]
- ... traditionally they produce their implementation reprot
- 11:00:59 [anthony]
- s/reprot/report/
- 11:01:09 [anthony]
- ... then request to go to PR
- 11:01:26 [anthony]
- CL: [Explains process]
- 11:02:05 [anthony]
- ... if we were in PR in Dec that's fine with me
- 11:02:20 [anthony]
- ... it's just a notice to say we have 6 weeks to go
- 11:02:29 [anthony]
- DS: We should really shoot for the end of the year
- 11:02:41 [anthony]
- ED: In that case we should go with the end of Sep
- 11:03:20 [anthony]
- AE: As CL said we may run the risk of not having 2 implementations for every feature
- 11:03:34 [anthony]
- ... that said it would nice to have a report sooner or later
- 11:04:01 [anthony]
- ... would be good task implementers where they are up to
- 11:04:22 [anthony]
- ... but maybe if a staff person asked it would be good
- 11:04:56 [anthony]
- ... so it sounds like Sep is probably the better time
- 11:05:04 [anthony]
- ED: Do we want to decide on a location?
- 11:05:13 [anthony]
- ... or do we want to discuss it at the next F2F
- 11:05:21 [anthony]
- AE: Might be a bit tight at the F2F
- 11:06:05 [anthony]
- DS: I'm happy to host or Andrew can you host?
- 11:06:34 [anthony]
- AE: I'd be happy to host
- 11:06:47 [anthony]
- CL: What about the week of the 29th Sep?
- 11:07:03 [anthony]
- DS: Anytime around then is fine with me
- 11:07:41 [anthony]
- AE: 29th sounds ok
- 11:07:52 [anthony]
- ... we can decide on another call the exact location
- 11:07:54 [anthony]
- ED: Sounds ok
- 11:08:20 [anthony]
- RESOLUTION: We will hold a test fest on the 29th Sep to the 2nd Oct somewhere in North America
- 11:08:36 [anthony]
- CL: We should announce that ASAP
- 11:08:47 [anthony]
- ... and say that further details are soon to follow
- 11:10:03 [anthony]
- AE: We should have time line for registering it for it
- 11:11:08 [anthony]
- ACTION: Emmons to announce that we will he holding a test fest from the 29th Sep to 2nd Oct and that we will provide further details soon
- 11:11:08 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2080 - Announce that we will he holding a test fest from the 29th Sep to 2nd Oct and that we will provide further details soon [on Andrew Emmons - due 2008-07-10].
- 11:12:17 [ed_]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/19480/svgF2Fnuremburg2008/
- 11:12:40 [anthony]
- Zakim, move to next agendum
- 11:12:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "svginhtml" taken up [from ed_]
- 11:13:37 [ChrisL]
- zakim, agenda?
- 11:13:37 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda:
- 11:13:38 [Zakim]
- 2. svginhtml [from ed_]
- 11:13:38 [Zakim]
- 3. XHTML access module [from ed_]
- 11:14:33 [anthony]
- Topic: SVG Open
- 11:14:44 [ed_]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Nuremburg_F2F_2008
- 11:14:45 [anthony]
- DS: I would like to have something to show at SVG Open to show progress
- 11:14:53 [anthony]
- CL: Form is now open
- 11:15:04 [anthony]
- ... for registration
- 11:16:09 [anthony]
- ED: Do we need to something out for the public list to get people to sign up for it?
- 11:16:22 [anthony]
- AE: We should send a reminder to the public working group list
- 11:16:27 [anthony]
- ED: Ok I can do that
- 11:17:07 [anthony]
- Topic: SVG in HTML
- 11:17:22 [anthony]
- ED: I did an update to the proposal
- 11:17:37 [ed_]
- http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/svg-html/svg-html-proposal.html
- 11:17:51 [anthony]
- ... you can still see the old proposal
- 11:17:59 [ed_]
- http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/proposals/svg-html/svg-html-proposal.html
- 11:19:07 [anthony]
- AE: Looks like we've taken the approach of what needs to change in HTML5
- 11:19:07 [ed_]
- http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/SVG/proposals/svg-html/svg-html-proposal.html?rev=1.2&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1
- 11:20:03 [anthony]
- ED: It's using the XML parser
- 11:20:12 [anthony]
- ... basically it's just a black box
- 11:20:25 [anthony]
- ... that says how to handle stuff the HTML parser doesn't understand
- 11:20:36 [anthony]
- AE: Should we have a highlevel note for that?
- 11:20:50 [anthony]
- CL: It would be good to list the requirements at the top of the proposal
- 11:21:01 [anthony]
- ... such as round trip copy and past of SVG
- 11:21:10 [anthony]
- ... to and from the document
- 11:21:36 [anthony]
- DS: We're not trying to HTML5
- 11:21:48 [anthony]
- ED: It would be good if people could make up dates to this
- 11:22:03 [anthony]
- DS: Can you give us a highlevel overview of this
- 11:22:07 [anthony]
- ... is this a subset of SVG?
- 11:22:20 [anthony]
- ED: No you can paste any SVG fragment
- 11:22:40 [anthony]
- ... there are somethings you can't do because HTML doesn't support name spaces
- 11:22:52 [anthony]
- DS: So this does not introduce name spaces to HTML5?
- 11:23:02 [anthony]
- ED: It does not
- 11:23:40 [anthony]
- DS: So if have some output from Inkscape and it has all the extra metadata how does it handle that?
- 11:23:46 [anthony]
- ED: That will still work
- 11:23:51 [anthony]
- ... it will still be put into the DOM
- 11:24:02 [anthony]
- DS: Except it will not be name spaced
- 11:24:08 [anthony]
- ED: It will be name spaced
- 11:24:25 [anthony]
- AE: It's adding it to the DOM
- 11:24:35 [anthony]
- ... but wouldn't the DOM need that anyway for the Xlink serialisation
- 11:25:13 [anthony]
- CL: The crucial thing for this is that once you've identified
- 11:25:20 [anthony]
- ... root node that you want to put in
- 11:25:35 [anthony]
- ... that all the other name spaces within it are preserved
- 11:25:59 [anthony]
- ... so we are not trying to put in name spaces into HTML5 but preserve the name spacing
- 11:26:09 [anthony]
- ... for content withing the SVG element
- 11:26:17 [anthony]
- s/withing/within/
- 11:26:31 [anthony]
- ... should have some examples
- 11:26:40 [anthony]
- ED: I think this is not a bad start
- 11:26:44 [anthony]
- ... but it's not complete
- 11:29:37 [anthony]
- DS: So Charles was saying that you could use foreignObject and use a switch with a required feature
- 11:29:50 [anthony]
- ED: Problem is malformed content
- 11:30:29 [anthony]
- CM: You could put the foreignObject at the end of the SVG
- 11:30:48 [anthony]
- ... there might be some other tricky things with Font and TextArea
- 11:31:28 [anthony]
- CL: I think it would be useful to document this
- 11:31:35 [anthony]
- ... and Doug's fallback idea
- 11:31:40 [anthony]
- ... and give pros and cons of both
- 11:31:55 [anthony]
- DS: So font shouldn't show up right
- 11:32:13 [anthony]
- CM: So if we mandated elsewhere that default style sheets have that on it
- 11:32:26 [anthony]
- ... so if these things get parsed and have name spaces set properly
- 11:32:44 [anthony]
- ... then you could use that to determine where it came from
- 11:33:15 [anthony]
- DS: I would really like to see us present this in a week or two
- 11:33:31 [anthony]
- ED: Would be good to flesh some of this out
- 11:33:48 [anthony]
- DS: Are you pretty confident with this algorithm?
- 11:33:53 [anthony]
- ED: I think it will work
- 11:34:04 [anthony]
- ... What's left is to provide examples
- 11:34:14 [anthony]
- ... and authoring guidelines
- 11:36:55 [anthony]
- DS: How about we try to have this in place by next Thursday?
- 11:36:59 [anthony]
- ED: Sounds good
- 11:37:09 [anthony]
- ... I guess I can try to fit in some examples
- 11:37:23 [anthony]
- ... it's a good idea to keep it in public CVS and work on it there
- 11:39:40 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to incorporate what we discussed into the the SVG-in-HTML proposal
- 11:39:40 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2081 - Incorporate what we discussed into the the SVG-in-HTML proposal [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-07-10].
- 11:40:14 [anthony]
- Zakim, move to next agendum
- 11:40:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "XHTML access module" taken up [from ed_]
- 11:40:24 [anthony]
- Topic: XHTML access module
- 11:40:30 [anthony]
- ED: Haven't had time to read it
- 11:40:39 [anthony]
- CL: I haven't had a careful read though it
- 11:40:53 [anthony]
- DS: I'll send in my second review to this list
- 11:41:16 [ed_]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0168.html
- 11:41:44 [Zakim]
- -shepazu
- 11:41:58 [ed_]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0153.html
- 11:42:08 [anthony]
- Topic: Issue 2004
- 11:42:13 [heycam]
- ISSUE-2004?
- 11:42:13 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-2004 -- Define SVGMatrix behavior when using float edge cases -- RAISED
- 11:42:13 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2004
- 11:42:33 [anthony]
- ED: Cameron had an action to look at this
- 11:42:35 [anthony]
- CM: I did
- 11:42:43 [anthony]
- ... the result was that mail
- 11:43:01 [anthony]
- ... there is no need for infinity and NAN values
- 11:43:19 [anthony]
- ... so we can define that at the top of the chapter
- 11:43:26 [anthony]
- ED: I have not issues with your findings
- 11:43:29 [anthony]
- ... looks fine to me
- 11:43:53 [anthony]
- CM: Not sure on the type of exception that should be thrown
- 11:44:01 [heycam]
- http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-svg-minutes.html#item09
- 11:44:02 [anthony]
- ... when one of these values is passed in
- 11:44:21 [anthony]
- AE: I think at one point there was wording about
- 11:44:30 [anthony]
- ... what exceptions was thrown
- 11:44:37 [anthony]
- ... I know that wording was in the traits
- 11:44:43 [anthony]
- ED: It's in A3.1
- 11:44:52 [anthony]
- ... [Reads out part]
- 11:45:05 [anthony]
- ... although it doesn't say anything about infinity
- 11:45:22 [anthony]
- CM: We could add wording in that said
- 11:45:51 [heycam]
- CM: If we could replace that "signalling NaN" text with something that says if an infinity or NaN is passed in as a float, then a certain exception is thrown
- 11:45:56 [anthony]
- ED: I would prefer not to add the wording into A3.1
- 11:46:28 [anthony]
- ... because it says "attribute property and normalisation"....
- 11:46:33 [anthony]
- ... but I guess it's ok
- 11:46:47 [anthony]
- ... if you consider a normalisation a call to any method
- 11:46:48 [ed_]
- s/attribute property and normalisation/attribute/property normalisation/
- 11:47:18 [anthony]
- AG: Result?
- 11:47:22 [anthony]
- ... add that wording?
- 11:47:28 [anthony]
- ED: Yes we should add that wording
- 11:48:45 [anthony]
- CM: What do implementations do at the moment for not supported error?
- 11:48:58 [anthony]
- AE: I think that with the trait tests
- 11:49:06 [anthony]
- ... we do what the current spec says
- 11:49:17 [anthony]
- ... I think it might be non-trivial to change that
- 11:49:23 [anthony]
- ... since it's in JSR226
- 11:49:31 [anthony]
- ... and that's already in the field
- 11:50:12 [anthony]
- CM: So I guess if someone can confirm that in 226
- 11:50:17 [anthony]
- AE: Yes I can confirm that
- 11:50:25 [anthony]
- CM: In that case we should chose that
- 11:51:09 [anthony]
- ... there was something slightly related that I mentioned in the email
- 11:51:21 [anthony]
- ... and that was for negative zeros
- 11:51:40 [ed_]
- javascript:alert(document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", "svg").setCurrentTime(parseFloat("asdasd")))
- 11:51:46 [anthony]
- ED: It seems that Opera is doing the not supported error
- 11:51:57 [anthony]
- ... so this will give you the not supported error in the console
- 11:52:13 [anthony]
- CM: So would you be willing to change the other one
- 11:52:20 [anthony]
- ... to type mismatch
- 11:52:31 [anthony]
- AE: The type mismatch is specifically dealing with NAN
- 11:52:36 [anthony]
- ... it's in the context of
- 11:52:48 [anthony]
- ... you're putting in what could be a float value
- 11:53:12 [anthony]
- ... but for the one you posted in that is not supported
- 11:53:38 [anthony]
- ED: For me the changes in either one of them is very limited
- 11:53:47 [anthony]
- ... but I'd prefer if it were similar everywhere
- 11:54:19 [anthony]
- ... so do we want to put this text into the spec
- 11:54:59 [ed_]
- javascript:alert(document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", "svg").setFloatTrait("x",parseFloat("asdasd")))
- 11:55:00 [anthony]
- CM: throwing type miss match error for set float trait
- 11:55:06 [anthony]
- ... and then other for the other cases
- 11:56:47 [anthony]
- ACTION: Cameron to fix exceptions in the specification for setFloat values
- 11:56:47 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2082 - Fix exceptions in the specification for setFloat values [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-07-10].
- 12:01:26 [Zakim]
- -heycam
- 12:01:27 [Zakim]
- -aemmons
- 12:01:27 [Zakim]
- -ChrisL
- 12:01:28 [Zakim]
- -ed_
- 12:01:36 [Zakim]
- -anthony
- 12:01:37 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has ended
- 12:01:38 [Zakim]
- Attendees were aemmons, heycam, anthony, ed_, shepazu, ChrisL
- 12:02:07 [anthony]
- Zakim, bye
- 12:02:07 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #svg
- 12:02:13 [anthony]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 12:02:13 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-svg-minutes.html anthony